PORT STATE CONTROL INSPECTIONS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Foreign Air Operator Validation & Surveillance Course
Advertisements

TITLE 5 – PORT STATE CONTROL
STCW ‘78 The International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers
Port State Control What is it, and why do we do it? K. Crawford / R. Lough 23 Nov 2012.
SPANOS NIKOLAOS COMMANDER H.C.G. EXPERT P.S.C.O
Transport EU Maritime Security Policy and legislation Christian DUPONT Deputy Head of Unit for Maritime & Land Transport Security DG Mobility and Transport.
TANKER DAMAGE STABILITY
1 CONCENTRATED INSPECTION CAMPAIGN by PAIRS MOU and TOKYO MOU STCW Hours of Rest.
An Ocean of Opportunity: An integrated maritime policy for the EU 1 Places of refuge: General legal framework and developments within IMO and the EU Alexandros.
Port State Control.
Shipping Community Bureau Veritas Training Course For the benefit of business and people.
MARITIME LABOUR CONVENTION Welcome to : I F S M A DELEGATES AGA Vina del Mar, Apr 2015 y.
Classification Societies – Contribution to Martime Safety Gesa Heinacher-Lindemann LL.M., Legal Director.
Online Learning 1 Marine Facility Personnel with Security Responsibilities Canaport LNG
Ship Recycling Facility Management System IMO Guideline A.962
The Herald of Free Enterprise capsized 6 March 1987, moments after leaving the Belgian port of Zeebrugge, killing 193 passengers and crew. This was the.
Seminar K M A 12 – 13 June 2007 Christer Bergquist – Kalmar Maritime Academy1 SAFE TRANSPORTATION AT SEA A Baltic Sea perspective – Requirements on vessels.
Familiarization with the 2010 Manila Amendments
2010 Manila Amendments to the STCW Convention and Code – Port State Control Perspective Jeff Lantz Director, Office of Operating and Environmental Standards.
Overview report of a series of FVO fact- finding missions and audits carried out in 2012 and 2013 in order to evaluate the systems put in place to give.
Mediterranean MoU 7th Committee Meeting on PSC Alexandria, EGYPT 31st January - 2nd February A Presentation by INTERTANKO Port State Control Capt.
PORT STATE CONTROL The Singapore Experience Tan Kim Liang Senior PSCO, MPA 2 December 2003.
Investigating Shipping Pollution Violations Pacific Module 12 Vessel boarding and onboard Investigation.
1 Anti-fouling Systems—Port State Control Inspection Huang Tianbing Marine Biosafety Section Bangkok, June 2009 Views expressed in this presentation are.
1 The statistical approach for monitoring maritime safety used and developed by EMSA Béatrice Comby Project Officer - Production and development of maritime.
MARITIME SECURITY STATUS REPORT JOSEPH ANGELO U.S. COAST GUARD.
Prevention of pollution by harmful substances in packaged form
INTERTANKO Technical Seminar Mumbai 19 th September 2005 Ship Inspections & The Screening Process Capt Howard N. Snaith. Master Mariner. M.N.I. Director,
PORT STATE CONTROL IN THE UK Patrick Dolby Inspection Operations Manager UK MCA
Safety and Marine Environment Protection; prospects we face - the EU perspective Marten Koopmans Permanent representative of the European Commission to.
Statistics for Tankers in Paris & Tokyo MOUs vs B/C – All ships Period 2003 –
PSC developments Dr. Vitaly Klyuev. PSC regional organizations  Paris MOU (Europe and North Atlantic)  Vina del Mar PSC Agreement (Latin America) 
PORT STATE CONTROL INSPECTIONS 1 Under the new regime established by Directive 2009/16 in the UK. The new EU directive came into force in June 2009 It.
ISM Code 2010: Part A - Implementation Malcolm Maclachlan.
Training Policy in the Paris MoU The Secretariat of the Paris MoU on Port State Control.
Investigating Shipping Pollution Violations Pacific Module 6: Port State Control.
The ICS/ISF Shipping Industry Flag State Performance Table
PORT STATE CONTROL Arş.Gör. Veysel GÖKÇEK. What is Port State Control? A SYSTEM A SYSTEM designed to: ensure foreign ships comply with international safety,
CONCENTRATED INSPECTION CAMPAIGN – CREW FAMILIARISATION ON ENCLOSED SPACE ENTRY Pat Dolby Inspection Operations Manager UK MCA.
INTERTANKO Technical Seminar Mumbai 19th September 2005 Port State Control Related Issues Capt Howard N. Snaith. Master Mariner. M.N.I. Director, Marine,
MLC Compliance for the Yachting Sector - Workshop Chamber of Commerce 23 rd March 2016 Dr. Nicholas Valenzia PORT STATE CONTROL An Introduction.
To Satisfaction of the Administration Seminar on the Implementation of measures to ensure that safety standards are “to the Satisfaction of the Administration.
Development of a New Inspection Regime by the Paris MoU Panama Maritime IX 8-11 February 2009.
Peter M Swift CMA, March 2004 Trade Associations and how they can represent their members with governments, extra-government organizations, and enforcement.
SOLAS and SAR JIHOON WI.
OH&S Management System
RATIFICATION OF THE 1991 FAL AMENDMENTS TO THE CONVENTION ON THE INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION, 1948 A PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE OF.
Chapter 6 Question-and-Answer.
BWS for CME under the BWM Convention
Foreign Air Operator Validation & Surveillance Course
The Shipboard Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP)
GCC CODE “THE SAFETY REGULATIONS FOR SHIPS THAT ARE NOT COVERED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS” THE CABINET RESOLUTION NO.(29) OF 2013.
Health and Safety Policy
Vessels and Facilities that are Temporarily Out of Service or Laid-up
PREPARATION OF GMP REPORT
PREPARATION FOR GMP INSPECTION
Investigating Shipping Pollution Violations
Mr. Fredrik Larsson Marine Manager
Open Forum for Exchanging Views with Industry
OH&S Management System
MARITIME LABOUR CONVENTION
BACKGROUND 1987 Joint MSC/MEPC working group on:
WORKSHOP on MLC COMPLIANCE FOR THE YACHTING SECTOR   Wednesday, 23rd March 2016 Malta Chamber of Commerce, Enterprise and Industry.
Foreign Air Operator Validation & Surveillance Course
How to conduct Effective Stage-1 Audit
Classification Societies
Training Policy in the Paris MoU
The ICS/ISF Shipping Industry Flag State Performance Table
Global Integrated Shipping Information System
Harmonization and improvement of port State control
Presentation transcript:

