Responsible Citizenship of the Data World

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Group on Earth bservations Discussion Paper on a Framework Dr. Ghassem Asrar August 1, 2003.
Advertisements

April 2010 MRC Data Sharing Policy Peter Dukes Policy Lead – Data Sharing & Preservation.
A centre of expertise in data curation and preservation UKOLN Open ForumIWMW June 2006 Funded by: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons.
DataCite: Making Data Citable Jan Brase (DataCite/TIB Hannover) Brigitte Hausstein (GESIS) Wolfgang Zenk-Möltgen (GESIS)
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: Building Capacity and Capability for Data : Requirements,
Jisc Data Spring Pitch: Cloud Workbench Ben Butchart EDINA.
ICSU World Data System - trusted data services for global science Michael Diepenbroek, Vice-Chair WDS-SC.
Data Archiving and Networked Services DANS is an institute of KNAW en NWO Trusted Digital Archives and the Data Seal of Approval Peter Doorn Data Archiving.
Co-funded by the European Union under FP7-ICT Co-ordinated by aparsen.eu #APARSEN Why persistent identifiers are crucial in digital preservation.
Managing Research Data – The Organisational Challenge at Oxford James A J Wilson Friday 6 th December,
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
The International e-Depot to Guarantee Permanent Access to Scholarly Publications Marcel Ras Tartu, June 2012.
Open Access in Russia (a view from inside Russian Academy of Sciences) Sergey Parinov, CEMI RAS, principal researcher euroCRIS, Board member.
International Perspectives on Data and Information for Science 1.What is ICSU 2.ICSU and data and information 3.ICSU policy 4.World Summit on the Information.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CDI Webinar Series 2013 Data Management at the National Climate Change and Wildlife Science Center.
The Marine Stewardship Council: A Multi- Stakeholder Fisheries Assessment Programme for Sustainable Fisheries Oluyemisi Oloruntuyi (MSC)
Why RDA? A domain repository perspective George Alter ICPSR University of Michigan.
TOWARDS A DATA CITATION STANDARD FOR GEOSS I. McCallum, H.-P. Plag & S. Fritz.
Open Science (publishing) as-a-Service Paolo Manghi (OpenAIRE infrastructure) Institute of Information Science and Technologies Italian Research Council.
GEO Data Management Principles Implementation : World Data System–Data Seal of Approval (WDS-DSA) Core Certification of Digital Repositories Dr Mustapha.
The RESEARCH DATA ALLIANCE WG: Brokering Governance Wim Hugo – ICSU-WDS/ SAEON.
PAA on Scientific Data and Information Roberta Balstad Chair, PAA Panel.
Name - Date Technology-enhanced Learning: tomorrow’s school and beyond Pat Manson Head of Unit Technology Enhanced Learning Directorate General.
DSA & WDS WG Certification RDA Outputs: Munich 20 February 2015.
Core Certification for Trustworthy Data Repositories
NRF Open Access Statement
CESSDA SaW Training on Trust, Identifying Demand & Networking
Introducing SCHOLIX.
2nd GEO Data Providers workshop (20-21 April 2017, Florence, Italy)
Legacy and future of the World Data System (WDS) certification of data services and networks Dr Mustapha Mokrane, Executive Director, WDS International.
Digital Repository Certification Schema A Pathway for Implementing the GEO Data Sharing and Data Management Principles Robert R. Downs, PhD Sr. Digital.
DSA and FAIR: a perfect couple
ELIXIR Core Data Resources and Deposition Databases
Metadata Catalogue and Knowledge Network
Responsible Citizenship of the World of Science
EOSC MODEL Pasquale Pagano CNR - ISTI
Certification of Trusted Repositories
OceanDocs Digital Repository of Marine Science Research Outputs
The RESEARCH DATA ALLIANCE Maturity Model Approach WG: Repository Audit and Certification Wim Hugo – ICSU-WDS/ SAEON.
Trustworthiness of Preservation Systems
TRAINING POLICY FOR AVIATION SAFETY IN AFRICA
CERN-UNESCO School on Digital Libraries
High level National Data Forum
High-Level Overview SAEON involvement in South African and Global Research Data Infrastructure Asiphe Sahula, Wim Hugo-SAEON AfriGEOSS Symposium 28.
Quality Management Systems
Which infrastructure for GEOSS?
Introducing the Publishing Data Services WG
How are Jisc-managed services/solutions supporting the HEFCE policy?
Internet Interconnection
Open Access to your Research Papers and Data
EOSCpilot Skills Landscape & Framework
Introduction to Research Data Management
11. The future of SDMX Introducing the SDMX Roadmap 2020
Metadata for research outputs management
EOSCpilot All Hands Meeting 9 March 2018, Pisa
EUDAT B2FIND A Cross-Discipline Metadata Service and Discovery Portal
Institutional Framework, Resources and Management
Scientific Publishing in the Digital Age
Geospatial Data Use and sharing Concepts
Scanning the environment: The global perspective on the integration of non-traditional data sources, administrative data and geospatial information Sub-regional.
Research Data Management
Common Solutions to Common Problems
FDA-08 FDA Whitepaper Update
United Nations Statistics Division
EOSCpilot All Hands Meeting 9 March 2018, Pisa
OPEN ACCESS POLICY Larshan Naicker Rhodes University Library
Bird of Feather Session
VCC 3 General VCC meeting, 2/3 April 2012, Utrecht, The Netherlands
ORCID: ADDING VALUE TO THE GLOBAL RESEARCH COMMUNITY
EOSC-hub Contribution to the EOSC WGs
Presentation transcript:

Responsible Citizenship of the Data World Wim Hugo Grenoble, 12 April 2017

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.11.001

Credibility of Science Access to original and complete data sets for reproducibility Re-usability declines with time Availability declines with age http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0000308#pone-0000308-g002 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982213014000

