Otter Tail County Drainage Ditches #5, #68 and #36

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PINE HOLLOW WATERSHED ENHANCEMENT PROJECT Sherman County Soil & Water Conservation District.
Advertisements

Board Of Appeals Documents
2009 Wyoming Street and Utility Improvements Neighborhood Informational Meeting December 18, :00 P.M. – 8:00 P.M. 6:00 P.M. – 8:00 P.M. Mark A. Erichson,
BCC PUBLIC HEARING ON BZA #VA , OCTOBER 3, 2013 APPLICANT: YURI FERRO APPELLANT: WILLIAM A DAVIS, SR. and REBECCA M. DAVIS Orange County Zoning.
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
+ Proposed Lockwood Targeted Economic Development District 2015 Yellowstone County.
U.S. 31 at CR 400 South Roundabout Information Meeting December 18, 2013 Clifty Creek Elementary Columbus, Indiana.
Connecticut Department of Transportation: Office of Environmental Planning (OEP) Statewide Drainage Maintenance Activities State owned Rail Facilities.
Emergency Action Plans Miriam Gradie Anderson Planning Specialist 608/ Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
Highway 169 Phase 2 (Part 2) – Cross Range Expressway April 30, 2014 Public Information Meeting Taconite Community Center.
1 ELEMENTS OF AN EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN PLANNING APPROACH Issued May 2009 Level II: Introduction to Design Education and Certification for Persons.
Public Hearing August 30, 2014 Drive-Way Ordinance Please Sign in…
Loudoun Watershed Watch “ Restoring Loudoun Streams” LCSA Water Forum Presented by: Darrell Schwalm Loudoun Watershed Watch Loudoun Wildlife Conservancy.
Public Hearing (PH 1) City Council Meeting February 7, 2012.
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES COASTAL RESTORATION DIVISION CRMS Tier 1 Training Landrights: Background and Access Packets.
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Murrieta Creek Flood Control, Environmental Restoration and Recreation Project June 2006.
Lake County Watershed Management Board Funding Program Mike Prusila, CFM, Watershed Planner.
Coos Watershed Association Watershed Restoration Projects.
Washington Thoroughfare Study Proposed Improvement of Washington Street Hainesville Road to Lake Street Lake County Hainesville Road Lake Street Washington.
Channel Rehabilitation Projects TAMWG - June ‘04 Trinity River at Hocker Flat 1/16/2003.
North Carolina Planned Community Act Types of Meetings and Meeting Minutes Ed Bedford, J.D.
ANNEXATION. WHY ANNEXATION CITIES PAY FOR A WIDE ARRAY OF SERVICES AND FACILITIES THAT BENEFIT ENTIRE REGIONS AND THE ENTIRE STATE. MOST STATES RECOGNIZE.
Repeal and Replace the Boundary Adjustment Act with the Urban Reserve Act.
Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement for Adoption of Stream Corridor Management Regulations for the Lake George Park.
 Section (2), Florida Statutes, requires each local government to maintain a comprehensive plan of the type and in the manner set out in this.
After-the-Fact Conservation Area Impact Permit Request* Keene’s Pointe Community Association, Inc. District 1 November 1, 2011 *Postponed from the December.
Public Hearing (PH 1) City Council Meeting January 17, 2012.
Fitzgerald Marine Reserve CA Coastal Trail California Coastal Commission May 12, 2011.
Crow Wing County Ditch #13 Public Hearing 10/27/15.
Dean C. Ringle, P.E., P.S. Franklin County Engineer.
ANNEXATION Statutory Overview July 19, 2011 David L. Yearout, AICP, CFM.
MECHANICS LIENS: NEW CHANGES & OLD ISSUES Ryan Hiss, Lyman & Nielsen, LLC Brienne Berscheid, Chicago Title Insurance Company.
W.S through  To provide for:  Prevention and control of erosion  Prevention of flood water and sediment damages  Agricultural.
MASON PUBLIC SCHOOLS Bond Committee Meeting #1 August 9, 2016.
Public Information Meeting St. George Road - Oak Hill Road Intersection Reconstruction Project.
Town of Brighton, Department of Public Works
PowerButte: Solar Overlay Replacement with PowerButte Guide
MECHANICS LIENS: New Changes & Old Issues
Elections – Dispensing with Primaries
Planning Commission Public Hearing September 9, 2016
IEEE AES Society Proposed ByLaw Change for Board of Governors Election
Flooding in Manitoba by: Rebecca, Taylor and Flavia.
Environmentally sensitive areas
Manistee County Drain Commissioner
Annual general meeting
Springbrook Estates Sewer Improvement Area Informational Meeting
Lady Creek Water System
Drainage 101 – Council Educational Session
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
Community Development Department May 2, 2016
Texas Secretary of State Elections Division
PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON HOME AFFAIRS
Village of Sherwood Stumpf Subdivision Paving and Drainage Improvements November 7, 2018.
COMMUNITY UPDATE OCTOBER 23, 2013
Property Disposition Public Information Session
Benefit Re-Determination Hearing: County Ditches #5/#68/#36
MACDC Intercounty Drain Procedures Training
Property Tax Levy – Taxes Payable 2019
By-laws of WVCO,Inc . By-laws Committee: Sandi Brown, Richard Clemmer, Elsie Tyree, Vicki Lee Jacobs, and Chair Nettie Lamerson.
Precincts and Polling Places
Acquisition Details: Owners: James E Joyce Sr. Revocable Intervivos Trust and Gloria A Joyce Revocable Intervivos Trust Location: Section 27, Town of.
Environmentally sensitive areas
Washoe County Board of Adjustment
WSUP (Lightning W Tank #2)
Indiana Department of Environmental Management Office of Water Quality
Washoe County Board of Adjustment
Aldine Westfield Stormwater Harris County Flood Control District
VICTORIA CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Community Development Department May 2, 2016
Presentation transcript:

Otter Tail County Drainage Ditches #5, #68 and #36 Presented by: Kevin Fellbaum Otter Tail County Ditch Inspector September/29/2014

County Ditches #5, #68 and #37 Presentation Drainage Authority Chair Comments Introductions Reason for Meeting Ditch Proceedings History Photos Questions and Comments

Drainage Authority Chair Comments *Use microphone when you speak, Please speak Loud and Clear *Please state your first and last name *Be respectful to others *2 minute time limit per opportunity to speak *One opportunity to speak until all others have had a chance to speak

Introductions

Reason for Meeting Discuss purpose of doing a Re-determination of Benefits and Ditch Combination Input from Benefitted Property Owners on County Ditches 5, 68 and 36 After the Re-determination of Benefits a Combined Ditch will be created and a maintenance fund established for the Combined Ditch for any future maintenance that would need to be performed on the New Combined Ditch 5/68/36 General Discussion of the operation and maintenance of the Ditch

Ditch Proceedings County Ditches are owned by all Benefitted Property Owners within that given Ditch System County Ditches are controlled by the Drainage Authority (County Board) County Ditches are inspected by the County Ditch Inspector (who reports information and issues of the Ditches to the Drainage Authority) Ditch Viewers are appointed by the Drainage Authority to view and report how and which properties are affected by the in place Ditch System Any costs associated with the Ditch system are the responsibility of All the Benefitted Property Owners.

Ditch Proceedings By Minnesota State Statute 103E.351: Re-determination of Benefits Subdivision 1: Conditions to Re-determine Benefits If the Drainage Authority determines that the original benefits determined in the drainage proceeding do not reflect reasonable present day land values or that the benefited areas have changed, or if more than 50% of the property benefited by the drainage system petition for correction of an error that was made at the time of the proceedings that established the drainage system. The Drainage Authority may appoint three viewers to re-determine and report the benefits from the ditch and it’s benefited area. Subdivision 2: Hearing and Procedure A) The re-determination of benefits shall proceed as provided for viewers and the viewers report in sections 103E.311 and 103E.321 of the Statute B)The Auditor must prepare a property owners’ report from the viewer’s report. A copy of the owners’ report must be mailed to each owner of property affected by the drainage system. C) The drainage authority shall hold a final hearing on the report and confirm the benefits and damages and benefitted areas. The final hearing shall be held within 30 days after the property owners’ report is mailed. Subdivision 3: Re-determined Benefits replace Original Benefits The re-determined benefits and benefited areas must be used in place of the original benefits and benefited area in all subsequent proceedings relating to the drainage system. Subdivision 4: Appeal A person aggrieved by the re-determination of benefits and benefited area may appeal from the order confirming the benefits and benefited area under section 103E.091 *Note: Buffer Strips will be purchased and established according to section 103E.021

Ditch Proceedings By Minnesota State Statute 103E.801: Consolidation of Ditches Subdivision 1: Authority to Consolidate or Divide After the Benefitted Area of a Drainage system has been determined, the Drainage Authority may consolidate two or more systems in order to provide more efficient administration of the system consistent with the determined benefitted area. Subdivision 2: Initiation of Action The consolidation may be initiated by the Drainage Authority on its own motion or by any party affected by the Drainage System by filing a petition with the County Auditor. Subdivision 3: Hearing When the Drainage Authority directs by resolution or a petition is filed with the County Auditor, the Drainage Authority will set a time and location for a public hearing. The Drainage Authority may consolidate Ditch Systems if they determine 1) it would be consistent with the re-determination of the benefitted area of the drainage system 2) it would provide for the efficient administration of the drainage system 3) it would be fair and equitable

