ACCESS for ELLs Score Changes

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Square Peg and Round Hole… As parents and educators, the change in grading systems requires a fundamental switch in our thinking… 4=A 1=F 2=D 3=B.
Advertisements

Introduction to GREAT for ELs Office of Student Assessment Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (608)
Understanding California’s New State Assessment Cambrian School District August 20, 2015.
California Assessment of Student Progress and Performance 1.
Introduction to GREAT for ELs Office of Student Assessment Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (608)
PREPARING [DISTRICT NAME] STUDENTS FOR COLLEGE & CAREER Setting a New Baseline for Success.
Understanding Alaska Measures of Progress Results: Reports 1 ASA Fall Meeting 9/25/2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development Margaret MacKinnon,
September 2013 THE COMMON CORE STANDARDS & THE NEW STATE TESTS: ADVANCING COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS IN NYC.
Created by: Krystal Barker, Teresa Campbell, Kim Grubb, and Tristan Parsons.
Understanding the 2015 Smarter Balanced Assessment Results Assessment Services.
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress CAASPP Insert Your School Logo.
Paulding County School District Elementary Parent Presentation New Georgia Elementary Parent Informational Meeting All parents and guardians.
Paulding County School District Hutchens Elementary Parent Presentation Powerpoint information has been adapted from resources available at
ACCESS for ELLs Score Changes
Use PowerPoint deck to share with your staff details about:
SHAPE your School Mental Health System!
Pupil Assessment Guide How teachers assess pupil progress
Student Growth What does it Mean for Principals and Teachers?
California Assessment of STUDENT PERFORMANCE and PROGRESS
Secondary Assessment & Grade Reporting
A Growth Measure for ALL Students.
Pre-Referral to Special Education: Considerations
Interpreting ACCESS Scores
Organizing Students for Cognitively Complex Tasks
Unit OP 1 Support children with additional needs
Smarter Balanced Assessment Results
Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS
ACT Aspire Test Preparation
Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS
California Assessment of Student Progress and Performance
TAIS Overview for Districts
Release of PARCC Student Results
PowerSchool for Parents
A Site Administrator’s Guide to Talking to Parents about the ELPAC
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Standards- based grading for parents- grades k-2
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
[Insert State Name] State Assessments: What do families need to know?
Session 4 Objectives Participants will:
Office of Education Improvement and Innovation
Common Core Update May 15, 2013.
Performance Task Overview
Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS
CORE Academic Growth Model: Results Interpretation
Evaluating the Quality of Student Achievement Objectives
Smarter Balanced Assessments: What do families need to know?
[Insert State Name] State Assessments: What do families need to know?
Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS
Instructional Learning Cycle:
Introduction to Middle School Admissions
Today’s Meet ! To help facilitate today’s meeting (and keep it short) you can ask your questions here, we will answer them and return.
Standards Aligned System Integration Trainer Professional Development
[Insert State Name] State Assessments: What do families need to know?
ACCESS for ELLs Score Reports
Introduction to Student Achievement Objectives
Background This slide should be removed from the deck once the template is updated. During the 2018 Legislative Session, Act 555 was passed requiring schools.
Selecting Baseline Data and Establishing Targets for Student Achievement Objectives Module Welcome to the Polk County Selecting Baseline Data and.
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI) for Parents and Community
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI) for Parents and Community
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
Whose Job Is It? Part Two At the Board Table Discussion Tool
Lesson 4: Analysis of Characters’ Actions in Greek Myths
(Introduce new electronic score reports)
Helping Students Generate and Test Hypotheses
Understanding the CAASPP Student Score Reports
Background This slide should be removed from the deck once the template is updated. During the 2019 Legislative Session, the Legislature updated a the.
A Site Administrator’s Guide: Talking to Parents About the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (ELPAC)
How do our beliefs affect our math instruction and our student’s learning? October 11, :00pm – 5:15pm Please read through the norms for courageous.
Presentation transcript:

ACCESS for ELLs 2.0 2017 Score Changes Presentation for Teachers and Administrators Please customize this slide with your name, affiliation, and any logos or other images associated with your work. You may want to review additional materials related to this topic on the WIDA website prior to sharing this powerpoint. You can watch a webinar of WIDA staff presenting these slides at www.wida.us/proficiency. In addition, a video overview of the topic is available. You may watch the webinar or video for your own learning or think about showing them to colleagues.

