WASH SECTOR EXTENDED Strategic Advisory Group Meeting - LORD ERROLL- 14/06/2017

1. Agenda WESCOORD Meeting Agenda for SAG Extended Meeting – 14th June 2017 Vulnerability model and priority areas for the Kenya WASH Sector Assessments and monitoring – presentation of the SMART survey WASH monitoring section Revision of the Flash Appeal – actions and timelines Current response and 5W review; WASH Standards. Minimum package of county WESCOORD AOB

Vulnerability model and priority areas for the Kenya WASH Sector – most affected counties

Vulnerability model and priority areas for the Kenya WASH Sector Objective Define priority areas for WASH interventions for the WASH Sector in Kenya based on HoA 2011 Lessons Learnt Review the people and need and targets per county/sub-county. Methodology Overlap primary data sources: Access to safe water and SAM rates. Overlap secondary data sources: Food security IPC phases, Population figures, Cholera cases, Drought risks (rainfall outlook) Include further analysis of tertiary data sources: Livestock morbidity, Population movements, Cross border data, Elections preparedness and risks.

Data model and sources Nutrition & Health SMART Surveys Food Security – FEWS data KMD – Meteorogical Updates Cholera Epi Surveillance – UNICEF/WHO Population data – Census Government of Kenya People in Need for Water – Short Rains Assessment

2. Assessments and monitoring – presentation of the SMART survey WASH monitoring section SMART Survey is currently being rolled out in the most affected counties until July 2017 WASH component of the survey tracks: Access to safe water Access to sanitation Access to hygiene Objective: review priority areas, people in need and targets for the WASH Sector for July-December 2017

2. SMART Surveys (WATER)

2. SMART Surveys (WATER 2)

2. SMART Surveys (HYGIENE)

2. SMART Surveys (HYGIENE 2 and Sanitation)

2. SMART Surveys and WASH Questionnare – way forward How can we better monitor the quality of the WASH response? Include questionnaire in planned assessment and monitoring excercises Agree on common data analysis framework and indicators. Example: -Number of people with permanent access to safe water (at least 7.5 liters per person per day) -Number of people with temporary access to safe water (at least 7.5 liters per person per day) 3. Sharing of monitoring exercises and assessments. 4. Infromation management support on mapping assessments

3. Proposed timeline and actions Present findings of SMART surveys and reviewed priority areas for the WASH Sector – July/August 2017 Include other monitoring exercises in analysis carried out by partners – use of WASH questionnaire – July/August 2017 Organize workshop with county government representatives and partners to define people in need and caseload for the WASH sector – August 2017 Revise FLASH Appeal accordingly – August 2017 Response monitoring framework

4. Current response dashboard and operational presence

4. Current response dashboard and operational presence Highlight Wajir discrepancy – Apparenetly no more PiN? – Recording/Standards method.

4. Current response and 5W – data model

4. Current response and 5W review; WASH Standards. Agree on logframe for the WASH Sector 5Ws Population accessing WASH infrastructure/service ≠ number of beneficiares reached with permanent/temporary access to water Review of 5Ws – comments from Partners? How can we make the 5Ws more useful? Add type of activity/infrastructure for better calculation of standards (1 handpump = 500 beneficiaries with access from 7.5-15l/p/day County level analysis

4. Current response and 5W – County level analysis Beneficiaries Reached by Constructed or Rehabilitated Water Facilities – April 2017

5. Minimum package and recommendations for county WESCOORD Reactivating County WESCOORD meetings – minimum requirements proposal & framework: County governments from Turkana, Samburu, Baringo and West Pokot are to: -Commit to monthly county coordination meetings. -Commit to venues: boardrooms. -Commit to have one focal point to hold meetings with minimum requirement of participants: MoW, MoH, At least three WASH Partners. -Commit to constitute a secretariat with WASH Partners. -Commit to adapt the DRAFT county WESCOORD ToRs as well as defining a minimum package for coordination/IM with support from National WESCOORD and UNICEF. Partners to commit one representative per monthly county WESCOORD meeting and to report in the 5Ws

5. Minimum package and recommendations for county WESCOORD Counties to commit to include WESCOORD in their legislations through the inclusion of their policies and water bills. WESCOORD Chairman to ensure one minimum participant is present at the CSGs. Whoever from WESCOORD who participates at the CSGs should represent the views of WESCOORD. UNICEF and National WESCOORD IMs to develop a framework of support to County Government on data collection. County government focal points to report monthly in the 5Ws. UNICEF to share the 5Ws with County Water Directors and determine focal points. Counties commit to establish WESCOORD desks. Other partners to commit to build capacity on IM and Coordination of the desks. Counties to commit to discuss with regional WRMA sub-offices (sub-regional managers) to access baseline data on boreholes & water infrastructures. IMs from UNICEF and from National WESCOORD to support counties to provide mapping of borehole data. National WESCOORD to support counties on information management. National WESCOORD to develop ToR of support on coordination and information management in support to counties.

5. AOB? Received and responded to Election Preparedness partner request?

THANK YOU!