Table 1. Confirmed cases of Typhoid and paratyphoid fever: number and rate per 100 000 population, EU/EEA, 2010–2014 Source: Country reports. Legend: Y = yes, N = no, C = case based, · = no report, ASR: age-standardised rate Suggested citation: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Annual epidemiological report 2015. Typhoid and paratyphoid fever. Stockholm: ECDC; 2016. © European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, 2016. Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged
Figure 1. Reported confirmed typhoid/paratyphoid cases: notification rate per 100 000 population, EU/EEA, 2014 Source: Country reports from Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and United Kingdom. Suggested citation: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Annual epidemiological report 2015. Typhoid and paratyphoid fever. Stockholm: ECDC; 2016. © European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, 2016. Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged
Figure 2. Confirmed typhoid/paratyphoid fever cases: rate per 100 000 population, by age and gender, EU/EEA, 2014 Source: Country reports from Austria, Cyprus, Czech, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and United Kingdom. Suggested citation: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Annual epidemiological report 2015. Typhoid and paratyphoid fever. Stockholm: ECDC; 2016. © European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, 2016. Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged
Figure 3. Number of confirmed cases of typhoid/paratyphoid fever by month in 2014 compared with 2010−2013, EU/EEA Source: Country reports from Belgium Cyprus, Czech, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and United Kingdom. Austria did not report data over the whole period at the level of detail required for the analysis. Suggested citation: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Annual epidemiological report 2015. Typhoid and paratyphoid fever. Stockholm: ECDC; 2016. © European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, 2016. Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged
Figure 4. Trend and number of confirmed cases of typhoid/paratyphoid fever, EU/EEA, 2010−2014 Source: Country reports from Belgium, Cyprus, Czech, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and United Kingdom. Austria did not report data over the whole period at the level of detail required for the analysis. Suggested citation: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Annual epidemiological report 2015. Typhoid and paratyphoid fever. Stockholm: ECDC; 2016. © European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, 2016. Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged
Table. Typhoid and paratyphoid fever, surveillance systems overview, 2014 Surveillance characteristics: compulsory (Cp), comprehensive (co), voluntary (V), other (O), active (A), passive (P), case-based (C), aggregated (A) Data reported by: laboratories (L), physicians (P), hospitals (H), other (O) Suggested citation: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Annual epidemiological report 2016. Typhoid and paratyphoid fever. Stockholm: ECDC; 2016. © European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, 2016. Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged