2017 Community Survey City of Mountain Brook, Alabama

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Citizen Survey Results. Mecklenburg County Citizen Survey  Questions on full range of usage, customer satisfaction, needs, unmet needs, and priorities.
Advertisements

Survey Results September Survey Information There is an error margin of ±3.6 on this survey. South Ogden City sent out 5,300 surveys and received.
BOWLING GREEN CITIZEN CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY Fall 2010 – National Citizen Survey.
Hays City Services Survey 2002 By Brett Zollinger, Ph.D. University Center for Survey Research Fort Hays State University Hays, Kansas
2008 Citizen Satisfaction Survey Results May 29, 2009.
2012 Citizen Survey results Background Implementing Our Vision Action Chart Key Drivers Areas of Significant Change Trends over Time What’s Next?
AGA 2009 Tracking Survey Perceptions of Governmental Financial Management Prepared for the Association of Government Accountants December 29, 2009 © Harris.
2014 National Citizen Survey Results Citizen Survey results Implementing Our Vision Background Areas of Significant Change Trends over Time Special.
Kimball Area Community Survey Results. Methodology Mail survey Sample included Kimball, Banner and western Cheyenne Counties  Random sample of 649 households.
Survey conducted by: National Research Center, Inc th St. Boulder, CO (303) The National Citizen Survey™ LOWER PROVIDENCE.
2012 CITY OF MIDDLETON SATISFACTION SURVEY WORKING DRAFT - PROPOSAL.
Prepared for: Vancouver Police Department Resident and Business Survey Prepared by: NRG Research Group April 4, 2007.
City of Sarasota 2008 National Citizen Survey Conducted by the National Research Center (NRC) for the City of Sarasota.
September 2015 Town of the Blue Mountains Citizen Satisfaction Survey.
Citizens’ Survey Presentation of Results for Total Sample February 25, 2003 Prepared By: 831 E. Morehead Street, Suite 150 Charlotte, North Carolina
Guilford County Schools Parent and Community Surveys Presentation January 24, 2015 Prepared By Nancy Burnap, Ph.D Research Strategies, Inc. Presented By.
Survey conducted: November 6th, 8th – 10th,
Key Findings from the 2008/9 Place Survey. Purpose of the Place Survey  Captures local people’s views, experiences and perceptions about the local area.
Copyright © All rights reserved to Student Insights. 1 Student-View ™ Report Level Two July, 2007 SAMPLE REPORT.
Agenda Methodology Major Findings –Perceptions of Congestion –Ease of Travel –Transportation Planning Issues –Interest in Using Public Transportation.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP – FEBRUARY 23, National Citizen Survey Results.
Citizen Satisfaction Survey September 2003 Results Office of the Mayor Program Management Office Nov 6, 2003.
Citizen Satisfaction Survey February 2006 Results Office of the Mayor Program Management Office February 10, 2006.
National Citizen Survey 2010 Results. City of Decatur Citizen Survey Results Contracted with the National Research Center, Inc. for third time Survey.
CITY AND COUNTY OF BROOMFIELD 2015 CITIZEN SURVEY PRESENTATION OF RESULTS.
Citizen Survey Hampton City Council July 8, 2009.
Citizen Satisfaction Survey March 2003 Results Office of the Mayor Program Management Office March 28, 2003.
Budget Week Results Public Forum Data March 10, 2010.
Ashland, VA Key Findings January 6, 2015 The NCS is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA.
Orland Park, IL Key Findings 2016 The NCS is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA.
City of Decatur National Citizen Survey 2012 Results City Commission Work Session July 16, 2012.
City of Decatur Citizen Survey Results  Contracted with the National Research Center, Inc. for second time  Survey conducted by mail  1200 randomly.
Banister Research and Consulting Inc Citizen Satisfaction Survey February 13, 2014.
2013 RTD Paratransit Customer Satisfaction Survey Results – Executive Summary July, 2013.
1 City of Virginia Beach 2007 Citizens’ Survey Objective: To learn how residents feel about their community and the services provided by the City of Virginia.
Arapahoe County, CO 2017 Citizen Survey Prepared by: Andrea Rasizer
Summary of VCU Student Satisfaction Fall 2012
FY 2018 Budget Engagement Pick Your Priority
McKinney, TX Key Findings 2017
City of Huber Heights Public Opinion Survey
Tomahawk School District Community Survey Results
Michigan Future Business Index
Angelika H. Claussen, PhD,
2016 Bellaire Citizen Survey
Summary of Findings January, 2009
City of Washougal 2016 Community Survey Findings
2017 Community Survey Town of Snowmass Village, CO
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
DirectionFinder® Survey
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Indiana Community Health Needs Assessment
Fall Community Survey Summary Conducted for the City of Port Hueneme
Student Satisfaction Spring 2009 Short Version
2014 National Citizen Survey Results
Privacy concerns and sharing data
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
Islington Residents’ Survey 2018 March 2018
EBA Investment Attractiveness INDEX
Neighbourhood Management Survey 2010/11
2010 DirectionFinder® Survey City of Blue Springs, Missouri
Academic Development Survey By School Spring 2007
McPherson College, Fall 2017
Methodology 327 interviews with Cotati voters
Student Satisfaction Survey Spring 2018 Undergraduate Trends
Customer Satisfaction Survey Report For City of El Segundo – Residents
Future Behaviours of Consumers
Presentation transcript:

