Hourly Offers Schedule Update Examples

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Minimum Generation Emergency Operating Reserve Proposal Gary Zielanski Markets Committee Meeting September 30, 2004.
Advertisements

MISO Day 2: A Transmission Users (Marketers) Perspective Leon White August 8, 2007.
NAESB Coordinate Interchange
03/11/2013 MARKETS COMMITTEE Aleks Mitreski MARKET DEVELOPMENT (413) Overview of Market Rule revisions.
SEPTEMBER 12, 2012 | MARKETS COMMITTEE Aleks Mitreski MARKET DEVELOPMENT (413) Hourly Offer and Intraday.
SCED Power Balance Penalty Curve
Demand Response in New York State Northwest Power and Conservation Council DR workshop February 24, 2006.
Ramping and CMSC (Congestion Management Settlement Credit) payments.
© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC October 17, 2013 Robert A. Weishaar, Jr. ON SITE ENERGY – INTERPLAY WITH PJM DEMAND RESPONSE PROGRAMS Harrisburg, PA.
ERCOT Tool to manage unexpected incremental load November 16, 2006.
ERCOT RMR Deployment and Cost Proposals By: Matt Mereness and Ino Gonzalez.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal Version EDS 3 R6.3 8 Focused Input Test (FIT) II Web Ex Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control.
1 CRR Credit Policy Task Force Update TPTF July 21, 2008.
THE PJM INTERCONNECTION STATE OF THE MARKET REPORT 2001 Joseph E. Bowring Manager PJM Market Monitoring Unit Federal Energy Regulatory Commission June.
Day Ahead Market Working Group March 31, Agenda Review minutes - March 24 Coral Proposal - Working Group Discussion Loads/LDCs and DAM.
Market Mitigation Concept Group Update Jim Galvin April 26, 2004.
Mitigated Offer Cap Presented to: NATF Date: September 29, 2009 By: Mark Patterson, Manager Market Operations Support (ERCOT) 1September 29 NATF Meeting.
January 21, 2010 Security Constrained Economic Dispatch Resmi Surendran.
Day Ahead Market Working Group April 7, Agenda March 31 minutes DAM Feasibility Study - Questions? Coral Proposal - Discussion Generators and.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
QMWG – Feb. 26, 2014 Discussion topic: NPRR585 Clarification of Administrative Pricing Requirements for Self-Committed Combined Cycle Combustion Turbines.
©2005 PJM 1 STATE OF THE MARKET REPORT 2004 Joseph E. Bowring Market Monitor FERC Briefing April 13, 2005.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
RCWG Update to WMS July 11, Alternatives to Address Negative Prices At its June meeting, WMS directed RCWG to bring back something to vote on. RCWG.
©2005 PJM 1 APEx The Mature PJM Market Kenneth W. Laughlin PJM October 31, 2005 Orlando, FL.
Resource Adequacy Task Force (RATF) Update to WMS June 12, 2013.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Demand Side Working Group Loads in SCED Angelo Marcino Real-Time Market Operations – PJM April 14, 2014.
CMWG Update WMS September 2015 Meeting. CRR Balancing Account Fund Discussion The CRR Balancing Account fund appears to be working as expected The cap.
DAM Overview: Processes & Tools in the DAM Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. Crescent Power, Inc. (512) April 2, 2008.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Nodal Verifiable Costs Process WMS Meeting May 15, 2007 Ino.
1. Non-Dispatchable Resources and EIS Market Carrie Simpson May 30,
Goal Parameters How Tools Results Increasing Revenues by Optimizing Generation Relative to PJM Forecasted Price Signals.
Operating Reserves and Extended Locational Marginal Pricing 1.
MIRTM Temporal Constraints Discussion Loads in SCEDv2 Subgroup Jan. 8, 2016.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
1/07/2014 QMWG – RUC and AS update QMWG – ERCOT Update ERCOT Market Analysis.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Verifiable Costs for Nodal WMS Meeting.
Resource Adequacy Task Force (RATF) Update to WMS October 8, 2013.
July 15, 2011 Reliability Deployments Task Force Meeting ERCOT Studies and Proposal on Reliability Energy Pricing John Dumas Director Wholesale Market.
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes November 12, 2008 VCWG Meeting.
Jul 23, 2003Market Operations Standing Committee of the IMO1 Market Pricing Issues Update John MacKenzie.
IMM alternate framework for Look-Ahead SCED November 21, 2011.
Day Ahead Market QSE’s Credit Requirements Concerns and Solutions August 14, 2008.
Use of ONTEST Resource Status over Telemetry: – ERCOT protocol permits the use of telemetered Resource Status code “ONTEST” during periods of start-up.
SPP.org1 1 MOPC Workshop Series on Future Markets: Session I August 24, 2010.
“Look Ahead SCED” Sai Moorty ERCOT November 28, 2011.
Market Trials Update NATF March 2,
Wind Management at MISO
Consolidated EIM Initiatives from 2017 Roadmap Issue Paper
ERCOT Market Design & Operations
General Overview Of Resource Costs
RTDF Overview of Data Analysis & Status of “Consesus Items”
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Ancillary Service Trades and Ancillary Service Settlement
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services
Northwest Power and Conservation Council
NPRR829 Incorporate Real-Time Telemetered Net Generation for Non-Modeled Generation into the Real-Time Liability Estimate ERCOT PRS Meeting May 11, 2017.
penetration of wind power
PJM & Midwest ISO Market-to-Market Coordination (APEx Conference 2007)
Michael Daly Becky Gifford
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Outline Modeling Issue 2017 Modeling Goals
Demand resource emergency energy measurement and verification
Pay for Performance Regulation
30 Minute Reserves EPFSTF January 4,
Reserve Products Interaction
Market Design in New England
Market Pricing Initiatives Update September 9th, 2003
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Presentation transcript:

