Variable Energy Resource Capacity Contributions Consistent With Reserve Margin and Reliability Noha Abdel-Karim, Noha.Karim@nerc.net, Eugene Preston,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Demand-Side Management Influence on Reliability NERC Demand-Side Management Task Force (DSMTF) Rick Voytas, Chair November 2007 Presented To The U.S.
Advertisements

ENERGY VALUE. Summary  Operational Value is a primary component in the Net Market Value (NMV) calculation used to rank competing resources in the RPS.
NERC/GADS Reporting Requirements John Yale Hydro Plant Engineering Manager Chelan County PUD 1.
Preliminary Impacts of Wind Power Integration in the Hydro-Qubec System.
Power Supply Adequacy Assessment Model/Methodology Review Steering Subcommittee Meeting January 29, 2010.
Overview of Loss of Load Expectation (LOLE) and Unforced Capacity (UCAP) Dan Huffman FirstEnergy Solutions November 20, 2007 OMS Board Workshop Resource.
A Summary on Probabilistic Workshop held on September 9, 2014 Milorad Papic (RAWG Chair) Salt Lake City, January 13, 2015.
06/04/2009 TAC 2009 Long-term Demand and Energy Forecast (LTDEF) and Capacity, Demand and Reserves (CDR) Calculation Dan Woodfin Director, System Planning.
05/14/2014 Flexibility Methods Workgroup. 2 © 2014 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Overview/Agenda Discussion of Literature.
Capacity Valuation.
Generation Adequacy Task Force Results of the 2012 Loss of Load Study January 18, 2013.
BOSTON DENVER LONDON LOS ANGELES MENLO PARK MONTREAL NEW YORK SAN FRANCISCO WASHINGTON Effective Load Carrying Capability of Wind Generation: Initial Results.
A R EVIEW OF L ARGE -S CALE R ENEWABLE E LECTRICITY I NTEGRATION S TUDIES Paulina Jaramillo, Carnegie Mellon University And Paul Hines, University of Vermont.
NERC LTRA Update / CDR Capacity Counting Issues
Electric Power System Reliability GRIDSCHOOL 2010 MARCH 8-12, 2010  RICHMOND, VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC UTILITIES ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY Prof.
EE 590 Reliability (LOLE) Evaluation for Generation & Transmission Adequacy Brandon Heath October 27 th 2008.
PLWG Report to ROS July 9, PGRRs needing vote PGRR043 – FIS Scoping Amendment – PGRR043 moves the Subsynchronous Resonance (SSR) Study out of the.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future * NREL July 5, 2011 Tradeoffs and Synergies between CSP and PV at High Grid Penetration.
ERCOT PUBLIC 4/21/ Loss of Load Probability Assessment for NERC April, 2015.
Costing of energy generation of multi area interconnected systems with conventional as well as renewable sources Kaisar R. Khan McNeese State University.
NW Resource Adequacy Forum Steering Committee Conference Call November 4, 2010.
1 Planning Reserve Margin Dan Egolf Senior Manager, Power Supply & Planning.
A Resource Adequacy Standard for the Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Technical Committee January 17, 2008 Portland Airport.
Developing an Adequacy Metric Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Subcommittee Meeting October 16, 2009.
Loss of Load Probability (LOLP) Project October 16, 2009 Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting.
ERCOT Planning WMS 10/20/2010 Target Reserve Margin and Effective Load Carrying Capability of Installed Wind Capacity for the ERCOT System – Methodology.
ERCOT Planning October 2010 Target Reserve Margin and Effective Load Carrying Capability of Installed Wind Capacity for the ERCOT System - Methodology.
Comparison of LOLP Practices Mary Johannis PNW Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Mtg January 23, 2009.
ERCOT Generation Adequacy Study TAC Meeting February 7, 2002.
Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) A Success Story… In Progress Ingmar Sterzing United States Association of Energy Economics (USAEE) Pittsburgh.
EFFECTIVE LOAD CARRYING CAPABILITY FOR WIND-POWER.
ISO Proposed Flexible Capacity Requirements Stephen Keehn Senior Advisor California ISO CPUC Workshop January 26, 2012.
Emergency Demand Response Concept Overview and Examples Presented to: ERCOT December 3, 2004 Presented by: Neenan Associates.
Target Reserve Margin (TRM) and Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) of Wind Plants Evaluation - Input and Methodology ERCOT Planning 03/25/2010.
Summary of Astrapé Reserve Margin Impact Analysis for the PUCT Pete Warnken WMS February 4, 2015.
BI Marketing Analyst input into report marketing Report TitleElectricity in Texas Report Subtitle State profile of power sector, market trends and investment.
DWG – Dependable Capacity Kevin Harris, ColumbiaGrid TEPPC\Hydro Modeling Task Force - Chair.
Probabilistic Approach to Resource Adequacy Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee Meeting Portland, OR January 23, 2009.
Generation Adequacy Task Force Meeting April 10, 2014.
Defining LOLP Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Subcommittee Meeting November 14, 2008.
Understanding Value of Short-Duration Resources CPUC RA Workshop March 5, 2016.
6. PLANNING OF POWER SYSTEM RESERVES
PRODUCTION COSTING W.D. Prasad Lecturer Dept. of Electrical Engineering University of Moratuwa.
