On behalf of the FORWARD Study Investigators

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Thirty-day Outcomes from the Multi-centre European Pivotal Trial for Transapical Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation with a Self-expanding Prosthesis.
Advertisements

STS 2015 John V. Conte, MD Professor of Surgery Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators Transcatheter Aortic.
Three-year clinical and echocardiographic follow-up of aortic stenosis patients implanted with a self-expending bioprosthesis Sabine Bleiziffer German.
ACC 2015 Jae K. Oh, MD On Behalf of the US CoreValve Investigators Remodeling of Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Is Responsible for Regression.
ACC 2015 Michael J Reardon, MD, FACC On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators A Randomized Comparison of Self-expanding Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic.
6-Month Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With a Novel Repositionable Self-Expanding Bioprosthesis Ian T. Meredith, MBBS, PhD,
Long-Term Outcomes Using a Self- Expanding Bioprosthesis in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Deemed Extreme Risk for Surgery: Two-Year Results From.
One Year Outcomes in Real World Patients Treated with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation The ADVANCE Study Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart.
INTERNATIONAL. CAUTION: For distribution only in markets where CoreValve® is approved. Not for distribution in U.S., Canada or Japan. Medtronic, Inc
University Heart Center Hamburg
The Risk and Extent of Neurological Events Are Equivalent for High-Risk Patients Treated With Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Thomas.
Randomized Trial of Ea rly S urgery Versus Conventional Treatment for Infective E ndocarditis (EASE) Duk-Hyun Kang, MD, PhD on behalf of The EASE Trial.
Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch in High Risk Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis in a Randomized Trial of a Self-Expanding Prosthesis George L. Zorn, III.
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Prosthesis David H. Adams et al (U.S. CoreValve Clinical Investigators) Journal Club November.
Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany Sabine Bleiziffer German Heart Center, Munich, Germany Johan Bosmans University Hospital.
TCT 2015 | San Francisco | October 15, 2015 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Bioprostheses Danny Dvir, MD John G. Webb, MD and.
TCT 2015 | San Francisco | October 15, 2015 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Bioprostheses Danny Dvir, MD John G. Webb, MD and.
UC c EN. Through Medtronic sponsored research, the Transcatheter Aortic Valves clinical portfolio is studying over 11,000 subjects at over 125.
INTERNATIONAL. CAUTION: For distribution only in markets where CoreValve® is approved. Not for distribution in U.S., Canada or Japan. Medtronic, Inc
Martin B. Leon, MD on behalf of the PARTNER Investigators TCT 2010; Washington, DC; September 23, 2010 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Inoperable.
INTERNATIONAL. CAUTION: For distribution only in markets where CoreValve® is approved. Not for distribution in U.S., Canada or Japan. Medtronic, Inc
G. Michael Deeb, MD On Behalf of the US Pivotal Trial Investigators 3-Year Results From the US Pivotal High Risk Randomized Trial Comparing Self-Expanding.
1 Jeffrey J. Popma, MD Professor of Medicine Harvard Medical School Director, Interventional Cardiology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston, MA.
Longest Follow-up After Implantation of a Self-Expanding Repositionable Transcatheter Aortic Valve: Final Follow-up of the Evolut R CE Study Stephen Brecker,
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with a Repositionable Self-expanding Bioprosthesis in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Suboptimal for Surgery:
G. Michael Deeb, MD On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators
The Impact of Preoperative Renal Dysfunction on the Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Andres M. Pineda MD, J. Kevin.
Real-World Use of a Repositionable Self- Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve: Primary Results of the Evolut R FORWARD Study Eberhard Grube, MD, FACC,
Outcomes in the CoreValve US High-Risk Pivotal Trial in Patients with a Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality Less than or Equal to.
Ian T. Meredith AM MonashHeart, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Patients at intermediate surgical risk undergoing isolated interventional or surgical aortic valve replacement for severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis.
Extending the Boundaries of TAVR: Future Directions
Trans- catheter aortic valve replacement vs
Late breaking news in heart valve disease
Highlights From the SAPIEN 3 Experience in Intermediate-Risk Patients Vinod H. Thourani, MD on behalf of the PARTNER Trial Investigators Professor.
The Lotus Device Design & FIM Experiences with a Repositionable Self Expanding Percutaneous Aortic Valve Ian T. Meredith MBBS, BSc(Hons), Ph.D, FRACP,
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Using the Lotus Valve with Depth Guard First Report from the RESPOND Extension Study Nicolas M Van Mieghem, MD,
Are we ready to perform TAVI in Intermediate Risk Patients?
Updates From NOTION: The First All-Comer TAVR Trial
Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Intermediate Risk Patients with Aortic Stenosis Description: The goal of the trial was to assess.
MedStar Washington Hospital Center Cardiac Catheterization Conference
First Report of One-Year Outcomes of the REPRISE I Feasibility Study of the Repositionable Lotus Aortic Valve Replacement System Ian T. Meredith.
30-Day Safety and Echocardiographic Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with the Self-Expanding Repositionable Evolut PRO System.
First Report of Three-Year Outcomes With the Repositionable and Fully Retrievable Lotus™ Aortic Valve Replacement System: Results From the REPRISE I.
Early Outcomes with the Evolut R Repositionable Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve in the United States Mathew Williams, MD, For the Evolut R US.
5th Meeting on Acute Cardiac Care and Emergency Medicine, 2016 Vilnius
Giuseppe Tarantini MD, PhD
Early Recovery of Left Ventricular Systolic Function After CoreValve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Harold L. Dauerman, MD; Michael J. Reardon,
Direct Flow Medical Experience with a Conformable, Repositionable Retrievable Percutaneous Aortic Valve Reginald Low MD University of California, Davis.
The Impact of Live Case Transmission on Patient Outcomes during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Results from the VERITAS Study Dr. Ron Waksman.
Keith Dawkins MD FRCP FACC FSCAI Global Chief Medical Officer
Two-Year Outcomes With the Fully Repositionable and Retrievable Lotus™ Transcatheter Aortic Replacement Valve in 120 High-Risk Surgical Patients With Severe.
Opportunities to Study Valve Iterations and Modifications in the US
Updates From SURTAVI in Intermediate Risk Patients
Longevity of transcatheter and surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves in patients with severe aortic stenosis and lower surgical risk Lars Sondergaard,
Latest Data from Balloon Expendable Trials
Vinod H. Thourani, MD on behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators
CoreValve Continued Access Study Shows Continued Improvement in 1-Year Outcomes With Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Steven J. Yakubov,
Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany
One Year Outcomes in Real World Patients Treated with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation The ADVANCE Study Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart.
Second Generation Valves: What Will Be Different?
University Heart Center Hamburg
Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Valve System : OUS Data
COREVALVE RCT 3YR Outcomes
Late Follow-Up from the PARTNER Aortic Valve-in-Valve Registry
Samir R. Kapadia, MD On behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators
Five-Year Outcomes after Randomization to Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Final Results of The PARTNER 1 Trial Michael J. Mack, MD.
(A) CUSUM analysis for the primary end point (VARC-2 safety end point at 30 days composite of: death, stroke, life-threatening bleeding, major vascular.
Procedural Characteristics
Transcatheter versus medical treatment of symptomatic severe tricuspid regurgitation: a propensity score matched analysis Maurizio Taramasso MD, PhD from.
Presentation transcript:

On behalf of the FORWARD Study Investigators 30-Day Outcomes Following Implantation of a Repositionable Self-Expanding Aortic Bioprosthesis: First Report From the FORWARD Study Stephan Windecker Department of Cardiology Bern University Hospital - INSELSPITAL Bern, Switzerland On behalf of the FORWARD Study Investigators

Disclosures Stephan Windecker receives research grants to the institution from Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Edwards, Medtronic, and St. Jude

Evolut R Clinical Program Evolut R CE CE Mark Study (Safety and performance) N=60; single arm, 26 mm and 29 mm valves Primary Safety EP = Death & any stroke at 30 days Final 2-Year Follow-up TCT.16 Evolut R US US IDE Study (Safety and efficacy) N=241; single arm, 23 mm, 26 mm and 29 mm valves Primary Safety EP = Death & disabling stroke at 30 days Follow-up through 5 years 1-Year Follow-up TCT.16 Evolut R FORWARD All-Comers Trial (Safety) N=1000; single arm, 23 mm, 26 mm and 29 mm valves Primary EP = Death at 30 days Follow-up through 3 years Interim Results TCT.16 Evolut R 34mm US IDE Addendum (Safety and efficacy) N=60; single arm, 34 mm valve Primary Safety EP = Death & disabling stroke at 30 days Follow-up through 5 years Initial Results TCT.16

Catheter Delivery System Evolut R System Catheter Delivery System 14Fr-equivalent profile Inline Sheath Capsule Loading System Transcatheter Valve Supra-annular design, optimized sealing

Evolut R FORWARD Study FORWARD is a multicenter, prospective, single-arm, observational post-market study to evaluate safety and performance of the Evolut R system in a routine hospital setting. Objective: To document the clinical and device performance outcomes of the Evolut R system used in routine hospital practice Primary Endpoint: The all-cause mortality rate at 30 days Sample Size: 1000 patients Present Analysis: Interim 30-day results in first 300 patients