Hourly Offers Schedule Update Examples GOFSTF August 21, 2015 Note: Due to shading & animation please view in “presentation” mode www.pjm.com

Allowable Schedule Updates in Real Time Committed DA Committed RT Committed on Change cost for committed hrs Change price uncommitted hrs Y N Price Yes (increase and decrease) Decrease Only Yes (up, down) Increase in price will be limited (limit TBD) Cost Y (Comm. RT for min run) NA www.pjm.com

Schedules can be updated in RT up to T-60 min Example Set Up Price-based Unit Unit has a single point on its incremental offer curve (for the sake of simplicity) Schedules can be updated in RT up to T-60 min Unit is following its commitment unless otherwise specified $/MWh Cost Schedule Submitted DA 50 Price Schedule Submitted DA 30 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 Time (Hour) www.pjm.com

Allowable Real Time Schedule Updates – Committed on Price Schedule Only or Price Schedule submitted DA $50 Commitment (DA or RT) $40 $30 $20 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 or $50 $40 Cost Schedule Submitted DA $30 $20 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 www.pjm.com

Allowable Real Time Schedule Updates – Committed on Cost Schedule Only or Price Schedule Submitted DA $50 Commitment (DA or RT) $40 $30 $20 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 or $50 $40 Cost Schedule Submitted DA $30 $20 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 www.pjm.com

Example 1a: Committed on Price – Increase to Offer in RT Assume cost increases for hour 10 and beyond $60 DA Commitment $50 Price schedule submitted DA Price schedule can be increased for uncommitted hours $40 Price schedule update submitted in RT @ 7:00 $30 $20 * 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 $60 $50 $40 Cost schedule submitted DA $30 Cost schedule update submitted in RT @ 7:00 $20 * 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 www.pjm.com

Example 1a: Committed on Price – Increase to Offer in RT DA Commitment Price schedule submitted DA Price schedule update submitted in RT @ 7:00 Assume cost increases for hour 10 and beyond 10 2 4 6 8 12 14 16 18 20 22 $30 $50 $20 $40 $60 Price schedule can be increased for uncommitted hours * The offer used for the Operating Reserves Credit calculations: Offer Used for Day-Ahead: For HB 0 – 10 the offer used is $30 For HB 10 – 14 the offer used is $50 Offer Used for Balancing: For HB 0 – 10 the offer used is $30 (segment 1) For HB 10 – 14 the offer used is $50 (segment 1) If the resource was extended past HB 14, then the offer used is $60 (segment 2) www.pjm.com

Example 1b: Committed on Cost – Increase to Offer in RT Assume cost increases for hour 10 and beyond $60 $50 Price schedule submitted DA $40 Price schedule update submitted in RT @ 7:00 $30 $20 * 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 $60 $50 DA Commitment $40 Cost schedule submitted DA $30 Cost schedule update submitted in RT @ 7:00 $20 Additional portion of curve used for RT dispatch and pricing * 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 www.pjm.com

