GMAS Proposal Entry and Proposal Homepage Enhancements

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Introduction to ChapterWeb 2.0. Logging In Use your same username/password to login. Once your website has been converted to ChapterWeb 2.0 you’ll.
Advertisements

New Proposal Review Form Revised 09/10/2008 Office of Sponsored Projects (512)
EResearch Proposal Management Release 1.9 System Enhancements August 2010.
Komen Grants eManagement System GeMS. Why Online Grants  Reduce the amount of administrative paperwork being completed by applicants and grantees. 
Komen Grants eManagement System GeMS. Why Online Grants  Reduce the amount of administrative paperwork being completed by applicants and grantees. 
Niner On-line Research Management (NORM) University of North Carolina at Charlotte Office of Research Services and Outreach.
TimeTrex Electronic Signature Process. Welcome to the new totally electronic TimeTrex System The purpose of this presentation is to explain how the electronic.
KRA Proposal Development Rhonda Dwyer University of Arizona Lisa Oliva Michigan State University Tyler Wilson Colorado State University.
How to enter WIA/WIOA contract information to meet requirements. DCEO review process. Where the public will view the WIA/WIOA contract information. Training.
0 Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System (eSRS) Department of Defense Government Training Submitting a SSR – Commercial Plan.
Carnegie Corporation of New York Submitting a Proposal 1 This document will guide you through submitting a proposal to Carnegie Corporation of New York.
How to Submit a New Human Ethics Clinical Application.
How to Submit a New Human Ethics Behavioral Application.
Komen Grants eManagement System GeMS. Why Online Grants  Reduce the amount of administrative paperwork being completed by applicants and grantees. 
Rev. May 2016 cuResearch User’s Manual. What is cuResearch? Introduction to cuResearch More information is available on the CURO website:
© 2016 University at Buffalo Click Training Agreements Module University at Buffalo Office of the Vice President for Research and Economic Development.
Emdeon Office Batch Management Services This document provides detailed information on Batch Import Services and other Batch features.
How to Submit a New Animal Care Research/Pilot Project Application
Class of 2018 Family Connection: Senior year
Administrators and System Administrators
CayuseIRB A Quick Start Guide for IRB, IACUC, and IBC Researchers
Submitting a Proposal This document will guide you through submitting a proposal to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Access the form Access Carnegie Corporation.
Creating and Changing Curriculum
Module 5 Proposal Creation.
Your Name Proposal Creation Module 5 Your Name
Michigan Electronic Grants System Plus
GMAS 2.0 Project Update April 2017
Project Applicant Profile
Final Report.
Getting Started with the Grants Portal Grants
What’s Changing in Research Administration?
Professional Profiles
How to Submit a New Animal Care Teaching Application
How to Submit a New Human Ethics Clinical Application
How to Submit a New Animal Care Breeding Application
Getting Started with the Grants Portal Non-Grants
How to Submit a New Human Ethics Behavioral Application
Tracker I-9 Upgrade November 2017.
How to Submit a New Biosafety RG2 Application
MyGaDOE Portal Provisioning for Security Officers
ASSIST TRAINING The entire ASSIST user guide can be found at
PPS/OPTRS Departmental Roles Structure System
Cayuse 424 Proposal Creation.
New MyFD JV Feature Demo Webcast August 1, 2018
Cayuse 424 Proposal Budgets.
CSDR Submit-Review Website Submitter Guide
The Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium
The Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium
Bringing Home the Bacon: Grant Writing Basics Unit 7 Grant Submission
myGRANT COI NEW User Interface Effective
Click Training Agreements Module
GMAS 2.0 Project Update April 2017
To the ETS – PNG Continuation: Online Training Course
To the ETS – Encumbrance Online Training Course
Create a Grant Continuation Proposal
The Grants.gov Online Grant Submission Portal November 8, 2017
Kuali Days / November 2007 Tempe, Arizona
for Instructors and Roster Contacts
TPP Online Filing Instructions
Your first steps with Personio
for Instructors and Roster Contacts
The Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium
The Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium
HOW TO USE THE NEW GLOBAL GRANT REPORT
To the ETS – Encumbrance Online Training Course
for Instructors and Roster Contacts
USF Research Integrity & Compliance
Faculty Center for Instructors
Cayuse IRB Training Sharla Miles, M.Ed., CIP
Presentation transcript:

GMAS Proposal Entry and Proposal Homepage Enhancements The following screenshots are prototypes and are subject to change prior to the May 2017 release. They also contain fake data (such as dates and names). These enhancements will only apply to Initial Proposal and Competing Renewal entry and homepages. All other request types and edit screens will still be on old screens after the May 2017 release.

