Envelope tracking as a tool for low emittance ring design

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Advertisements

Electron-cloud instability in the CLIC damping ring for positrons H. Bartosik, G. Iadarola, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Rumolo TWIICE workshop, TWIICE.
Halo calculations in ATF DR Dou Wang (IHEP), Philip Bambade (LAL), Kaoru Yokoya (KEK), Theo Demma (LAL), Jie Gao (IHEP) FJPPL-FKPPL Workshop on ATF2 Accelerator.
Dr. Zafer Nergiz Nigde University THE STATUS OF TURKISH LIGHT SOURCE.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Accelerator Backgrounds M. Sullivan 1 Accelerator Generated Backgrounds for e  e  B-Factories M. Sullivan.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Searching for Quantum LOVE at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Eugene Tan On behalf of Rohan Dowd 120/10/2010Eugene Tan – IWLC 2010, Genega ASLS.
Beamstrahlung and energy acceptance K. Ohmi (KEK) HF2014, Beijing Oct 9-12, 2014 Thanks to Y. Zhang and D. Shatilov.
Yichao Jing 11/11/2010. Outline Introduction Linear lattice design and basic parameters Combined function magnets study and feasibility Nonlinear dynamics.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Impedance and Collective Effects in BAPS Na Wang Institute of High Energy Physics USR workshop, Huairou, China, Oct. 30, 2012.
Intra-beam Scattering Study for Low Emittance of BAPS S.K.Tian(IHEP)
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB-LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Simulation of low emittance lattice includes machine errors and optics corrections. Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
New Progress of the Nonlinear Collimation System for A. Faus-Golfe J. Resta López D. Schulte F. Zimmermann.
Theoretical studies of IBS in the SPS F. Antoniou, H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, Y.Papaphilippou MSWG – LIU meeting, 1/10/2013.
Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.
Matching recipe and tracking for the final focus T. Asaka †, J. Resta López ‡ and F. Zimmermann † CERN, Geneve / SPring-8, Japan ‡ CERN, Geneve / University.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
November 14, 2004First ILC Workshop1 CESR-c Wiggler Dynamics D.Rubin -Objectives -Specifications -Modeling and simulation -Machine measurements/ analysis.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Progress in Quad Ring Coolers Ring Cooler Workshop UCLA March 7-8, 2002.
1 Simulations of fast-ion instability in ILC damping ring 12 April ECLOUD 07 workshop Eun-San Kim (KNU) Kazuhito Ohmi (KEK)
M.E. Biagini, M. Boscolo, T. Demma (INFN-LNF) A. Chao, M.T.F. Pivi (SLAC). Status of Multi-particle simulation of INFN.
Comparison between simulations and measurements in the LHC with heavy ions T. Mertens, R. Bruce, J.M. Jowett, H. Damerau,F. Roncarolo.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
Nonlinear Dynamic Study of FCC-ee Pavel Piminov, Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia.
E Levichev -- Dynamic Aperture of the SRFF Storage Ring Frontiers of Short Bunches in Storage Rings INFN-LNF, Frascati, 7-8 Nov 2005 DYNAMIC APERTURE OF.
Emittances Normalised r.m.s. Emittances at Damping Ring Extraction Horizontal Emittance (  m) Vertical Emittance (  m)
Orbits, Optics and Beam Dynamics in PEP-II Yunhai Cai Beam Physics Department SLAC March 6, 2007 ILC damping ring meeting at Frascati, Italy.
February 5, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity -Machine studies -Simulation and modeling -4.1GeV.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
Electron cloud study for ILC damping ring at KEKB and CESR K. Ohmi (KEK) ILC damping ring workshop KEK, Dec , 2007.
FCC-ee booster: preliminary design study Dmitry Shwartz BINP
Intra-Beam scattering studies for CLIC damping rings A. Vivoli* Thanks to : M. Martini, Y. Papaphilippou *
Low Emittance Rings 2014 Workshop INFN-LNF, 18. September 2014 Low Emittance Studies at 3 GeV at PETRA III Joachim Keil DESY.
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
T. Demma (INFN-LNF) In collaboration with: M. Boscolo (INFN-LNF) A. Chao, M.T.F. Pivi (SLAC). Macroparticle simulation of IBS in SuperB.
IBS and Touschek studies for the ion beam at the SPS F. Antoniou, H. Bartosik, Y. Papaphilippou, T. Bohl.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz IDS- NF Acceleration Meeting, Jefferson Lab,
IntraBeam Scattering Calculation T. Demma, S. Guiducci SuperB Workshop LAL, 17 February 09.
Ultra-low Emittance Coupling, method and results from the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Accelerator Physicist Australian Synchrotron.
ESLS Workshop Nov 2015 MAX IV 3 GeV Ring Commissioning Pedro F. Tavares & Åke Andersson, on behalf of the whole MAX IV team.
Off-axis injection lattice design studies of HEPS storage ring
ILC DR Lower Horizontal Emittance, preliminary study
MDI and head-on collision option for electron-positron Higgs factories
Dynamic Aperture Studies with Acceleraticum
Beam Dynamics in Electron Storage Ring
Benchmarking MAD, SAD and PLACET Characterization and performance of the CLIC Beam Delivery System with MAD, SAD and PLACET T. Asaka† and J. Resta López‡
Primary estimation of CEPC beam dilution and beam halo
Lecture 1: Synchrotron radiation Lecture 2: Undulators and Wigglers
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
IntraBeam Scattering Calculation
IntraBeam Scattering Calculation
Intra-Beam Scattering modeling for SuperB and CLIC
Luminosity Optimization for FCC-ee: recent results
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev
Update of Damping Ring parameters
Status of CEPC lattice design
E-cloud instability at CESR TA
SuperB ARC Lattice Studies
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Review of IBS: analytic and simulation studies
Beam-Beam Effects in the CEPC
ICFA Mini-Workshop, IHEP, 2017
PEPX-type BAPS Lattice Design and Beam Dynamics Optimization
Low Emittance Lattices
Radiation Damping S.A. Bogacz, G.A. Krafft, S. DeSilva and R. Gamage
Beam-Beam Effects in High-Energy Colliders:
Radiation Damping - Low emittance lattices
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Presentation transcript:

Envelope tracking as a tool for low emittance ring design M. Aiba and M. Ehrlichman 2nd LERD workshop 01.12.2016, Lund, Sweden

Introduction Computations for low emittance ring design (LERD) Linear optical functions (Beta and Dispersion) Basis of LERD – Quads and Bends configuration Radiation integrals → Emittance, Damping time, etc. Particle tracking → Nonlinear opt. – Dynamic aperture, life time, etc. Envelope (or sigma matrix) tracking → Emittance, Damping time, IBS, etc. for any coupled lattice Implemented in SAD code from KEK Not everybody is using this “tool”

Sigma matrix Sigma matrix represents the beam: 𝜎 𝑏𝑒𝑎𝑚 = 𝑥 2 𝑥𝑥′ 𝑥𝑦 𝑥′𝑥 𝑥′ 2 𝑥 ′ 𝑦 𝑦𝑥 𝑦𝑥′ 𝑦 2 𝑥𝑦′ 𝑥𝑠 𝑥𝛿 𝑥 ′ 𝑦′ 𝑥 ′ 𝑠 𝑥′𝛿 𝑦𝑦′ 𝑦𝑠 𝑦𝛿 𝑦 ′ 𝑥 𝑦 ′ 𝑥′ 𝑦 ′ 𝑦 𝑠𝑥 𝑠𝑥′ 𝑠𝑦 𝛿𝑥 𝛿𝑥′ 𝛿𝑦 𝑦′ 2 𝑦 ′ 𝑠 𝑦′𝛿 𝑠𝑦′ 𝑠 2 𝑠𝛿 𝛿𝑦′ 𝛿𝑠 𝛿 2 Sigma matrix represents the beam: - Beam sizes (squared) = Diagonal elements - Emittances = Eigen values - Coupling terms = Off-diagonal elements

Envelope tracking (1) 𝜎 𝑏𝑒𝑎𝑚 → 𝑀𝜎 𝑏𝑒𝑎𝑚 𝑀 𝑇 Transport sigma matrix element by element Synchrotron radiation is included as Damping and Diffusion matrices Reference: K. Ohmi, K. Hirata, and K. Oide, “From the beam-envelope to synchrotron-radiation integrals”, Phys. Rev. E 49-1, p.751 (1994) IBS can be included in the same manner Reference: K. Kubo, K. Oide, “Intrabeam Scattering in Electron Storage Rings”, PRST-AB 4, 124401 (2001) Generalization of the method in J.D. Bjorken, S.K. Mtingwa, “Intrabeam Scattering”, Part. Acc. Vol. 13, pp. 115-143 (1983) 𝜎 𝑏𝑒𝑎𝑚 → 𝑀𝜎 𝑏𝑒𝑎𝑚 𝑀 𝑇

