Morality and Ethics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MORALITY AND ETHICS (cont.)
Advertisements

MORALITY AND ETHICS (cont.)
Kant Are there absolute moral laws that we have to follow regardless of consequences? First we want to know what Kant has to say about what moral rule.
Utilitarianism, Deontology and Confidentiality
Ethical Theory.
Kant’s Categorical Imperative and Euthanasia
Chapter Seven: Utilitarianism
Ethics and Morality Theory Part 2 11 September 2006.
Ethics and ethical systems 12 January
COMP 381. Agenda  TA: Caitlyn Losee  Books and movies nominations  Team presentation signup Beginning of class End of class  Rawls and Moors.
Ethical Theories: Deontology and Teleology
© Michael Lacewing Three theories of ethics Michael Lacewing
THEORIES ABOUT RIGHT ACTION (ETHICAL THEORIES)
Ethics and Ethical Theories
Morality and Ethics.
MORALITY AND ETHICS (cont.). Debate Teams 1) “Cigarette Smoking Should be Banned in Public Areas” Support:Oppose: FishIda JuliusLok Kit 2) “It is wrong.
Deontological & Consequential Ethics
What is the right thing to do?
Introduction to Ethical Theory I Last session: “our focus will be on normative medical ethics, i.e., how people should behave in medical situations” –
Deontological Ethics Is saving someone from drowning a morally praiseworthy act? Do motives play any role in whether an act is morally praiseworthy?
THEORIES OF ETHICS PART 2 OF CHAPTER 12 (ETHICS).
Consequentialism Is it OK to inflict pain on someone else? Is it OK to inflict pain on someone else? What if it is a small amount of pain to prevent a.
Ethical Theories Unit 9 Ethical Awareness. What Are Ethical Theories? - Explain what makes an action right or wrong - Have an overview of major ethical.
MORALITY AND ETHICS. Where does morality come from?
Setting the state for Kant --Are there any acts that are wrong, regardless of the consequences? (Are consequences all that matter?) --Case: Bombing Hiroshima.
Traditional Ethical Theories. Reminder Optional Tutorial Monday, February 25, 1-1:50 Room M122.
A balance between theory and practice
AREA 1 GUIDING PRINCIPLES SECTION 3 Consequences (Utilitarian Ethics) Duty and Reason (Kantian Ethics)
5 Some Traditional Ethical Theories
From Last Time The good will is the only good thing in an ‘unqualified way” Acting from duty vs. acting in accord with duty Categorical vs. hypothetical.
© Michael Lacewing Kant’s Categorical Imperative Michael Lacewing
The Moral Philosophy of Immanuel Kant The Ethics of Duty and Reason
Morality in the Modern World
A Study of Ethical Thinking You get to decide what works for You.
Utilitarianism. John Stuart Mill ( ), English philosopher A form of consequentialism An act is judged to be moral or immoral according to its.
Chapter 2: Readings in Moral Theory Jeremy Bentham, “The Principle of Utility” – Consequentialism: the rightness or wrongness of an action depends entirely.
What is the right thing to do?
Basic concepts in Ethics
Ethics: Theory and Practice
Moral Theory Review.
Introduction to Philosophy
Is torture wrong? If so, why?
VIRTUE ETHICS.
Theory of Formalism.
Ethical approaches to the harm reduction debate: “Virtue ethics as an alternative to deontological and consequential reasoning in the harm reduction debate”
Obligation: Contemplating the Good, the Right, and the Ought
Lesson III Normative Ethics
Kant’s Categorical Imperative
Absolutism.
Theory of Health Care Ethics
Consequentialism Is a class of normative ethical theories
Kant’s Categorical Imperative - revision
Ethics – Util Recap What is the principle of utility?
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 15 Ethics #1: Utilitarianism
Moral Reasoning  Ethical dilemmas in management are not simple choices between “right” and “wrong”.They are complex judgments on the balance between economic.
Moral Reasoning  Ethical dilemmas in management are not simple choices between “right” and “wrong”.They are complex judgments on the balance between economic.
OBE 117 BUSINESS AND SOCIETY.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 14 Immanuel Kant
Morality and Ethics.
20th century conflict day one
Moral Reasoning  Ethical dilemmas in management are not simple choices between “right” and “wrong”.They are complex judgments on the balance between economic.
Kant’s Moral Theory.
Kantian Ethics.
Moral Reasoning  Ethical dilemmas in management are not simple choices between “right” and “wrong”.They are complex judgments on the balance between economic.
Think Pair Share “Evaluating Kant’s Duties and Inclinations by Ranking Actions”
Intro to Philosophy Ethical Systems.
Deontology Immanuel Kant ( ) Founder of Deontology.
Traditional Ethical Theories
Medical Ethics -frameworks
The rights and wrongs about morals
Presentation transcript:

Morality and Ethics

Where does morality come from?