Example 1b: Committed on Cost – Increase to Offer in RT Assume cost increases for hour 10 and beyond 10 2 4 6 8 12 14 16 18 20 22 $30 $50 $20 $40 $60 Cost schedule submitted DA DA Commitment Cost schedule update submitted in RT @ 7:00 Additional portion of curve used for RT dispatch and pricing * The offer used for the Operating Reserves Credit calculations: Offer Used for Day-Ahead: For HB 0 – 10 the offer used is $20 For HB 10 – 14 the offer used is $40 Offer Used for Balancing: For HB 0 – 10 the offer used is $20 (segment 1) For HB 10 – 14 the offer used is $40 (segment 1) If the resource was extended past HB 14, then the offer used is $50 (segment 2) www.pjm.com

Example 2a: Committed on Price – Decrease to Offer in RT Assume CT was committed DA and not called on in RT. In RT unit decreases offer to increase chance of being called on. $60 DA Commitment $50 Price schedule submitted DA Price schedule can be decreased for committed and uncommitted hours $40 Price schedule update submitted in RT @ 6:00 $30 $20 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 * $60 $50 $40 Cost schedule submitted DA $30 No decrease to cost schedule needed if cost didn’t decrease $20 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 www.pjm.com

Example 2a: Committed on Price – Decrease to Offer in RT Assume CT was committed DA and not called on in RT. In RT unit decreases offer to increase chance of being called on. 10 2 4 6 8 12 14 16 18 20 22 $30 $50 $20 $40 $60 Price schedule can be decreased for committed and uncommitted hours * DA Commitment Price schedule submitted DA Price schedule update submitted in RT @ 6:00 The offer used for the Operating Reserves Credit calculations: Offer Used for Day-Ahead: For HB 6 – 10 the offer used is $30 For HB 10 – 14 the offer used is $50 Offer Used for Balancing (If the unit is called online): For HB 6 the offer used is $30 (segment 1) For HB 7 – 14 the offer used is $25 (segment 1) If the resource was extended past HB 14, then the offer used is $25 (segment 2) www.pjm.com

Example 2b: Committed on Price – Increase to Offer in RT Assume cost increases for the entire day after DA market clears $60 DA Commitment $50 Price schedule submitted DA Price schedule can be increased for uncommitted hours $40 Price schedule update submitted in RT the day prior (after the DA market clears) $30 $20 * 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 $60 $50 $40 Cost schedule submitted DA $30 Cost schedule update submitted in RT the day prior (after the DA market clears) $20 * 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 www.pjm.com

Example 2b: Committed on Price – Increase to Offer in RT Assume cost increases for the entire day after DA market clears 10 2 4 6 8 12 14 16 18 20 22 $30 $50 $20 $40 $60 DA Commitment Price schedule submitted DA Price schedule update submitted in RT the day prior (after the DA market clears) Price schedule can be increased for uncommitted hours The offer used for the Operating Reserves Credit calculations: Offer Used for Day-Ahead: For HB 6 – 10 the offer used is $30 For HB 10 – 14 the offer used is $50 Offer Used for Balancing (If the unit is called online): For HB 6 - 10 the offer used is $30 (segment 1) For HB 10 – 14 the offer used is $50 (segment 1) If the resource was extended before HB 6 or past HB 14, then the offer used is $60 (segment 2 excluding ramp) www.pjm.com

Example 3: Committed on Cost in RT (for min run) – Increase to offer during committed and uncommitted hours Unit has a min run time of 8 hours. Assume cost increases for hours 10 and beyond subsequent to DA offer submission and offer was not updated prior to RT commitment. $60 Price schedule submitted DA $50 Price schedule can be increased for uncommitted hours (hours after min run time is met) $40 Price schedule update submitted in RT @ 8:11 $30 $20 2 4 6 8 * 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 $60 $50 Cost schedule submitted DA $40 RT Commitment (commitment decision made @ 5:00) – used for make whole $30 Cost schedule update submitted in RT @ 8:11 $20 Additional portion of curve used for RT dispatch and pricing (not included in make whole) 2 4 6 8 * 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 www.pjm.com

Example 3: Committed on Cost in RT (for min run) – Increase to offer during committed and uncommitted hours Unit has a min run time of 8 hours. Assume cost increases for hours 10 and beyond subsequent to DA offer submission and offer was not updated prior to RT commitment. 8 $60 Additional portion of curve used for RT dispatch and pricing (not included in make whole) Cost schedule submitted DA 10 2 4 6 12 14 16 18 20 22 $30 $50 $20 $40 RT Commitment (commitment decision made @ 5:00) – used for make whole Cost schedule update submitted in RT @ 8:11 * The offer used for the Operating Reserves Credit calculations: Offer Used for Day-Ahead: Not Committed Offer Used for Balancing: For HB 6 - 10 the offer used is $20 (segment 1) For HB 10 – 14 the offer used is $40 (segment 1) If the resource was extended past HB 14, then the offer used is $50 (segment 2) www.pjm.com

