FASTLANE Grants, Freight, Megaregions, Innovation, and more….

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TIFIA Credit Program Overview Updated August 2014 T ransportation I nfrastructure F inance and I nnovation A ct (TIFIA)
Advertisements

VTrans2035 Update March 30, Dironna Belton Office of Intermodal Planning and Investment.
Railroad Rehabilitation & Improvement Financing Program FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.
Infrastructure Planning and Funding MID-REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MID-REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION MARCH 19, 2015 NAIOP-NEW MEXICO CHAPTER.
Proposition 1B and the Strategic Growth Plan Randell Iwasaki California Department of Transportation.
Designated by US DOT Publication of Draft PFN for Comments - Spring 2013 Initial Designation of the PFN – Fall 2013 National Freight Network Primary Freight.
Rail Freight Assistance Program (RFAP) S ETTING THE S TAGE FOR THE F UTURE Rail Transportation Assistance Program (Rail TAP) RFAC Meeting April 28, 2010.
Minnesota Department of Transportation ARRA, Greater Minnesota Transit, Airport Program Status, & Local Bridge Bonding Update House Transportation Finance.
Fiscal Years Outlook Preliminary Six-Year Financial Plan and Six-Year Improvement Plan Strategy John W. Lawson, Chief Financial Officer Reta.
“Talking Freight” Presented by the Federal Highway Administration United States Department of Transportation July 27, 2011.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Act of 2011 Potential Freight Implications FHWA Talking Freight December 2011 Tony Furst, Director FHWA.
FY 2012 President’s Budget Released February 14, 2011.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Virginia Association of Planning District Commissions October 4, 2012.
National Multimodal Freight Trends/Issues/Forecasts/ Policy Implications.
KEY PROVISIONS OF THE DRIVE* ACT H.R. 22, as passed by the Senate on July 30, 2015 *Developing a Reliable and Innovative Vision for the Economy Thomas.
MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21 ST CENTURY MAP-21 Volusia TPO TCC & CAC Presentation – August 21, 2012.
U.S./Canada Transportation Border Working group April 9, 2014 Roger Petzold Office of Planning Federal Highway Administration.
MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21 ST CENTURY MAP-21 Volusia TPO Board Presentation September 25, 2012.
1 Public Safety Interoperable Communications (PSIC) Grant Program Laura Pettus, Program Specialist Public Safety Interoperable Communications.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Roger Jacobs Field Office Director Sioux Falls Field Office 4301 West 57 th St., Suite 101 Sioux Falls,
STATE AND FEDERAL PASSENGER AND FREIGHT SURVEY NCRRP Libby Ogard Jeannie Beckett.
Tolling and Pricing Opportunities Under the Federal-aid Highway Program January 2006.
Module Funding Sources, Requirements, and Opportunities Identify, access, and share funding to support road safety initiatives.
Highway Program Structure Highway Recommendations Neil Pedersen Chair, ASC Highway Legislative Team Vice Chair, AASHTO Standing Committee on Highways Administrator,
Texas Water Development Board Financing Programs Presentation by Ignacio Madera, Jr. Office of Project Finance & Construction Assistance December 2, 2003.
TIFIA Credit Program Overview Updated October 2012 T ransportation I nfrastructure F inance and I nnovation A ct (TIFIA)
Caltrans Transportation Planning Grant Programs: Partnership Planning & 5304 Transit Planning Presented by Priscilla Martinez-Velez California Department.
