IGP Troubleshooting 3.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OSPF 1.
Advertisements

OSPF Header OSPF HEADER OSPF HEADER for this project Types we will use
Introduction to OSPF.
Lonnie Decker Multiarea OSPF for CCNA Department Chair, Networking/Information Assurance Davenport University, Michigan August 2013 Elaine Horn Cisco Academy.
ISIS and OSPF: Network Design Comparisons and Considerations Roosevelt Ferreira Professional Services Engineer
© 2008 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 Chapter 6: Multiarea OSPF Scaling Networks.
Instructor & Todd Lammle
Release 5.1, Revision 0 Copyright © 2001, Juniper Networks, Inc. Advanced Juniper Networks Routing Module 4: Intermediate System To Intermediate System.
Advanced Juniper Networks Routing
1 © 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Computer Networks 6 Layer 3 troubleshooting Halmstad University Olga Torstensson
1 ELEN 602 Lecture 20 More on Routing RIP, OSPF, BGP.
Objectives After completing this chapter you will be able to: Describe hierarchical routing in OSPF Describe the 3 protocols in OSPF, the Hello, Exchange.
CCNP Network Route OSPF Part -I OSPF: Open Shortest Path First Concept of OSPF: 1. It is a link state routing protocol. 2. There are basically only 2 ISIS.
Juniper ESCR Tesco Day 2. Overview Day #1 Maintenance and monitoring Routing protocols Lab Day #2 Introduction to Juniper devices Junos CLI System and.
Single-Area OSPF Implementation
Lecture Week 10 Link-State Routing Protocols. Objectives Describe the basic features & concepts of link-state routing protocols. List the benefits and.
Unicast Routing Protocols  A routing protocol is a combination of rules and procedures that lets routers in the internet inform each other of changes.
Collected By: Mehdi Daneshvar Supervisor: E.M.Kosari.
OSPF Last Update Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D.
© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public 1 Version 4.0 Link-State Routing Protocols Routing Protocols and Concepts – Chapter 10.
Cisco Confidential 1 © 2010 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Configure and Troubleshoot IP Routing Protocols - EIGRP & OSPF Manas R Moothedath.
Introduction to OSPF Nishal Goburdhan. Routing and Forwarding Routing is not the same as Forwarding Routing is the building of maps Each routing protocol.
1 © 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. CCNA 3 v3.0 Module 2 Single-Area OSPF.
 Development began in 1987  OSPF Working Group (part of IETF)  OSPFv2 first established in 1991  Many new features added since then  Updated OSPFv2.
Supplement to “Introduction to IS-IS” presented at NANOG 20 Greg Hankins.
© 2008 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 Chapter 8: Single-Area OSPF Routing Protocols.
© 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. ROUTE v1.0—3-1 Implementing a Scalable Multiarea Network OSPF-Based Solution Planning Routing Implementations.
© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public 1 Version 4.0 Link-State Routing Protocols Routing Protocols and Concepts – Chapter 10.
OSPFv3 John Rullan Cisco Certified Instructor Trainer Thomas A. Edison CTE HS Stephen Lynch Network Architect, CCIE #36243 ABS Technology Architects.
Release 5.1, Revision 0 Copyright © 2001, Juniper Networks, Inc. Advanced Juniper Networks Routing Module 3: OSPF NSSA.
Single Area OSPF Module 2, Review How routing information is maintained Link-state routers apply the Dijkstra shortest path first algorithm against.
--- CCIE R&S Advanced Lab Session 4 OSPF ---
Chapter 11 Chapter 8 Routing & Switching Open Shortest Path First OSPF Thanks to instructors at St. Clair College in Windsor, Ontario.
Troubleshooting EIGRP & OSPF (Some typical problems)
Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) Uses Link State routing Each node acquires complete topology information using link state updates Link-state - what it.
1 Introduction to ISIS AfNOG 2011 SI-E Workshop. 2 IS-IS Standards History  ISO specifies OSI IS-IS routing protocol for CLNS traffic A Link State.
1 Relates to Lab 4. This module covers link state routing and the Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) routing protocol. Dynamic Routing Protocols II OSPF.
1 CMPT 471 Networking II OSPF © Janice Regan,
© 2008 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 Chapter 8: Single-Area OSPF Routing & Switching.
Device Infrastructure
Link State Routing protocol
Instructor & Todd Lammle
Kevin Piper, David Perry, Tom Hoffman, Emely Pagan
OSPF (Open Shortest Path First)
Introducing The OSPF Routing Protocol
Routing Protocols and Concepts
Link-State Routing Protocols
Dynamic Routing Protocols part2
Dynamic Routing: Dynamic routing is where we use a routing protocol; routing protocols are cool because they take care of our work. Routing protocols will.
Instructor Materials Chapter 10: OSPF Tuning and Troubleshooting
Single-Area OSPF (Open Shortest Path First Protocol)
Single-Area OSPF (Open Shortest Path First Protocol)
CCNA 2 v3.1 Module 7 Distance Vector Routing Protocols
Static and Dynamic Routing
13.3 OSPF: Open Shortest Path First.
Link State Algorithm Alternative to distance-vector
CCNA 3 v3 JEOPARDY Module 2 CCNA3 v3 Module 2 K. Martin.
OSPF.
EIGRP.
Link-State Routing Protocols
Instructor & Todd Lammle
Dynamic Routing and OSPF
Chapter 8: Single-Area OSPF
Chapter 7: EIGRP Tuning and Troubleshooting
Dynamic Routing Protocols part2
Cisco networking, CNET-448
Cisco networking, CNET-448
Link-State Routing Protocols
Dynamic Routing: Dynamic routing is where we use a routing protocol; routing protocols are cool because they take care of our work. Routing protocols will.
EIGRP.
Presentation transcript:

IGP Troubleshooting 3

IGP Troubleshooting Topics for the JNCIE-SP Exam IS-IS adjacency issues Understand what can cause IS-IS adjacency issues Understand how to troubleshoot IS-IS adjacency issues OSPF adjacency problems Understand what can cause OSPF adjacency issues Understand how to troubleshoot OSPF adjacency issues Other troubleshooting scenarios Routing loops Overloaded routers Route summarization issues

IS-IS Adjacency Problems Possible causes: Mismatched area IDs for Level 1 IS-IS adjacencies Duplicate system IDs Incorrect IP addressing Mismatched subnet masks do not affect IS-IS adjacencies Hello authentication mismatch LSP authentication problems do not affect IS-IS adjacencies Mismatched interface types Interfaces missing the family iso statement Interfaces that are physically down Incorrect IS-IS interface placement Low MTU setting—less than 1492 for protocol family ISO

OSPF Adjacency Problems Possible causes: Duplicate RIDs Mismatched subnet masks or incorrect IP addressing Authentication mismatches Mismatched interface types OSPF interface priority set to 0 on both sides Interfaces that are physically down Mismatched area types or area IDs Mismatched hello intervals and dead intervals Mismatched MTU settings Remember to examine OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 adjacencies

Troubleshooting Adjacency Issues Troubleshooting tools monitor traffic interface interface-name detail Quick and dirty Use the no-resolve option to remove the look up delay Traceoptions More specific but might cost time deciding which flags to use IS-IS: hello detail and error detail flags OSPF: hello detail and error detail flags Examine which interfaces are participating in the protocol IS-IS: show isis interface OSPF: show ospf interface and show ospf3 interface Adjacency states might give valuable clues

Troubleshooting Routing Loops What is a routing loop? Anytime a packet passes through a routing instance more than once Packets will loop until the TTL expires Typically occurs at points of route redistribution How to troubleshoot a routing loop traceroute Helps to determine where the routing loop is occurring Examine routing tables Once you have found the point at which the packet loops, the routing tables on the involved routers can give valuable information

An Overloaded Router What does it mean to have an overloaded router in IS-IS or OSPF? In OSPF, the router advertises the maximum metric for any routes that will cause the router to forward transit traffic In IS-IS, the router floods its locally generated LSP, to other IS-IS routers, with the overload bit set Be careful if the overload timeout statement is configured Bouncing the protocol will cause the router to become overloaded A router can be configured to be overloaded or can become overloaded If the prefix-export-limit statement is configured and the router exceeds that limit, it becomes overloaded

Route Summarization Issues IS-IS route leaking Examine route leaking polices for common issues Incorrect criteria: from protocol, from level, and to level Incorrect actions: reject instead of accept OSPF area-range statement restrict option blocks route propagation into the backbone area Ensure the area-range statement is applied at the correct hierarchy level Directly under the area stanza for Type 1 and 2 LSAs Directly under the nssa stanza for Type 7 LSAs

Task and Topology Task: R4 R3 R5 OSPF Area 0 ge-0/0/3 R1 R2 Task: The OSPFv2 adjacency between R1 and R2 is currently not operational. Ensure that the adjacency reaches the Full state.

