The HD target JLab12 Collaboration Meeting Annalisa D’Angelo

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LRP2010 WG5 Fundamental Interactions Nathal Severijns ( K.U.Leuven) for WG5 Scoping workshop Frankfurt, October th 2009.
Advertisements

Extraction of G E n at Q 2 =1 (GeV/c) 2 by Measurements of May 1, 2011 Ge Jin University of Virginia.
Measuring the Neutron and 3 He Spin Structure at Low Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA Experimental Overview The.
Boosting Deuteron Polarization in HD Targets: Experience of moving spins between H and D with RF methods during the E experiment at Jefferson Lab.
Patricia Aguar Bartolomé Institut für Kernphysik, Universität Mainz PSTP 2013 Workshop, Charlottesville 11th September 2013.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft on the LEAP conference Polarized Fusion by Ralf Engels JCHP / Institut für Kernphysik, FZ Jülich Nuclear.
HD group LEPS RCNP C. Morisaki. ① Development of NMR measurement system for the polarized HD target ② Development of single crystal HD target.
Chem. 133 – 5/7 Lecture. Announcements I Exam 3 on Tuesday (will give summary of material to know later) Format will be similar to other exams I will.
Guillermina Ramirez San Juan
Optically Pumping Nuclear Magnetic Spin M.R.Ross, D.Morris, P.H. Bucksbaum, T. Chupp Physics Department, University of Michigan J. Taylor, N. Gershenfeld.
ALTO Laser Ion Source Ruohong Li, Serge Franchoo, Christophe Lau LA 3 NET Feb 22, 2013.
Physical and Chemical Tests 10-1 Purification: Chromatography Distillation Recrystallization Comparison to known compounds: Melting point Boiling point.
Solid Polarized Target Opportunities at JLab Possibilities for Future Experiments.
 The average kinetic energy (energy of motion ) is directly proportional to absolute temperature (Kelvin temperature) of a gas  Example  Average energy.
Chapter 6.  Temperature ◦ Is something hot or cold? ◦ Relative measure.
Prentice Hall © 2003Chapter 19 Chapter 19 Chemical Thermodynamics CHEMISTRY The Central Science 9th Edition David P. White.
NMR spectroscopy in solids: A comparison to NMR spectroscopy in liquids Mojca Rangus Mentor: Prof. Dr. Janez Seliger Comentor: Dr. Gregor Mali.
An attempt toward dynamic nuclear polarization for liquid 3 He 1. Motivation of the study 2 . Polarizing 3 He in dense form 3. DNP for liquid He3 3 . Doping.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft on the LEAP conference Polarized Fusion by Ralf Engels JCHP / Institut für Kernphysik, FZ Jülich
Motivation Polarized 3 He gas target Solenoid design and test 3 He feasibility test Summary and outlook Johannes Gutenberg-Universit ä t Mainz Institut.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Polarized Fusion by Giuseppe Ciullo INFN and University of Ferrara for Ralf Engels JCHP / Institut für Kernphysik,
Overview installation of Polarized Target 14th Crystal Ball Meeting
HD target.
HD target. HD target overview Characteristics of polarized HD target Polarization Method HD target is polarized by the static method using “brute force”
Polarized Proton Solid Target for RI beam experiments M. Hatano University of Tokyo H. Sakai University of Tokyo T. Uesaka CNS, University of Tokyo S.
Applications of polarized neutrons V.R. Skoy Frank Laboratory of Neutron Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia.
1 XI International Workshop PST05 Tokyo, Japan, November 14-17, 2005 The Sb and HIO 3 Aligned Nuclear Targets for Investigation of Time Reversal Invariance.
9 th Crystal Ball Meeting Basel October Andreas Thomas Transversely Polarized Target 1.-Possible Physics Experiments 2.-Frozen Spin Target 3.-Technical.
Laser-Driven H/D Target at MIT-Bates Ben Clasie Massachusetts Institute of Technology Ben Clasie, Chris Crawford, Dipangkar Dutta, Haiyan Gao, Jason Seely.
Recent Developments in Polarized Solid Targets H. Dutz, S. Goertz Physics Institute, University Bonn J. Heckmann, C. Hess, W. Meyer, E. Radke, G. Reicherz.
1 Possibility to obtain a polarized hydrogen molecular target Dmitriy Toporkov Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk, Russia XIV International.
Electrons on the HDice Target Results and Analysis of Test Runs at JLab in 2012 M. M. Lowry PSTP2013 Sep 2013.
DNP for polarizing liquid 3 He DNP for polarizing liquid 3 He Akira Tanaka Department of Physics For Yamagata University PT group.
17th Crystal Ball Meeting
DNP for polarizing liquid 3 He DNP for polarizing liquid 3 He Hideaki Uematsu Department of Physics For Yamagata University PT group.
Physical Behavior of Matter Review. Matter is classified as a substance or a mixture of substances.
MOLECULAR SPECTROSCOPY
Status of Polarimeters and Polarized Targets: what are the plans for development of polarized targets to meet the needs of the Day 1 and future experimental.
Initial Tests of the JLab Frozen Spin Target Chris Keith Target Group Jefferson Lab September 13, 2007 Brookhaven National Lab.
MLZ is a cooperation between: Irradiation Effects on Solid Deuterium Stephan Wlokka.
Physical Chemistry (TKK-2446)
SEPARATION METHODS OF ANALYSIS (CHM 703)
TATVA INSTITUTES OF TECHNOLOGICAL STUDIES, MODASA
Physical Behavior of Matter Review
Fundamental Techniques and Measurements
Introduction & Its instrumentation
Thermochemistry Test Review
Precision Measurement of the Electroproduction of p0 Near Threshold:
Polarized solid Targets for AFTER
UNIT - 4 HEAT TRANSFER.
Tentative polarized solid Targets for CERN Projects
4.6 Anharmonic Effects Any real crystal resists compression to a smaller volume than its equilibrium value more strongly than expansion due to a larger.
Claridge Chapter 9.
UNIT 2.3 METHODS IN NATURAL PRODUCTS CHEMISTRY
Applications of the Canonical Ensemble:
Anharmonic Effects.
Fluid Models.
Chapter 19 Chemical Thermodynamics
A Precision Measurement of GEp/GMp with BLAST
Fundamental Techniques and Measurements
Anharmonic Effects.
Irradiation of Polarized Target Materials
Molecular Luminescence Spectrometry
Intermolecular Forces
Chapter 5 - Phonons II: Quantum Mechanics of Lattice Vibrations
Polymer Characterization
Environmental Systems
New results on SIDIS SSA from JLab
Yu.N. Filatov, A.M. Kondratenko, M.A. Kondratenko
HiFi The high-field muon instrument at ISIS
Presentation transcript:

The HD target JLab12 Collaboration Meeting Annalisa D’Angelo Alessia Fantini, Carlo Schaerf and Valentina Vegna University of Rome Tor Vergata and INFN Roma Tor Vergata Roma- October 19th 2009

Outline - Principles of HD frozen-spin target production and properties of Hydrogen isotopes molecules - Optimization of orto-H2 and para-D2 concentrations HD gas distillation HD gas analysis  gas chromatography high resolution HD gas analysis  Raman Scattering Improvements on Raman Set-up Target condensation and NMR set-up Target polarization  New Building construction Target transportation and New In-beam cryostat

Determination of orto-H2 and para-D2 concentrations in HD gas using Raman Scattering HD frozen-spin target advantages: Fraction of free protons exceeds any other polarized target  High dilution factors H and D may be independently polarized and their polarization may be independently reversed  proton and neutron polarization H and D may reach a high degree of polarization: 95 % for H 70% for D In the frozen-spin condition targets may be cold-transported, stored and used in beams under simple environment: (B = 7 Tesla ,T=4k B=1 Tesla , T=0.5K) storage experiment HD frozen-spin target main disadvantage: - long production cycles  R&D

Why HD : properties of hydrogen isotopes Homo-nuclear molecules: H2 (D2) wave-functions must be symmetric (anti-symmetric) under nuclear exchange Hetero-nuclear molecules (HD) do not obey any symmetry constraint Nuclear Exchange  space inversion for electrons and nuclear spatial coordinates e (-1)L symmetric in the ground state (L=0) V symmetric in the ground state ( =0) Rotational levels ER= b0 J(J+1) symmetry is given by (-1) J Always symmetric in the ground state Nuclear spins: H2 (Ip =1/2) Spins couple to I = 0 (anti-symmetric) I=1 (symmetric) D2 (Id =1) Spins couple to I = 0,2 (symmetric) I=1 (anti-symmetric) J= even Symmetric J = odd Anti-symmetric The H2 and D2 molecules are in I=0 ground state and may not be polarized I=1 molecular states may be polarized - not the molecular ground states - associated to J odd rotational states - meta-stable H2 wave-function must be anti-symmetric : I = 0 couples to J even (para-H2) I=1 couples to J odd (orto-H2) D2 wave-function must be symmetric : I = 0,2 couples to J even (orto-D2) I=1 couples to J odd (para-D2) Nuclei in HD molecules may be polarized in the ground state

1) Brute force: High field/low temperature HD frozen-spin target principle of operation: brute force and a gentle touch 1) Brute force: High field/low temperature By A. Sandorfi High field B=15 -17 T and low temp T=10-15 mK align spins with magnetic field Maximum equilibrium polarization PH = 0.91-0.95 PD = 0.3

2) Gentle touch: longitudinal relaxation time switch mechanisms. HD frozen-spin target principle of operation: brute force and a gentle touch 2) Gentle touch: longitudinal relaxation time switch mechanisms. T1H = minutes if orto-H2 concentration10-3 T1H = months if orto-H2 concentration10-6 H D Direct spin-lattice relaxation is suppressed T1H increases while orto-H2 concentration in HD decreases T1H and T1D very high for pure HD gas T1H depends on orto-H2 concentration in HD Cross-relaxation spin-spin interaction spin-lattice relaxation is suppressed H Efficient spin-lattice relaxation H Para-H2 I=0,J=0 ground state Orto-H2 I=1,J=1 impurities T1H spin-lattice relaxation switch Decay 6.8 days T=172 K AGING

2) Gentle touch: longitudinal relaxation time switch mechanisms. HD frozen-spin target principle of operation: brute force and a gentle touch 2) Gentle touch: longitudinal relaxation time switch mechanisms. H D Direct spin-lattice relaxation is suppressed T1D depends on para-D2 concentration in HD T1D increases while para-H2 concentration in HD decreases T1H and T1D very high for pure HD gas Cross-relaxation spin-spin interaction spin-lattice relaxation is suppressed D Efficient spin-lattice relaxation D Para-D2 I=1,J=1 impurities Orto-D2 I=0,2 J=0 ground state T1D spin-lattice relaxation switch Decay 18.6 days T=86 K D AGING

HD polarization: relaxation time T1H

HD distillation Commercial HD contains  98% HD 1.5% H2 ≤0.5% D2 Distillation process developed By Steve Whinsnant @ USC 12 moles in the batch

HD distillery operation 6-7 moles may be distilled in three weeks reducing the orto-H2 and para-D2 contaminants by a factor 10 By Steve Whinsnant @ USC

Gas chromatography: measurement of the thermal conductivity difference with respect of Neon gas carrier, as a function of retention time Varian CP-3800 GC Retention time is a function of the molecular mass and spin. Double distillation is necessary to reduce the contamination content by two orders of magnitude. The GC resolution limit is  0.1% By Steve Whinsnant @ USC

Problems HD gas stored in high pressure tanks tends to dissociate and recombine in H2 and D2 species, at a rate of 0.14% /month There are indications that after aging the para-H2  orto-H2 conversions occurs with a very long time constant in normal conditions. Accurate measurement of orto-H2 and para-D2 content in the HD is highly desirable

Raman spectroscopy: laser scattering from rotational states Connects orto- to orto- and para- to para- molecular states J=2

Raman set-up Argon Ion Laser Beam expander

Concentration Measurement < 0.5% D2 in H2  (cm-1)

Exponential dependence from Raman lines intensity: Temperature dependence Partition function I0 = Laser Intensity A() = spectral response function f(J) = an-harmonicity correction = anisotropic matrix element N = total number of molecules gs(J) = nuclear spin multiplicity Constant C where Exponential dependence from 1/ gas Temperature CN and T may be extracted from a fit to data

Dominant H2   J Iexp (c/s) Iexp 467.65 0.21 1 1391.5 0.2 2 200.74 3 132.15  

Main H2 gas content Log A = ( 2.764  0.002 ) counts/s J Iexp(J)Iexp (counts/s) Ifit(J)Iexp (J) (counts/s) 467.650.2 467.29 0.1 1 1391.5 0.2 1391.6 0.2 2 200.74 0.2 201.53 0.03 3 132.15 0.2 131.44 0.02 4 - 4.9731 0.0009 5 0.9014 0.0001 6 (0.9766  0.0002)10-2 7 (0.5155  0.0001)10-3 E(J)/KB (K-1) Log A = ( 2.764  0.002 ) counts/s T = (286.4  0.2) K Itot exp = (2192.1 0.8) counts/s Itot fit = (2197.7 0.4) counts

Extraction of analysis for different H2 species J para-H2 CNeven/ CNtot= 0.25090.0005 orto-H2 J CNodd/ CNtot= 0.75000.0005 J

D2 contaminant J (counts/s) 1 2 3 4 Iexp(J)Iexp 1.27 0.16  (cm-1) J Iexp(J)Iexp (counts/s) 1 1.27 0.16 2 2.15 0.15 3 0.68 0.12 4 0.35 0.12  (cm-1)  (cm-1)  (cm-1)

D2 gas content Log A = ( -1.1  0.1 ) counts/s T = (294  30) K J Iexp(J)Iexp (counts/s) Ifit(J)Iexp (J) (counts/s) - 1.9920 0.21 1 1.270.16 1.34 0.21 2 2.15 0.14 2.13 0.23 3 0.680 0.12 0.57 0.06 4 0.34 0.12 0.43 0.04 5 0.060 0.006 6 0.024 0.002 7 0.0017  0.0002 Log A = ( -1.1  0.1 ) counts/s T = (294  30) K E(J)/KB (K-1) I tot= (6.57 0.71) counts/s

D2/H2= (0.00290.0003) H2 temperature Fit I tot= (6.460.69) C/s D2 temperature

Extraction of analysis for different D2 species J orto-D2 CNeven/ CNtot= 0.660.03 para-D2 J CNodd/ CNtot= 0.330.03 CND2/ CNH2 = (0.0030.001) J

Progress on Raman Analysis: Raman spectroscopy works. Sensitivity is being upgraded from 10-4 to 10-5: New Laser  15 W on the green line repaired New cell with lower inner volume and non-magnetic windows done New beam expander mounted Second mirror available to be mounted PM instead of CCD will be done in November New measurements: - 0.3% D2 in H2 being repeated to check improvements Commercial HD gas analysis Absolute normalization: 50% H2-HD, H2 -D2, H2-HD mixtures – precise gauge. Real HD sample – sent from JLAB  next weeks

HD-ice target production: condensation Target :  = 15 mm x50 mm Material: solid HD HD Gas is condensed in a production Dewar were equilibrium temperature NMR is also performed. It has been found that HD must be condensed at HIGH PRESSURE (30 atm) to avoid formation of holes in the HD crystal. The Rome group has been asked to develop a new production Dewar allowing: High pressure production of HD NMR measurements with sweeping frequency and fixed magnetic field

HD-ice target production: polarization HDice Target Lab: renovated test lab annex condense HD gas  liquid  solid at 16 K calibrate pol- NMR at T=2 K and B= 0.2 T transfer to dilution refrigerator & polarize at 15-17 T and 12 mK hold at high-field low temp. for > 3 months transfer to 8 T/1.6 K storage Cryostat

HD-ice target production: run the experiment Hall-B move to Hall B transfer to In-Beam Cryostat (IBC) move spins HD as needed roll IBC into Clas run the experience P(H) = 75% P(D)=40% Dilution factors: ½ 1 T1 (1/e relaxation time  years)

HD ice Time Line: 1st Occupancy of HDice Lab: Nov/09 IBC test with polarized HD (in HDice Lab): July/10 IBC installed in CLAS/ Hall-B: Sept/10 Start of g14/E06-101( ) 27/9/10 Test of Apr /10 Start of ET- 1/E08 -021/015 07/Nov/11