Is it wrong to kill an innocent person for no good reason? If so, why?

Morality comes from God? Plato’s Euthyphro Is something wrong because God says it’s wrong or does God say its wrong because it is wrong. We have to use our own judgment to decide right and wrong.

Metaethics How do we determine what is right and wrong? System of ethics Justification for ethics Three popular ethical schemes: Virtue ethics Deontological ethics Utilitarianism

Virtue Ethics Aristotle (384 B.C. – 322 B.C.) Ancient Greek philosopher and student of Plato Virtue consists of realizing our natural human potential as rational animals (our telos) Eudemonia (happiness, the good life) is achieved through the cultivation of human virtues, such as wisdom, justice, courage, generosity, kindness and moderation.

The good life People are virtuous in order to cultivate their own soul and achieve a higher happiness Focus on motivations for actions, rather than consequences The goal is self-realization: to be noble, honorable, decent Cf. Confucious’s junzi 君子 What kind of people do we want to be? Do we want to be the kind of people who would do that?

Problems with virtue ethics Do people really have a telos? If not, how can the virtues be justified? Is cultivating the virtues really the best way for an individual to maximize his human potential? People can do the wrong thing for the right reasons Surely the action is wrong even if the motivation is right

Deontological Ethics Kant (1724-1804), German philosopher Rightness of actions is independent of consequences. The Categorical Imperative defines our moral duties. Moral duties, e.g. not to kill or harm innocent people not to lie to keep promises to respect the rights of others The Categorical Imperative can be understood through reason.

Deontological Ethics (cont.) The Categorical Imperative can be worked out through the principle of universalizability: "Always act according to that maxim whose universality as a law you can at the same time will", and is the "only condition under which a will can never come into conflict with itself…" (Kant, Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals) Rational beings have an intrinsic worth and dignity. The end (purpose) of morality is in preserving the well-being and dignity of all rational agents: “Act with reference to every rational being (whether yourself or another) so that it is an end in itself in your maxim…“ You must never treat a person as a means, but always as an end.

Problems with deontological ethics Problem of justification for Categorical Imperative – where does it come from Not all good actions can be universalized Rigid e.g. if we have a categorical imperative not to lie, it is wrong to lie even if by lying to a mad gunman, we can save an innocent person’s life It is not always possible never to treat a rational agent as an end, e.g. war

Utilitarianism John Stuart Mill (1806-1873), English philosopher A form of consequentialism An act is judged to be moral or immoral according to its consequences. Instrumentalist good vs. Intrinsic good Instrumentalist good: good as a means by which to realize an intrinsic good, e.g. medicine Intrinsic good: something good in and of itself, e.g. happiness

Utilitarianism (cont.) Happiness and the absence of suffering are the ultimate intrinsic goods. The goal of morality is to maximize happiness (“the greatest good for the greatest number”) An act is good if it maximizes the collective happiness and minimizes the collective suffering.

Problems with Utilitarianism Seemingly immoral acts can be judged moral, e.g. killing an innocent person. Consequences are often difficult or impossible to predict. The morality of an act may depend on chance (how the consequences How can you calculate units of goodness (utiles)? Happiness and lack of suffering may not be the only intrinsic goods.

Varieties of Utilitarianism Act utilitarianism classic utilitarianism Preference utilitarianism aim to maximize the fulfillment of people’s preferences, rather than happiness Rule utilitarianism act in accordance with rules that, in the long run, tend to maximize happiness/preferences

Required reading Suggested readings Traditional Ethical Theories (excerpt from Online Guide to Ethics and Moral Philosophy at: caae.phil.cmu.edu/Cavalier/80130/part2/sect9.html), available on Moodle Suggested readings Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, at: http://plato.stanford.edu/ Entries on: Consequentialism and Deontological Ethics and Virtue Ethics Mill, John Stuart, Utilitarianism (1863), available at: www.utilitarianism.com/mill1.htm Stephen Law, The Philosophy Gym, Chapter 17, “Killing Mary to Save Jodie”. available on Moodle