Jagan Mandavilli Senior Reliability Engineer Texas RE NERC DERTF Update ERERERCOT WMS June 3, 2015.
Estimating the resource adequacy value of demand response in the German electricity market Hamid Aghaie Research Scientist in Energy Economics, AIT Austrian.
Pan-Canadian Wind Integration Study (PCWIS) Prepared by: GE Energy Consulting, Vaisala , EnerNex, Electranix, Knight Piésold Olga Kucherenko.
Target Reserve Margin (TRM) and Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) of Wind Plants Evaluation - Input and Methodology ERCOT Planning 03/25/2010.
Electric Power System Reliability
Erik Ela, Eamonn Lannoye, Bob Entriken, Aidan Tuohy
GSR022: Review of Security and Economy Required Transfer Conditions
WECC 2026 Common Case Capacity Assessment with RECAP
GENESYS Redevelopment Strawman Proposal
Database Fields for DR PNDRP January 2014.
penetration of wind power
Solar Eclipse Overview August 2017
ISO New England Net Load Analysis with High Penetration Distributed PV
MIT tour of the California ISO Control Center March 31, 2015
Transmission Planning in a Modern Market Environment
Additional clarifications on economic and adequacy running hours
Resilience and Reliability in PJM’s Competitive Markets
2013 Long-Term Reliability Assessment and Other Key Assessment Initiatives Briefing.
Integration of Variable Generation Task Force (IVGTF)
2500 R Midtown Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Impact of Wind Farms Aggregation on Large System Scheduling Cost Under Frequency Linked Deviation Settlement Mechanism Presented by Anoop Singh Authored.
Integration of Variable Generation Task Force (IVGTF)
GENESYS Current Functionality
INTERCONNECTED SYSTEM GENERATING CAPACITY RELIABILITY EVALUATION
Capacity Analysis in the Sixth Plan
Planning Reserve Margin
Solar Energy Commercialization
Presentation transcript:

Variable Energy Resource Capacity Contributions Consistent With Reserve Margin and Reliability Noha Abdel-Karim, Noha.Karim@nerc.net, Eugene Preston, g.preston@ieee.org, John Moura, John.Moura@nerc.net, Thomas Coleman, Thomas.coleman@nerc.net Introduction Simulation Results (cont) 1 4 The North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) is responsible for ensuring the reliability of the bulk power system in North America as variable energy resources (VERs) are expected to grow. A minimum LOLE of one day in ten years is used to measure if planned generation capacity is sufficient, which now includes the addition of VERs. VERs are treated as negative load which creates a net demand and avoids complexities of having to create VER equivalent generator models. A future study year scales historic 2010-2015 demand and VER hourly profiles to maintain time synchronization. A COPT capacity outage probability table gives the hourly LOLP loss of load probability for conventional generators serving the net demand. The COPT is created in a special way to provide ‘exact’ reliability indices for the IEEE RTS model as verified from a 1986 RTS paper listing exact indices. The RM reserve margin is found for high and low VER capacity credits while the demand is adjusted so LOLE = 0.1 d/y is maintained in each instance. Fig. 3 Historical Years Ratio LOLH/LOLE. LOLH/LOLE gives the expected duration of loss of load. The outage duration varies between 2 - 3 hours over 2010-2015. The Exact IEEE RTS Calculator 2 Fig. 4 Solar Shifts the Net Peak Demand to Sundown. Solar capacity will eventually shift the peak to sundown. This is known as the duck curve effect in CAISO. Solar incremental capacity credit drops to zero percentage. Fig. 1 RTS Program Capacity Outage Probability Table - COPT Uses the following cumulative distribution F(x) before and F(x)+ after convolution: [F(x)+ = (1FORk)F(x)+ FORkF(xCk) ]  x = 0, xmax This process produces the published ‘exact’ indices for the IEEE RTS. F(x) can only be used for conventional fully dispatchable generators. Modeling Sequential Events Using a COPT 3 Time dependent historical demand MW and VER MWs from 2010-2015 are scaled to a future test year to calculate hourly net demands for the COPT. The hourly LOLP is a lookup process from the COPT table. Each scaled forward historical year to future test year is given equal weight. From the hourly LOLP all the indices LOLE, LOLH, and EUE are calculated. The direct calculation produces the same indices as a Monte Carlo solution. Fig. 5 ERCOT VER RM at Different Capacity Contributions. The capacity value of VER diminishes as more VER is added, causing an increase in the RM to hold LOLE at 0.1 d/y. VER capacity values are not unique and couple nonlinearly. Frequent LOLP analysis is needed to find VER capacity values. Simulation Results 4 Recommendations 5 NERC regions should provide reliability evaluations of VER impacts. It's very important to maintain chronology between different variable energy generation sources and load. It will be necessary to develop and maintain public databases of wind, solar, and hydro historical production. VERs should be given capacity credits from the running of loss of load probability studies. Fig. 2 Historical LOLE Deviation Increases with VER As VERs are added to the system, the LOLE deviation from historical year to historical year increases in ERCOT from 40% with no VERs to 80% for planned 2026 VERs. Adding VERs to the system creates additional risk for serving load.