Purpose Figure out which properties are within the watershed and who owns them and how those properties are Benefitted by having an in-place County Ditch System Re-determine the Benefits of the Ditch to match present day values (Current values are from (1902 to 1919) (Happening Countywide to all Ditches) Combine 3 systems that are serving the same area into 1 Ditch (makes bookkeeping easier) (benefit of having 1 system is: financial load is split over more benefitted properties) What type of maintenance or cleanings would the property owners like to see (cleaning the ditch will restore drainage to the area)

History Ditch #5 Established: June 8, 1903 Purpose: To drain away the overflow waters that by remaining upon the meadow and farming lands greatly lessen the farm products and also seriously endanger the public health (From Original Petition for Ditch- May 10, 1902 ) Original Cost: $12,516.55 Original Benefit: $23,953.98 Events: 1985 a meeting was held on the possibility of reverting the land back into a lake as it was in 1900 Currently: Ditch 5 is an open channel Ditch. The Ditch is operational, but could use some maintenance to restore proper flow, including the removal of beaver dams, cleaning of culverts and the cleanout of sediment that has fallen into the channel. Currently for Ditch 5, the maintenance fund is at a value of $10,983.75

History Ditch #36 Established: January 10,1908 Purpose: So that large tracts of land would thereby be made productive and suitable for cultivation, and to remove stagnant water which endangers public health. (From Original Petition for Ditch- May 24, 1907) Original Cost: $2,227.91 Original Benefit: $3,126.00 Course: Beginning at Stony Lake in Section 6 of Elmo Township, heading in a Northerly and Easterly direction until it crosses under the Soo Line Railway Corridor. It continues on from there heading in more of an Easterly Direction through lowland areas in Sections 32 and 33 of Inman Township until the ditch flows into Ditches 5/68 on the Eastern Line of Section 33 of Inman Township. Events: 1985 a meeting was held on the possibility of reverting the land back into a lake as it was in 1900 Currently: Ditch 36 is an open channel Ditch. The Ditch is semi-operational, but could use some maintenance. Currently for Ditch 36, the maintenance fund is at a value of $00.00

History Ditch #68 Established: December 30,1919 Purpose: To drain away the overflow waters that by remaining upon the meadow and farming lands greatly lessen the farm products and also seriously endanger the public health (From Original Petition for Ditch- November 25, 1919) Original Cost: $43,497.42 Original Benefit: $60,413.00 Course: Has several branches within the Inman and Elmo Wildlife management area Events: 1985 a meeting was held on the possibility of reverting the land back into a lake as it was in 1900 Currently: Ditch 68 is an open channel Ditch. The Ditch is operational, but could use some maintenance to restore proper flow, including the removal of beaver dams, cleaning of culverts and the cleanout of sediment that has fallen into the channel. Currently for Ditch 68, the maintenance fund is at a negative value of $3,661.11

Original Ditch Map

Ditch Photos Snowmobile bridge in Henning, crossing Ditch at CSAH 67

Ditch Photos Ditch, looking East from CSAH 67, Beaver Dam removed from this site this Spring (2014) Beaver Dam Removed

Ditch Photos Ditch Channel looking South from State Hwy 210 Same Picture just zoomed in, can see how big the channel is supposed to be Compared to what it actually is

Ditch Photos Culvert structure underneath State Hwy 210, material on apron restricting flow Ditch flowing North of State Hwy 210

Ditch Photos Culvert structure on 525th Ave Channel looking East from the above Structure, ditch filled with growth

Ditch Photos Ditch meandering through growth and downed branches

Ditch Photos Channel in Section 20 of Inman Township, channel is full of water several feet deep with little to no flow taking place Beaver Dam removed in same section Fall of 2013, Dam was about 4 feet tall

Ditch Photos Channel Fall of 2013 Channel Fall of 2014 535th Ave crossing, very little flow happening Channel Fall of 2013 Channel Fall of 2014

Ditch Photos Ditch 36 on the North Side of CSAH 134 Ditch 36 on the South Side of CSAH 134

Beaver Dams Beaver Dams on the Ditch, some have been removed

Ditch Not Functioning Ditches on Inman/Elmo Township Line Road, Difficult to access due to the water not able to flow out of the wetland in a timely manner

Questions and Comments