Overview of Part 213 Amendments Senate Bill 717 – Act 381 of 2016

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
REVITALIZING CONTAMINATED LANDS: ADDRESSING LIABILITY CONCERNS Susan Kunst Boushell EPA’s Office of Site Remediation Enforcement March 25, 2015.
Advertisements

Institutional Controls Pamela Elkow and Richard Fil.
Act 381 Amendments John V. Byl and Richard A. Barr February 5 and 6, 2008.
2012 VIRGINIA COMMON INTEREST COMMUNITY LEGISLATION This course is approved by the National Board of Certification for Community Association Managers (NBC-CAM)
HEL Conservation Compliance Beth A Schuler National Highly Erodible Land Specialist, Conservation Operations Division.
Gary W. Baughman, Division Director 2010 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Conference November 17, 2010.
VAP Environmental Covenant Guidance 2015 CP Coffee - July 14, 2015 Sue Kroeger, Ohio EPA Legal Office.
1 Exemption AdministrationTraining Related to Accepting Certificates Prepared by the Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board Audit Committee Prepared January.
Proposed Governing Document Revision Updated April, 2011.
Voluntary Cleanup and Redevelopment Act
Water and Wastewater Certification 1 Water & Wastewater Reference Manual.
A Review of Board of Health Liability James A. LeNoury LeNoury Law Counsel to alPHa February 5th, 2015.
Final Rule Setting Federal Standards for Conducting All Appropriate Inquiries U.S. EPA Brownfields Program.
Tier II: Module 1C CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program.
Headquarters U. S. Air Force I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 Mr. Wayman I. Braxton.
Legislative Update March 6, HB 104 School Planning and Zoning Compliance Sponsor: Rich CunninghamStatus: Held by House Political Subdivisions Committee.
Overview of Regulatory Changes, Policy and Implementation Colleen Brisnehan Colorado Department of Public Health And Environment Hazardous Materials and.
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act March 23, 2010.
Overview of the Land Recycling Program (Voluntary Cleanup Program)
Presented by: Yolanda Chavez, RN, BSN Policy Rules and Curriculum Development Unit DADS Regulatory Services 1 DADS REGULATORY UPDATE March 2013.
Part 213: 2012 Amendments Changes & Implementation Dennis Eagle Field Operations Section, Remediation & Redevelopment Division
1 The Use of Institutional Controls Under the RCRA Corrective Action Program.
California Integrated Waste Management Board November 10, 2008 Item #2 Discussion And Request For Direction Regarding The Board's Fulfillment Of The Requirements.
FleetBoston Financial HIPAA Privacy Compliance Agnes Bundy Scanlan Managing Director and Chief Privacy Officer FleetBoston Financial.
Uniform Environmental Covenants Act March 7, 2005.
November Final Rule Setting Federal Standards for All Appropriate Inquiries Patricia Overmeyer EPA Office of Brownfield Cleanup and Redevelopment.
Mountain Regional Water Rules & Regulations Overview.
Institutional Controls in Pennsylvania’s Brownfields Program Presented by: Jill Gaito Director, Brownfields Action Team Office of Community Revitalization.
1 ALL APPROPRIATE INQUIRIES PROPOSED FEDERAL STANDARDS U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Brownfields Cleanup and Redevelopment.
Orange County Government Adoption Public Hearing May 10, 2016 Board of County Commissioners School Impact Fee Update.
Who I am Darren Bowling Phone: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Remediation and Redevelopment.
Uniform Environmental Covenants
HR Policy Updates: Executive Summary
Changing Tides in the Assessment and Taxation Landscape:
Preventing Exposure to Lead in Drinking Water
European Union Law Week 10.
Department of Environmental Quality
Planning Commission Public Hearing September 9, 2016
Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS): Local Ordinance Considerations
The E-Rate Program CIPA Update Fall 2011 Applicant Trainings.
2007 EPA Region 4 – Department of Defense – States Environmental Conference June 21, 2007 Atlanta, Georgia.
July 13, 2016 Department of Environmental Quality Proposed Amendments to UST Rules 15A NCAC 02N and 02O Ruth Strauss.
Updates to Expedited Review Procedures
September 8, 2016 Department of Environmental Quality Proposed Amendments to UST Rules 15A NCAC 02N and 02O Ruth Strauss.
Consideration of Action Re: Commercial Cannabis Businesses
May 12, 2016 Study of the State’s Riparian Buffer Protection Program Pursuant to SL Karen Higgins, Division of Water Resources.
Revolutionising Victorian environmental law & White & Case
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
Providing Enforcement of Ohio’s Damage Prevention Law
Liability Under CERCLA
Groundwater and Waste Management Committee November 9, 2016
Department of Environmental Quality
May 11, 2016 Study of the State’s Riparian Buffer Protection Program Pursuant to SL Karen Higgins, Division of Water Resources.
Updates to Expedited Review Procedures
Regulation Amendment AM April 3, 2018.
PROVISIONS OF H.R
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Department of Environmental Quality
Evan Kane Division of Water Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Quality Scott Bullock
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Preventing Exposure to Lead in Drinking Water
Department of Environmental Quality
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
A Review of Board of Health Liability
CONNECT Treasurer Advisory Meeting
105 Indiana Administrative Code Article 13
Institutional Controls At Voluntary Cleanup Sites
Exemption AdministrationTraining Related to Accepting Certificates
Presentation transcript:

