CLASSICAL ORATION INDUCTION DEDUCTION TOULMIN MODEL

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structuring and Analyzing Arguments: The Classical and Toulmin, Models Junior AP English September 23, 2008.
Advertisements

Using the “Available means”
An Introduction to Rhetoric: Using the Available Means
Key Terms: Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning
Toulmin’s argument model
Activity: Mon-Fri Log on and check your Dashboard for my comments!!!!!! Your goals for this week Organize your notecards Map out your main points Paraphrase.
AP English Language and Composition H. Rogers. Rhetoric Defined Aristotle: Rhetoric is "the faculty of discovering in any particular case all of the available.
THE ARRANGEMENT OF RHETORIC THE CLASSICAL MODEL AP English Language Mr. Gallegos.
Pages  More than one way  Important for the development of the essay  Depends on author’s purpose and intended effect  Beginning, middle, end.
How to write your research paper
Note Cards on Noodle Tools How should your notecards be organized? How will your break down your main points? Do you have enough information to prove your.
5 Canons of Rhetoric. Aristotle’s Five Traditional Canons of Rhetoric 1.Invention 2.Arrangement 3.Style 4.Memory 5.Delivery.
Terms of Logic and Types of Argument AP English Language and Composition.
Classical Oration.  Structure in arguments defines which parts go where.  People don’t always agree about what parts an argument should include or what.
Structuring Arguments. Structuring arguments  Defines which parts go where  Logical arguments described as:  Inductive reasoning  Deductive reasoning:
Toulmin Argument Format
AP Lang and Comp Ms. Bugasch November 5, 2013 “E” Day Goals 1.Finish political cartoon presentations.
Greek and Roman Rhetoric THE CLASSICAL ORATION. 1.Exordium: The speaker/writer tries to win the attention and good will of an audience while introducing.
Communicating Effectively.  Etymology: Middle English rethorik, from Anglo-French rethorique, from Latin rhetorica, from Greek rhētorikē, literally,
RHETORIC.
Argument: Ethos, Pathos, Logos Mr. Eagan English 110.
RHETORIC “The art of finding the available means of persuasion in a given case” - Aristotle.
Language of Composition Chapter 1. Key Terms Rhetoric Rhetoric Audience Audience Context Context Purpose Purpose Bias Bias Thesis Thesis Claim Claim Assertion.
The Classical Model of Rhetoric (oratory, later written)
Argument What is required?. Argument – the essentials Claim – a statement that expresses a point of view on a debatable topic “the exact wording of the.
Intro to Argument Appeals to Reason, Emotion, and Ethics Direct and Indirect Arguments.
{ Digging Deeper Into Argumentation.  Determining a clear structure helps with clarity  Similarities found between published engineering reports and.
 First hand evidence 1. Personal experience (sports, technology, theater, education, etc) 2. Anecdotes 3. Knowledge of current events  Second hand evidence.
The Classical Model for Argumentation. Organization Classical rhetoricians call this arrangement since you must consider how your essay and its individual.
Introduction to Argument Chapter 2 (Pgs ) AP Language Demi Greiner | Arlyn Rodriguez Period 4.
Classical Rhetoric By the time we’re through… It won’t be all Greek to you Maybe more like Latin.
Writing a Classical Argument
The Argument Essay Modes of Organization. What is argument? A contest between opposing forces to prove the other side wrong? A battle with words? These.
Do Now Answer #s 1, 4, 5, and 7 of Exercise 2 on the “Grammar as Rhetoric: Appositives” packet you were given yesterday. Kennedy, a wiry fifty-nine-year-old.
Argument Organization
Introduction to Rhetoric chapter one. Rhetoric *definition: the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion *rhetoric is.
ARGUMENT. Purposes of Argument ► To inform ► To convince ► To explore ► To make decisions.
Rhetorical Vocab. Toulmin Model of Argumentation Choice Reading
How to write your research paper
Rhetoric The faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion--Aristotle.
The Research Paper Process
Structuring Arguments English 1301
Logic Lines and Toulmin Model
Review: Essay Components, Appeals, Logical Fallacies
Shaping Argument: 4 Ways
A Model for Writing a Persuasive Paper
The Language of Composition Arrangement
The Classical Model fifth century B.C., the classical argument- Roman court system a model for writers and speakers For those who believe their case can.
Language of Composition
Constructing Arguments
1. Discuss Speech topic format and procedure
…or, “Stop your lippy attitude.”
Toulmin Model AP Lang. & Comp. Ch. 3
The Toulmin Model of Argumentation
Classical Oration Argument.
A Model for Writing a Persuasive Paper
The Persuasive Speech Ch. 24.
Structuring and Analyzing Arguments: The Toulmin Model
Key Terms: Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning
Tenets to Argumentation
List Meaning: Prefix Meaning Mis Wrong Mono
Key Terms: Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning
Structuring and Analyzing Arguments: The Toulmin Model
The Classical Model for Argumentation
Please pick up your clicker. Refer to “Women’s Brains” page 518.
Argument Organization: Classical Model
Rhetoric Notes.
Cicero: Considered the greatest of ancient Roman Orators
Cicero: Considered the greatest of ancient Roman Orators
September 25, 2017 AP English 3 Mr. Bell
Presentation transcript:

CLASSICAL ORATION INDUCTION DEDUCTION TOULMIN MODEL Shaping Argument CLASSICAL ORATION INDUCTION DEDUCTION TOULMIN MODEL

CLASSICAL ORATION Refers to the 5 part structure for an oratory, or speech that uses the following outline: Introduction (exordium) Narration (narratio) Confirmation (confirmatio) Refutation (refutatio) Conclusion (peroratio)

Introduction (exordium) “Beginning the web” Introduces the reader to the subject under discussion Draws the readers into the text by piquing their interest, challenging them, or otherwise getting their attention This is where the writer typically establishes their credibility (ETHOS)

Narration (narratio) Provides factual information and background material on the subject at hand Establishes why the subject is a problem that needs addressing Often appeals to emotion (PATHOS) because the writer attempts to evoke an emotional response about the importance of the issue being discussed

Confirmation (confirmatio) The major part of the text Development or the proof needed to make the writer’s case The nuts and bolts of the essay Contains the most specific and concrete detail in the text Generally makes the strongest appeal to logic (LOGOS)

Refutation (refutatio) Addresses the counterargument The bridge between the writer’s proof and the conclusion Appeals largely to an audience’s logic (LOGOS)

Conclusion (peroratio) Brings the essay to a satisfying close Usually appeals to emotion and reminds the reader of the credibility established earlier Brings all the writer’s ideas together and answers the question, “So what?” Remember: the last words and ideas of a text are those the audience is most likely to remember.

Practice!! Pg. 117 “Not by Math Alone” by Sandra Day O’Connor and Roy Romer Read and identify (quote/paraphrase support for this identification AND explain the effects) the different sections of the classical oration in this essay.

INDUCTION “to lead into” Arranging an argument so that it leads from particulars to universals Using specific cases to draw a conclusion Regular exercise promotes weight loss. Exercise lowers stress levels. Exercise improves mood and outlook. Exercise contributes to better health.

INDUCTION cont. Process of induction involves collecting evidence and then drawing an inference based on that evidence in order to reach a conclusion. Argument developed inductively can never be said to be true or false, right or wrong. Can only be considered strong or weak Possible vulnerability: exception to the rule These essays cannot lead to certainty, only to probability

Practice!! Pg. 121 “From Outliers” by Malcolm Gladwell

Deduction To reach a conclusion by starting with a general principle or universal truth (major premise) and applying it to a specific case (a minor premise) Often structured as a syllogism (a logical structure that uses the major premise and minor premise to reach a necessary conclusion)

Deduction (cont.) Major Premise: Exercise contributes to better health. Minor Premise: Yoga is a type of exercise. Conclusion: Yoga contributes to better health. Major Premise: Women are poor drivers. Minor Premise: Ellen is a woman. Conclusion: Ellen is a poor driver.

Let’s Practice!! Read “from Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do?” by Michael J. Sandel on pg. 125 Identify the major and minor premise and the conclusion Do the “Essay in Progress: Shaping an Argument” activity on pg.124 Use one of the thesis statements you wrote last week in your notes. The list of topics can be found on pg.100

Toulmin Model An effective tool in uncovering the assumptions that underlie arguments 6 elements: Claim Support (evidence) Warrant (the assumption) Backing Qualifier Reservation

Toulmin Model (cont.) Claim: conclusion whose merits we are seeking to establish Support/Evidence: duh Warrant: expresses the assumption necessarily shared by the speaker and the audience Links the claim to the evidence Backing: consists of further assurances or data without which the assumption lacks authority

Toulmin Model (cont) Qualifier: Reservation: Usually, probably, maybe, in most case, most likely Tempers the claim a bit, making it less absolute Reservation: Explains the terms and conditions necessitated by the qualifier. Sometimes contains a rebuttal that gives voice to objections.

Toulmin Model (cont.) Because (evidence as support), therefore (claim), since (assumption) , on account of (backing), unless (reservation). If there is a qualifier, it will come before the claim Example: Because it is raining, (therefore) I should probably take my umbrella, since it will keep me dry on account of its waterproof material, unless, of course, there is a hole in it.

Let’s Practice! Read “Analyzing Assumptions” pg. 127-129 Do the “Activity” on pg. 129