Example 4a: Committed on Price in RT (for min run) – Increase to offer for uncommitted hours Unit has a min run time of 6 hours. Assume cost increases for hours 10 and beyond subsequent to DA offer submission and offer was not updated prior to RT commitment. $60 Price schedule submitted DA $50 RT Commitment (commitment decision made @ 5:00) Price schedule can be increased for uncommitted hours (hours after min run time is met) $40 $30 Price schedule update submitted in RT @ 8:11 $20 2 4 6 8 * 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 $60 $50 $40 Cost schedule submitted DA $30 Cost schedule update submitted in RT @ 8:11 $20 2 4 6 8 * 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 www.pjm.com

Example 4a: Committed on Price in RT (for min run) – Increase to offer for uncommitted hours Unit has a min run time of 6 hours. Assume cost increases for hours 10 and beyond subsequent to DA offer submission and offer was not updated prior to RT commitment. 10 2 4 6 8 12 14 16 18 20 22 $30 $50 $20 $40 $60 RT Commitment (commitment decision made @ 5:00) Price schedule submitted DA Price schedule update submitted in RT @ 8:11 Price schedule can be increased for uncommitted hours (hours after min run time is met) * The offer used for the Operating Reserves Credit calculations: Offer Used for Day-Ahead: Not Committed Offer Used for Balancing: For HB 6 - 10 the offer used is $30 (segment 1) For HB 10 – 12 the offer used is $50 (segment 1) If the resource was extended past HB 12, then the offer used is $60 (segment 2) www.pjm.com

Example 4b: Committed on Price in RT (for min run) – Increase to offer for uncommitted hours Unit has a min run time of 6 hours. Assume cost increases for hours 10 and beyond subsequent to DA offer submission. Offer is updated in RT prior to RT commitment. Offer is then updated again in RT after commitment decision is made. $60 Price schedule submitted DA $50 Price schedule update submitted in RT @ 3:45 Price schedule can be increased for uncommitted hours (hours after min run time is met) $40 $30 RT Commitment (commitment decision made @ 5:00) $20 Price schedule update submitted in RT @ 8:45 * * 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 $60 $50 $40 Cost schedule submitted DA $30 Cost schedule update submitted in RT @ 3:45 $20 Price schedule update submitted in RT @ 8:45 * * 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 www.pjm.com

Example 4b: Committed on Price in RT (for min run) – Increase to offer for uncommitted hours Unit has a min run time of 6 hours. Assume cost increases for hours 10 and beyond subsequent to DA offer submission. Offer is updated in RT prior to RT commitment. Offer is then updated again in RT after commitment decision is made. 10 2 4 6 8 12 14 16 18 20 22 $30 $50 $20 $40 $60 RT Commitment (commitment decision made @ 5:00) Price schedule submitted DA Price schedule update submitted in RT @ 3:45 Price schedule can be increased for uncommitted hours (hours after min run time is met) submitted in RT @ 8:45 * The offer used for the Operating Reserves Credit calculations: Offer Used for Day-Ahead: Not Committed Offer Used for Balancing: For HB 6 - 10 the offer used is $30 (segment 1) For HB 10 – 12 the offer used is $55 (segment 1) If the resource was extended past HB 12, then the offer used is $60 (segment 2) www.pjm.com

Example 4c: Committed on Price in RT (for min run) – Extended on Price in RT Unit has a min run time of 6 hours. Assume cost increases for hours 10 and beyond subsequent to DA offer submission. Offer is updated in RT prior to RT commitment. Offer is then updated again in RT after commitment decision is made. Unit is then extended in RT. $60 Price schedule submitted DA $50 Price schedule update submitted in RT @ 3:45 $40 $30 RT Commitment (commitment decision made @ 5:00) $20 Price schedule update submitted in RT @ 8:45 * * RT Commitment Extended (commitment decision made @ 11:30) 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 $60 $50 $40 Cost schedule submitted DA $30 Cost schedule update submitted in RT @ 3:45 $20 Cost schedule update submitted in RT @ 8:45 * * 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 www.pjm.com

