Estimate AC power for TeV Upgrade

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CLIC Energy Stages D. Schulte1 D. Schulte for the CLIC team.
Advertisements

Design Considerations LHC hadron beams: E p =7 TeV E A =E e  Z/A Luminosity O (10 33 ) cm -2 s -1 with Beam Power 100 MW (wall plug) Integrated e ± p.
TLCC Themes BAW-2, SLAC, 19 January 2011 Ross Walker Yamamoto 1.
Nick Walker (DESY/GDE) GDE Internal Cost Review FNAL ILC Design Overview N. Walker ILC PAC TDR review1.
3-March-06ILCSC Technical Highights1 ILC Technical Highlights Superconducting RF Main Linac.
X-ray Booster IR Linac Harmonic RF RF Systems for NSLS-II J. Rose, A. Blednykh, N. Towne With help from many others at BNL and other institutions.
ILC RTML Lattice Design A.Vivoli, N. Solyak, V. Kapin Fermilab.
Cost Impacts of two e- ML cycles at sqrt(s) < 250 GeV purpose: not to generate a new ILC estimate, but to facilitate SB2009 decisions Peter H. Garbincius,
Global Design Effort - CFS Baseline Assessment Workshop 2 - SLAC Positron Source Relocation 1 BASELINE ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP 2 CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
1 C-Band Linac Development Satoshi Ohsawa 2004.Feb.19LCPAC.
Christopher Nantista ARD R&D Status Meeting SLAC February 3, …… …… …… … ….
ILC – Recent progress & Path to Technical Design Report Brian Foster (Hamburg/DESY/Oxford & GDE) Plenary ECFA CERN 25/11/11.
N. Walker (for PMs) ALCPG, Univ. of Oregon, Eugene TeV Upgrade.
Status of the Rebaselining D. Schulte for the Rebaselining Team D. Schulte, CLIC Rebaselining, October 2013.
SINGLE-STAGE BUNCH COMPRESSOR FOR ILC-SB2009 Nikolay Solyak Fermilab GDE Baseline Assessment Workshop (BAW-2) SLAC, Jan , 2011 N.Solyak, Single-stage.
Nick Walker – SA meeting KEK Treaty Points and Costing Guidance Nick Walker 1 st System Area Managers Meeting KEK –
Aug 23, 2006 Half Current Option: Impact on Linac Cost Chris Adolphsen With input from Mike Neubauer, Chris Nantista and Tom Peterson.
1 Update on Q2 Main linac starting gradient, upgrade gradient, and upgrade path Results of WG5 discussions after feedback from plenary on Tuesday New Option.
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
Nick Walker AD&I WebEx Meeting TeV Upgrade Study AD&I WebEx Meeting Nick Walker 1 Brief summary of ALCPG’11 discussions.
Cold versus Warm, parameters impacting LC reliability and efficiency contribution to the discussion on risk factors Giorgio Bellettini, Seul ITRP meeting,
Longitudinal HOM damping estimations for SPL cavity. status W. Weingarten 26 July 20101SPL Cavity WG Meeting.
CLIC Energy Stages D. Schulte1 D. Schulte for the CLIC team.
DTL Option for MEIC Ion Injection Jiquan Guo, Haipeng Wang Jlab 3/30/
N. Walker, K. Yokoya LCWS ’11 Granada September TeV Upgrade Scenario: Straw man parameters.
ML (BC) Studies update Nikolay Solyak Arun Saini.
Cost Impacts of Reduced # Bunches per Train purpose: not to generate a new ILC estimate, but to facilitate SB2009 decisions Peter H. Garbincius, Fermilab.
3.1 Main linac layout and parameters 3 SCRF Main Linacs50Yamomoto 31 Main linac layout and parameters5Adolphsen 31.1 Main Linac layout for flat site 31.2.
High intensity electron beam and infrastructure Paolo Valente * INFN Roma * On behalf of the BTF and LINAC staff.
WG1: Overall Design personal highlights report by Nick Walker First project meeting 2/12/2004 conveners: Kiyoshi Kubo (KEK) Tor Raubenheimer (SLAC)
Baseline Technical Review – Central Region Accelerator Systems
AD&I Meeting 23/6/10 Jim Clarke
From Beam Dynamics K. Kubo
WP5 Elliptical cavities
Coupler RF kick simulations.
ILC - Upgrades Nick Walker – 100th meeting
LHC schedule.
Summary of WG2 :CFS for staging
SC Quadrupole Magnets in ILC Cryomodules
Staging in the TDR.
Status of the CLIC main beam injectors
Auxiliary Positron Source
CLIC Rebaselining at 380 GeV and Staging Considerations
CLIC Klystron-based Design
SuperB Injection, RF stations, Vibration and Operations
Linac possibilities for a Super-B
CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES presented by Peter H. Garbincius
A. Yamamoto, S. Michizono, and B. List
Beam-Based Feedback in LCLS-II
ILC CFS AD&I Daresbury Lab Summary
BriXS – MariX WG 8,9 LASA December 13, 2017.
Cost Comparison of Undulator and e-Driven Systems
Measurements, ideas, curiosities
High Q Cavity Operation in the Cornell Horizontal Test Cryomodule
XFEL Project (accelerator) Overview and recent developments
Beam Delivery System Schedule at ILC2010
Analysis of Multi-Turn ERLs for X-ray Sources
Nick Walker for the Project Management
CW Energy Recovery Linac for Next Generation of XFELs
ILC Cryogenics -- Technical Design Report Planning
LCLS Commissioning Parameters
MEIC Cost Estimate Overview
ATF project meeting, Feb KEK, Junji Urakawa Contents :
Barry Barish Paris ICHEP 24-July-10
AC Power for a Super-B Factory
CLIC Feasibility Demonstration at CTF3
Maximum Credible Beam Event Paul Emma et al
ILC - Global Design Effort
DTL for MEIC Ion Injection
JLEIC ion fullsize booster (2256m) space charge limit (Δν=0
Presentation transcript:

Estimate AC power for TeV Upgrade UPDATE Work in Progress N. Walker AD&I meeting 4.07.12

Assumptions Simplistic scaling from current TDR AC power load ‘matrix’ Baseline linac remains the same upgrade beam energy: 265 – 500 GeV New linac 15 – 265 GeV 45 MV/m (avg) with Q0 = 2×1010 Assume high current 2450 bunches @ 0.7×1010 particle/bunch 7.44 mA 4 Hz operation

Starting Point for Scaling B C

Starting Point for Scaling B 5Hz Full Power nb = 2625 e- source e+ source Damping Rings RTML Main Linac BDS Dump IR

Fraction of 217 MW Assume ~ constant

Fraction of 217 MW Main Linac: 158 MW

Simplistic Scaling RF AC power: 2.5∙Pb∙h [ h = tb/(tb+tf) ] Cryo RF dyn Llin∙Frep∙Tb(1+1.1Tf)∙G2/Q0 HOM dyn Llin∙Frep∙Tb∙Ib2 Static Llin Damping Rings (3 assumed), and sources No change (over estimate) BDS Magnets, normal CFS, dump x1.5 (WAG) CFS (main linac) Normal load (for linac) PAC(RF)-Pb Emergency load Llin KCS AC  RF efficiency (~40%) Assumed constant

Adjustments (?) 5Hz Full Power nb = 2625 e- source e+ source Apply simple scaling to baseline numbers e- source e+ source Damping Rings RTML Main Linac BDS Dump IR C 83.7 39.4 Installed vs operation (x1.3) Scaled from baseline (Possible issue with RTML BC @ 10Hz) 104.5 45.1 203 C -14 MW !! Needs to be checked!

Upgrade Estimate 285 MW (±10 MW) Ib = 7.44 mA nb = 2450 N = 5∙109 frep = 4 Hz G = 45 MV/m Q0 = 2∙1010 285 MW (±10 MW) based on KCS numbers and simplistic scaling upgrade linac