Acceleration is detected by comparing initial and final velocities

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Motion and Force A. Motion 1. Motion is a change in position
Advertisements

Kinematics II April 20, 2017.
Motion in One DimensionSection 2 What do you think? Which of the following cars is accelerating? –A car shortly after a stoplight turns green –A car approaching.
Preliminary Questions 2B.1.1: Position, Velocity, Acceleration Plots The plot to the right represents the motion of an object. During period 1, the object’s.
Motion in One Dimension
Harmonic Motion © 2010, 2011, 2013 Eric Freudenthal and Art Duval.
Acceleration- Change in Velocity occurs when an object _____________________ occurs when an object ______________ in speed. occurs when an object __________.
Projectile Motion The motion of an object that is thrown and moves along a curved path through the influence of gravity, only.
Summer 2012 PHYS 172: Modern Mechanics Lecture 2 – Vectors, Momentum, & Relativity Read:
Chapter 2 Kinematics in One Dimension. Dynamics Dynamics: branch of physics describing the motion of an object and the relationship between that motion.
Motion. Mechanics – branch of physics dealing with the action of forces on objects and with the resulting motion.
Chapter 2 Motion in One Dimension. Kinematics Describes motion while ignoring the agents that caused the motion For now, will consider motion in one dimension.
© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture Outline Chapter 5 College Physics, 7 th Edition Wilson / Buffa / Lou.
Displacement-Time Graphs
Motion Graphs Position-Time (also called Distance-Time or Displacement-Time) d t At rest.
Describing Motion The graphs… Game.
Graphing Motion Vocabulary: The Slope is the Thing trend slope
Physics Montwood High School R. Casao
B1.3 Acceleration.
Motion with Constant Acceleration
Preview Multiple Choice Short Response Extended Response.
What is Motion?.
Contribution of spatial and temporal integration in heading perception
Section 2–4 Acceleration Acceleration is the rate change of velocity.
Velocity and Acceleration
Foundations of Physical Science
Motion Graphing Acceleration vs. Time Graphs
Acceleration Changing velocity (non-uniform) means an acceleration is present Acceleration is the rate of change of the velocity Units are m/s² (SI)
Ch.5, Sec.1 – Measuring Motion
Kinematics Acceleration
Graphing Motion Walk Around
Statistical Analysis Error Bars
Motion.
Perceptual Echoes at 10 Hz in the Human Brain
Motion and Force. Motion and Force Chapter Twelve: Distance, Time, and Speed 12.1 Distance, Direction, and Position 12.2 Speed 12.3 Graphs of Motion.
Graphing Speed and Acceleration
Caspar M. Schwiedrzik, Winrich A. Freiwald  Neuron 
Huan Luo, Xing Tian, Kun Song, Ke Zhou, David Poeppel  Current Biology 
Selective Attention in an Insect Visual Neuron
Volume 28, Issue 7, Pages e6 (April 2018)
Dynamical Scenarios for Chromosome Bi-orientation
Caspar M. Schwiedrzik, Winrich A. Freiwald  Neuron 
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (December 2002)
Physics 111: Mechanics Lecture 2
Jeremy B. Wilmer, Ken Nakayama  Neuron 
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (September 2016)
Uma R. Karmarkar, Dean V. Buonomano  Neuron 
Volume 89, Issue 6, Pages (March 2016)
Greg Schwartz, Sam Taylor, Clark Fisher, Rob Harris, Michael J. Berry 
The Normalization Model of Attention
Unit 1: Learning Target 1.5 Create & Interpret Motion Graphs:
Chapter 12 Chemical Kinetics Speed Steps
The resulting position-time graph would look like this.
Chapter 4, Section 3 Acceleration.
Chapter 1 Motion.
Velocity vs Time Graphs – Notebooks
Motion Measuring Motion Motion Speed & Velocity Acceleration
Unit 7 Matter in Motion
Albert V. van den Berg, Jaap A. Beintema  Neuron 
Graphing Motion.
Journal Entry 5 Accelerated Motion, Pt I
End-Stopping and the Aperture Problem
Position, Speed and Velocity
Optimizing Visual Motion Perception during Eye Movements
Motion in One Dimension
Visual Motion Induces a Forward Prediction of Spatial Pattern
The resulting position-time graph would look like this.
Motion-Induced Blindness and Motion Streak Suppression
Kinematics in One Dimension
Presentation transcript:

Acceleration is detected by comparing initial and final velocities Brian Timney, Samantha Kearney, and Benjamin Asa. Western University, London, Ontario, Canada

Visual Acceleration Necessary complement to motion perception Virtually neglected in the literature, most of what is available is quite old These older studies were technologically limited We decided to do some parametric studies and attempt to gain an understanding of the mechanisms underlying acceleration perception

How is acceleration detected? Acceleration may be detected in one of two ways Direct Thresholds determined by acceleration rate. This implies the existence of “acceleration detectors” that process rate of change of motion directly Indirect Thresholds determined by ability to detect that speed has changed This implies that the critical variable will be the difference between initial and final velocity, not the absolute acceleration rate

Experiment 1:Threshold acceleration rate Speed Time 200 ms constant velocity at beginning and end of presentation Acceleration rate varied from trial to trial

Experimental 1:Threshold acceleration rate We measured ability to detect acceleration for a range of starting velocities General Methodology 100 black dots in 5° x 5° white square aperture 2-interval, 2 AFC; Constant velocity vs Acceleration Constant stimuli: 6 acceleration rates, 25 trials/rate, 4 runs Report which interval contained dots that were accelerating Starting velocities: 1 to 32° s-2 2 presentation durations: 500ms and 1000ms

Acceleration Detection Performance Performance improved with acceleration rate Greater increases in acceleration were needed for faster starting velocities (Weber’s Law) Acceleration thresholds varied with presentation duration

Performance vs Final Velocity Original data replotted to show performance as a function of final velocity Each pair of curves represents one starting velocity Effect of presentation duration disappears Threshold is dependent on the speed difference between initial and final velocity

Experiment 2a: Varying the acceleration rate Experiment 1 provides good evidence for the indirect hypothesis, but a stronger test would be to decouple absolute acceleration rate from average acceleration over the acceleration period; To do this we introduced a speed plateau during the acceleration phase; If thresholds rely on detecting speed differences, then average acceleration over the presentation period should be constant at threshold

Experimental Paradigm Representation of two different stimulus presentations with different absolute acceleration rates but the same average acceleration rate In different sessions the duration of the plateau was varied

Absolute acceleration thresholds Acceleration thresholds, plotted as a function of the absolute acceleration rates, for starting velocities of: A) 2° s-1 and B) 10° s-1 Absolute acceleration threshold increases as a function of plateau duration

Average acceleration thresholds Acceleration thresholds, plotted as a function of the avaerage acceleration rates, for starting velocities of: A) 2° s-1 and B) 10° s-1 Average acceleration threshold is independent of plateau duration

Experiment 2b: Multiple acceleration rates Data from Experiment 2a suggest that recognizing that a target has accelerated is dependent on the average acceleration within the presentation period As a final test, we varied the acceleration rates during presentation even further

Experimental paradigm The acceleration period was broken down into three components: 250 ms initial acceleration 500 ms middle acceleration 250 ms final acceleration (identical to initial) The middle acceleration period could be positive (red), negative (blue), or zero (green) Velocity Time Acceleration Period

Absolute vs. average acceleration Thresholds vary markedly when plotted as a function of the first last acceleration phases When data are expressed in terms of average acceleration over all three phases, thresholds are invariant

Conclusions Thresholds for the detection of acceleration vary substantially depending on the temporal parameters of the stimulus presentation When data are expressed in terms of the average velocity over the course of the presentation, thresholds remain relatively constant The data suggest that the critical variable in the detection of acceleration is the difference between the initial and final velocities, regardless of the duration of the acceleration period All of the results provide strong support for the “indirect” model of acceleration perception.

Thank You