Example 4c: Committed on Price in RT (for min run) – Extended on Price in RT Unit has a min run time of 6 hours. Assume cost increases for hours 10 and beyond subsequent to DA offer submission. Offer is updated in RT prior to RT commitment. Offer is then updated again in RT after commitment decision is made. Unit is then extended in RT. RT Commitment (commitment decision made @ 5:00) Price schedule submitted DA Price schedule update submitted in RT @ 3:45 submitted in RT @ 8:45 10 2 4 6 8 12 14 16 18 20 22 $30 $50 $20 $40 $60 * RT Commitment Extended (commitment decision made @ 11:30) The offer used for the Operating Reserves Credit calculations: Offer Used for Day-Ahead: Not Committed Offer Used for Balancing: For HB 6 - 10 the offer used is $30 (segment 1) For HB 10 – 12 the offer used is $55 (segment 1) For HB 12 to the end of day the offer used is $60 (segment 2) www.pjm.com

Example 4d: Committed on Price in RT (for min run) – Extended on Cost in RT Assume cost increases for hours 10 and beyond subsequent to DA offer submission. Offer is updated in RT prior to any commitment. Unit is then committed in RT for its min run time of 6 hours. Offer is then updated again in RT after commitment decision is made. Unit is then extended, but offer capped for failing the TPS test after its min run elapsed. $60 Price schedule submitted DA $50 Price schedule update submitted in RT @ 3:45 Price schedule can be increased for uncommitted hours (hours after min run time is met) $40 $30 RT Commitment (commitment decision made @ 5:00) $20 Price schedule update submitted in RT @ 8:45 * * 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 $60 $50 $40 Cost schedule submitted DA $30 Cost schedule update submitted in RT @ 3:45 $20 Cost schedule update submitted in RT @ 8:45 * * 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 www.pjm.com

Example 4d: Committed on Price in RT (for min run) – Extended on Cost in RT Assume cost increases for hours 10 and beyond subsequent to DA offer submission. Offer is updated in RT prior to any commitment. Unit is then committed in RT for its min run time of 6 hours. Offer is then updated again in RT after commitment decision is made. Unit is then extended, but offer capped for failing the TPS test after its min run elapsed. $60 Price schedule submitted DA $50 Price schedule update submitted in RT @ 3:45 $40 $30 RT Commitment (commitment decision made @ 5:00) $20 Cost schedule submitted DA * * Cost schedule update submitted in RT @ 3:45 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 The offer used for the Operating Reserves Credit calculations: Cost schedule update submitted in RT @ 8:45 Offer Used for Day-Ahead: Not Committed Offer Used for Balancing: For HB 6 - 10 the Price schedule offer used is $30 (segment 1) For HB 10 – 12 the Price schedule offer used is $55 (segment 1) For HB 12 to the end of day the Cost schedule offer used is $50 (segment 2) www.pjm.com

Example 5a: Committed on Cost in DA - Brought on Early in RT on Price (CTs) CT is offer capped DA and committed on cost. Assume cost increases for the entire day after DA market clears. Unit has an 8 hour min run. Unit is brought on early and does not fail the TPS test. $60 $50 Price schedule submitted DA $40 Price schedule update submitted in RT the day prior (after the DA market clears) $30 $20 RT Commitment (commitment decision made at 3:00) * 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 $60 DA Commitment $50 Cost schedule submitted DA $40 CT LOC paid for DA committed hours not run in RT Cost schedule update submitted in RT the day prior (after the DA market clears) $30 $20 CT LOC eligible * 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 www.pjm.com

Example 5a: Committed on Cost in DA - Brought on Early in RT on Price (CTs) CT is offer capped DA and committed on cost. Assume cost increases for the entire day after DA market clears. Unit has an 8 hour min run. Unit is brought on early and does not fail the TPS test. 10 2 4 6 8 12 14 16 18 20 22 $30 $50 $20 $40 $60 Price schedule submitted DA Price schedule update submitted in RT the day prior (after the DA market clears) * RT Commitment (commitment decision made at 3:00) Cost schedule submitted DA DA Commitment Cost schedule update CT LOC eligibility The offer used for the Operating Reserves Credit calculations: Offer Used for Day-Ahead: For HB 6 – 10 the Cost schedule offer used is $20 For HB 10 – 14 the Cost schedule offer used is $40 Offer Used for Balancing: Eligible for CT LOC for HB12-14. Details to be discussed at the next GOFSTF meeting. For HB 4 - 6 the Price schedule offer used is $60 (segment 2) For HB 6 – 10 the Price schedule offer used is $30 (segment 1) For HB 10 – 12 the Price schedule offer used is $50 (segment 1) www.pjm.com

