Bullying and Students with Disabilities: Predictive and Protective Factors, Current Intervention Efforts, and Future Directions Chad A. Rose, Ph.D. Assistant.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bullying Among “Tweens” and Teens (c) 2005 Take a Stand. Lend a Hand. Stop Bullying Now! Las Colinas Middle School.
Advertisements

Bullying Prevention Catherine Bradshaw, Ph.D., M.Ed. Johns Hopkins Center for the Prevention of Youth Violence (CDC) Johns Hopkins Center for Prevention.
Recognizing, Preventing, and Managing Bullying: What SLPs Can Do Stephanie Hughes, Ph.D., CCC-SLP University of Toledo
Bullying Fact or Myth.
Bullying Education Version Types of Bullying What is Bullying? Bullying Statistics Bullying Roles Handling Bullying.
Although definitions of bullying vary, most agree that bullying involves: –Imbalance of Power: people who bully use their power to control or harm and.
D IFFERENCES IN B ULLYING V ICTIMIZATION B ETWEEN S TUDENTS W ITH AND W ITHOUT D ISABILITIES George Bear, Lindsey Mantz, Deborah Boyer, & Linda Smith Results.
Welcome! Linking PBIS to Bullying Prevention. Amy Walker Client Outreach Representative , ext. 6514
Re-examination of Effective Classroom Management: Middle School The work reported in this symposium is supported by: Office of Special Education Programs.
Bullies, Victims and Bystanders David A. Levine Leland Domann.
MPER-CAMHPS School Mental Health Leadership Academy Session II January 15, 2008.
Children’s Rights In and Through Education: Learning to Live Together
Literature Review. –Protective Factors Self-awareness Family cohesion Perception of risk Age of first use –Intervention Programs Substance abuse Prevention.
©2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 8 Ecology of the Peer Group.
Early Childhood Special Education. Dunst model interest engagement competence mastery.
Building Healthy Relationships Makayla Bair Bailey DeRoest Megan Waters.
Ashley Swanson. “There comes a time when silence is betrayal” -Martin Luther King Jr.
3/9/ “If you stop making fun of me, I promise to stop making fun of you Bullying Prevention Prevention Lynne Mayo.
Sydney L. Sklar, PhD, CTRS and Cari E. Autry, PhD, CTRS chapter 11 Youth Development and Therapeutic Recreation.
Title, Edition ISBN © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Exceptional Children: An Introduction to Special Education, 9th Edition ISBN X.
Relational Bullying Lauren Wazio, Shanda Harclerode, Susan Nourse.
Bullying & Cyberbullying Prevention Kelly P Dillon Doctoral Candidate The Ohio State University.
Bullying Definition: a form of aggression and occurs when a person(s) who perceives a power imbalance, willfully subjects another person (victim), whoever.
SALLY BLACK, AMANDA LEE TSAFOS & ERICKA WASHINGTON THE ORIGINAL FUNDING FOR THIS PROJECT WAS PROVIDED BY PENNSYLVANIA COMMISSION ON CRIME AND DELINQUENCY.
1.  It’s Not about “fixing” the bullies  Making bullying unacceptable  Includes staff, parents, and students 2.
Let’s Play Cards… Everyone will get one card, face down. DO NOT look at your card. Stand up. Flip the card up onto your forehead with the face of it pointing.
Bullying Prevention Workshops Implementing the Bullying Prevention Guidance The aim of this presentation is to give schools an overview of the bullying.
Response to Intervention (RTI)
Review Ch. 2: Ecology of Socialization (what are 1, 2, 3 & 4?) What is meant by Aims of Socialization? What are the stages of Erikson’s Psychosocial Theory?
IES Advanced Training Institute on Single-Case Research Methods
Youth Violence.
Chapter 5: Genes, Culture, and Gender
Chapter 20: Bullied Children
Chapter 14 Early Childhood Special Education
Small Group Intervention for 5th Grade Girls involved with Relational Aggression Jennifer Goslin June 1, 2012.
Social Cognition Aggression
Regulating Emotions Crying
Bullying Prevention & Supporting Students with Disabilities
NCMS taking a stand against bullying
Lesson 2 Bullying.
Sarah L. Desmarais, Ph.D. North Carolina State University
The KiVa program Evidence-based program to prevent and reduce bullying
CHAPTER 7: Developmental Assessment
The Laguna Middle School Bullying Prevention Program
Belinda B. Mitchell, PhD Shepherd University
A guide for elementary school students
Bullying Prevention Training Series
Criminal Violence Riedel and Welsh, Ch
Olweus Bullying Prevention Overview
Integrating Outcomes Learning Community Call February 8, 2012
Developing a public health approach to
Research Question 4 How can the most vulnerable children be reached/included by data collection systems and instruments?
A guide for middle and high school students
Bullying Fact or Myth.
It means “Nice” in Finnish. It means “Against Bullying”
Gender Differences in Aggression
Bullying: The role of the bystander.
As a Social Institution
Building Capacity to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Systems and Practices 2018 DEC Conference.
Bullying and it’s Effects On Health
Presented by : Shareen Ratnani Addressing Challenging Behaviours in the Classroom.
Multicultural and Bilingual Aspects of Special Education
What is bullying?.
Chapter 16 Organizational Culture
Lindsey Williams Bullying Lindsey Williams
A Social Learning Approach Martina Miller
Bullying: The role of the bystander.
History/Theories Research
Bullying Fact or Myth.
Lesson 1 - Bullying; What is it and who is involved?
Presentation transcript:

