Application Systems Health Assessment Summary

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QA Forum - Private Providers Programme Design March 2012.
Advertisements

PROJECT TITLE Project Leader: Team: Executive Project Sponsor (As Required): Date: Month/Day/Year 110/17/2014 V1.
Annie Michaelian Jill Okurowski Stephen Toto. Tri-State Quality Review Rubric.
Extended Enterprise Architecture Framework (E2AF)
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency How do you know how far you have got? How much you still have to do? Are we nearly there yet? What – Who – When.
BTS730 Communications Management Chapter 10, Information Technology Management, 5ed.
IRSN STRATEGY TO ASSESS A NEW MAINTENANCE POLICY / Nesebar, Bulgaria Presented by Naoëlle MATAHRI, IRSN.
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
Assessing Program-Level SLOs November 2010 Mary Pape Antonio Ramirez 1.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
1 Technical Communication A Reader-Centred Approach First Canadian Edition Paul V. Anderson Kerry Surman
Copyright © 2002 by Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Longman Publishers. All rights reserved. Chapter 15 Procedures, Processes, and Specifications.
“Quantitative” methodologies (a) Assumptions underpinning research Associate Professor Rob Cavanagh September 19, 2007 Fraenkel, J.R. & Wallen, N.E. (2003).
Quantitative vs Qualitative Research
Improving engineering productivity APEGGA. Improving Productivity Mega Projects  History  What is needed  How will it be done  Division of Labour.
Introduction to Management LECTURE 17: Introduction to Management MGT
Practice Management Quality Control
Department of Electrical Engineering Technical Writing Technical Reports Laboratory Reports Project Reports Murali Varanasi 03/24/2009.
Training and Development Prof R K Singh AIMA CME.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
CDER / Office of Compliance ACPS October 5, 2006 Joseph C. Famulare Acting Deputy Director Office of Compliance CDER / FDA.
ICAJ/PAB - Improving Compliance with International Standards on Auditing Planning an audit of financial statements 19 July 2014.
AUDIT STAFF TRAINING WORKSHOP 13 TH – 14 TH NOVEMBER 2014, HILTON HOTEL NAIROBI AUDIT PLANNING 1.
The Rocket Science of Score Points Holistic Scoring and the New Jersey HSPA Writing Assessment.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Computer Security Culture and Capacity Building Overview Presented by: May 2016.
Customer Experience: Create a digitally led customer experience
Routes to Internal Equity
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Forming a Strategy for your Business.
How to be an Expert Witness
Workshop on preparing nominations (NOM)
Impact-Oriented Project Planning
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
3rd International Scientific Conference on "Energy and Climate Change"
Introduction to the Validation Phase
State Audit Bureau of Kuwait
Digging In Deep: Literacy in Career and Technical Education Courses
Assessment and Evaluation
FFA Goalkeeper Self-Assessment Session Planner
HUM 102 Report Writing Skills
2nd Annual Faculty e-Learning Symposium 26th May 2016 Mrs E D Joubert
Defining and Analyzing Financial Wellness
Drivers and Emissions workgroup
School Self-Evaluation
Monitoring and Assessment Assignment
Preparing for the Verbal Reasoning Measure
Using MOOCs for development of transversal skills
Software Measurement Process ISO/IEC
5 Diagnosing.
Human Resources Management: Module 2
Student Assessment and Evaluation
Turn to page 26. Read the Conclusion
Insert your name and a picture. Change the Design Template.
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Overview What is evaluation? Why an evaluation framework?
VaNTH-PER Workshop June 2, 2004 Barbara A Austin
Chapter 3.1 The Business Plan!.
Using MOOCs for development of transversal skills
edTPA Coordinator, Illinois State University
Assessment of quality of standards
AACC Mini Conference June 8-9, 2011
Student Assessment and Evaluation
Draft Mandate to request SCHER opinion on the TGD-EQS
Summarising and Evaluating Academic Sources
Managing the Planning Process
Tiering is… NOT the only kind of differentiation, though it is foundational NOT locking students into “ability boxes” -- groups are flexible and vary according.
Performance improvement observations
Software Verification and Validation
Managing the Planning Process
Introduction to Extended Reflection 1 Term 1, Development Day 1
Presentation transcript:

Application Systems Health Assessment Summary EXAMPLE

Application Systems Assessment Introduction The purpose of the Legal Application Systems Assessment was to evaluate the key characteristics of key IT application systems used by the Legal Division. It is important to identify the positive and — if necessary — negative aspects of current systems in relation to the strategy of the business and how well they contribute to the operational success of the Division. The basis for this assessment was the Application Systems “Health Check” evaluation process from Gartner, one of the leading research firms in the Information Technology industry. The process evaluated each Legal application system based on characteristics of performance in the following areas: Business Business Process Support Business Value Data and Information Quality/Timeliness Business Robustness Life Cycle Position

Application Systems Assessment (cont’d) Introduction (cont’d) Operational Complexity Reliance on Subject Matter Experts Maintenance Factors Supportability Availability and Cost of Support Skills Technical Architectural Alignment Foundational Technology Quality Extendability Technical Performance. The results of the assessment are reflected on the following pages.

Application Systems Assessment (cont’d) A summary of the Application System assessment is provided below reflecting the overall “health” or fitness of each application to support the Legal business. It is the combined score of three performance indices related to business, operational, and technical areas. An overall score of 36 to 42 is good. In general, the application is performing well and adequately supports Legal. A score of 31 to 35 indicates the application fitness is fair. Key areas need attention to bring it back into alignment with business, operational or technical standards and requirements. A score of 30 or less indicates some serious issues with the application which should be evaluated in more detail to determine corrective action. Detailed assessment scores by application are provided on the following pages.

Application Systems Assessment (cont’d) Business Performance – Assessment Scores

Application Systems Assessment (cont’d) Operational Performance – Assessment Scores

Application Systems Assessment (cont’d) Technical Performance – Assessment Scores

Application Systems Assessment - Conclusions Based on the results of the assessment, we found that: Conclusion #1 Conclusion #2 Etc.

Application System Health Check Assessment Criteria

Business Aspects of Performance Source: Gartner

Business Aspects of Performance (cont’d) Source: Gartner

Business Aspects of Performance (cont’d) Source: Gartner

Operational Aspects of Performance Source: Gartner

Operational Aspects of Performance (cont’d) Source: Gartner

Operational Aspects of Performance (cont’d) Source: Gartner

Technical Aspects of Performance Source: Gartner

Technical Aspects of Performance (cont’d) Source: Gartner

Technical Aspects of Performance (cont’d) Source: Gartner