COLlaboration time survey

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright 2009 SAP All rights reserved
Advertisements

Sovereign Credit Quality after the Crisis MARCH, 2010 Steve Hess, VP – Senior Credit Officer.
Scenario Overview Purpose and Benefits: Purpose
© 2013 Sri U-Thong Limited. All rights reserved. This presentation has been prepared by Sri U-Thong Limited and its holding company (collectively, “Sri.
Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EES Staff v9.0 Comparison 1 EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY v9.0-
Housing Climbs Back CELIA CHEN, SENIOR DIRECTOR NOVEMBER 13, 2013.
Innovations in Structured Products October 25, 2010 An Innovator’s Dilemma?
Education’s Value Proposition MARK ZANDI, CHIEF ECONOMIST FROM MOODY’S ECONOMY.COM.
FPGA and ASIC Technology Comparison - 1 © 2009 Xilinx, Inc. All Rights Reserved How do I Get Started with PlanAhead?
Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. 1 EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY - STUDENT v2.0.
EES Student v2.1 Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY TM Student Edition.
EES Parent v2.1 Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY TM Parent Edition.
EES Staff v10.0 Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY TM Staff Survey 3-Way.
Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. 1 EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY - PARENT v2.2.
End User License Agreement Permission to use and redistribute this Document is granted, provided that (1) the below copyright notice appears in all copies.
Housing Takes Off MARK ZANDI, CHIEF ECONOMIST. Homebuilding Will Ramp Up Sources: Census, Moody’s Analytics Single-family and multifamily starts, mil.
Copyright ©2006 CA. All rights reserved. All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
International Telecommunication Union New Delhi, India, December 2011 ITU Workshop on Standards and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Issues Philip.
Changing Databases This presentation gives a quick overview on how to change databases in Osprey.
Oracle Fusion Applications 11gR1 ( ) Functional Overview (L2) Manage Inbound Logistics (L3) Manage Receipts.
Oracle Fusion Applications 11gR1 ( ) Functional Overview (L2) Manage Inbound Logistics (L3) Manage Supplier Returns.
Oracle Fusion Applications 11gR1 ( ) Functional Overview (L2) Manage Inbound Logistics (L3) Manage and Disposition Inventory Returns.
Sustainability Case Studies. Activity 3: Sustainability Case Studies LIMITED LICENSE TO MODIFY. These PowerPoint® slides may be modified only by teachers.
ILLINOIS - RAILTEC Slide 1 © 2013 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. All Rights Reserved Pipeline Data Analysis Crude Oil Pipeline Transportation.
Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EES Parent 2-way Comparison 1 EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY - PARENT.
End User License Agreement Permission to use and redistribute this Document is granted, provided that (1) the below copyright notice appears in all copies.
Copyright ©2006 CA. All rights reserved. All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
Copyright © 2012, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Oracle Proprietary and Confidential. 1.
Welcome Atlanta Jewelers Supply Atlanta Jewelers Supply is forever committed to giving our customers the best quality, value, service and selection of.
EES Parent v2.1 Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY TM Parent Edition.
EES Staff V10.1 © Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 1 EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY™ Staff edition V Characteristics.
Copyright ©2006 CA. All rights reserved. All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
Connectivity to bank and sample account structure
A Population of Duckweed
Risk Model Crude Oil Pipeline Transportation Risk Analysis
Receptacle Housings for M-Style Infinite Switches
Oracle Database 11g: PL/SQL Fundamentals
OGSA Service Classifications
KROLL BOND RATING AGENCY, INC.
Automation in an XML Authoring Environment
Activity 4 Invasive Species.
Personal Graduation Plan Coherent Sequences Endorsements
Oracle BI Publisher 11g R1: Fundamentals
Motivation for 36OU Open Rack
Kicking Into a Higher Gear
Comparing the Degree of Urbanization to the US Census Bureau’s Urbanized Areas, Urban Clusters, and Rural Areas Michael Ratcliffe, Michael Commons, and.
P/N MV*V3.4*Z*Z*Z*SM-MVI320-NT1
© 2013 Sri U-Thong Limited. All rights reserved
Emotional Intelligence: The Core of Family Offices
2019 MEDICARE AGE-IN STUDY SENIOR MARKET INSIGHTS SERVICE Part IV
EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEYTM
EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY - STUDENT v2.0
Presentation transcript:

COLlaboration time survey Everett Public Schools V1.2 3-way Comparison Report

Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc. Since its founding nearly 125 years ago, Everett Public Schools has grown to serve 18,930 students living in the urban, suburban and rural neighborhoods of Everett and Mill Creek, Washington. The district educates students in 26 schools over a 39 square mile area that includes swaths of unincorporated Snohomish County. Most of the district’s schools are located in the city of Everett. Everett’s population of 103,100 is ethnically diverse, and its residents are both younger (median age of 32) and more educated (84% high school graduates) than the national average. The city of Mill Creek, incorporated in 1983, has a population estimated at 18,450 living in 2,365 acres. As of Oct. 1, 2013, 39.6% of the district’s students self-identified as non-white; 41.0% qualify for free or reduced lunch; 12.3% are enrolled in special education, and 10.2% qualify as transitional-bilingual (ELL) and speak 70 languages. The district employs more than 1,800 total staff; 924 are certificated teachers, of whom 61.4% hold a master’s degree or above. The Center for Educational Effectiveness (CEE) is a service, consulting, and research organization dedicated to the mission of partnering with K-12 schools to improve student learning. NOTICE The Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc. (CEE) makes substantial effort to ensure the accurate scoring, analysis, and reporting of the results of the Educational Effectiveness Survey. However, CEE makes no warranty of any kind with regard to this material, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. CEE shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for incidental or consequential damages in connection with the furnishing, performance, or use of this material. No part of these materials may be copied, reproduced, republished, posted, modified, edited, transmitted, distributed, or used to create derivative works in any form or by any means without the prior written consent of Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc.  These materials are copyright protected under U.S. and international copyright laws and treaties.  Violation of these laws will lead to prosecution.  Trademark notice: Center for Educational Effectiveness™ and affiliated logo, Better Data. Better Decisions. Better Schools.™ and affiliated logo, Educational Effectiveness Survey™, EES-Leadership 360™ are all trademarks of Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc.  All other trademarks cited here are the property of their respective owners. Published by: Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc. © 2013 Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. Contact Information: Phone: 425-283-0384 Fax: 425-947-0066 info@effectiveness.org www.effectiveness.org

3-Way Comparison Report This report supplements your main Collaboration Time Survey reports and provides a 3-way comparison of results. Collaboration Time Survey This page summarizes your results on the Collaboration Time Survey for each of the scales. As you look at these categories do you see one or two that indicate real strength as represented in significant green? Do you see one or two that lean more toward the negative values of orange and red? To further understand the meaning of this data you will need to review the breakdown of the individual items which comprise each of these categories. Those pages follow.

Summary View—Percent Positive Responses This simple radar graph provides you with an overall comparison of positive responses. Recall that positive responses are the sum of “Almost Always True” and “Often True”.

Summary View—Mean Scores While the overall summary view is important to consider, researchers often use mean scores – particularly when viewing results over time.

Focus on Collaboration

Focus on Learning

Focus on Results