Overview 1 2 3 4 5 What has changed? How might it impact my students? Example students 3 Takeaways 4 Your questions 5 The purpose of this presentation is to provide an overview of how the scores on the ACCESS for ELLs 2.0 assessment will be changing. First, we will explain how the scoring of the assessment has changed this year. We will tell you how these changes may affect your students’ scores on this year’s assessment when we compare them to last year. And finally, we will save time for your questions.

What are the ACCESS for ELLs 2.0 Score Changes for 2017? The WIDA ELD Standards are not changing. The expectations for student performance on the assessment (ACCESS for ELLs 2.0) have changed. The test items are not harder, but we have changed how student scores are interpreted into proficiency levels. Students must demonstrate higher language skills to achieve the same proficiency levels. These are the basics. One way to describe the changes is that scores are now derived using a more rigorous score scale. You can read more about the change at www.wida.us/proficiency

What do increased expectations on ACCESS for ELLs 2. 0 mean What do increased expectations on ACCESS for ELLs 2.0 mean? What will this mean for students? To give it a metaphor, it means they will face higher hurdles to achieve the same level of success on the test, and they will need strong language support in the classroom to clear those hurdles. The hurdles have gone up because when demands for content success increase, the demands for language embedded in that more complex content are also higher.

What can we expect? Some students’ scores may go down in 2017. Fewer students may exit program support. Applying the new score scale to last year’s test results (2015-16), about 95% of students would receive a lower overall composite proficiency level than on the old score scale, about 1% would see an increase, and the rest had no change.

Here you can see the distribution of 8th grade students using last year’s test results. We previously had about 45% of students scoring in levels 4-6. That has decreased to just 30% with the new score scale applied. Students achieving levels 5 and 6 went down to around 5%. If your exit criteria was level 5.0, you might have exited about 15% of 8th grade students last year, but now that would only be about 5%.

Main Ideas Need to ensure that ELLs receive the support they need for success and do not exit programs too early. Scores vary for MANY reasons. 2017 is a fresh start: new baseline for growth. Identify and build on strengths. This truly is an opportunity to make sure we are supporting students to ensure their success. Scores can vary for these reasons and more: individual circumstances, age and development, program/instruction, engagement of the assessment, motivation, and so on… We are not able to analyze growth using scale scores this year. The scales are not comparable. We can convert proficiency levels from 2016 to the new scale to determine whether or not students made progress. WIDA’s online score lookup calculator gives us this information. As you always have, you will continue to identify and build on students’ strengths using ACCESS for ELLs 2.0 scores.

Score Lookup Calculator at www.wida.us/proficiency Comparing 2016 and 2017 Scores Optional Slide: it may be helpful to talk about 2016 and 2017 scores using a metaphor. When two things are too different to meaningfully compare, we say “it’s like comparing apples and oranges.” This is true with the 2016 and 2017 ACCESS for ELLs 2.0 test scores. If our students’ scores decreased but we aren’t sure why, it’s a good idea to enter the student’s 2016 scores into the calculator. After using the calculator, you’ll be able to look at apples and apples to make comparisions. In other words, the score lookup calculator will allow you to determine whether or not your students made progress because you’ll be looking at both year’s test results on the same score scale. Score Lookup Calculator at www.wida.us/proficiency

Score Lookup Calculator www.wida.us/proficiency Converts 2016 scores to the new scale so that you can meaningfully compare them with 2017 results. Helps you interpret or explain in situations where a student's scores look different than expected. Does not allow us to determine if a student made adequate progress, only whether they made any progress. Expectations for how much growth was adequate from the past are no longer valid. The test and scores have changed too much. After first bullet, you could give an example: Example: Priyanka’s overall score was reported as a 4.0 in 2016 but once converted, it was a 3.6. In 2017, she earned a 3.9. After second bullet, continue the example: Good news! Even though her score appeared to decrease from 4.0 to 3.9, after using the calculator, we can see that Priyanka made progress from 3.6 to 3.9. After third bullet, complete the example. Previously, we targeted growth of .5 PL for Priyanka, but we can’t assume that is reasonable. We will start fresh on charting her growth going forward. I encourage you to read through the FAQ document on the webpage before using the Score Lookup Calculator.

3rd grade reported proficiency level Example Student: Yelena Domain or Composite 3rd grade reported proficiency level 4th grade reported PL Listening 4.0 3.9 Speaking 3.5 4.1 Reading 2.8 2.3 Writing 4.2 Overall Composite 3.7 It appears that Yelena did not perform as well in Listening or Reading this year as she did last year. But we need to take this year’s score changes into account. This year’s test scoring is more rigorous, so let’s see what last year’s scores would have been with that same rigor applied.

