Recent Progress in Stellarator Optimization

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Plasma-Surface Interactions Lecture 6 Divertors.
Advertisements

17. April 2015 Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Application of a multiscale transport model for magnetized plasmas in cylindrical configuration Workshop.
Stellarator in a Box: Understanding ITG turbulence in stellarator geometries G. G. Plunk, IPP Greifswald Collaborators: T. Bird, J. Connor, P. Helander,
6th Japan Korea workshop July 2011, NIFS, Toki-city Japan Edge impurity transport study in stochastic layer of LHD and scrape-off layer of HL-2A.
A new class of magnetic confinement device in the shape of a knot Abstract We describe a new class of magnetic confinement device, with the magnetic axis.
Update on Modeling of Power and Particle Control for ARIES- Compact Stellarator A.Grossman UCSD 11/04/2004 Acknowledgements: P.Mioduszewski(ORNL) J. Lyon.
Steps Toward a Compact Stellarator Reactor Hutch Neilson Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory ARIES Team Meeting October 3, 2002.
Compact Stellarator Configuration Development Planning Hutch Neilson Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory ARIES Team Meeting October 4, 2002.
January 8-10, 2003/ARR 1 Plan for Engineering Study of ARIES-CS Presented by A. R. Raffray University of California, San Diego ARIES Meeting UCSD San.
Progress in Configuration Development for Compact Stellarator Reactors Long-Poe Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Aries Project Meeting, June 16-17,
Physics of fusion power
Optimization of Stellarator Power Plant Parameters J. F. Lyon, Oak Ridge National Lab. for the ARIES Team Workshop on Fusion Power Plants Tokyo, January.
LPK Recent Progress in Configuration Development for Compact Stellarator Reactors L. P. Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Aries E-Meeting,
Physics of fusion power
Magnet System Definition L. Bromberg P. Titus MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES meeting November 4-5, 2004.
AN UPDATE ON DIVERTOR HEAT LOAD ANALYSIS T.K. Mau, A. Grossman, A.R. Raffray UC-San Diego H. McGuinness RPI ARIES-CS Project Meeting June 14-15, 2005 University.
Overview of ARIES Compact Stellarator Study Farrokh Najmabadi and the ARIES Team UC San Diego US/Japan Workshop on Power Plant Studies & Related Advanced.
Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
IPP Stellarator Reactor perspective T. Andreeva, C.D. Beidler, E. Harmeyer, F. Herrnegger, Yu. Igitkhanov J. Kisslinger, H. Wobig O U T L I N E Helias.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 8 : The tokamak continued.
AN UPDATE on DIVERTOR DESIGN and HEAT LOAD ANALYSIS T.K. Mau (UCSD) H. McGuinness (RPI), D. Steiner (RPI) A.R. Raffray (UCSD), X. Wang (UCSD), A. Grossman.
Recent Results of Configuration Studies L. P. Ku Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory ARIES-CS Project Meeting, November 17, 2005 UCSD, San Diego, CA.
Examples of using Langevin equation to solve FP equation.
Physics of Fusion power Lecture 7: Stellarator / Tokamak.
9/2004Strickler, et. al1 Reconstruction of Modular Coil Shape and Control of Vacuum Islands in NCSX D. Strickler, S. Hirshman, B. Nelson, D. Williamson,
TITLE RP1.019 : Eliminating islands in high-pressure free- boundary stellarator magnetohydrodynamic equilibrium solutions. S.R.Hudson, D.A.Monticello,
Nils P. Basse Plasma Science and Fusion Center Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA USA ABB seminar November 7th, 2005 Measurements.
Massively Parallel Magnetohydrodynamics on the Cray XT3 Joshua Breslau and Jin Chen Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Cray XT3 Technical Workshop Nashville,
Advanced Tokamak Plasmas and the Fusion Ignition Research Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Spring APS, Philadelphia, 4/5/2003.
SIMULATION OF A HIGH-  DISRUPTION IN DIII-D SHOT #87009 S. E. Kruger and D. D. Schnack Science Applications International Corp. San Diego, CA USA.
Status and Prospects of Nuclear Fusion Using Magnetic Confinement Hartmut Zohm Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Garching, Germany Invited Talk given.
1 Modeling of EAST Divertor S. Zhu Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Hutch Neilson Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Stellarator Team Meeting 3 March 2011 Stellarator Program Update.