Bullying and Students with Disabilities: Predictive and Protective Factors, Current Intervention Efforts, and Future Directions Chad A. Rose, Ph.D. Assistant Professor – Department of Special Education University of Missouri

Quick Quotes “I couldn‘t stand going back to school because of what the other kids put me thorough. I was bullied, bruised, called names, kicked under the table, you name it someone had done it to me. I couldn’t help being epileptic.” (Whitney, Smith, & Thompson, 1994, p. 214) “Often just being different in a noticeable way can be a risk factor for being a victim.” (Whitney et al., 1994, p.213) That is the way of it. Someone always gets picked on. That is life. That happens in the hierarchy” (p.73). Therapist Remark About the Bullying of Students with Fragile X Syndrome in Baker & Donlley’s (2001) study (p. 73)

Understanding Bullying “Victimization may be the result of our educational system being regarded as a social hierarchy, where bullying is generally considered a social ritual, a typical part of adolescent experience, or a student’s rite of passage.” (Rose, Monda-Amaya, & Espelage, 2011, p. 114)

Understanding the Bullying Dynamic

What is Bullying? Adapted from Olweus (2005)

Topographies of Bullying Physical Verbal Relational Cyber Aggression Instrumental Retaliatory Jostling

Who is Involved? Adapted from Olweus (2001)

Understanding the Bullying Dynamic (Rose, Simpson, & Moss, 2015)

Understanding the Nature of Bullying

Traditional Thinking (Rose, Simpson, & Moss, 2015)

Contemporary Thinking (Rose, Simpson, & Moss, 2015)

Social-Ecological Perspective of Bully/Victimization Disability may, at least, partially result from “ineffective interactions between a person’s capabilities and the demands of his or her environments” (Lukasson & Schalock, 2012, p. 3) (Rose, Allison, & Simpson, 2012)

Stages of Bullying Reinforcement: Stimulus change immediately following a response and increases the future frequency of that type of behavior in similar conditions (Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007) Adapted From Doll & Swearer (2006)

Power and Influence Body Capital - certain kind of body Social Capital - peer relationships Cultural Capital - participate in valued activities or belong to valued cultural group Informational Capital - up on latest gossip Economic Capital - money Symbolic Capital - material possessions (Klein, 2012)

