From: Finite Element Modeling of Microcrack Growth in Cortical Bone

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date of download: 5/30/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Analyzing Drive Cycles for Hybrid Electric Vehicle Simulation and Optimization.
Advertisements

Date of download: 5/31/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Surface Wrinkling Patterns of Film–Substrate Systems With a Structured Interface.
Date of download: 6/8/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Modeling, Prototyping, and Testing of Helical Shape Memory Compression Springs.
Date of download: 6/20/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Analysis of the Reliability of a Jet Engine Compressor Rotor Blade Containing.
Date of download: 6/26/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: When Crowdsourcing Fails: A Study of Expertise on Crowdsourced Design Evaluation.
Date of download: 7/8/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Delamination Detection-Oriented Finite Element Model for a Fiber Reinforced Polymer.
Date of download: 9/19/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Revisiting the Maugis–Dugdale Adhesion Model of Elastic Periodic Wavy Surfaces.
Date of download: 9/20/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/12/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Low Output Power Laser Bending of Thin.
Date of download: 10/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Lattice Approach in Continuum and Fracture Mechanics
Date of download: 10/5/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Nonlinear Vibration of Gears With Tooth Surface Modifications
Date of download: 10/8/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: A Numerical Investigation Into Cold Spray Bonding Processes
Date of download: 10/10/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/12/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Forced Flexural Gravity Wave Motion in Two-Layer Fluid
Date of download: 10/12/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Rational Interpolation of Car Motions
Date of download: 10/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Elastic Theory of Nanomaterials Based on Surface-Energy Density
Date of download: 10/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/17/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/17/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Toughness-Dominated Hydraulic Fracture in Permeable Rocks
Date of download: 10/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Actuators for Micropositioners and Nanopositioners
Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Computer Simulation of Rapid Granular Flow Through an Orifice
Date of download: 10/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/1/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Anisotropic Materials Behavior Modeling Under Shock Loading
Date of download: 11/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Elastic Bounds of Bioinspired Nanocomposites
Date of download: 11/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/12/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Design of Axially Graded Columns Under a Central Force
From: A Damage-Mechanics-Based Constitutive Model for Solder Joints
Date of download: 12/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Design of Thermoelectric Modules for High Heat Flux Cooling
Date of download: 12/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Effects of Tensile Stress on the Corrosion Rate of Magnesium1
From: Evolution Mechanisms of Thermal Shock Cracks in Ceramic Sheet
Date of download: 12/31/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: The Multimodal Dynamics of a Walnut Tree: Experiments and Models
From: The Multimodal Dynamics of a Walnut Tree: Experiments and Models
Date of download: 1/2/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Mechanics of Cell Mechanosensing on Patterned Substrate
Date of download: 1/13/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/22/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Presentation transcript:

From: Finite Element Modeling of Microcrack Growth in Cortical Bone Date of download: 10/8/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Finite Element Modeling of Microcrack Growth in Cortical Bone J. Appl. Mech. 2011;78(4):041016-041016-9. doi:10.1115/1.4003754 Figure Legend: Crack growth behavior for 45 deg and 90 deg crack orientations based on the ratio of the bone to cement line shear fracture properties. Gsc-b/Gsc-cl denotes the ratio of Mode II (shear) fracture toughness of bone to cement line and σsc-b/σsc-cl denotes the ratio of the shear strength of bone to cement line. The strength and toughness ratios were obtained by keeping the interstitial bone and osteon properties constant (Table ) while varying the cement line properties. The ranges of cement line properties used to obtain these ratios are marked on the graphs. The solid and hollow circles correspond to individual simulations for penetration and deflection, respectively. The solid lines represent the transition boundary between crack deflection and penetration based on the individual simulation data.

From: Finite Element Modeling of Microcrack Growth in Cortical Bone Date of download: 10/8/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Finite Element Modeling of Microcrack Growth in Cortical Bone J. Appl. Mech. 2011;78(4):041016-041016-9. doi:10.1115/1.4003754 Figure Legend: Crack driving force versus crack extension for 0 deg, 45 deg, and 90 deg cracks. Note that this plot is for Mode I fracture toughness ratio of Gnc-b/Gnc-cl=1 and tensile strength ratio of σnc-b/σnc-cl=1. The same behavior was observed for other strength and fracture toughness ratios.