V. A. Soukhanovskii 1 Acknowledgement s: R. Maingi 2, D. A. Gates 3, J. Menard 3, R. Raman 4, R. E. Bell 3, C. E. Bush 2, R. Kaita 3, H. W. Kugel 3, B.
D. A. Gates, R. B. White NSTX Physics Meeting 1/19/03
NSTX-U NSTX-U PAC-31 Response to Questions – Day 1 Summary of Answers Q: Maximum pulse length at 1MA, 0.75T, 1 st year parameters? –A1: Full 5 seconds.
Transport of deuterium - tritium neutrals in ITER divertor M. Z. Tokar and V.Kotov Plasma and neutral gas in ITER divertor will be mixed of deuterium and.
RF simulation at ASIPP Bojiang DING Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences Workshop on ITER Simulation, Beijing, May 15-19, 2006 ASIPP.
14 Oct. 2009, S. Masuzaki 1/18 Edge Heat Transport in the Helical Divertor Configuration in LHD S. Masuzaki, M. Kobayashi, T. Murase, T. Morisaki, N. Ohyabu,
DIII-D SHOT #87009 Observes a Plasma Disruption During Neutral Beam Heating At High Plasma Beta Callen et.al, Phys. Plasmas 6, 2963 (1999) Rapid loss of.
1 Modular Coil Design for the Ultra-Low Aspect Ratio Quasi-Axially Symmetric Stellarator MHH2 L. P. Ku and the ARIES Team Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory.
Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association Different numerical approaches to 3D transport modelling of fusion devices Alexander Kalentyev.
Compact Stellarator Approach to DEMO J.F. Lyon for the US stellarator community FESAC Subcommittee Aug. 7, 2007.
TITLE Stuart R.Hudson, D.A.Monticello, A.H.Reiman, D.J.Strickler, S.P.Hirshman, L-P. Ku, E.Lazarus, A.Brooks, M.C.Zarnstorff, A.H.Boozer, G-Y. Fu and G.H.Neilson.
QAS Design of the DEMO Reactor
D. A. Spong Oak Ridge National Laboratory collaborations acknowledged with: J. F. Lyon, S. P. Hirshman, L. A. Berry, A. Weller (IPP), R. Sanchez (Univ.
Comments on Fusion Development Strategy for the US S. Prager Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory FPA Symposium.
1Field-Aligned SOL Losses of HHFW Power and RF Rectification in the Divertor of NSTX, R. Perkins, 11/05/2015 R. J. Perkins 1, J. C. Hosea 1, M. A. Jaworski.
18th International Spherical Torus Workshop, Princeton, November 2015 Magnetic Configurations  Three comparative configurations:  Standard Divertor (+QF)
1 Recent Progress on QPS D. A. Spong, D.J. Strickler, J. F. Lyon, M. J. Cole, B. E. Nelson, A. S. Ware, D. E. Williamson Improved coil design (see recent.
Presented by Yuji NAKAMURA at US-Japan JIFT Workshop “Theory-Based Modeling and Integrated Simulation of Burning Plasmas” and 21COE Workshop “Plasma Theory”
Neutral beam ion loss measurement and modeling for NSTX D. S. Darrow Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory American Physical Society, Division of Plasma.
Stellarator-Related MHD Research H. Neilson MHD Science Focus Group meeting December 12, 2008 MHD Science Focus Group, Dec. 12, 2008.
57th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , Savannah, Georgia Equilibrium Reconstruction Theory and Modeling Optimized.
NIMROD Simulations of a DIII-D Plasma Disruption S. Kruger, D. Schnack (SAIC) April 27, 2004 Sherwood Fusion Theory Meeting, Missoula, MT.
Compact Stellarators as Reactors J. F. Lyon, ORNL NCSX PAC meeting June 4, 1999.