Example 5b: Committed on Cost in DA – Brought on early in RT on Price (Combined Cycle) Combined Cycle unit is offer capped DA and committed on cost. Assume cost increases for the entire day after DA market clears. Unit has an 8 hour min run. Unit is brought on early and does not fail the TPS test. $60 $50 Price schedule submitted DA $40 Price schedule update submitted in RT the day prior (after the DA market clears) $30 $20 RT Commitment (commitment decision made at 3:00) * 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 $60 DA Commitment $50 Cost schedule submitted DA $40 Cost schedule update submitted in RT the day prior (after the DA market clears) $30 $20 Additional portion of curve used for RT dispatch and pricing (not included in make whole) * 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 www.pjm.com

Example 5b: Committed on Cost in DA – Brought on early in RT on Price (Combined Cycle) Combined Cycle unit is offer capped DA and committed on cost. Assume cost increases for the entire day after DA market clears. Unit has an 8 hour min run. Unit is brought on early and does not fail the TPS test. Cost schedule submitted DA 10 2 4 6 8 12 14 16 18 20 22 $30 $50 $20 $40 $60 DA Commitment Cost schedule update submitted in RT the day prior (after the DA market clears) * Additional portion of curve used for RT dispatch and pricing (not included in make whole) Price schedule update RT Commitment (commitment decision made at 3:00) The offer used for the Operating Reserves Credit calculations: Offer Used for Day-Ahead: For HB 6 – 10 the Cost schedule offer used is $20 For HB 10 – 14 the Cost schedule offer used is $40 Offer Used for Balancing: For HB 4 - 6 the Price schedule offer used is $60 (segment 2) For HB 6 – 10 the Cost schedule offer used is $20 (segment 1) For HB 10 – 14 the Cost schedule offer used is $40 (segment 1) www.pjm.com

Adjustment to Balancing Value PJM proposes change to Balancing Value calculation Addresses case for unit committed on Cost in DA and increases offer in RT resulting in unit being dispatched down. As a result the unit has to buy back energy in RT. Absent a change, BOR credits would compensate the unit for the buy back due to Balancing Value going negative. Balancing Value = (RT Generation MWh – DA Scheduled MWh) x RT Generator LMP             Where RT Generation MWh is greater of                          [RT Generation MWh                                     Or                        Lesser of (Greater of (RT Dispatch Desired MWh and Original Schedule Desired MWh using the committed offer schedule) and DA Scheduled MWh)] Bal Op Res Credit = RT Offer – Balancing Value – DA Value – DA Operating Reserve Credit – Any Sync/Non Sync/Reactive/DASR revenue www.pjm.com

Existing Balancing Value Calculation Example Original Cost Offer - DA Updated Cost Offer - RT Segment MW Price 1 50 5 2 100 10 Segment MW Price 1 50 10 2 100 15 In DA, LMP = $10 and unit clears at 100 MW In RT, LMP = $10 and unit is dispatched at 50 MW Applying the existing Balancing Value equation: RT Generation MWh is greater of                         [RT Generation MWh (50 MW)                                     Or                        Lesser of (RT Dispatch Desired MWh (50 MW) and DA Scheduled MWh (100 MW))] RT Generation MWh = 50 MW Balancing Value = (RT Generation MWh (50 MW) – DA Scheduled MWh (100 MW)) x RT Generator LMP ($10) = -$500 A negative balancing value results in an increased Balancing Operating Reserve Credit www.pjm.com

Proposed Balancing Value Calculation Example Original Cost Offer - DA Updated Cost Offer - RT Segment MW Price 1 50 5 2 100 10 Segment MW Price 1 50 10 2 100 15 In DA, LMP = $10 and unit clears at 100 MW In RT, LMP = $10 and unit is dispatched at 50 MW Applying the proposed Balancing Value equation: RT Generation MWh is greater of                         [RT Generation MWh (50 MW)                                     Or                        Lesser of (Greater of (RT Dispatch Desired MWh (50 MW) and Original Schedule Desired MWh (100 MW) using the committed offer schedule) and DA Scheduled MWh (100 MW))] RT Generation MWh = 100 MW Balancing Value = (RT Generation MWh (100 MW) – DA Scheduled MWh (100 MW)) x RT Generator LMP ($10) = $0 www.pjm.com

Resource Offer Curves used for Settlement Example www.pjm.com

Settlement Example for Operating Reserves Price 99 Cost 66 - Dispatch DA 66 A DA 66 B www.pjm.com