PORT STATE CONTROL INSPECTIONS Under the new regime established by Directive 2009/16 in the UK. The new EU directive came into force in June 2009 It has been incorporated into UK law as of 1st January 2011.

The Paris MOU were also looking at a new approach to Port State Control (PSC) to target substandard ships and move away from the 25% inspection regime where good ships were being targeted as well as poor ships. The New Inspection Regime (NIR) was developed by the Paris MOU to provide: a more risk based system of targeting ships; dispense with the 25% inspection commitment and provide full inspection coverage of ships visiting the Paris MOU region as a whole.

PORT STATE INSPECTION Another aim of the NIR is to eliminate substandard shipping by increasing the frequency of inspection of “high risk” ships, while reducing the frequency of inspection of “low risk” ships, with the intention of rewarding the good operator. The concept of the NIR is incorporated into the new PSC directive. One wonders if there have been other considerations given that EU flagged ships have been good PSC performers.

PORT STATE INSPECTION Inspections A port State control visit on board a ship will normally start with, as a minimum and to the extent applicable, examination of the documents in accordance with Annex 10 of the Paris MOU. In addition the PSCO conducts a general inspection of several areas on board to verify that the overall condition of the ship complies with that required by the various certificates.

PORT STATE INSPECTION.... If the ship is found to comply, the PSCO will issue a ‘clean’ inspection report (Form A) to the master of the ship. In case deficiencies have been identified, the inspection report will include a deficiencies found report (Form B) indicating any follow-up actions to be taken to rectify the deficiencies indicated. Next, the data of the respective ship and the inspection result will be recorded on the central computer database, located at EMSA in Lisbon, Portugal.

PORT STATE INSPECTION..... Furthermore, control on compliance with on board operational requirements may be included in the control procedures, particularly if the PSCO has reason to believe that the crew demonstrates insufficient proficiency in that area

PORT STATE INSPECTION... PARIS MOU is part of IMO BUT the database facility is owned and supplied by EMSA Paris MOU controls inspections in Europe and Canada. Essentially the inspection is a spot IMO audit on the performance of the ship in terms of; FLAG STATE CLASSIFICATION COMPANY PERFORMANCE

PORT STATE INSPECTION... This policy was theoretically EFFECTIVE FROM JUNE 2009, but MIN 380 is Jan 2011 What does this mean? Generally a get tougher and meaner inspection regime, based upon data consistently gathered and analyzed with reference to White grey and black listings.

The new Directive This new directive incorporateS the Paris MOU New Inspection Regime (NIR) which will bring about significant changes in the way ships are targeted in member states. The key purpose of the NIR is to take a risk based approach to PSC targeting, with the aim of eliminating substandard shipping. This will be achieved by frequently targeting high-risk ships whilst reducing the inspections on low-risk ships. Some of the key points of the directive, incorporating the NIR are listed below. Ships will be targeted based upon a risk profile which will take into account the type of ship, age, company performance, previous deficiencies and detentions. High risk ships will be due inspections every 5 - 6 months, standard risk ships every 10 - 12 months and low-risk ships every 24 - 36 months.

The new Directive… ·  Additional inspections may be carried out between the above mentioned intervals due to unexpected factors such as reports from pilots, collisions, groundings etc. ·  The type of inspection will depend on the ship’s risk profile; the minimum for a high risk ship will be an expanded inspection. ·  Ships requiring an expanded inspection must give 72 hours notice, prior to arrival. In order to be a low risk ship, the flag state must be on the Paris MOU white list and have undergone the Voluntary IMO Member State Audit Scheme. To maintain the low risk status a vessel must have no more than 5 deficiencies during any one inspection and no detention recorded in the preceding three years.

PORT STATE INSPECTION TYPES OF INSPECTION INITIAL  An initial inspection will consist of a visit on board the ship in order to: check the certificates and documents listed in Annex 10 of the MoU text; check that the overall condition and hygiene of the ship including: 1. navigation bridge 2. accommodation and galley 3. decks including forecastle 4. cargo holds/area 5. engine room meets generally accepted international rules and standards;

More detailed inspection PORT STATE INSPECTION More detailed inspection A more detailed inspection will be carried out whenever there are clear grounds for believing, during an inspection, that the condition of the ship or of it's equipment or crew does not substantially meet the relevant requirements of a relevant instrument. Clear grounds definition: Clear Grounds exist when a Port State Control Officer finds evidence, which in his/her professional judgement warrants a more detailed inspection of the ship, its equipment or its crew.

The absence of valid certificates or documents is considered a clear ground. Other examples of clear grounds can be found in Annex 9, paragraph 6 of the MoU text. A more detailed inspection will include an in-depth examination in: the area (s) where clear grounds were established the areas relevant to any overriding or unexpected factors, which means practically anywhere the PSC officer decides.

And also the following risk areas: 1. Documentation 2 And also the following risk areas: 1. Documentation 2. Structural condition 3. Water/Weather-tight condition 4. Emergency systems 5. Radio communication 6. Cargo operations 7. Fire safety 8. Alarms 9. Living and working condition 10. Navigation equipment 11. Life saving appliances 12. Dangerous Goods 13. Propulsion and auxiliary machinery 14. Pollution prevention

The more detailed inspection will take account of the human elements covered by ILO, ISM and STCW.

Expanded inspection. An expanded inspection shall include a check of the overall condition, including human element where relevant, in the following risk areas: Refer to 1-14 as previous, namely

1. Documentation 2. Structural condition 3 1. Documentation 2. Structural condition 3. Water/Weathertight condition 4. Emergency systems 5. Radio communication 6. Cargo operations 7. Fire safety 8. Alarms 9. Living and working conditions 10. Navigation equipment 11. Life saving appliances 12. Dangerous Goods 13. Propulsion and auxiliary machinery 14. Pollution prevention

CONCENTRATED INSPECTION CAMPAIGNS Only one so far, “ Tanker Damage Stability” Sept-Nov 2010

Targeting Every day a number of ships will be selected for a port State control inspection. To facilitate such selection, the central computer database, known as ‘THETIS’ is consulted by PSCO’s.   This information system, hosted by the European Maritime Safety Agency, informs national PSC authorities which ships are due for an inspection. Data on ships particulars and reports of previous inspections carried out within the Paris MoU region are provided by the information system as well

Ship risk profile Each ship in the information system will be attributed a ship risk profile (SRP), in accordance with Annex 7 of the Paris MoU text. This SRP will determine: the ships priority for inspection, the interval between its inspections and the scope of the inspection. Ships are assigned high, standard or low risk. This is based on generic and historic parameters (i.e. on its type, age and its inspections’ record).

A ship’s risk profile is recalculated daily taking into account changes in the more dynamic parameters such as age, the 36 month history and company performance. Recalculation also occurs after every inspection and when the applicable performance tables for flag and ROs (recognized organizations= CLASS) are changed. UK legislation on 1st January 2011.

BANNING “Refusal of Access” (banning) is amended to include all ship types registered with a black of grey listed flag, according to the “ParisMOU BGW list”. Banning will be based, as at present, on the number of detentions within a specified period. For a black listed flag ship, if it has been detained more than twice in the preceding 36 months it will be banned. For a grey listed ship, if it has been detained more than twice in the previous 24 months it will also be banned. A minimum time of banning will apply, 3 months for first ban, 12 months for second ban. A detention after a second ban could lead to possible permanent exclusion from EU ports and anchorages;

What does it all mean? Essentially, performance ratings which have up till now meant FLAG only ( re Black list etc) are now expanding to include Company CLASS and then Ship build Ship repair

Coupled with this expansion is the plan to connect all MOU databases to talk to each other.

Signatories to the Paris MOU (blue), Tokyo MOU (red), Indian Ocean MOU (green), Mediterranean MOU (dark green), Acuerdo Latino (yellow), Caribbean MOU (olive), Abuja MOU (dark red), Black Sea MOU (cyan) and Riyadh MOU (navy).

QUESTIONS ?