Anniston PCB Site Review of Risk Assessments for OU-1/OU-2

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Consumer Exposure Assessment at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: A ccomplishments and Opportunities for Global Collaboration Thomas Brennan.
Advertisements

Revisiting the Formula CTL Workgroup Contaminated Media Forum 1.
BoRit Superfund Site Timeline
The Role of Background Soil Levels in Risk Assessment Teresa S. Bowers Presented at USGS/NRCS Soil Geochemistry Workshop March 4, 2003.
Claremore Medical Office Building From Landfill to Medical Office Building A Brownfield Success Story THE GREEN SIDE OF BROWNFIELD REMEDIATION.
Upper Providence Township Stormwater Management MS4 Program.
+ Water Quality & Human Health: From Arsenic Exposure to Biological Response Understanding how contaminants move through the environment UNC Superfund.
CE 510 Hazardous Waste Engineering
Risk Assessment.
National Inventory of Potential Sources of Soil Contamination in Cyprus Part 2 Risk-Based Approach to Assessment of Cypriot Contaminated Sites Eleonora.
Case S-4_SRS Par Pond1 Case Study 4: CERCLA INTERIM ACTION AT THE SRS PAR POND.
1 Risk Assessment Develop Objectives And Goals Develop and Screen Cleanup Alternatives Select Final Cleanup Alternative Communicate Decisions to the Public.
Module 4: Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS. 2 Module Objectives  Explain the purpose of the scoping phase of the RI/FS  Identify existing data which.

