SCA Sampling Protocol Results: 2016

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
**ESTABLISHING PATTERNS OR TRENDS IN THE DATA COLLECTED** BY DR. ARTEMIO P. SEATRIZ MMSU-CTE LAOAG CITY.
Advertisements

Corn (Zea mays L.) Leaf Angle and Emergence as Affected by Seed Orientation at Planting Guilherme Torres, Jacob Vossenkemper, William Raun, John Solie.
Growing The U.S. Livestock Economy: The Environmental (Phosphorous Assimilation) Challenge Tyler Mark, Louisiana State University Mike Boehlje, Allan Gray,
Agro-energy efforts & progress at UF-IFAS Hastings Partnership J. Breman, S. Taylor, D. Dinkins, T. Donovan, and E. Redden.
Kansas IPM Education October 2005 Termite Colony Development and Ecology Dr. Richard Houseman Assistant Professor of Entomology Division of Plant Sciences.
1 1 Slide © 2009, Econ-2030 Applied Statistics-Dr Tadesse Chapter 10: Comparisons Involving Means n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis of.
Fig. 1-3: The long run growth rate for the entire population, for different numbers of subpopulations. Fig. 1: high level of growth rate synchrony among.
The Nitrogen Requirement and Use Efficiency of Sweet Sorghum Produced in Central Oklahoma. D. Brian Arnall, Chad B. Godsey, Danielle Bellmer, Ray Huhnke.
Oklahoma State University Sorghum Headworm Sequential Sampling System Tom A. Royer Department of Entomology & Plant Pathology.
Plant tissue analysis for testing nutrients deficiency in Mango
Oklahoma State University Greenbug Expert System and “Glance ‘N Go” Sampling for Cereal Aphids: Results of Field Testing Tom A. Royer Department of Entomology.
1 1 Slide © 2006 Thomson/South-Western Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
1 Texas Liquid Fertilizer Sorghum TLF Commitment to you Increase yields Lower Costs Help solve those production problems that limit profitability.
Relative Cost Efficiency of No-Till Farms 2008 Ag Profitability Conference: McPherson Michael Langemeier January 15, 2008.
2014 AOSA/SCST Mid-West Region SORGHUM WARM TEST REFEREE A comparison of the 10 day AOSA warm test to a 7 day warm test.
USDA Outlook Forum Feeder Cattle Supplies for the South Plains and Implications February 24, 2012 By Don Close Market Director Texas Cattle Feeders Association.
Regeneration of Natural Pasture in Enclosures for Parthenium Weed Management in the Rangeland of Jigjiga, Somali Regional State, Ethiopia B Y Lisanework.
Why are there more kinds of species here compared to there? Theoretical FocusConservation Focus – Latitudinal Gradients – Energy Theory – Climate Attributes.
IPM for Commercial Grain Storage: Industry Perspective Paul W. Flinn USDA, ARS, Grain Marketing & Production Research Center Manhattan, Kansas With a.
IWMM Update July 2011 Update on status of program Feedback on Pilot Season Protocol changes Protocol validation Database changes Coordination through Fall.
Annual Variation in Northern Bobwhite Survival and Cause-specific Mortality in Relation to Ground Cover and Phenology of Raptor Migration R. Douglas Holt,
A Spatially Explicit Individual-based forest simulator Grégoire Vincent *, Luc Veillon and Hubert de Foresta Overview Individual trees of different species.
Agricultural Policy Effects on Land Allocation Allen M. Featherstone Terry L. Kastens Kansas State University.
© Phil Hurvitz, Introduction to Geographic Information Systems and their Potential Uses as Management Tools in Commercial Shellfish Farming Introduction.
Econ 3790: Business and Economic Statistics Instructor: Yogesh Uppal
Econ 3790: Business and Economic Statistics Instructor: Yogesh Uppal
2007 John B. Cole USDA Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2008 Data Collection Ratings and Best Prediction.
Progress in evaluating converted cotton race stocks for resistance to whiteflies and aphids Mary M. Toothaker Dr. Marvin Harris Dr. C. Wayne Smith Texas.
Driving Simulator Validation for Speed Research Stuart T. Godley, Thomas J. Triggs, Brian N. Fildes Presented By: Ben Block Wen Lung Hii.
Freeze Tolerance Freeze tolerance of each was determined on 15 Dec 2007, 15 Feb 2008, 15 Oct 2008, 15 Dec 2008, and 15 Feb Plugs 2.5-cm in diam.
Best Management Practices by Barney Bernstein and Dr. Ron Heiniger - NCSU Smithfield recommended hybrids based on Mid-Atlantic OVT data Smithfield.
Chapter 11: Test for Comparing Group Means: Part I.
Kelley Tilmon OSU Field Crop Entomologist OARDC, 120 Thorne Hall, Wooster Photo By: R. Venette.
ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF IMPROVED GRAIN STORAGE TECHNOLOGY IN TANZANIA Hanney Mbwambo, Bekele Kotu and Zena Mpenda Africa RISING Writeshop White Sand Hotel.
Weather Maps and Symbols. Meteorologists use weather maps and tools to help them see weather patterns and forecast weather.
% population+density+and+biomass+study+kit.do.
Southern Region of the United States. Midwest Northeast South West For purpose of collecting statistics, the government divides the US into 4 major regions.
Sorghum – Sugarcane Aphid Research Exchange Meeting
Environmental Variables and Observed Field Differences in Aphid Population Change Across Geographic Locations John Gordy, Michael Brewer Texas A&M University.
Scott D. Stewart (project leader)
REMOTE SENSING OF IPM: Reflectance Measurements of Aphid Infestation and Density Estimation in Wheat Growing under Field Conditions. Mustafa Mirik, Gerald.
Influences of Planting Population on Sugarcane Aphid (Melanaphis sacchari) in Grain Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) Brittany Lipsey Mississippi State University.
Leads: David Kerns and Gus Lorenz
Southern Region of the United States
THIS IS TO EVIDENCE YOUR WORK AND GET THE BEST GRADE POSSIBLE
2017 Corn and Sorghum Insect Update
Tracking sugarcane aphid infestations using myFields.info in 2016
Grain Sorghum/Sugarcane Aphid Insecticide Seed Treatment Test
Secondary pests associated with Melanaphis sacchari in Kansas sorghum
Question 6: Sorghum IPM System for SCA Management
Sorghum – Sugarcane Aphid Research Exchange Meeting
Amanda Beaudoin & Frank Rittemann Bayer Sorghum – Sugarcane Aphid
J. Scott Armstrong1, Gary Peterson2, Bill Rooney3
Jeff Gore Mississippi State University Sorghum – Sugarcane Aphid
Influential Factors Prevailing Market Conditions Cost of Production Cotton: 77 to 73¢ range ( cents) Corn: $4.35 (2009 -$0.15) Soybeans: near.
Research & Development and Product Development Update
Advances in Valley Vegetable Production and Irrigation
2017 – Year in Review Cotton prices stronger relative to competing crops Large world production & ending stocks Growth in world GDP Increased demand for.
Econ 3790: Business and Economic Statistics
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
Agronomic Evaluation of At-Plant Insecticides and Nematicides
Validating Student Growth During an Assessment Transition
THE WARS OF INDEPENDENCE
Kristopher Giles Oklahoma State University Sorghum – Sugarcane Aphid
Tornado Fatalities in the USA
Ryan Gilreath Louisiana State University Sorghum – Sugarcane Aphid
Local Habitat Sampling
Chapter 10 – Part II Analysis of Variance
Exercise 1 (a): producing individual tables, using the cross-tabs menu
Impacts of Biofuels on the South
Presentation transcript:

SCA Sampling Protocol Results: 2016 Tom A. Royer Oklahoma State University Sorghum – Sugarcane Aphid Research Exchange Meeting Dallas, TX January 3 – 4, 2017

Introduction Goals: Develop, validate and demonstrate a user-friendly, dynamic sampling tool based on seasonal and spatial distribution patterns and linked to research-based economic thresholds for sugarcane aphid in grain sorghum

Materials & Methods One sampling universe for every 80 acres a field of 160 acres could be made into two fields 48 of 54 samples per field taken from 2 fully expanded leaves, one on lower 1/3, and one upper 1/3 of plant 6 plants were randomly selected for whole plant counts Design allows for analysis of variation within and between plants, within and between cells, between fields, and between states Fields classified into five growth stages Vegetative (01) Boot (02) Flowering (03) Milk (04) Soft Dough to Maturity (05) For data purposes use the closest of the five stages listed when collecting plant measure data

Materials & Methods

Data Slides A nested ANOVA was conducted on data from125 fields, representing 6750 samples from TX and OK (fields from other states have not been included yet)

Key Learnings Most of the variation in sampling is captured within plant samples or between the two sets of within cell samples Sampling for SCA needs to be modified based on location OK and North Texas distribution patterns saw no substantial difference in variation; data suggests that there is less need to consider edge when sampling South Texas showed evidence of a slight edge effect due to a higher % of accounted variance in the “column” category when compared to N Texas and Oklahoma.

Next Steps Continued field sampling for increased robustness of data and for independent validation of sampling protocol Evaluation of aphids counts on leaves within plant for most efficient estimation of aphid density

Collaborators Jessica Lindenmayer, Oklahoma State University*** Kristopher L. Giles, Oklahoma State University N.C. Elliott, USDA-ARS Ali Zarrabi, Oklahoma State University Mark Payton, Oklahoma State University Allan Knutson, Texas A&M Agrilife Xandra Morris, Texas A&M Agrilife Robert Bowling, Texas A&M Agrilife Michael Brewer, Texas A&M Agrilife Nick Seiter, University of Arkansas Sebe Brown, Louisiana State University Brian McCornack, Kansas State University

Discussion