Envelope tracking (2) SR and IBS effects are computed at each element ∆ 𝐼𝐵𝑆 = 0 0 0 0 ∆ 𝑥 ′ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ∆ 𝑦 ′ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ∆ 𝛿 IBS diffusion ∆ 𝑥 ′ , ∆ 𝑦 ′ ,∆ 𝛿 are computed with IBS theory for given sigma matrix elements 1) At all elements 𝜎 𝑏𝑒𝑎𝑚 → 𝜎 𝑏𝑒𝑎𝑚 + ∆ 𝐼𝐵𝑆 IBS: 2-a) If the element is dipoles Damping matrix (on-energy beam) Diffusion matrix D= 𝑃 𝐸 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 𝐺 𝑥 0 𝐺 𝑦 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 𝜎 𝑏𝑒𝑎𝑚 → 𝐼−𝑙𝐷 𝜎 𝑏𝑒𝑎𝑚 (𝐼−𝑙𝐷) 𝑇 Damping: Transport & Diffusion: 𝜎 𝑏𝑒𝑎𝑚 → 𝑀𝜎 𝑏𝑒𝑎𝑚 𝑀 𝑇 + 𝑀𝐵 𝑀 𝑇 𝑑𝑠 2-b) If the element is not dipoles 𝐺 𝑥,𝑦 include gradient and edge of bending 𝐵 66 = 55 24 3 𝑟 𝑒 ℏ 𝑚𝑐 𝛾 5 𝜌 3 B= 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 𝐵 66 Transport: 𝜎 𝑏𝑒𝑎𝑚 → 𝑀𝜎 𝑏𝑒𝑎𝑚 𝑀 𝑇 3) Continue tracking until an equilibrium is reached

Rad. Int. vs Envelope tracking Comparison for SLS2 lattice Radiation integral Envelope tracking Natural emittance (pm) 137 139 Energy spread (‰) 1.03 Hor. Damping time (ms) 4.54 4.48 Ver. Damping time (ms) 8.07 7.96 Long. Damping time (ms) 6.60 6.57 Note: - Need to slice dipole to 1~2 cm length for good agreement for Envelope tracking. - Required slice length depends on optical function.

Emittances with full coupling Envelope tracking can handle any coupled lattice Equilibrium emittances of Mobius rings (no IBS) are computed: 𝜀 0 𝜀 𝑥 = 𝜀 0 𝜀 𝑦 = 1 𝐽 𝑥 + 1 𝐽 𝑦 is confirmed * * M. Borland, Private communication (2015)

IBS simulation (1) “Standard” simulation procedure Compute IBS growth rate for one turn IBS (diffusion) increases the momentum spread (<x’2>, <y’2>, <d2>) Add synchrotron radiation damping at the end of turn For the transverse planes: e=e0+deIBS+deSR deSR is computed for the equilibrium emittances and damping times Transverse equilibrium emittances are set “artificially” to mimic a coupled lattice For the longitudinal plane: d=d0+ddIBS+ddSR and the bunch is “forcibly” fit to the RF bucket Continue the tracking until deIBS+deSR~0 and ddIBS+ddSR ~0 Faster simulation: e=e0+N(deIBS+deSR) (N~10-1000) 𝛿 s

IBS simulation (2) Standard → Env. tracking: Horizontal emittances ↑ Result for: Zero current bunch length ~ 3mm Zero current vertical emittance = 5 pm (Artificially set!) Standard → Env. tracking: Horizontal emittances ↑ Vertical emittances → Longitudinal emittance ↓

IBS simulation (3) Simulation for full-coupled lattice Short bunch length and increased bunch current to enhance IBS Without IBS IBS "Standard" simulation Env. tracking with SR+IBS Hor. Emittance (pm) 88 165 135 Ver. Emittance (pm) 134 Energy spread (‰) 1.03 1.31 1.21 Bunch length (mm) 1.24 1.58 1.45 Bunch current (mA) 5 Weak point of Standard simulation (artificial introduction of coupling) is more evident for full-coupled lattice

Summary Envelope tracking a good complement tool for LEDR can handle any coupled lattice including synchrotron radiation and IBS