Unstructured Meshing Tools for Fusion Plasma Simulations
Neoclassical Predictions of ‘Electron Root’ Plasmas at HSX
Stellarator Divertor Design and Optimization with NCSX Examples
Finite difference code for 3D edge modelling
E3D: status report and application to DIII-D
Targeted Physics Optimization in HSX
Studies of Bias Induced Plasma Flows in HSX
Targeted Physics Optimization in HSX
D. S. Darrow Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
Mikhail Z. Tokar and Mikhail Koltunov
New Results for Plasma and Coil Configuration Studies
New Development in Plasma and Coil Configurations
Stellarator Program Update: Status of NCSX & QPS
Presentation transcript:

Recent Progress in Stellarator Optimization D. A. Gates1, A. H. Boozer2, T. Brown1, J. Breslau1, D. Curreli3, M. Landreman4, S. A. Lazerson1, J. Lore5, H. Mynick1, G.H. Neilson1, N. Pomphrey1, P. Xanthopoulos6, A. Zolfaghari1 1Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ 08543, U.S.A. 2Columbia University, New York, NY 10027 3U. Illinois Champaign-Urbana, Champaign, IL 61820 4University of Maryland, College Park, 20742 5Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 6Max Planck Insitut-fur-Plasmaphysik, Greifswald, Germany EX/P3-39 EX/P3-39 Coil Simplification A four part program for improved stellarators A design activity based on the four new optimization capabilities would lead to an improved stellarator reactor concept Coil optimization with spatial constraints Fast Particle Confinement Optimization Limited access leads to low availability Basic code changes include: Modular coil winding topology used on NCSX and ARIES-CS designs leads to small component, port based maintenance approach Details develop that allow straightened MC back legs and the code revised to receive input of engineering supplied MC surface geometry to locate the MC winding centers, The MC winding geometry now is developed with spline representations enabling spatial constraints to be placed on the coil locations, Coding effort was also made to smooth the shaping of the modular coil winding, add torsion constraints, freeze coil geometries and much more. Fast particle confinement in modern optimized designs such as W7-X and NCSX is much improved compared to conventional stellarators, but remains one of the main challenges for the concept G. Grieger, et al., Phys. Fluids B 4, 2081 (1992) STELLOPT has recently been coupled to the gyro-center following parts of the BEAMS3D code allowing massively parallel computations. M. McMillan and S. A. Lazerson, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 56, 095019 (2014) NCSX 4.4 AR 1.4-M Raxis ARIES-CS 4.5 AR 7.75-M Raxis ARIES-CS port based maintenance approach A European tokamak study looking at an equivalent ITER configured DEMO design found that an operating availability barely above 50% could be achieved. COILOPT++ was run with constraints applied using aspect ratio 6 case from Ku and Boozer The results of this work is a newly developed stellarator configuration with much improved maintenance features Primary minimization cost function was combination of rms and max dB/B over the boundary COILOPT++ with splines was substantially easier to run with the splines than COILOPT with Fourier representation The use of saddle coils was deemed unnecessary Magnetic field error after one pass was rms2.27e-2 and Max = 5.28e-2 Spline coil centers from COILOPT++ with applied constraints Achieved equilibrium Target equilibrium A fast particle loss prediction verification exercise will be undertaken on W7-X using the nearly radially injected neutral beams Fast lost ion detectors will be installed to verify predicted losses Future optimization strategies Plasma boundary well matched after single iteration Turbulent Transport Optimization Divertor Heat Flux Optimization Mynick et al., recently demonstrated the reduction of turbulent heat flux by employing a novel “proxy function” within the STELLOPT code. H. Mynick, et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 105, 095004 (2010) The proxy function is developed to rapidly estimate the transport level of a given configuration Nonlinear GENE run to corroborate that the evolved configuration in fact has reduced transport. Most work to date has focused on optimizing for ion temperature gradient (ITG) turbulence. Without scraper Overloaded elements (>10MW/m2, rated for 5) With scraper MW/m2 Load on low-rated tiles reduced below 1MW/m2 A method has been developed to rapidly determine the heat flux footprint on a stellarator facing surface using field line tracing with diffusion J. Lore, et al., IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 42 539 (2014) This method can be included in STELLOPT with the parallelized FIELDLINES code The result can then be compared to a more accurate model, such as EMC3- EIRENE Automated divertor plate design can make machine design much more rapid Can also verify robustness of the design to equilibrium variations Poloidal cross-sections and (b)surface-averaged heat flux Q versus time from GENE simulations for NCSX and 2 turbulence-optimized configurations QA_40n (red) and QA_35q (green), showing the reduction in Q from NCSX by factors of 2 to 2.5. Xanthopoulos has since generated a W7-X-like configuration with turbulent flux minimized across the entire cross-section. P. Xanthopoulos, et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 113, 155001 (2014). The MPX configuration Comparison between field line tracing and EMC3-EIRENE Parallelized field line tracing using the FIELDLINES code Peak flux: ~16MW/m2 Peak flux: ~12MW/m2 DIV3D EMC3 Comparison of the normalized heat flux between MPX and W7-X