FAA NAVAID Rationalization / Resiliency Overview

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MINIMUM NAVIGATION PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION AIRSPACE (MNPS)
Advertisements

Agenda Item 6 GNSS Operations Ross Bowie, NAV CANADA Rapporteur, Operational WG Navigation Systems Panel Thank you… Good morning… I am ... and member.
A PERFORMANCE BASED GLOBAL AIR NAVIGATION SYSTEM: PART II
Air Traffic Management
Have you ever wondered how an aircraft can find a specific airport in a highly populated airspace?
1 PP 48 Use of GNSS distance instead of DME B. Rabiller CNS-ATM steering group meeting Gatwick February 2008.
USER COMMUNITY NAVIGATION TRANSITION PLAN 19 TH ANNUAL FAA/JAA INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE June 3-7, 2002 Phoenix, Arizona Presented by Frank Alexander Northwest.
PBN Plan Development Aviation Industry Forum 18 November 2009.
Instrument Ground Training Module 4 & 5
Aircraft Navigation Basics 1/C MQS. Two Schools of Air Nav  Visual Flight Rules (VFR)  Navigation accomplished primarily by visual reference to the.
Mr. Hooper Harris FAA/JAA Annual Meeting Phoenix, AZ June 3 - 7, 2002
Federal Aviation Administration Navigation Services Overview Briefing to Air Traffic Management Bureau of the Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC)
Future of Surveillance in the National Airspace System
Area Nav: RNP Evolution
Alternative Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Initiative
AIR TRAFFIC ROUTES.
Special Topics Introduction to Aeronautical Engineering
Rob Eagles Director ASIA PACIFIC Safety, Operations & Infrastructure.
Federal Aviation Administration A lternative P ositioning, N avigation, and T iming Initiative Ground Rules Mitch Narins Chief Systems Engineer FAA Navigation.
Basic Indoctrination Navigation 2 HOURS
6-1 Design of UAV Systems UAV operating environmentsc 2002 LM Corporation Lesson objective - to discuss UAV Operating Environments including … National.
Performance Based Navigation (PBN) Canadian Implementation Presentation to Air Transport Association of Canada 9 November 2010.
Overview of FAA Satellite Navigation Transition and Backup Strategies Int’l Loran Association October 28, 2002.
Federal Aviation Administration What’s New In Instrument Flight Procedures Jerry Lebar, Eastern Flight Procedures Office March 3, 2010 Hershey Airports.
Space-Based Navigation Systems
2003 FRP User Conferences 1 FAA’s Transition Strategy for Navigation and Landing Services Dave Olsen Navigation System Engineer Architecture and Systems.
F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N 1 Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) Dan Hanlon.
Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System, Montreal, 29 March RNA and RNAV and RNP Strategy in Japan Yoshiki Imawaka Director.
Navigation Technology
1 International Flight Operations Efficiency Enhancements: Oceanic Navigation and the North Atlantic Track System (NATS) Presented by Frank Ketcham.
Larry Ley | Digital Aviation | Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Vertical, lateral separations based on time / distance
Global Positioning System
UPDATE ON CASA RULEMAKING IN THE YEAR SINCE SITF/10
Flight Validation Process of RNP APCH Procedures: Thailand Case Study
Modernising the System
TYPES, AIRSPACE CLASSIFICATION, CHANGE FROM ONE TO ANOTHER
AIR TRAFFIC ONTROL.
U.S. AIRSPACE.
Assignment of Cruising Levels
Overview of Continental En-route Navigation Specifications
Airports, Airspace, & Radio Communication
Portland Tower/TRACON UAO Customer Briefing July 2010
Global Positioning System
The Right Radar Backup for ADS-B
longitudinal separations based on time / distance
A PERFORMANCE BASED GLOBAL AIR NAVIGATION SYSTEM: PART II
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
PBN Performance Based Navigation
BWI Roundtable Presentation
Association of California Airports Instrument Flight Procedures
Performance Based Navigation: Navigation Specifications
Agenda Item 6 GNSS Operations Ross Bowie, NAV CANADA Rapporteur, Operational WG Navigation Systems Panel Thank you… Good morning… I am ... and member.
CAR/SAM ATN GNSS SEMINAR VARADERO, CUBA May 8, 2002
SEPARATION Module 1, Topic 1.
How Air Traffic Is Coordinated
Flight Navigation and Planning
IAOPA 29th IAOPA World Assembly Queenstown, NZ March 2018 PBN and the Benefits for GA.
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
How Air Traffic Is Coordinated
ASEAN PBN Routes Objectives:
PBN and the benefits for GA
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
How Air Traffic Is Coordinated
ICAO Air Navigation Bureau
RNAV-RNP CERTIFICATION SUMMARY RNAV-RNP EVOLUTION RNAV-RNP CERTIFICATION SUMMARY2 On-Board Navigation Monitoring 2016.
AIXM and AIRM Analysis Results Summary.
RNAV and RNP Strategy in Japan
Global Positioning System
Oceanic and International Operations
Presentation transcript:

FAA NAVAID Rationalization / Resiliency Overview Presented to: AACA By: JoAnn Ford Navigation Programs Engineering Date: Feb 23, 2017

Navigation Programs Goals To develop, acquire, implement, and sustain navigation systems that support current NAS operations, the transition to a PBN centric NAS, and the delivery of new capabilities that enable NextGen operational improvements.

NAS Transition to Performance Based Navigation (PBN) PBN NAS Strategy – 2016 Implementation of Area Navigation (RNAV) and Required Navigation Performance (RNP) Retention of conventional NavAids necessary for a resilient navigation infrastructure

Resilient Navigation Services GNSS DME/DME FL600 FL180 NSG 1-2 Airports NSG 1-2 Airports 77 miles 100 miles >= 5000 AGL VOR MON CAT-I ILS as needed CAT-I ILS as needed 154 miles MON Airport with ILS or VOR approach MON VORs GNSS is the primary enabler for all PBN (RNAV and RNP) and ADS-B accuracy & integrity for all separation levels DME/DME provides an RNAV alternative VOR MON can be used by aircraft that are not DME/DME RNAV equipped CAT-I ILSs will support safe recovery in the event of a GNSS outage

Navigation Strategy Goals Enable the PBN NAS Strategy–2016 Provide GNSS (GPS and WAAS) to enable all PBN operations and ADS-B (accuracy & integrity for all separation levels) Provide resilient navigation services to ensure safety, capacity, and efficiency Implement the NextGen Distance Measuring Equipment (DME) Program to provide an RNAV backup for Class A airspace and the Navigation Service Group (NSG) 1-2 airports, during GNSS outages NavAid Rationalization VOR Minimum Operational Network (VOR MON) Distance Measuring Equipment (DME) Tactical Air Navigation (TACAN) Non-Directional Beacon (NDB) Procure systems to fill gaps or sustain the retained infrastructure

NAVAIDs Sustainment Strategy SA – Sustainment Analysis ISD – In-Service Decision CA – Contract Award

VOR MON Program Goals Support the NAS transition from VOR based routes to a more efficient Performance Based Navigation (PBN) structure consistent with Next Gen goals and the NAS Efficient Streamlined Services Initiative (NESS). Enable pilots to: Revert from PBN to conventional navigation in the event of a Global Positioning System (GPS) outage; Tune and identify a VOR at an altitude of 5,000 feet or higher; Navigate using VOR procedures through a GPS outage area; Navigate to a MON airport within 100 nautical miles to fly an Instrument Landing System (ILS) or VOR instrument approach without Distance Measuring Equipment (DME), Automatic Direction Finder (ADF), surveillance, or GPS; and Navigate along VOR Airways especially in mountainous terrain where surveillance services are not available and Minimum En Route Altitudes (MEAs) offer lower altitude selection for options in icing conditions. Discontinue approximately 30% (308) of VORs by 2025, in accordance with JO 7400.2 and established policies.