Overview of Part 213 Amendments Senate Bill 717 – Act 381 of 2016 Kevin Schrems Michigan Department of Environmental Quality 517-284-5149/ schremsk@michigan.gov

Roadmap of Presentation Chronology of Senate Bill 717 Walk-through of Amendments Special attention to Public Highway IC Questions Before After

“I’m Just a (SB 717) Bill” Signed by the Governor on 12/21/2016 Introduced by Senator Casperson on 1/21/2016 Passed by Senate on 4/12/2016 Introduced in House on 4/12/2016 Read a first time (4/12/2016) and referred to Committee on Natural Resources. Committee reported (9/20/2016) out with recommendation (substitute H-1) Read a second time (12/1/2016) Substitute H-1 adopted (12/1/2016) Placed on third reading (12/1/2016) Passed by the Senate on 12/7/2016 Signed by the Governor on 12/21/2016 Effective Date – March 29, 2017

Short Summary SB 717 expands the types of allowable land use or resource use restrictions used to facilitate closures under Part 213.

Land Use or Resource Use Restrictions A Brief Primer When contamination remains at a property above generic residential criteria, a land or resource use restriction may be used to address the remaining risk if: LRUR is protective, and Persons who own and use property have knowledge. Restricted (limited) categories exist for circumstances that require restrictions on the use of property, such as: Not allowing residential or institutional uses Protect integrity of remedy, such as exposure barriers (i.e., paving) Prohibitions on resource use (i.e., don’t drink the groundwater) to keep people from being exposed to contamination now and in the future.

Understand the Difference ECs vs. LRURs Engineering controls (Physical) vapor barriers, physical or hydraulic containment, asphalt/concrete, vapor mitigation fans, etc. LRURs (Paper / Legal) “Institutional Controls*” (EPA) Protects integrity of EC or minimize potential for human exposure to contamination

Part 213 – Amendments Due Care Clarifies due care obligations do not apply to a road comm. or LUG for public highway. Except to comply with a LRUR (aka IC). Adds provision to impose all due care obligations on a liable O/O. Specifically for regulated substances present within public highway.

Part 213 – Amendments Institutional Controls Eliminates impracticality requirement prior to selecting ICs other than a RC. Instead of “reliably restrict exposure”, the selected IC “protects against exposure”. Adds to listed alternative mechanisms to include: State law or rule, license/license agreement with MDOT, and reliance on public highway (local). Note – Part 213 now has definition for public highway.

Part 213 – Amendments ICs – Public Highway (2 Scenarios) If MDOT “fails or refuses” to grant or enter ELA w/in 120 days, And for public highways owned/controlled by road comm. or LUG, O/O may rely on existence of public highway. O/O must complete 3 tasks (details next slide) Technical information LUG confirmation Storm sewer certification

Part 213 – Amendments ICs – Public Highway Provide technical information, Confirm no current plans to relocate, vacate, or abandon public highway, and Provide certification that either contamination does not enter storm sewer system or provide all information regarding nature/extent of contamination that enters or has potential to enter.

Part 213 – Amendments ICs – Public Highway Adds requirement that a person who applies for a permit to perform work within public highway shall identify whether the proposed work will take place within AIC area Also includes provision that reliance on public highway does not impose liability on MDOT or LUG Or prevent those entities from repairing, reconstructing, enlarging, relocating, etc. the public highway or permitting any utilities to use public highway.

MDEQ RRD Publishes “Public Highway Institutional Control” Form March 14, 2017 - GovDelivery notice. Replaces former “Road Right-of-Way Alternate Institutional Control” document. Equivalent information presented in alternate means will be reviewed by DEQ. Previous reports or plans approved by DEQ using previous form remains valid.

Public Highway Institutional Control A lot like ROW AIC Structure matches Part 213 Allowed under Part 201 Available on Storage Tank Information Center Webpage And Part 201 Forms and Documents page

Part 213 – Amendments BEAs Adds a provision for O/O to request inconsequential determination from dept. O/O conducts a BEA. Failure to meet 45-day statutory timeframe for conducting BEA or failure to provide BEA to Dept. and subsequent purchaser or transferee within 6 months was inconsequential. If O/O receives an inconsequential determination, they maintain liability exemption

Part 213 – Amendments Liability Revises the liability protections provided by an approved Closure Report that relies on land or resource use restrictions. Amendments now make a liable owner or operator responsible for additional corrective action: to address any increased risk if any alternate mechanism is modified, lapses, or is revoked or a public highway is relocated, vacated, or abandoned.

Part 213 – Amendments RBCA Adds a provision that requires DEQ employees to be formally trained and demonstrate proficiently in Risk Based Corrective Action.

Questions? Kevin Schrems Remediation and Redevelopment Division Compliance and Enforcement Section Enforcement Unit 517-284-5149 schremsk@michigan.gov