Alaska Dept. Transportation and Public Facilities

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Culvert Inventory and Assessment Protocol 2015 Field Season.
Advertisements

3-D Dynamic Base Shaking Model 2-D Static BNWF Pushover Model
Automatic Concrete Sounder Connor Murphy ELM /24/14.
NONDESTRUCTIVE CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF CONCRETE RAILROAD TIES
Mechanical Properties MAJOR PROPERTIES: 1.Strength 2.Stiffness Defects are not controllable in large sized pieces Full sized members are not homogenous.
Rating of Local Bridges for SHVs Using Virtis Software Virtis/Opis User Group Meeting August 3-4, 2010 Moises C. Dimaculangan, P.E. Minnesota Department.
Body and Surface Wave Seismic Tomography for Regional Geothermal Assessment of the Western Great Basin Glenn Biasi 1, Leiph Preston 2, and Ileana Tibuleac.
ADSC/CALTRANS CIDH Pile Workshop Spring Overview of Structural Design and Detailing of Large Diameter Drilled Shafts (Caltrans Practice) Amir M.
DES 606 : Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS Module 12 Theodore G. Cleveland, Ph.D., P.E 29 July 2011.
6/12/20031 AASHTO Report from Task Force on Hydrology and Hydraulics Subcommittee on Design Boston, Massachusetts June 12, 2003.
Presented at the 2009 AK EPSCoR All-Hands Meeting, Anchorage, Alaska Zhaohui (Joey) Yang, Ph.D. Associate Professor University of Alaska Anchorage 14 May.
Design of Open Channels and Culverts
GG450 April 22, 2008 Seismic Processing.
Foundations. Feature common to bridge and building structures Deep vs. shallow Safely transfer dead and live loads with acceptable levels of settlement.
Department for ENGINEERING STRUCTURES Professor Vlado MICOV, Ph.D Head of Department.
BRIDGE FOUNDATION DESIGN
Harris County (Fig. 3) was chosen as the area of study for this project. The three phases described in the methodology above was used for this area. Six.
Cassandra Rutherford Master of Science Candidate Department of Civil Engineering Department of Civil Engineering Identifying Bridge Scour Susceptibility:
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Sound Synthesis With Digital Waveguides Jeff Feasel Comp 259 March
2014 CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES Estimates Estimates 3 Point of the illustration? Document your assumptions.
Using field exercises to develop critical thinking skills in hydrology students Eric W. Peterson Department of Geography-Geology.
INSPECTION OF PRESTRESSED CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES BY ULTRASOUND 3D TOMOGRAPHER SYSTEM Eng. Guy Rapaport Infrastructure & Transport, Finland.
October 8, 2008 Spokane, WA Doug Walters, P.E. King County DOT
Instructions and Reporting Requirements Module 7 Electronic Reporting For Facilities March 2014 North Carolina Central Cancer Registry State Center for.
Of An Evaluation of Performance Measures for Prefabricated Submerged Concrete Breakwaters: Section 227 Cape May Point, New Jersey Demonstration Project.
Beaver Dam Wash Bridge Project Introduction Nick Hont, P.E. Mohave County Flood Control District Engineer.
Bedload-transport measurements with geophones
Assessment of Economic Benefits of the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program Hydrologic and Hydraulic Case Studies Adapted from a Presentation to NRC.
Research Lead  The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill CHC-R 5 th Annual Meeting January 31-February 1, System Observability, Diagnosis,
US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment SedFlume.
Outline of the Execution Manual for Seismic Retrofitting of Existing Pile Foundations with High Capacity Micropiles Masashi ITANI Takeshi OSHITA Seiichi.
A paper by: Paul Kocher, Joshua Jaffe, and Benjamin Jun Presentation by: Michelle Dickson.
Prediction of coastal flooding at residence zones and transportation infrastructure at the east bank of Delaware Bay in sea ‐ level rise conditions Hansong.
NC Flood Plain LIDAR Use at NCDOT August 4, 2004 NC LIDAR Workgroup NCSU North Carolina Department of Transportation.
Bridge Load Tests involve test trucks, data acquisition and computer models. Field inspection Bridge load test Data acquisition system FEM computer model.
Vibroacoustics Academics: Jen Muggleton, Emiliano Rustighi Researchers: Michal Kalkowski, Michele Iodice.
Model Fusion and its Use in Earth Sciences R. Romero, O. Ochoa, A. A. Velasco, and V. Kreinovich Joint Annual Meeting NSF Division of Human Resource Development.
Testing of Unknown Foundation: A Case Study with Comparison of Different NDT Methods Present at Ohio Transportation Engineering Conference Oct 23-24, 2007.
APHY201 2/3/ Resonance   Matching an object’s natural frequency with an external force   Since most objects have elastic properties, resonance.
Reinforcement Information - Code
SLOPES IV – Structure Span OHW ACW Functional Floodplain Span (FFS) Paul R. Wirfs, P.E. Oregon Department of Transportation Engineering & Asset Management.
IPC Notes Wave Properties. Definitions reflection – the bouncing back of a wave ex) your reflection in a mirror & a sound echoes.
El Charro Specific Plan Hydrology & Hydraulics Daniel J. Schaaf, PE Mary Eliza McNulty, PE.
Bridge Hydraulics and Geotechnical. BRIDGE HYDRAULICS AND GEOTECHNICAL TECHNICAL STANDARDS BRANCH INTRODUCTION TO BRIDGES TRANSPORTATION Slide 2 The Hydrological.
COFFERDAMS.
FHWA Updates/News Benjamin Beerman, PE Federal Highway Atlanta, GA
Anthony Alvarado, PE, CFM National Hydraulic Engineering Conference
SUR-2250 Error Theory.
UPDATE ON FHWA’S IN-SITU SCOUR TESTING DEVICE (ISTD)
STRUCTURAL CONCEPT Cityland MART VPKC3 - VNCC.
Interaction between Riprap Layout and Contraction Scour from Vertical-Wall Bridge Abutments Supported by Shallow Foundations presented by Huang, C., Xie,
Week 1.
First International Roadside Safety Conference June 12, 2017
The use of borehole radar tomography to monitor a steam injection pilot study in a contaminated fractured limestone (Maine, USA) C. Grégoire, J.W. Lane.
Pavement Thickness Evaluation Using Ground Penetrating Radar
Foundations.
Hydraulic Impedance Testing in Water Disposal wells in Oman
Physical-Model-Based Data Interpretation
Luis Leonardo González Jiménez; CE, MSc Jorge Enrique Saénz Samper; CE
EQ: How do waves interact with each other?
Course Contents Culverts Bridges Buildings 20 November 2018.
Assoc.Prof. dr.tarkan erdik
Introduction/Open-Channel Flow
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
Civil engineering drawing
Senior Hydraulics Engineer, INDOT
Post Seismic Bridge Inspection
GY111L Physical Geology Lab
Caltrans Structures Maintenance & Investigations Local Agency Bridge Hydraulics (SM&I). SM&I primary focus: Perform hydraulic evaluations on local agency.
Presentation transcript:

Alaska Dept. Transportation and Public Facilities Unknown Bridge Foundations: Pile Length Testing and Scour Vulnerability Alaska Dept. Transportation and Public Facilities Hiram Henry August, 2016

Scour at Unknown Bridge Foundations Managing U-Bridges Scour Vulnerability Evaluations Pile Length Testing for Embedment Depth

Alaskan U-Bridges 1000 Publicly-travelled bridges (roughly) 50 Unknown Foundations (5 %) Coded “U” per NBI Item #113 Scour Plan of Action required

Scour Estimates Joint Funding Project: USGS Alaska DOT&PF Field Survey HEC-RAS Model HEC-18 Scour Est.

Foundation Puzzle

Foundation Puzzle

Known vs. Mystery KNOWN Basin Hydrology Channel Hydraulics

Known vs. Mystery KNOWN Basin Hydrology Channel Hydraulics Scour Depth Estimate

Known vs. Mystery KNOWN Basin Hydrology Channel Hydraulics Scour Depth Estimate Desired Embedment Below Scour Required Tip Elevation

Known vs. Mystery KNOWN MYSTERIES… Basin Hydrology Channel Hydraulics Scour Depth Estimate Desired Embedment Required Tip Elevation MYSTERIES…

Known vs. Mystery KNOWN MYSTERIES Pile Length Basin Hydrology Channel Hydraulics Scour Depth Estimate Desired Embedment Required Tip Elevation MYSTERIES Pile Length

Known vs. Mystery KNOWN MYSTERIES Pile Length Embedment Post-Scour Basin Hydrology Channel Hydraulics Scour Depth Estimate Desired Embedment Required Tip Elevation MYSTERIES Pile Length Embedment Post-Scour Scour Vulnerability

Pile Length Testing EDAR – Effective Dispersion Analysis of Reflection Non-Destructive Test of Pile Length Mobile Equipment Research by North Carolina State University, Dept. Civil Eng. Murthy Gudatti, PE, PhD Vivek Samu, PhD Candidate Funded by Alaska DOT&PF and FHWA

Lab Development Control Pile: Length known Substrate known EDAR test #1: Length Seismic Testing: Pile Failure EDAR test #2: Failure depth

EDAR Equipment Accelerometers Signal Processor Tablet PC Hammer

Old Ideal Concept Strike pile with hammer Longitudinal Wave: Reflects from pile tip Accelerometer: Measures reflection travel time Length = ½ Time * Velocity Pile

Reality Chaotic, Noisy Waves Must strike top of pile (inaccessible) Multiple signals Echoes Resonance Must strike top of pile (inaccessible) Error beyond usefulness Pile

EDAR Strike side of pile (exposed) Flexural wave is dispersive Algorithms must filter and identify reflections Error Decreased Pile

Longitudinal Signal (theoretical) time Flexural Signal Pile

EDAR

EDAR – Preliminary Results Preliminary length estimate error at known piles (%): Goal (%) +/- 10 Laboratory (%) +/- 5 Field Test (%) +/- 10 Accuracy improved with Temoshenko Beam Theory. (Wilmington, NC Field Test) Confidence Level Upper Limit (m) Lower Actual Length (m) Limit Error (%) 95 11.56 9.31 10.85 6.57 -14.16 90 11.37 9.5 4.81 -12.38 80 11.15 9.78 2.83 -10.4

EDAR - Development Timeline Theory and Laboratory 2015 – Present (North Carolina) Field Tests and Validation – Known Piles 2016 Spring – Fall (Alaska and NC) Implementation – Unknown Foundations 2017 Spring – Alaskan Unknown Foundations

Questions ?

Pile Types for Testing Steel Pipe – Concrete filled (Primary For Testing) H-Piles – Very Common Timber – Common but Irregular Properties Railroad Three-Rail