Hazard Assessment with GIS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GRIP - Global Risk Identification Programme, UNDP Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery, , Training.
Advertisements

Establishing Basic Parameters: Risk Assessment
Hazard, Threats, Risk, Etc. An examination of some key terms … Walter G. Green III, Ph.D., CEM Disaster Theory Series No. 3 Copyright 2008 by Walter G.
1 Comprehensive Disaster Risk Management Framework National Disaster Management Systems 1111 Introduction to Damage and Reconstruction Needs Assessment.
Using Mitigation Planning to Reduce Disaster Losses Karen Helbrecht and Kathleen W. Smith United States: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May.
State of Montana Hazard Mitigation Plan and Statewide Hazard Assessment – 2013 Update Montana State Hazard Mitigation Coordinator: Kent Atwood
Catastrophe Assessment: Actuarial SOPs and Model Validation CAS Seminar on Catastrophe Issues New Orleans – October 22, 1998 Session 12 Panel: Douglas.
URBAN FLOODS IN GREECE Current situation and major research and development needs in Urban Flood Management Cost meeting, Warsaw, 29-31/5/2008 Vassilopoulos.
What is HAZUS-MH? HAZUS-MH is a planning tool that estimates
1 Floodplain Management SESSION 15 Risks to Human Settlements What Are Hazards? Prepared By Rod Emmer CFM, PhD Larry Larson, CFM, PE.
Chatham County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Steering Committee Meeting August 13, 2009.
Flood Vulnerability Analysis
Application of HAZUS TM to the New Madrid Earthquake Project Prepared for: Federal Emergency Management Agency Central US Earthquake Consortium Prepared.
The Firewise Virginia Program John Miller - Chief, Resource Protection Virginia Department of Forestry.
Foster and sustain the environmental and economic well being of the coast by linking people, information, and technology. Center Mission Coastal Hazards.
Flood Risk Review Meeting: [Watershed Name] [LOCATION] [DATE]
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Consequence Assessment for Dam Failure Simulations Kurt Buchanan, CFM Economist Mapping, Modeling, and Consequences.
Implementing HAZUS-MH in Pre-Disaster Mitigation
Structural Engineering Issues for a Large Cascadia Event.
Dam Hazard Consequences Assessment
Dr. Shane Parson, PE, CFM, URS (RAMPP Team)
HAZUS-MH is a multi-hazard risk assessment and loss estimation software program developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (animate on.
Risk Assessment Public Safety Geoscience Program – Earth Sciences Sector Centre for Natural Hazards Research Nicky Hastings, Bert Struik, Murray Journeay,
Infrastructure Profile Consider strengths and vulnerabilities of the built environment.
Estimation of Future Earthquake Annualized Losses in California B. Rowshandel, M. Reichle, C. Wills, T. Cao, M. Petersen, and J. Davis California Geological.
Summary of Recommendations on Data Availability, Access and Use by Leisa Perch MACC PDF-B Technical Coordinator, Organization of American States.
Prepared by: Burnham – Floodplain Study October 23, 2009 Presented by: Marty Spongberg, PhD, PE, PG AMEC Geomatrix, Inc.
Using HAZUS-MH to Assess Tsunami Risk Bill Bohn, Tetra Tech June 19, 2007.
FLHUG Meeting at CFGIS -- 09/21/09
International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC) ISL 2004 RiskCity Exercise: Spatial Multi Criteria Evaluation for Vulnerability.
JASON MASTERS UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SENIOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES - PUBLIC POLICY AND MANAGEMENT.
Regional Planning for Sea-Level Rise in Hampton Roads Benjamin McFarlane, AICP Regional Planner NOAA Hydrographic Services Review Panel October 26, 2011.
Labor Market Risks of a Magnitude 6.9 Earthquake in Alameda County Richard Holden, U.S. DOL/BLS Donna Bahls, California EDD Charles Real, Cal. Geological.
27Session 14: Utilizing Mapping & Modeling in Hazard Mitigation Planning & Land Use Characterization of the Hazard Event Location Boundary Magnitude.
Hazards, Vulnerability, and Mitigation Sub-Committee.
RISK MANAGEMENT YULVI. Introduction Time Quality Cost Project Constraints Success Introduction.
National Situational Awareness Predictive Analytics (SAPA) Jesse Rozelle FEMA Region VIII GIS Coordinator FEMA Modeling Task Force SME
3 rd International Workshop on Global Flood Monitoring & Modelling Assessing Global Flood Hazards: Engineering and Insurance Applications March 6, 2013.
TEXAS HOMELAND SECURITY &EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE APRIL 28, 2011 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.
Janice Rahman Program Manager Metropolitan King County Council Law, Justice, Health and Human Services Committee May 14 th, 2013 HAZARD MITIGATION A Regional.
HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE CONCORD, VERMONT. GETTING STARTED EXERCISE Who lives in the Town of Concord? What buildings, infrastructure, or organizations.
The Local Mitigation Strategy: Your Guide To A Safer Community Mitigation: Actions we can take before a disaster or when we rebuild after a disaster, that.
OVERVIEW OF CLARA MODEL IMPROVEMENT TESTING Kenneth Kuhn – RAND Corporation Jordan Fischbach – RAND Corporation David Johnson – Purdue University.
Using HAZUS-MH for Comprehensive Planning Bill Bohn, Tetra Tech June 20, 2007.
Visualizing Hazus Flood Analysis Results with Interactive Web Maps Micaella Penning, MA Geospatial Analysis Center.
Overview of HAZUS for Earthquake Loss Estimation October 28, 2011.
Overview of HAZUS for Flood Loss Estimations
Richard Butgereit, GISP Chief Information Officer
Framework Programme : 7th Research Framework Programme : Some aspects.
“Protecting the Public through Hazard Mitigation Planning”
Tools for Infrastructure System Resilience Evaluation
Flood in Austin - Economic losses assesment
Multi-Hazard Risk Report for Tillamook County
Risk Assessment Methodology
National Hurricane Conference Training Session
Most Probable Landfall
Most Probable Landfall
What information do you think this is showing?
Multi-Hazard Risk Report for Tillamook County
JASON MASTERS UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SENIOR
Hazards Planning and Risk Management Risk Analysis and Assessment
Application of HAZUSTM to the New Madrid Earthquake Project
Presentation to Coachella’s City Council October 8, 2014
Risk Mapping, Assessment, and Planning
BVI MITIGATION PROGRAMME
Most Probable Landfall
Disaster Risk Reduction A Global Process - State of Play
Most Probable Landfall Critical Infrastructure –
Risk Assessment Ali Ardalan MD, PhD Assistant Professor
Unit 14 Emergency Planning IS 235
Presentation transcript:

Hazard Assessment with GIS Initial Explorations of Hazus MH and Local Data For TJPDC By David L. Phillips With Nicole Gilkeson Leigh Rosen Lory Pendergraph

Planning with Disaster in Mind An applied GIS course Cooperatively with staff of Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission—A multi-county ecologically diverse region 2.5 months effort

Aims Help Identify and Map Region’s exposure to natural hazards as indicated by National sources. Construct website to document and raise public awareness of hazards in region Assess Inventory of Critical Facilities as provided by HAZUS Assess the usability of HAZUS-MH for a multi-county region Assess the availability of local data

Aims Help Identify and Map Region’s exposure to natural hazards as indicated by National sources. Construct website to document and raise public awareness of hazards in region Assess Inventory of Critical Facilities as provided by HAZUS Assess the usability of HAZUS-MH for a multi-county region Assess the availability of local data

Probability of a Hurricane Hurricanes Probability of a Hurricane The TJPDC area has a less than 2 percent probability of experiencing a hurricane during hurricane season.

Earthquakes 1996 Data

Wildfire According to the Virginia Department of Forestry a large portion of the TJPDC has a high risk of wildfire, shown here in red.

Dam Failure The TJPDC has a total of 12 dams, 6 of which are considered a high hazard risk.

Floods 100-year floodplains indicate 1% chance of flooding each year.

Floods

Hazus-MH Multi-hazard Impact Simulation Models Hurricane Flood Earthquake Each model estimates impacts for region Our experimentation allowed some rough assessments

Modeling Impacts Modeling Natural Hazard Direct Physical Damage Induced Damage Direct Economic Losses Indirect Economic losses

HAZUS_MH Hazard Impact Assessment: Levels of Refinement and Sophistication Modifies cost and damage parameters to local conditions Uses locally acquired data about buildings, population, terrain and natural features. Uses widely available but generalized data

HAZUS-MH Critical Facilities An very good set of the types of facilities considered important from a national perspective: Hospitals, fire stations, police stations, schools, churches, transportation facilities, etc. Systematic consistency across the jurisdictions

HAZUS-MH Critical Facilities Listings found to be incomplete and sometimes inaccurate: Recent facilities missing (Schools, hospitals) Wrong addresses or reported to be located at “headquarters” address. Occasional Incorrect Location

HAZUS-MH Building Inventory Undercounts the number of business locations for some sectors Agricultural Religious

HAZUS-MH Hazus – MH building inventory: Estimates 72,870 buildings in TJPDC 72,000 residential 715 commercial 32 governmental/educational 74 industrial 33 religious County building planimetrics give 149,870 buildings. Many of these are out-buildings.

Using HAZUS Impact Model Multiple scenarios gave local planners “a feel” for the magnitudes of impacts for different intensities and different hazards

Using HAZUS Impact Model TJPDC is “on the fringe” of HAZUS-MH model validity Earthquake damage over estimated at lower (5.0 and below) intensities. Hurricane model “stops” when storm degrades to tropical storm.

Using HAZUS Impact Model TJPDC is “on the fringe” of HAZUS-MH model validity (continued) Flood model designed for detailed study of small or modest “reaches” not regional watersheds. Flood model focuses more on inundation and less on velocity impacts.

Using Local Data Local planimetric data on building footprints allowed: Focused location of buildings rather than Hazus Census Tract or Census Block level aggregates. Local floodplain maps used in conjunction with building footprints identified “Critical Reaches”

Direct GIS measurement of flood exposure

Testing Historic Events Hazus contains some historic events Hurricanes: 1949, Fran, Hazel These are run against current inventory of population, buildings and critical facilities—likely to over estimate historic event impacts. We were able to get a digital data set of 1949-1950 building stock for two jurisdictions. This will allow some “scaling” of model impacts to test the model against historic reporting of damage.

Using even rough results Local planning taskforce beginning to: Assess the likelihoods of different hazards Assess the magnitudes of the impacts of different hazards

Discussion of the Assignment of Likelihoods

Discussion of the Assessment of Severity of Impacts

Using Local Data To Validate HAZUS Data Map HAZUS Critical Facility Data On Local Detailed Maps Use local experts to identify errors or omissions

Charlottesville Floodplain Insert

Charlottesville Floodplain Insert With Identified Data Problems Fire station Miss-located Charlottesville Floodplain Insert With Identified Data Problems County Police Station Missing Flood Plain may need study New Hospital Missing Montecello not listed as Significant Cultural Facility Montecello High School Missing

Hazard Assessment with GIS