3rd grade reported proficiency level Example Student: Yelena Domain or Composite 3rd grade reported proficiency level 3rd grade adjusted PL 4th grade reported PL Listening 4.0 3.8 3.9 Speaking 3.5 4.1 Reading 2.8 2.0 2.3 Writing 4.2 Overall Composite 3.7 What we see here is that Yelena’s scores in Listening and Reading last year were reported higher. If we adjust them to the new score scale using the online score lookup calculator, we see that Yelena actually did perform better on the test this year than last year in all four domains. We should still look for her strengths and growth opportunities to set goals for her instruction, but we don’t need to worry that she is losing ground.

10th grade reported proficiency level Example Student: Marwan Domain or Composite 10th grade reported proficiency level 11th grade reported PL Listening 5.3 5.2 Speaking 4.2 3.7 Reading 5.1 4.5 Writing 4.6 Overall Composite 4.8 4.4 Now let’s look at Marwan, an older student. His teachers saw last year that Marwan was very close to meeting his state’s criteria for program exit, and have been encouraging him to focus on his Speaking and Writing skills this year in hopes of preparing him for success in the mainstream classroom without ELL support. Marwan was very hopeful about this year’s test results, so after seeing his 2017 score report, his teachers prepared for a difficult conversation that they knew would disappoint Marwan. They wondered what happened: were his 10th grade scores higher than they should’ve been for his actual proficiency? Did he have a hard time with the Speaking test this year, despite all of their efforts? And Marwan had always been strong in Reading…what happened?

10th grade reported proficiency level Example Student: Marwan Domain or Composite 10th grade reported proficiency level 10th grade adjusted PL 11th grade reported PL Listening 5.3 5.1 5.2 Speaking 4.2 3.7 Reading 4.5 Writing 4.6 Overall Composite 4.8 4.4 After adjusting his 10th grade scores using the online score lookup calculator, we see that Marwan held steady or gained proficiency in every domain. This just means that the shifting educational climate toward higher expectations means that Marwan could probably benefit from staying in the ELL program throughout his senior year to ensure he can meet his goals for college and career. His teachers can continue with many of the same goals they had for Marwan.

FAQs Q: What is the average change in score? A: This varies! Q: Which domain(s) are most impacted? A: Speaking, followed by Reading and Writing. Listening was minimally impacted. Q: Which students are most impacted? A: Higher grade levels and higher proficiency levels. Responses are in general, for all students. This will depend on the grade and proficiency levels of students, as well as how they perform on this year’s test. 2. This does vary by grade level. Some grade levels had bigger adjustments to certain domains than others. 3. Scores that would have been 6.0 are now closer to 5.0 in many cases. College and career readiness may require more support so we know students are ready.

Takeaways to Consider and Discuss Look across your students for any whose scores might require any additional attention. At your grade level(s), do you notice any consistent themes (like one particular domain changed a lot)? Did anyone have notable decreases in scores? Were any nearing program exit but did not meet the criteria? What does this mean for you as a teacher? For your program? For your district? The score lookup calculator will help you analyze each of your students’ scores how I just did with Yelena and Marwan so you can still see whether or not they made progress. Who should you plan to meet with to discuss this information? What initiatives are you involved in that might be impacted?

Impact on ELL Identification and Exit The WIDA Screener (paper and online) was designed using the new score scale. The W-APT and WIDA MODEL have not been updated. Students who recently exited program support (2016 or earlier on the old score scale) should be carefully monitored. Optional slide if you want to discuss your procedures for placement and exit. Please customize with local assessments used and/or policies for reclassification. Make sure to monitor students’ academic content test scores and classroom performance if they either were not placed in program using the W-APT or MODEL, or if they recently exited. Refer to your state education agency for guidance on how to handle redesignation of any students who you identify as possibly needing program support.

2017 Score Changes Resources Educator Materials Student Materials Parent/Family Materials Score Lookup Calculator Flyers on screen: Overview flyer, Understanding Your Child’s 2017 ACCESS for ELLs 2.0 Scores, Getting Students Ready for Testing Resources include a video, webinars, PowerPoints, flyers, and more.

Where to Find Information & Resources www.wida.us/proficiency

Questions & Answers Thank you! Insert your professional photo, logo, or another image. Teacher and administrator handouts available. You may want to print some to distribute at the presentation: www.wida.us/proficiency Thank you! Insert your name and contact information