VOR MON Lessons Learned Safety must not be compromised during the transition External and internal communication and coordination is critical Internal dependencies exist within the VOR infrastructure External needs vary All practical means of communication should be utilized Instrument procedures work is the key to success Spectrum requirements may need to change Business case realities should be balanced with expectations Balancing resources between implementation and sustainment

Criteria for Establishing the VOR MON

Airline Operations during a GPS Outage Nearly all airliners are equipped with Distance Measuring Equipment (DME/DME) equipment and are RNAV capable The FAA assumes that most airliners will use DME/DME navigation and Instrument Landing System (ILSs) in case of a GPS outage This presentation does not discuss DME navigation, but the FAA has a separate program to maintain DME/DME navigation

MON Airports and VOR MON Selection Criteria General Criteria Retain sufficient ILSs, LOCs, and VORs to support safe landings at a suitable destination with a GPS-independent approach (ILS, LOC or VOR) within 100 NM of any location within CONUS Retain almost all VORs in western designated mountainous area and outside of CONUS Retain VORs to support international arrival airways from the Atlantic, Pacific, the Caribbean, and at the Core 30 airports Provide near-seamless coverage at and above 5000ft AGL Note: Substantial coverage will exist below 5000 ft AGL Retain sufficient VOR ground stations to enable aircraft to proceed safely to another VOR and/or to a suitable destination with a GPS-independent approach (ILS, LOC or VOR) within 100 NM of any location within CONUS

MON Airport and VOR MON Selection Criteria - Continued Other considerations Only FAA owned/operated VORs are being considered DMEs and TACANS are generally being retained DME/TACAN service would, in general, be retained if VOR service is removed Radios at VOR sites will generally be maintained Support for VOR-to-VOR navigation capability VOR signal coverage at 5000 ft above ground level to FL 450 will be provided Generally navigate VOR-to-VOR direct without airways Existing airways and VORs would generally be used in the western mountain area and where necessary in other places

Reducing Dependencies on VORs As the FAA transitions to PBN, aircraft reliance on VORs will decrease significantly This will allow the FAA to transition to a VOR MON, which will provide backup coverage during a GPS outage as well as basic navigation capability A majority of operators, operating under rules other than Part 91, will have GPS, DME/DME and ILS Some operators may need VOR to fulfill requirements for independent navigation systems For all other aircraft, the MON will provide sufficient coverage to enable aircraft to proceed safely VOR-to-VOR and/or to a suitable landing destination with a GPS-independent approach within approximately 100 nm of any location in CONUS

VOR MON Equipment Requirements There will be no change in current equipage rules: 14 CFR Part 91 (non Subpart K) Aircraft equipped with non-WAAS GPS will continue to be required to carry an alternate form of navigation appropriate to the route to be flown (i.e., a VOR) WAAS-equipped aircraft will continue to not be required to carry an alternate form of navigation If WAAS is out of service, the non-WAAS GPS rules will apply Others (14 CFR part 121, 135, 91 Subpart K, etc.) Must carry an appropriate independent non-GPS-based navigation system (in addition to GPS and/or WAAS) Rules on “independence” can be complex depending on navigation architecture in aircraft

Resiliency - It’s a Big Job VORs have been central to the U.S. National Airspace System for over 60 years Virtually all charts, airways, airspace, and procedures are based on or depict VORs The specific VORs and the specific order of removal will be the subject of official announcements, collaboration, and outreach by the FAA A VOR will not be removed from service until all procedures using that VOR have been modified or cancelled

Summary PBN NAS Strategy defines the overall requirement Navigation Strategy implements the resilient navigation infrastructure VOR MON Program currently being implemented NextGen DME Program is being planned Internal and External coordination is key to success