2017 Community Survey City of Mountain Brook, Alabama Presented by April 2017

ETC Institute A National Leader in Market Research for Local Governmental Organizations …helping City and County governments gather and use survey data to enhance organizational performance for more than 30 years More than 2,150,000 Persons Surveyed Since 2006 for more than 900 communities in 49 States

Agenda Purpose and Methodology Bottom Line Upfront Major Findings 2 Summary Questions

Purpose To objectively assess satisfaction among residents with the delivery of City services To measure trends from previous survey To help determine priorities for the community To compare the City’s performance with other cities across the U.S. 4

Methodology Survey Description Method of Administration Sample size: seven-page survey; includes many of the same questions asked on previous survey 2nd Community Survey conducted for the City Method of Administration by mail, online and phone to random sample of City residents each survey took approximately 15-20 minutes to complete Sample size: goal number of surveys: 400 goal far exceeded: 962 completed surveys Confidence level: 95% Margin of error: +/- 3.1% overall

Location of Survey Respondents Mountain Brook 2017 Community Survey Good Representation throughout the City Mountain Brook 2017 Community Survey

Bottom Line Up Front Residents Have a Very Positive Perception of the City 99% rated the City as an excellent or good place to live 97% rated the City as an excellent or good place to raise children Satisfaction Ratings Are Similar to 2014, and Remain Among the Highest in the Nation Satisfaction with City Services Is Much Higher in Mountain Brook Than in Other Communities The City rated above the U.S. Average in ALL 56 areas that were compared; significantly above in 55 areas The City rated 48% above the U.S. Average in the overall quality of services provided by the City Top Priorities for Investment: Traffic Flow/Congestion Management Maintenance of City Streets and Facilities

Residents Have a Very Positive Perception of the City Major Finding #1 Residents Have a Very Positive Perception of the City

9 97% of Residents Are Satisfied with the Overall Quality of Services Provided by the City

Satisfaction Is High for All City Services 10 Satisfaction Is High for All City Services

11 Nearly All Residents Feel Mountain Brook Is an Excellent Place to Live and Raise Children 11

Overall Quality of Services Provided by the City All areas are in BLUE, indicating that residents in all parts of the City are satisfied with the overall quality of City services Citizen Satisfaction Mean rating on a 5-point scale ETC INSTITUTE 1.0-1.8 Very Dissatisfied 1.8-2.6 Dissatisfied 2.6-3.4 Neutral 3.4-4.2 Satisfied 4.2-5.0 Very Satisfied No Response

Major Finding #2 Satisfaction Ratings Are Similar to 2014, and Remain Among the Highest in the Nation

Trend Analysis Since 2014 the Satisfaction Ratings Have… Increased in 39 of 94 areas Stayed the Same in 19 of 94 areas Decreased in 36 of 94 areas

Trend Analysis Most Significant Increases Since 2014 Number of walking trails (+7%) Number of City parks (+7%) Quality of info available on Animal Control, Fire & Police Facebook pages (+6%) Transparency of City government/City’s willingness to openly share information with the community (+6%) Quality of animal control (+5%) Litter control along major streets (+5%) Most Significant Decreases Since 2014 Flow of traffic and congestion management(-11%) Brush and bulky removal services (-8%) Youth athletic programs – Mountain Brook soccer(-7%) Outdoor athletic fields (-5%) 15

Major Finding #3 Satisfaction with City Services Is Significantly Higher in Mountain Brook Than in Other Communities

17 The City Rates Significantly Above the National Average in All 8 Categories of City Services

1st in the Nation 1st in the Nation 1st in the Nation 18

19 Satisfaction with the Overall Quality of City Services Is 48% Above the National Average

1st in the Nation 1st in the Nation 1st in the Nation 20

21 The City Rates Significantly Above the National Average in All 11 Areas of Public Safety

1st in the Nation 1st in the Nation 1st in the Nation 22

23 The City Rates Significantly Above the National Average in All 5 Areas of Code Enforcement

1st in the Nation 24

25 The City Rates Significantly Above the National Average in All 8 Areas of Maintenance

1st in the Nation 1st in the Nation 26

27 The City Rates Significantly Above the National Average in All 6 Areas of Parks & Recreation

1st in the Nation 28

29 The City Rates Significantly Above the National Average in All 5 Areas of Customer Service

30

Top Priorities for Investment Major Finding #4 Top Priorities for Investment

Overall Priorities: 32

33

Public Safety Priorities: 34

Maintenance Priorities: 35

Library Priorities: 36

Parks and Recreation Priorities: 37

Other Findings

39

40

41

42

Summary Residents Have a Very Positive Perception of the City 99% rated the City as an excellent or good place to live 97% rated the City as an excellent or good place to raise children Satisfaction Ratings Are Similar to 2014, and Remain Among the Highest in the Nation Satisfaction with City Services Is Much Higher in Mountain Brook Than in Other Communities The City rated above the U.S. Average in ALL 56 areas that were compared; significantly above in 55 areas The City rated 48% above the U.S. Average in the overall quality of services provided by the City Top Priorities for Investment: Traffic Flow/Congestion Management Maintenance of City Streets and Facilities

Questions? THANK YOU!!