Grant Writing 101 Joan Wasserman, DrPH, RN (Branch Chief) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration Bureau.
PRESENTED BY PRISCILLA MARTINEZ-VELEZ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SACRAMENTO, CA (916)
June 9, 2009 VTA 2009 Annual Conference DRPT Annual Update 2009 VTA Conference Chip Badger Agency Director.
Environmental Justice: Context Sensitive Planning Grant Program California Department of Transportation Division of Transportation Planning Office of Community.
Tiffany Julien Office of Freight Management and Operations Implementation of the National Freight Network 1.
Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration US Department of Transportation Congestion Initiative Update I-95.
Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST Act) Association of MPOs 444 N Capitol St., NW Suite345 Washington, DC
Caltrans Transportation Planning Grant Programs: Partnership Planning & 5304 (formerly 5305) Transit Planning Presented by Priscilla Martinez-Velez California.
A P LAN TO C ONNECT W EST V IRGINIA ’ S C OMMUNITIES.
Addressing Freight in the Planning and Programming Process presented by Jim Brogan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. July 11, 2001 FHWA Freight Planning Workshop.
GOODS MOVEMENT COLLABORATIVE AND GOODS MOVEMENT PLAN 1 Goods Movement Collaborative and Goods Movement Plan Final Plan Alameda County Transportation Commission.
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES DEPLOYMENT (ATCMTD) PROGRAM 1 Bob Arnold, Director Office of Transportation Management,
Virginia House Bill 2 – Funding the Right Projects Intelligent Transportation System Activities May 19, 2016.
Community Crossings Matching Grant Fund Program Kathy Eaton-McKalip
MAP 21 Freight Talking Freight December 14, 2011 Leo Penne AASHTO.
Travis Black Office of Intermodal System Development Maritime Administration Oklahoma – Arkansas Port Talk July 28, 2016.
Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION Carmen Monroy Director, Office of Policy Planning April 28, 2016.
Statewide Transportation Planning Oklahoma DOT Planning Process Statewide Long Range Transportation Plan Statewide Freight Transportation Plan Arkansas.
1 Overview of EPA Climate Showcase Communities Grant Program Julie Rosenberg State and Local Climate and Energy Program Office of Atmospheric Programs.
Introduction to the USDA and Overview of
Alternative Financing
The Emergence of Megaregions and the Connection to Local Economies
P.L Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act
FAST Act Overview $305 billion 5 year bill – FY ‘16 – FY ’20
MnDOT Budget Overview House Transportation Finance Committee Tracy Hatch Deputy Commissioner Chief Financial Officer / Chief Operating Officer February.
Census Bureau Agency Briefing
Overview of Changes Made to CMAQ & System Performance Measures
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
REGIONAL MODELS OF COOPERATION Between FDOT & Florida’s MPOs
Regional Transit Formula Fund Policies Section 5307/5340 – Urbanized Formula Fund Section 5337 – State of Good Repair Section 5339 – Bus and Bus Facilities.
Transportation Regional Incentive Program
Lorain County Transit Needs Assessment
2016 SCORT Annual Meeting Federal Grant Opportunities
NC RPO Meeting July 25, 2018.
Financing Transportation Infrastructure
Take Your Money and Run! Federal Transit Funding Opportunities
Capital Improvement Plans
Surface Transportation Reauthorization: Corridors and Borders
Office of Research & Commercialization
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
Buckner Road Interchange at I-65 Public Meeting
Presentation transcript:

FASTLANE Grants, Freight, Megaregions, Innovation, and more…. National Association of Counties Transportation Peer Exchange Savannah, GA March 24, 2017 Good afternoon and thanks for being here.

FASTLANE Grants Overview $4.5 billion authorized through FY 2020 $850 million for FY 2017 25 percent for rural projects 90 percent for large projects 10 percent for small projects Not more than $500 million in aggregate of the $4.5 billion for FY 2016 – 2020 can be used for freight rail, ports, or intermodal projects Approximately $326 million is still available The FAST Act established the Nationally Significant Freight and Highway Projects (NSFHP) program to provide funding to projects of national or regional significance that address critical freight and highway issues We’re calling these FASTLANE grants. The NSFHP program provides an opportunity to address challenges across the nation’s transportation system including: Improving highways and bridges on the National Highway System Reducing highway congestion and bottlenecks; Enabling more efficient intermodal connections; minimizing delays at international borders; improving inadequate first and last mile segments; modernizing port facilities to meet 21st Century demands, including connections between ports and their surface transportation systems; improving grade crossings; and addressing the impact of population growth on the movement of people and freight. The program was authorized at $4.5 billion for fiscal years 2016 through 2020, including $800 million for this year. Of these authorized funds, 25 percent – about $190 million this year – will be spent on projects located in rural areas For the purposes of FASTLANE grants a rural project is one outside a Census designated urbanized area with 200,000 or more people. If you are a suburb of a large metro area, please review this carefully. If your project is located within the boundary of an urbanized area of 200,000 or more, you will be considered urban for the purpose of a FAST LANE grant – even if your town has fewer than 200,000 people. Cost share and minimum grant awards are the same for rural and urban projects. Ten percent – about $76 million – is reserved for small projects and we’ll go over what constitutes a rural project in a few slides. . Under statute, not more than $500 million in aggregate over the five years of the authorized program may be used for grants to freight rail, port, or intermodal projects and these projects must make significant improvements to freight movement on the National Highway Freight Network. There are few notable exceptions to projects that count toward the cap. Grade crossing and grade separation either for highway-railway or rail/rail don’t count toward the $500 million maximum for freight rail, port, or intermodal projects. Additionally, only the non-highway portion(s) of multimodal projects count toward the $500 million maximum – so if your project includes multiple components, some of which would count toward the $500 million maximum, we ask that you clearly identify those in your application.

Eligible Applicants State(s) Metropolitan Planning Organizations with 200,000 population Local Government(s) Political subdivision(s) or State or local government Public authorities (including port authorities) with a transportation function Federal land management agencies applying jointly with a State(s) Tribal government/consortiums Multi-State or multijurisdictional group of public entities Eligible applicants are: a State or group of States MPOs that serve an urbanized area with 200K plus Local government or political division of state or local government Special purpose public authority like a port authority Federal land management agency that applies jointly with a State Tribal government Multi-state or Multijurisdictional group If applying as part of a Multi-State or multijurisdictional group, your application should identify a lead applicant as a POC for the application.

Eligible Projects Highway freight projects carried out on the National Highway Freight Network Highway or bridge projects carried out on the National Highway System, including: Projects that add Interstate System capacity to increase mobility Projects located in a national scenic area Railway-highway grade crossing or grade separation projects Other freight projects that are: Intermodal/rail freight project Within the boundaries of a public or private freight rail, maritime (including ports) or intermodal facility Eligible projects for FASTLANE grants are: Highway freight projects carried out on the National Highway Freight Network; Highway or bridge projects carried out on the National Highway System (NHS Railway-highway grade crossing or grade separation projects; Intermodal, freight rail, or port project, or 2) within the boundaries of a public or private freight rail, water (including ports), or intermodal facility. A freight rail, port, or intermodal facility must be a surface transportation infrastructure project necessary to facilitate direct intermodal interchange, transfer, or access into or out of the facility and must significantly improve freight movement on the National Highway Freight Network. For a freight project within the boundaries of a freight rail, water (including ports), or intermodal facility, Federal funds can only support project elements that provide public benefits.

Grant Amounts and Cost Share Minimum FASTLANE Grants $25 million for large projects $5 million for small projects Cost Share Up to 60 percent FASTLANE grants Up to 80 percent total Federal Previously incurred expenses cannot count toward cost share For large projects with a minimum project size of $100 million, the minimum award is $25 million. For small projects, the minimum award is $5 million. FASTLANE grants may be used for up to 60 percent of future project costs. And total Federal assistance may not exceed 80 percent of costs. Non-Federal sources include State funds originating from programs funded by State revenue, local funds originating from State or local revenue funded programs, private funds or other funding sources of non-Federal origins. If funds originate from a Federal source – even if the State or a local government is providing them – they are still considered Federal funds. Unless otherwise authorized in statute, local cost-share may not be counted as non-Federal share for both the NSFHP and another Federal program. For any project, the Department cannot consider previously incurred costs towards the matching requirement. This means we’re going to be looking carefully at an applicant’s budget to make sure they meet all statutory requirements.