From: Finite Element Modeling of Microcrack Growth in Cortical Bone Date of download: 10/8/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Finite Element Modeling of Microcrack Growth in Cortical Bone J. Appl. Mech. 2011;78(4):041016-041016-9. doi:10.1115/1.4003754 Figure Legend: Crack growth behavior for three crack lengths oriented at 45 deg based on the ratio of the bone to cement line fracture properties. Gnc-b/Gnc-cl denotes the ratio of Mode I (opening) fracture toughness of bone to cement line and σnc-b/σnc-cl denotes the ratio of the tensile strength of bone to cement line. The strength and toughness ratios were obtained by keeping the interstitial bone and osteon properties constant (Table ) while varying the cement line properties. The ranges of cement line properties used to obtain these ratios are marked on the graphs. Note that the values reported in the figures denote the amount of crack extension. The trendline represents the average of the deflection and penetration data sets.

From: Finite Element Modeling of Microcrack Growth in Cortical Bone Date of download: 10/8/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Finite Element Modeling of Microcrack Growth in Cortical Bone J. Appl. Mech. 2011;78(4):041016-041016-9. doi:10.1115/1.4003754 Figure Legend: Crack growth behavior for 45 deg crack with two different osteon properties. The model with Osteon 1 has the same cohesive properties for both the osteonal and interstitial bones. In the second model, the osteon (Osteon 2) has 40% lower strength and 40% higher toughness than the interstitial bone. Gnc-b/Gnc-cl denotes the ratio of Mode I (opening) fracture toughness of bone to cement line and σnc-b/σnc-cl denotes the ratio of the tensile strength of bone to cement line. The strength and toughness ratios were obtained by keeping the interstitial bone properties constant (Table ) while varying the cement line properties. The ranges of cement line properties used to obtain these ratios are marked on the graphs. The trendline represents the average of the deflection and penetration data sets.

From: Finite Element Modeling of Microcrack Growth in Cortical Bone Date of download: 10/8/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Finite Element Modeling of Microcrack Growth in Cortical Bone J. Appl. Mech. 2011;78(4):041016-041016-9. doi:10.1115/1.4003754 Figure Legend: Crack growth behavior for 45 deg and 90 deg crack orientations based on the ratio of the bone to cement line normal fracture properties. Gnc-b/Gnc-cl denotes the ratio of Mode I (opening) fracture toughness of bone to cement line and σnc-b/σnc-cl denotes the ratio of the tensile strength of bone to cement line. The strength and toughness ratios were obtained by keeping the interstitial bone and osteon properties constant (Table ) while varying the cement line properties. The ranges of cement line properties used to obtain these ratios are marked on the graphs. The solid and hollow circles correspond to individual simulations for penetration and deflection, respectively. The solid lines represent the transition boundary between crack deflection and penetration based on the individual simulation data.

From: Finite Element Modeling of Microcrack Growth in Cortical Bone Date of download: 10/8/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Finite Element Modeling of Microcrack Growth in Cortical Bone J. Appl. Mech. 2011;78(4):041016-041016-9. doi:10.1115/1.4003754 Figure Legend: Crack driving force versus crack extension for crack penetration into the osteon and crack deflection into the cement line. Note that the crack is oriented at 45 deg.

From: Finite Element Modeling of Microcrack Growth in Cortical Bone Date of download: 10/8/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Finite Element Modeling of Microcrack Growth in Cortical Bone J. Appl. Mech. 2011;78(4):041016-041016-9. doi:10.1115/1.4003754 Figure Legend: Crack driving force versus crack extension for three crack lengths oriented at 45 deg. Note that this plot is for Mode I fracture toughness ratio of Gnc-b/Gnc-cl=1 and tensile strength ratio of σnc-cl/σnc-cl=3.5. The same behavior was observed for other strength and fracture toughness ratios. Note that the crack extension values shown in the figure (182 μm, 253.5 μm, and 532 μm) correspond to initial crack lengths of 425 μm, 353.5 μm, and 75 μm, respectively.