Network of referenced objects in the web Linked Open Data Network of referenced objects in the web Dependent on permanent identifiers for the objects References vocabularies, ontologies, registries, … The Knowledge Network

ICSU-WDS Knowledge Network: the Fabric of Science Scholarly Publications (CrossRef?) TDRs (WDS, DSA, DataCite*) Samples and Events People (ORCID) RDI Outputs/ Online Resources Coverage (Temporal, Spatial, Topic) Data Citations (DataCite) Institutions (?) Projects Initiatives Use, Caveats, Lineage, Methods Networks Licenses (CoDATA, Creative Commons) * Including re3data, DataBib Funders (?) Exists Started Not Now WDS The Knowledge Network

Generalised Scientific Data Infrastructure Use Case “Predictable Assembly from Reliable Components” Access/ Download Data/ Services Analise/ Visualise “Bind” “Publish” Process Metadata Discovery “Find” Generalised Scientific Data Use Case

Generalised Scientific Data Infrastructure Use Case Curate Cite Access/ Download Data/ Services Analise/ Visualise “Bind” “Publish” Process Metadata Discovery Assess/ Rate “Find” Generalised Scientific Data Use Case

Mediation and Brokering Curate Mediate Cite Access/ Download Data/ Services Analise/ Visualise “Bind” “Publish” Process Metadata Discovery Assess/ Rate “Find” Mediation and Brokering

“Responsible Citizenship of the Data World” Content Best Practice Persistent Identifiers and Registries Vocabularies, Ontologies Global Infrastructure Services Federated Data Services and Implementations Standards and Specifications Licenses and Data Policy Scope Applies to all Applies to a specific data family or format Applies to a specific scientific discipline or domain Actors Individual Researchers, Institutions, Initiatives Voluntary contributors and the Public Systems developers, Data Centre Managers, Architects Granularity Individual Data Points (UncertML, …) Individual Data Sets (GEO Data Management Principles, ...) Data Centres and Repositories (WDS, DSA, ISO, Nestor) Data Networks and Composite Services (WDS) Maturity Data Management Principles

Core Certification: Trusted Data Services Data Records Data Sets Repositories <UncertML> … Standards can play an important role in establishing this trust. There has long been a demand for some way to evaluate, to assess the trustworthiness of a digital repository. Over the last few years a number of evaluation guidelines are becoming available. These standards not only take into account the technical infrastructure and standards, but also look at organisational, financial, staffing and legal aspects, workflows, risk management, etc. … Quality, Accreditation, and Trust

African GRDI Perspectives Challenges are obvious …

Technology Footprint It is clear that technology of the type expected in more developed nations remains a problem: not only is bandwidth at a premium, but it is expensive, and state-of-the art equipment (both personal equipment and in respect of data centres) are unlikely to be commonplace in Africa in the near future. Design directives for Networked Data Centres:   Technology: use of mobile phone technology in a non-bandwidth intensive manner will be a very good option. Simple data discovery is preferable to non-discovery due to technology hurdles. Technology: Cloud-based services Governance: data dissemination via satellite remains an affordable option for large data sets.

Open Access Irrespective of the wide and growing acceptance and mandatory implementation in the developed world, open access remains problematic in the developing world. One can aim to address the misconceptions – undoubtedly a longer term goal – but in the meantime, discovery and access to data embargoed in some way is preferable to non-discovery. Design directives for Networked Data Centres:   Technology: data centres should allow multiple modes of access (free and open, acceptance of limiting conditions, paywall). Policy: Licenses should allow a small number of valid restrictions. Divergence of national policies need to be accommodated by matching them with a small number of standardised licenses.

Growth of Creative Commons Policies and Licensing

Creative Commons License Use Policies and Licensing

Where CC Works are Published Policies and Licensing

Funding It is highly unlikely that funding for the establishment of data centres on a scale comparable to the developed world will emerge. African countries may have funds, but capacity is also a problem. At times, donors or multinational projects fund infrastructure, but one has to accept that these are often ineffectual, or will not be able to serve the majority of scientists. Design directives for Networked Data Centres:   Technology: we need to make use of free technology as far as possible: cloud-based data storage, network data centres for meta-data that are funded by stakeholder institutions, and low-bandwidth options for data discovery, application, and use. Governance: Use the crowd - peer review, quality assurance, and some oversight functions can be crowd-sourced. It may be beneficial for experienced scientists, globally, to act voluntarily as governance sources for Network Data Centres – without financial compensation. Such a framework, and the explicit roles, responsibilities, and benefits may require endorsement by a suitable global institution such as ICSU.

Capacity A large part of the problem with implementation of Global Research Data Infrastructure (GRDI) and data centres as a component of these is technology focus. Even today, it is necessary to have significant background knowledge of aspects such as meta-data and its mainstream standards, data formats and their standards, and the general body of knowledge associated with GRDI to participate in and benefit from the emerging infrastructure. This has to change: end users need not know any more of this than they need to know of the standards that enable Google Mail or and Android smartphone. The challenge is with the developers of the GRDI: listen to the customer.   Design directives for Networked Data Centres: Technology: Data Centre use needs to be made intuitive, and shield end users from technical complexity, standards, and specialist knowledge. Technology: integration with well-established services (cloud-based services, social networks) both in terms of functionality and shared infrastructure is needed.

Scientific Activity in Southern Africa

Ships in the Night … First-world-funded initiatives – e.g. SciGaIA Unaware of one another Not connected to National Initiatives Why not a funded programme to make Zenodo and OpenAire immediately useful to developing country infrastructure providers? Recognition of Effort Often hidden in first-world networks or data centres Coordination and landscape assessment