Homophily Hypothesis

Development of Bullying Behavior Behavior tends to follow a distinct developmental pattern Younger students without well-developed verbal or social skills resort to physical aggression As verbal skills develop, these students transition to less physical forms of aggression…verbal aggression As social skills develop, students learn to analyze and manipulate situation in their favor, so they use more indirect means of aggression (Björkqvist, 2001; Björkqvist et al., 1992)

Behavioral Understanding Behavior is both functional and communicative Bullying is a Social Construct Maintained by Social Reinforcers Hidden Curriculum Bystanders At-Risk Characteristics Include Anything that could be deviant from perceived “norm” behaviors of the group. Bullying is not exclusive to one population or school environment

Critical Issues Related to the Disproportionate Representation of Youth with Disabilities

Disproportionate Representation of Youth with Disabilities

History of Prevalence Safe School Initiative (Vossekuil et al., 2002) 37 Shooting; 41 Perpetrators (1974-2000) 71% Victimized Nansel et al. (2001) 30% (Perpetrator, Victim, Provocative Victim) Espelage et al. (2000) Only 19.5% of Middle School Students Had NOT Observed, Been a Victim, or Participated in Bullying within the Last Month of Being Surveyed

Prevalence of Victimization (US Dept. of Justice, 2014)

Prevalence of Victimization Total Victimization Victimization by Category (Rose, Simpson, Moss, 2015)

Prevalence of Bully Perpetration Total Perpetration Perpetration by Category (Rose, Simpson, Moss, 2015)

Victimization of Youth with Disabilities Over Time (Rose & Gage, In Press)

Perpetration by Youth with Disabilities Over Time (Rose & Gage, In Press)

Other Prevalence Studies: Disability Status Early Childhood Victimization – Disability Victimization Over Time - Disability (Son et al., 2012) (Blake et al.,, 2012)

Predictive and Protective Factors

Class Placement: Bullying (Rose, Espelage, & Monda-Amaya, 2009)

Class Placement: Fighting (Rose, Espelage, & Monda-Amaya, 2009)

Class Placement: Victimization (Rose, Espelage, & Monda-Amaya, 2009)

Victimization and Perpetration by Disability Type and Class Placement (Rose et al., 2015)

Bullying and Social Supports (Rose, Espelage et al., 2015)

Bullying and Social Supports (Rose, Espelage et al., 2015)

Bullying and Social Supports (Rose, Espelage et al., 2015)

Bullying and Social Supports (Rose, Espelage et al., 2015)

Bully-Victim vs. Reactive-Victim (Rose & Espelage, 2012)

Bully-Victim and Psychosocial Outcomes (Rose, Simpson, & Preast, 2016)

Intervention Efforts

Our Approach

SW-PBIS & Bully Prevention (Rose & Monda-Amaya, 2012)

SW-PBIS & SEL Overlap (Preast, Bowman, & Rose, Under Review)

Second Step: Student Success Through Prevention (SS-STP) (Espelage, Rose, & Polanin, 2015)

Increasing Social Skill Acquisition (Preast, Bowman, & Rose, Under Review)

Targeted Social Skill Groups (K-8) (Preast, Bowman, & Rose, Under Review)

Future Directions

Future Directions for Bully Prevention Address the 3 critical questions related to the disproportionate representation of youth with disabilities Does the traditional definition of bullying, specifically bully perpetration, apply to youth with disabilities? Is the disproportionality associated with disability identification or characteristics associated with specific disabilities? What role does educational placement play in the disproportionate representation of youth with disabilities? Evaluate intervention efforts at the systems, universal, class/group, and individual levels Develop a bullying involvement screener to proactively support skill development Increase access and opportunities related to bully prevention interventions and programming

Chad A. Rose, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Special Education University of Missouri Email: rosech@missouri.edu Website: bullypreventionlab.com (Active 10/1) Phone: 573-882-3269