SOUTHWEST DIVISION Evaluation of Ambient Metals in the San Francisco, California Area Presentation for the NDIA Conference G. Patrick Brooks, R.G. NAVFAC,
River Corridor Closure Project Safety People Results 1 Data Evaluation Summary - Columbia River Component River Corridor Closure Project Safety People.
1 Uncertainty in Ecological Risk Assessments Larry Tannenbaum, U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine (USACHPPM)
Screening Level Ecological and Human Health Risk Assessment Poplar Point, Washington, DC.
McCoy Field Proposed Keith Middle School Site EPA Proposes Approval of McCoy Field Cleanup Plan.
1 Ann Carroll, MPH Office of Brownfields & Land Revitalization (OBLR) September 25, 2012.
Application of a Human Health Risk Assessment Software to Support Revitalisation Decisions at Post-industrial Sites E.Wcislo, J.Dlugosz, M.Korcz Institute.
BASELINE RISK ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW Dawn A. Ioven Senior Toxicologist U.S. EPA – Region III 4 April 2012.
1 of 35 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 4 - Specify Boundaries (30 minutes) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 4.
Regulatory Controls PBT Strategy Team Great Lakes Regional Collaboration February 22, 2005.
Arsenic in the Soils, USGS.
COMMITMENT & INTEGRITY DRIVE RESULTS Risk Based Corrective Action Using site-specific risk assessment to achieve Regulatory Closure.
Examples of Health Risk Assessment Applications for Contaminated Sites in the Upper Silesia, Poland Eleonora Wcislo Institute for Ecology of Industrial.
Water Quality Data, Maps, and Graphs Over the Web · Chemical concentrations in water, sediment, and aquatic organism tissues.
Human Health Risk Assessment and Chemical Safety
Spectron Superfund Site Proposed Plan Contaminated Shallow Soils U.S. EPA Region III June 26, 2003 Philadelphia, PA Robert J. Sanchez US EPA - Remedial.
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Health Assessment and Consultation Meeting Agenda Monday, September 27, :30 pmMeet and.
Module 6: Alternatives. 2  Module 6 contains three sections: – 6.1 Development and Screening of Alternatives – 6.2 Detailed Analysis of Alternatives.
Regulatory Processes for Pesticides Mark Hartman Antimicrobials Division (AD) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances United States Environmental.
Triangle Park Removal Action Area within the Portland Harbor Superfund Site (Portland, Oregon) Jennifer MacDonald Assistant Regional Counsel Office of.
Potential Addition of Vapor Intrusion to the Hazard Ranking System U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response February 24, 2011 Listening Session.
The Superfund ERA Process. What is Superfund? Superfund was created on December 11, 1980 when Congress enacted the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Pollution and Human Health
Area I Burn Pit Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan February 19, 2008 Laura Rainey, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist California.
September 18, 1998 State of Illinois Rules and Regulations Tiered Approach to Corrective Action (TACO) Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical.
Waste Program Monitoring Technology Needs and the 21M 2 Effort ETC Brownbag Thursday, May 19, 2005 Daniel Powell, U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation.
Lead NAAQS Review: 2 nd Draft Risk Assessment NTAA/EPA Tribal Air Call August 8, 2007 Deirdre Murphy and Zachary Pekar OAQPS.
Chapter 15.3 Risk Assessment 2002 WHO report: “Focusing on risks to health is the key to preventing disease and injury.” risk assessment—process of evaluating.
DOE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP BIOTA PROTECTION Stephen L. Domotor (202)
Human Health Risk Assessment and Chemical Safety Stephanie Simstad The Ohio State University Extension Clermont County AFCEE, 2002.
Principles of Hazardous Waste Site Ranking September 27, 2001 Stephen M. Caldwell Deputy Director, State and Tribal Programs and Site Identification Center.
Think safe. Act safe. Be safe. LEHR Site Annual Soil Management Plan Training Sue Fields, Environmental Health & Safety Sept,
I RIS E NVIRONMENTAL Independent Review of Documents Pertaining to the Lehigh Southwest Cement Permanente Facility Rob Balas & John McLaughlin February.
Brian Hitchens and Sam Williams PCBs in the Urban Environment: Implications for Long-Term Sustainability Of Low-Threshold Remediation.
Who’s Risk Is It? Risk-Based Decision-Making in Indian Country Ms. Marilyn Null Deputy for Community-Based Programs U.S. Air Force.
Coeur d’Alene Basin TLG Repository PFT meeting December 9, 2003.
FAIR Meeting April 6, Groundwater Results – Fall 2003 Benzene ND 1,000 ug/L Product.
Forging Partnerships on Emerging Contaminants November 2, 2005 Elizabeth Southerland Director of Assessment & Remediation Division Office of Superfund.
The Environment and Human Health
1. 2 Presentation Highlights BGOU overview Scope of the Remedial Investigation Investigation results Schedule 2.
1 FORMER COS COB POWER PLANT From Characterization to Redevelopment Brownfields2006 November 14, 2006.
Marshall Landfill Site.  Patrick Cabbage, Hydrogeologist/Site Manager  Bill Fees, Engineer  Carol Bergin, Public Involvement Coordinator.
Key Concepts on Health Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures.
UNIT 9 Hazardous Wastes and Risk Assessment. Major Public Agencies Involved in Environmental Health Risk Assessment and Intervention Consumer Product.
 Clean Water Act 404 permit  Ohio EPA Division of Surface Water 401 water quality certification  Ohio Revised Code 6111 – Placement of dredged materials.
Brownfields 2011 Philadelphia, PA – April 5, 2011 Vanessa Steigerwald-Dick, Ohio EPA Amy Yersavich, Ohio EPA Urban Gardens on Brownfields: Making Them.
Risk CHARACTERIZATION
Proposed Plan for No Further Action
Presentation on Livermore Lab Site 300 Superfund Cleanup Peter Strauss, Environmental Scientist, PM Strauss & Assoc. Community-Wide Meeting on
Uranium in Colorado: Past, Present, and Potential Future
THE SUPERFUND PROCESS Assessment and Listing
Environmental sampling and monitoring
UNC Superfund Research Program
Arsenic in the Soils, USGS
Radon Vapor Intrusion Screening Level Calculator
Pollution and Human Health
Presentation transcript:

Anniston PCB Site Review of Risk Assessments for OU-1/OU-2

EPA’s Cleanup Process Data Collection From: -Site Discovery -Preliminary Assessment -Site Inspection Source: -Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund - Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual. Part A, EPA/540/1-89/002 To: -Selection of Remedy -Remedial Design -Remedial Action Evaluation Toxicity Assessment Exposure Risk Characterization

Site Assessment: Data Collection and Evaluation Range of information helps identify what is needed to evaluate risks including: Types of chemicals Amount of chemicals Who might be contacting chemical (“exposure”)

Map of Anniston PCB Site

Type of Data Collected for the Anniston Area (OU-1/OU-2) Soils Air Groundwater Surface water Land use information

Human Health Risk Assessments Protective NOT Predictive Meant to protect the public, not predict the occurrence of a disease (e.g., cancer) NOT a Health Assessment (like Anniston Community Health Study)

What is a Risk Assessment? Risk = Exposure (Dose) x Toxicity Exposure: How much is contacted Toxicity: How hazardous is the chemical

Toxicity of a Chemical Based on studies in animals and humans Safety Factors used to ensure protectiveness Example: Amount of PCBs without effect in animals divided by safety factors.

How EPA Protects the Community from Cancer Risks Risk of Cancer: 1 in 3 people in US will contract cancer Cleanup actions are required if the additional cancer risk exceeds 1 additional cancer in 10,000 people exposed to a particular chemical

How EPA Protects the Community from Risk of Other Injury or Disease? Risk of Other Injury or Disease Besides Cancer: Compare Estimated Exposure (Dose) in Community to “Safe” Dose Safe dose doesn’t cause effects in animals or humans, divided by safety factors If estimated Dose exceeds “acceptable” intake – cleanup actions are needed

Human Health Risk Assessment Current and future land uses: Residential (Adult, Child) Industrial/Commercial Worker (Adult) Construction Worker (Adult) Utility Worker (Adult) Commercial Visitors (Adult, Young Child) School/Daycare Occupants (Adult, Young Child) Recreational User (Young Child, Adolescent) Trespasser (Adolescent)

Exposure Media: Soil Surface water Air Groundwater incidental ingestion dermal contact inhalation of fugitive dust Surface water inhalation of volatiles Air inhalation Groundwater Ingestion of drinking water

Human Health Risk Findings (2010) Surface soil in residential and high activity areas was appropriately addressed through the early actions (NTCR) Surface soil in a limited number of nonresidential areas exceeds EPA risk levels Subsurface soil throughout the Anniston area do not present an elevated risk Groundwater EPA risk levels only exceeded in one isolated area located near the Facility Air levels of PCBs are low and similar to background conditions Surface water exposure in Snow Creek does not present a risk to the community

Ecological Risk Assessment Ecological risks were evaluated with EPA oversight (2013) Ecological risk evaluations focused on sediment and surface water of Snow Creek The floodplain was evaluated in a screening-level assessment that was focused on urbanized habitat

Ecological Risk Findings Risks to aquatic species associated with: PCBs Several metals (chromium, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel and vanadium) Risks are primarily present in sediment deposits located in Snow Creek upstream of Highway 202 Field studies of the floodplain areas confirmed the lack of quality and connected habitat and terrestrial ecological risks

Next Steps Range of potential cleanup options are identified and evaluated in the Feasibility Study (FS) currently under EPA review. General FS steps include: Identify the areas to be addressed based on the risk assessments and government regulations Identify the type of cleanup actions that could be used to address the areas Evaluate the range of cleanup options using criteria developed by EPA Based on the FS, EPA issues a Proposed Plan for public comment describing their preferred cleanup option EPA issues a Record of Decision describing the final cleanup approach based on input from the community and the State

Questions

Locations with Surface Soils Exceeding PCB Nonresidential Risk Thresholds Exposure Unit with PCBs Below EPA Risk Threshold Exposure Unit with PCBs Above EPA Risk Threshold Facility (OU-3)