Eligible Project Costs Development phase activities, including planning, feasibility analysis , revenue forecasting, environmental review, preliminary engineering, design work, and other pre-construction activities Construction activities including new construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, property or equipment acquisition, environmental mitigation, construction contingencies, and operational improvements FASTLANE grants can support development phase activities and construction. Development phase activities include planning, feasibility analysis , revenue forecasting, environmental review, preliminary engineering, design work, and other pre-construction activities Construction activities including new construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, property or equipment acquisition, environmental mitigation, construction contingencies, and operational improvements Please note, however, that one statutory requirement for project selection is that the project be based on preliminary engineering. While development phase activities are eligible project costs, to be considered for selection, some level of environmental analysis and preliminary engineering must be undertaken prior to the application. The Department will evaluate the level of completion of development phase activities to assess project readiness and risk – which I’ll get into more in a bit.

FY17 FASTLANE Application Deadline December 15, 2016 8:00 PM EST: Applications submitted to www.Grants.gov If you think you’ll apply, we ask that you email FASTLANEgrants@dot.gov by March 25 with your project name, cost, and a 2-3 sentence description. This is not a requirement for submission. Applications must be submitted by 8:00 p.m. EDT on April 14, 2016. The Grants.gov “Apply” function will open by March 15, 2016. Applications must comply with all requirements set forth in the Notice of Funding Opportunity and be submitted through www.Grants.gov to be eligible for award. Applications received after the deadline will not be considered except in the case of unforeseen technical difficulties outlined in the Notice of Funding Opportunity.

More information Visit: www.transportation.gov/buildamerica/FASTLANEgrants Email: FASTLANEgrants@dot.gov FHWA Point of Contact: Crystal Jones, Office of Freight Management and Operations (Crystal.Jones@dot.gov) The Department will regularly post answers to frequently asked questions on the program’s website. Guidance, webinar registration, and other importation information is also available.at www.transportation.gov/FASTLANEgrants If your question is not addressed or you would like to contact the Department, please email FASTLANEgrants@dot.gov

Advancing Innovation What are some critical freight projects and initiatives in your area? Can these projects support larger (regional, megaregional) goals and activities? Who in your region is best suited to lead a Megaregions effort? What partnerships work best?

Challenges Facing PAM: Railway Infrastructure Facts on U.S. railroads: 139,000 miles of track $68.9 billion of revenue annually Railroads offer capacity to accommodate future freight increases. 88% of railroads under capacity (2007) By 2035, 45% projected to be under capacity. Investment required to accommodate projected freight increases. Source: Federal Railroad Administration

Piedmont-Atlantic Megaregion: Migration Trends 1995 to 2000 1.6 million people moved to PAM from the rest of the country. 1.3 million people migrated to PAM internationally. In just 5 years, 2.9 million people moved to PAM, with just over half from other parts of the US and the rest coming from other countries. Source: US Census Bureau Source: U.S. Census Bureau

Memphis Spotlight- Freight Committee Membership Just a few listed here………….

Mid-South Megaregion Workshop Feedback Mid-South Megaregion Workshop Feedback **Important ideas gained from workshop**

Mid-South Megaregion Workshop Feedback Mid-South Megaregion Workshop Feedback **Additional FHWA efforts to support megaregions**

Mid-South Megaregion Workshop Feedback Mid-South Megaregion Workshop Feedback **Suggestions for megaregions in development of planning and projects**

Mid-Atlantic Megaregion Workshop Feedback Mid-Atlantic Megaregion Workshop Feedback **Important ideas gained from workshop**

Mid-Atlantic Megaregion Workshop Feedback Mid-Atlantic Megaregion Workshop Feedback **Additional FHWA efforts to support megaregions**

Mid-Atlantic Megaregion Workshop Feedback Mid-Atlantic Megaregion Workshop Feedback *Suggestions for megaregions in development of planning and projects*

Advancing Innovation What are some critical freight projects and initiatives in your area? Can these projects support larger (regional, megaregional) goals and activities? Who in your region is best suited to lead a Megaregions effort? What partnerships work best?

Thank You James Garland Planning Capacity Building Team FHWA Office of Planning 202-366-6221 Office James.Garland@dot.gov www.planning.dot.gov www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/megaregions