Secondary Endpoints EFFICACY SAFETY Absence of procedural mortality Correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location Absence of patient-prosthesis mismatch, mean gradient < 20 mmHg (or peak velocity < 3 m/sec), and no moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation. Hemodynamic performance at 24 hours to 7 days (discharge) and 1 year SAFETY VARC-II Safety Composite Endpoint and Components at 30 days post procedure All-cause mortality , All stroke , Life-threatening bleeding, Acute kidney injury: stage 2 or 3, Coronary artery obstruction requiring intervention, Major vascular complication, and valve-related dysfunction requiring repeat procedure (BAV, TAVI, or SAVR) Rate of new permanent pacemaker implant at 30 days post procedure

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria Symptomatic native aortic valve stenosis or surgical bioprosthetic valve failure Acceptable candidate for elective treatment with the Evolut R System in conformity with the local regulatory context Age ≥80 years OR considered to be at high or greater risk for surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) where high risk is defined as: STS predicted risk of mortality ≥8% OR Heart team agreement of risk for AVR due to frailty or comorbidities. Contraindication to aspirin, heparin, bivalirudin, ticlopidine, clopidogrel, Nitinol, contrast media Mechanical heart valve in aortic position Sepsis, including active endocarditis Anatomically not suitable for the Evolut R system Estimated life expectancy <1 year Participating in another trial that may influence the outcome of this trial Need for emergency surgery for any reason

Study Oversight and Participation 60 sites in 23 countries Enrollment to date: 805 Steering Committee Members *Eberhard Grube, University of Bonn *Stephan Windecker, Inselspital/Universitätsspital Bern Sabine Bleiziffer, Deutsches Herzzentrum München Johan Bosmans, UZ Antwerp Ganesh Manoharan, Royal Victoria Hospital Belfast Thomas Modine, CHRU de Lille Nicolas Van Mieghem, Erasmus MC Rotterdam Echocardiographic Core Lab Jae Oh, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN Clinical Events Committee Harvard Clinical Research Institute Sponsor Medtronic Canada 4 sites Europe 45 sites Middle East & Africa 3 sites Latin America 3 sites Australia 5 sites *Co-principal Investigators

Baseline Clinical Characteristics Characteristic - % or mean ± standard deviation EVOLUT R N=300 Age (years)  82.0 ± 5.7 Female 67.3 STS Score (%) 5.6 ± 3.8 <4% 43.3 4-8% 40.0 >8% 16.7 EuroSCORE II (%) 5.6 ± 4.8 NYHA III/IV 72.6 Diabetes 30.0 Serum Creatinine >2 mg/dl 7.4 Chronic Lung Disease (COPD) 24.5 Cerebrovascular Disease 14.7 Frailty 34.1 Assisted Living 13.2

Procedural Data Characteristic - % EVOLUT R N=300 General Anesthesia 37.0 Iliofemoral Access Route 98.3 Implanted Valve Size 23mm 7.0 26mm 40.5 29mm 52.5 Pre-TAVR Balloon Dilation Performed 49.0 Post-Implant Dilatation Performed 33.4 EnVeo InLine Sheath used 92.6 Multiple Valve (≥ 2 Implanted) 1.3

30-Day All-Cause Mortality 2.0% No. at risk: 300 264

Procedural Data Implant depth as assessed by aortography and reported by the sites: NCS: 4.8 ± 2.7mm LCS: 6.0 ± 2.8mm 1Patient Prosthesis Mismatch: Defined as AVA <0.85cm2/m2 for subjects with BMI <30kg/cm2, or <0.7cm2/m2 for subjects with BMI ≥ 30kg/cm2

VARC-II Safety Endpoints at 30 Days * * Requiring repeat procedure

Additional 30-Day Safety Endpoints Event, Kaplan-Meier Rate (%) Evolut R N=300 Myocardial Infarction 0.3 New Pacemaker1  15.4 Prosthetic Valve Thrombosis  0.0 Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis Valve Embolization* 1.0  Valve Migration Mitral Valve Apparatus Damage 1Subjects with pacemaker or ICD at baseline are included in the denominator. *per VARC II; all 3 were pop-outs

Resheath and Recapture Patients who underwent resheath/recapture had a similar mortality rate (1.3% vs. 2.3%) and pacemaker implantation rate (13.3% vs. 16.2%) as those who did not undergo resheath/recapture.

Hemodynamic Outcomes* Valve Performance Paravalvular Regurgitation *Echocardiographic Core Lab

New York Heart Association Functional Class

Conclusions Interim results at 30 days in this real-world, global experience with Evolut R demonstrate: Low incidence of all-cause mortality, stroke and major vascular complications Reduced pacemaker rate post TAVR Excellent hemodynamic results and low rate of moderate/severe PVR Resheath/recapture was used safely in 25% of cases Primary endpoint for 1000 patients at EuroPCR 2017