Panel Discussion: Discussion on Trends in Multi-Physics Simulation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 CASL: The Consortium for Advanced Simulation of Light Water Reactors A DOE Energy Innovation Hub for Modeling and Simulation of Nuclear Reactors Jess.
Advertisements

Hongjie Zhang Purge gas flow impact on tritium permeation Integrated simulation on tritium permeation in the solid breeder unit FNST, August 18-20, 2009.
Aug 9-10, 2011 Nuclear Energy University Programs Materials: NEAMS Perspective James Peltz, Program Manager, NEAMS Crosscutting Methods and Tools.
Crashworthiness and High Strain Rate Material Testing Test Development for Vehicle Crash Conditions Motivation: The current vehicle design approaches result.
INSPE internship 6 month internship proposal for a Ph.D. student at WUT within the framework of WUT-I2EN Transnational Agreement Location: CEA-Cadarache.
RELAP5-3D© to Fluent CFD Software Coupling
Chapter 15 Application of Computer Simulation and Modeling.
ENGINEERING PROJECT PROPOSAL MASTER OF ENGINEERING IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DAN FLAHIVE Analytical Method to Predict Primary Side Steam Generator Pressure.
Numerical Methods for Engineers MECH 300 Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
Efficient Methodologies for Reliability Based Design Optimization
Presentation Summary: Design and Optimization Group NSF/DOE/APC Workshop: The Future of Modeling in Composites Molding Processes June 9-10, 2004.
Some Ideas For Metrology to Extend Capability and Attract Investors and Users from Methods Development Communities Art Ruggles, UTNE.
Page - 1 Rocketdyne Propulsion & Power Role of EASY5 in Integrated Product Development Frank Gombos Boeing Canoga Park, CA.
Multi-physics coupling Application on TRIGA reactor Student Romain Henry Supervisors: Prof. Dr. IZTOK TISELJ Dr. LUKA SNOJ PhD Topic presentation 27/03/2012.
INTEGRATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE [AI] SYSTEMS FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANT SURVEILLANCE & DIAGNOSTICS.
Power Extraction Research Using a Full Fusion Nuclear Environment G. L. Yoder, Jr. Y. K. M. Peng Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN Presentation.
Fuel Behavior in Long-term Management of Spent Light-Water Reactor Fuel International Conference on Management of Spent Fuel from Nuclear Power Reactors.
Thorium molten salts, theory and practice Paul Madden (Oxford, UK) & Mathieu Salanne & Maximilien Levesque (UPMC, France) Euratom Project, 13 Groups Molten.
1 Recent Progress in Helium-Cooled Ceramic Breeder (HCCB) Blanket Module R&D and Design Analysis Ying, Alice With contributions from M. Narula, H. Zhang,
Work conducted by ANL for the GNEP Fast Reactor Simulation Andrew Siegel, ANL.
Thermal Hydraulic Simulation of a SuperCritical-Water-Cooled Reactor Core Using Flownex F.A.Mngomezulu, P.G.Rousseau, V.Naicker School of Mechanical and.
Nuclear Research Institute Řež plc 1 DEVELOPMENT OF RELAP5-3D MODEL FOR VVER-440 REACTOR 2010 RELAP5 International User’s Seminar West Yellowstone, Montana.
Ozone Layer in the 21 st Century Swagath Navin Manohar.
CRESCENDO Full virtuality in design and product development within the extended enterprise Naples, 28 Nov
Work Package 2 Giacomo Grasso ENEA UTFISSM-PRONOC LEADER Work Package 2 meeting Madrid, May 8, 2012 Current status and organization of the work.
Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering Reactor Dynamics and Fuel Management Group Comparative Analysis of PWR Core Wide and Hot Channel Calculations.
The Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative Overview of NEAMS Reactor Simulation Project Andrew Siegel Argonne National Laboratory NEAMS Reactor Meeting May 19,
A System Analysis Code to Support Risk-Informed Safety Margin Characterization: Rationale, Computational Platform and Development Plan Nam Dinh, Vince.
Center for Radiative Shock Hydrodynamics Fall 2011 Review Assessment of predictive capability Derek Bingham 1.
An Adaptive-Stochastic Boussinesq Solver With Safety Critical Applications In Nuclear Reactor Engineering Andrew Hagues PhD Student – KNOO Work Package.
USING SOLAR ENERGY CONTINUOUSLY THROUGH DAY AND NIGHT FOR METHANE REFORMING – AN EXPERIMENTAL DEMONSTRATION J. L. Lapp, M. Lange, M. Roeb, C. Sattler ECCE10.
DFT Applications Technology to calculate observables Global properties Spectroscopy DFT Solvers Functional form Functional optimization Estimation of theoretical.
Model Reduction techniques. Applications to reactor scale-up. Evgeniy Redekop, Palghat Ramachandran CREL Washington University in St.Louis, MO Proper Orthogonal.
ES 84 Numerical Methods for Engineers, Mindanao State University- Iligan Institute of Technology Prof. Gevelyn B. Itao.
Oxygen Potential in High Burnup LWR Fuel using Themochimica in MOOSE/BISON Theodore M. Besmann.
1 Modeling Complex Systems – How Much Detail is Appropriate? David W. Esh US Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2007 GoldSim User Conference, October 23-25,
Next Generation Nuclear Plant Licensing Strategy William D. Reckley NRC/NRO/ARP March 12, 2009.
NLSSI and Current Seismic R&D Justin Coleman, P.E. Nuclear Science and Technology Idaho National Laboratory October 7 th and 8 th, 2015.
Experimental and Computational Investigations of Plenum-to-Plenum Heat Transfer and Gas Dynamics Under Natural Circulation in a Prismatic Very High Temperature.
CFD Simulation & Consulting Services Hi-Tech CFD | Voice: Optimizing Designs of Industrial Pipes, Ducts and.
RRC “Kurchatov Institute”, Russia NEUTRONIC AND THERMAL HYDRAULIC CODE PACKAGE PERMAK-3D/SC-1 IN 3D PIN-BY-PIN ANALYSIS OF THE VVER CORE P.А. Bolobov,
Expert Group Task Leaders
Validation of Traditional and Novel Core Thermal-Hydraulic Modeling and Simulation Tools Issues in Validation Benchmarks: NEA OECD/US NRC NUPEC BWR Full-size.
BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module VI Deterministic safety assessment Case Studies Version 1.0, May 2015 This material was prepared.
Engineering (Richard D. Braatz and Umberto Ravaioli)
Demonstration of Small Scale Solar Gas Turbine
New Project 1: Development and Validation of models for DNB prediction
Closing Remarks and Action Items
Validation of Advanced Modeling and Simulation: an Imperative
Project COMP10: Designing for Blade Aeromechanical Integrity
Overview of Serpent related activities at HZDR E. Fridman
FRAPCON-3/FRAPTRAN APPLICATIONS Unit of Nuclear Safety Research
On calibration of micro-crack model of thermally induced cracks through inverse analysis Dr Vladimir Buljak University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mechanical.
Recent FRAPCON and FRAPTRAN activity at VTT
Trade-Off Studies and Engineering Input to System Code
Integrated Modeling Approach and Plans
Data transfer between codes
BEPU and Safety Margins in Nuclear Reactor Safety
U. Fischer, K. Kondo, D. Leichtle, H. Liu, L. Lu, P. Pereslavtsev, A
Status of the ARIES Program
IRSN work and perspectives
VLT Meeting, Washington DC, August 25, 2005
Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group
IAEA Technical Support & Capacity Building Programme M. El-Shanawany
The Fuel Cycle Analysis Toolbox
TRL tables: power conversion and lifetime
“Kinetic mechanisms” discussion Summary Matt Oehlschlaeger
Nuclear Energy University Programs
«ROSATOM» State Atomic Energy Corporation
Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority (EAEA), Egypt
Presentation transcript:

Panel Discussion: Discussion on Trends in Multi-Physics Simulation First Workshop on Multiphysics Model Validation NCSU, Raleigh June 27-29, 2017 Lisa Marshall, Nuclear Engineering, 2015-16

Multi-physics Modeling The NPP predictive modelling capabilities have evolved from the so-called best-estimate calculations to first-principle high-fidelity multi-physics simulations The multi-physics interactions in a NPP are manifested in both global-length-scale behavior and lower-length-scale behavior Especially important are the multi-physics interactions in reactor cores including neutronics (reactor physics), fuel thermo-mechanical performance, thermal-hydraulics, material chemistry, and structural material behaviors. Usually the focus is on interactions between reactor physics (neutronics) and thermal- hydraulics in a reactor core (where the fuel thermo-mechanical performance is integrated in the thermal-hydraulics codes via simplified fuel rod models) Multi-physics multi-scale interactions in a NPP

Multi-Physics Modeling Multi-physics modeling of reactor core

Pin / Subchannel Resolution Classification The definitions of multi-physics simulation tools in the two groups (categories) are: “Ttraditional” (T) tools, which include mostly neutronics/thermal-hydraulics coupling into reactor core on assembly/channel basis. The coupling of reactor core to the system and coupling of the system to containment also belongs to traditional (T) multi- physics simulations; “Novel” (N) or state-of-the-art tools, which include high-fidelity coupling on pin/sub-pin (pin-resolved)/sub-channel level of several physics phenomena in reactor core such as neutronics (reactor physics), thermal-hydraulics, fuel performance, structural mechanics, chemistry, etc. Prediction of the temperature and dissolved hydrogen distributions near the triple point in a LWR fuel rod Pin / Subchannel Resolution (Liquid Enthalpy) Hydride distribution and oxide layers on Zircaloy-4 irradiated for 6 cycles in a PWR

High-Fidelity Multi-Physics A significant opportunity exists to apply advanced modeling and simulation and high- performance computing to improve designs of reactors, reduce uncertainty of predictions, and improve safety An integrated high-fidelity system of software tools should describe the overall nuclear plant behavior taking into account coupling among the different systems and physical phenomena during reactor operations or safety related transients This coupling should link neutronics, fuel behavior, fluids and heat transfer, chemistry and structural mechanics. The system must also be coupled with the balance-of-plant software tool Such system should perform sensitivity and uncertainty analyses to assess margins, qualify, validate, and optimize designs The recent advances and developments in reactor design and safety analysis are towards more physics-based high-fidelity simulations, which allow for insights and understanding needed to resolve industry challenge/high impact problems previously impossible with traditional tools

Approaches to High-to-Low Fidelity Model Information Currently there is a trend in nuclear reactor research and industry to use high-fidelity models and codes to inform low-fidelity models and codes. Due to their complexity, the high-fidelity codes are computationally expensive, and may take on the order of hours to days to complete a simulation run. This motivates the use of low-fidelity models, which are less comprehensive but provide numerical efficiency required for practical applications in design and safety evaluations. These low-fidelity codes have parameters or inputs which must be informed or calibrated using experimental data or simulations from validated high-fidelity codes. High-fidelity models can be used to predict physical behavior in regimes or on scales where physical data is not available. A number of methods have been proposed to address the integration of high-fidelity and low-fidelity codes to predict quantities of interests in an efficient manner. The first approach is based on non-linear multi-scale frameworks, which have been applied in reactor physics (neutronics) and heat-transfer simulations. This second type utilizes information theory in a Bayesian framework to use high-fidelity codes to calibrate low-fidelity codes. In the third approach, the overall physical phenomena and corresponding effects are dissected in corresponding building basic processes, and corresponding models are informed using high-fidelity codes. This method is called a Physics-based Approach for High-to-Low Model Information.