Initial Proposal/Competing Renewal Entry Screen Proposal entry will be changing from a possible 22 screens to 1

Initial Proposal/Competing Renewal Entry Screen

Streamlined and Smarter Initial Proposal/Competing Renewal Entry Screen Streamlined and Smarter ORG look-up Defaults based on security (cannot select an ORG you are not authorized to create requests for) Drop-down includes look-up for longer lists (can search by number or description) Principal Investigator look-up/search Defaults based on security (cannot select a PI you are not authorized to create requests for) If PI access is not defined by security, field is a person auto-complete look-up that searches all GMAS people If proposal is a fellowship, security is applied to the Mentor field and the PI field is open to select anyone. Sponsor look-up New auto-complete look-up Prime sponsor/Prime PI Fields will only show if the user indicates that Harvard is a subaward on the project Period of performance Number of periods automatically generate in 12 month increments based on start date and number of periods entered Budget periods can be overwritten

Initial Proposal/Competing Renewal Homepage

Deconstructing the Initial Proposal/Competing Renewal Homepage Left Navigation Links to list screens live here Status/Workflow Indicator Provides information relevant to the current state of the proposal Will list needed actions prior to/preventing routing the proposal for signatures Action Buttons Primary action button suggests what the next step in the workflow might be. Secondary action button lists all other actions available (deleting a request, retracting a request, etc.) Key Information Includes answers to approval attribute questions, and if Harvard is a subaward Panels Panels will only display when applicable, and will provide summary details in the open view

Deconstructing the Initial Proposal/Competing Renewal Homepage Left Navigation Link to old list screens

Deconstructing the Initial Proposal/Competing Renewal Homepage Status/Workflow Indicator Highlights what day the proposal is due to the central office and sponsor, and missing sections that prevent Lock and route when “Under Development” Highlights what day the proposal is due to sponsor when “Under Review” or “Authorized” Highlights submission details when “Submitted” Highlights associated action memos when “Awarded” Highlights the reason and who performed the closeout when “Closed”

Deconstructing the Initial Proposal/Competing Renewal Homepage Action Buttons Under Development: Lock and route for signature is the next step in the proposal process Delete is a secondary option Under Review/Authorized: Submit to sponsor/Submit to Grants.gov is the next step in the proposal process Retract (send proposal back to Under Development status) is a secondary option Submitted to sponsor: Log a notice is the next step in the proposal process Revise to resubmit, Request closeout, and request rollback (send proposal back to Under Review or Authorized status) are secondary options Awarded: Log a notice is the next step in the proposal process Make project revision is a secondary option Closed: Revise to resubmit is the next step in the proposal process for the most recent proposal submission Log a notice is the next step in the proposal process for a prior version proposal submission Request rollback (send proposal back to Submitted to sponsor status) is a secondary option for the most recent proposal submission

Deconstructing the Initial Proposal/Competing Renewal Homepage Key Information All applicable key info will always display with a green checkmark All key info that does not apply will appear in the hidden portion of the list with a red X Key information for Initial Proposals and Competing Renewals include the following: Approval attribute responses *Note: PI appointment term will only show on proposals entered prior to the May release. If Harvard is identified as a subaward (if there is a prime sponsor or not)

Deconstructing the Initial Proposal/Competing Renewal Homepage Panels

Deconstructing the Initial Proposal/Competing Renewal Homepage Panels The Signatures panel shows for all statuses after Under Development. The summary view in the panel shows all signatures listed as required to sign. The summary view defaults to open when the proposal is in Under Review and Authorized statuses. The Proposal information panel always shows. The summary view in the panel shows basic information about the request (such as PI name, ORG, etc.)

Deconstructing the Initial Proposal/Competing Renewal Homepage Panels The Proposed dates and dollars panel shows for all statuses unless the budget information is missing and appears in the “Actions required” section. The summary view in the panel shows each proposed period and the break down of Direct, and Indirect dollars. The Approvals panel shows once the approval attribute questions have been answered. The summary view in the panel shows the needed approvals and their current statuses, and the approval attribute answers

Deconstructing the Initial Proposal/Competing Renewal Homepage Panels The Proposed cost sharing panel only shows if the cost sharing question in approval attributes was answered Yes. The summary view in the panel shows the cost share form details and indicates whether the cost share is Mandatory or Voluntary. The Program income panel only shows if the program income question in approval attributes was answered Yes. The summary view in the panel shows the break down of program income by period.

Deconstructing the Initial Proposal/Competing Renewal Homepage Panels The Grants.gov information panel only shows if an opportunity number has been validated. The summary view in the panel is where the grants.gov questions, grants.gov attachments, and other submission information can be found. The School specific information panel shows for all statuses unless the answers are missing and it appears in the “Actions required” section. The summary view in the panel shows the questions that were answered yes with an option to see the full list of questions.

Deconstructing the Initial Proposal/Competing Renewal Homepage Panels The Interfaculty involvement panel always shows. The summary view in the panel shows the details of the interfaculty department, PI, and involvement period. The Documents panel always shows. The summary view in the panel shows all of the documents that have been uploaded into the proposal document repository.

Additional Features for the May Release 30 minute time out increased to 60 minutes Person profile converted Document repository panels on all converted screens will now have the option to upload from the panel and have an open component to view all of the documents For More Information Visit the GMAS website: http://gmas.fss.harvard.edu/ May Release Updates: https://gmas.fss.harvard.edu/news/gmas-release-144 Job Aids: http://gmas.fss.harvard.edu/user-resources Blog (don’t forget to sign-up): http://gmas.fss.harvard.edu/blog Release Notes: http://gmas.fss.harvard.edu/releases Contact us: contactgmas@Harvard.edu