What Now? What are the required components? Must you troubleshoot OSPFv2 and OSPFv3? No Only OSPFv2 adjacency establishment is required Which troubleshooting tools can you use? Examine OSPF adjacencies Adjacency states might provide valuable clues monitor traffic interface interface-name detail or traceoptions MTU problems Hello and dead intervals Mismatched subnet masks Others

Task Completion (1 of 3) Examine the OSPFv2 adjacency lab@R1> show ospf neighbor Address Interface State ID Pri Dead 172.27.0.13 ge-0/0/6.0 Full 172.27.255.3 128 18 172.27.0.2 ge-0/0/3.0 Exchange 172.27.255.2 128 22 lab@R2> show ospf neighbor 172.27.0.1 ge-0/0/3.0 ExStart 172.27.255.1 128 26 172.27.0.17 ge-0/0/2.0 Full 172.27.255.3 128 18 172.27.0.21 ge-0/0/5.0 Full 172.27.255.4 128 17 172.27.0.25 ge-0/0/6.0 Full 172.27.255.5 128 10

Task Completion (2 of 3) Monitor R1’s ge-0/0/3 interface lab@R1> monitor traffic interface ge-0/0/3 detail no-resolve Address resolution is OFF. Listening on ge-0/0/3, capture size 1514 bytes 17:26:41.350994 In IP (tos 0xc0, ttl 1, id 17971, offset 0, flags [none], proto: OSPF (89), length: 52) 172.27.0.2 > 224.0.0.5: OSPFv2, Database Description, length 32 Router-ID 172.27.255.2, Area 0.0.0.0, Authentication Type: none (0) Options [Opaque], DD Flags [Init, More, Master], MTU: 1486, Sequence: 0xac172c39 17:26:41.352069 Out IP (tos 0xc0, ttl 1, id 41177, offset 0, flags [none], proto: OSPF (89), length: 132) 172.27.0.1 > 224.0.0.5: OSPFv2, Database Description, length 112 Router-ID 172.27.255.1, Area 0.0.0.0, Authentication Type: none (0) Options [Opaque], DD Flags [none], MTU: 1500, Sequence: 0xac172c39 Advertising Router 172.27.255.1, seq 0x80000004, age 777s, length 28 Router LSA (1), LSA-ID: 172.27.255.1 Options: [Demand Circuit] ...

Task Completion (3 of 3) Examine and change the MTU setting on R2’s ge-0/0/3 interface [edit interfaces ge-0/0/3] lab@R2# run show interfaces ge-0/0/3 | match mtu Link-level type: Ethernet, MTU: 1500, Speed: 1000mbps, BPDU Error: None, Protocol inet, MTU: 1486 Protocol inet6, MTU: 1486 lab@R2# set mtu 1514 lab@R2# commit commit complete Link-level type: Ethernet, MTU: 1514, Speed: 1000mbps, BPDU Error: None, Protocol inet, MTU: 1500 Protocol inet6, MTU: 1500

Task Verification Examine the OSPFv2 adjacency lab@R1> show ospf neighbor Address Interface State ID Pri Dead 172.27.0.13 ge-0/0/6.0 Full 172.27.255.3 128 18 172.27.0.2 ge-0/0/3.0 Full 172.27.255.2 128 22 lab@R2> show ospf neighbor 172.27.0.1 ge-0/0/3.0 Full 172.27.255.1 128 26 172.27.0.17 ge-0/0/2.0 Full 172.27.255.3 128 18 172.27.0.21 ge-0/0/5.0 Full 172.27.255.4 128 17 172.27.0.25 ge-0/0/6.0 Full 172.27.255.5 128 10

3