Eight Main Symptoms of Group Think.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 12 Group Dynamics Groups and Social Groups and Social Exchanges Exchanges The Group Development The Group Development Process Process Roles and.
Advertisements

Lecture Eleven Chapter Thirteen Group Dynamics and Meetings.
Crisis And Conflict Management
Social Scientists define a social group as a group of two or more people who have four characteristics: * They interact regularly and influence each other.
Sociology 545 Social Psychology Fall Topics Social Groups Social Groups Social Institutions Social Institutions Collective Behavior / Social Movements.
GROUPS IN SOCIETY. In-group/Out-group Group’s boundaries are made clear People define themselves as in-group or out-group In-group: the group that a person.
Themes in 12 Angry Men Groupthink Obedience to Authority Conformity
Module 56. Conformity Studies Adjusting one’s behavior or thinking to coincide with a group standard.
Organizational Behavior: An Experiential Approach 7/E Joyce S. Osland, David A. Kolb, and Irwin M. Rubin 1 ©2001 by Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chapter 15.
Organizational Behaviour Individual and Social Behaviour
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Chapter 10 Decision Making by Individuals & Groups Learning Outcomes.
Organizational Behavior: An Experiential Approach 7/E Joyce S. Osland, David A. Kolb, and Irwin M. Rubin 1 ©2001 by Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chapter 15.
Chuck Millstead – Master Student University of Michigan, Flint
Chapter 15 Decision Making and Organizational Learning
Bipartisan Reports Cite Groupthink
Chapter 8 – Groups Part 1: Oct. 21, Groups and Social Processes Groups are 2 or more people who interact and perceive themselves as a unit/”us”
Re-designing Decision-Making Processes (Kennedy Cases) Prof. Morten Hansen MIIC, April
Groups in Process Decision Making Pitfalls, Foibles, and Techniques.
Ethics in Human Communication Part III. Organizations Organizational Culture and Climate Organizational Culture and Climate Values, beliefs, symbols and.
Thinking About Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behavior 2e Charles T. Blair-Broeker Randal M. Ernst.
Introduction to knowledge management Teamwork. Team Production of Knowledge Wuchty et al. 2007, Science Over the span of 5 decades, no. of authors Almost.
Foundations of Group Behavior
THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE LORD OF THE FLIES. Ralph, Piggy, and Jack can be seen as incomplete characters. Ralph, Piggy, and Jack can be seen as incomplete.
How Teams Work. Task and Maintenance Needs  Task Activities – Any activity a team member does that contributes to the group’s performance purpose. 
GroupThink Embracing the Power of the Group Elaine Seat, PhD, PE.
Groupthink What is it? Why should we care about it? What can we do about it?
Abilene Paradox Group members adopt a position because they feel that other group members desire it Team members do not challenge suggestion because they.
Decision Making in Groups. Outline I. Problems in Decision Making Failure to share information Risky shift/polarization II. Video: GroupThink.
Team Development Objectives To know the stages in the development of teams To understand team roles To understand about team decisions To learn how to.
Defective Decision Making & Problem Solving Small Group Communication.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT Making Decisions The purpose of this module is to develop participants’ facilitation and training skills to enable them to enhance.
GroupThink Maria Tierra. What is Group Think?  A form of faulty decision making in cohesive groups in which there is insufficient thinking.
GROUP DECISION MAKING ADVANTAGES BROAD REPRESENTATION TAPS EXPERTISE MORE IDEAS GENERATED EVALUATION OF OPTIONS COORDINATION HIGH ACCEPTANCE DISADVANTAGES.
Groupthink Clip art.
Chapter Thirteen Groups & Teams: Increasing Cooperating, Reducing Conflict McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
Abilene Paradox Group members adopt a position because they feel that other group members desire it Team members do not challenge suggestion because they.
Foundations of International Foreign Policy.  Definition  Issues – Group versus individual genius  Issues – individual versus group acceptance  Issues.
Listening in Groups. Listening - HURIER Hearing Understanding Remembering Interpreting Evaluating Responding.
Leading and Working in Teams
Effective Groups and Teamwork
Groupthink When group members striving for agreement (norm for unanimity), fail to realistically appraise alternative courses of action A means for a group.
Theories of Supervision
Chapter 10 Decision Making by Individuals and Groups
Chapter 15: Decision Making and Organizational Learning
Chapter 6: Social Influence and Group Behavior
Foundations of Interpersonal and Group Behavior
Processes that Occur in Group Decision Making
Team Dynamics Eric M. Robinson.
Communicating For Results
Groupthink: The Desperate Drive for Consensus at Any Cost Irving L
Decision Making Pitfalls, Foibles, and Techniques
GROUPTHINK in Archived Chapter, 3rd ed.
Chapter 8 – Group Influence
Characteristics of Effective Teams
Decision Making in Groups
Groupthink and board dynamics: Some evidence from the field
Why should we care about it?
Team Dynamics Chapter 16.
Group Behavior and Influence
Study Question 1: How do teams contribute to organizations?
Groupthink What is Groupthink?
Re-designing Decision-Making Processes (Kennedy Cases)
Groupthink.
GROUPTHINK in Archived Chapter, 3rd ed.
Group think A Potential Steel Barrier to Becoming Your Future You
Decision Making Pitfalls, Foibles, and Techniques
Chapter 8 – Groups Part 2: Oct. 22, 2010.
The Clinical Competency Committee
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Canada Inc.
Group Behavior and Influence
Presentation transcript:

Eight Main Symptoms of Group Think

Janis, I. L. & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: Free Press.) Illusion of Invulnerability: Members ignore obvious danger, take extreme risk, and are overly optimistic. 2. Collective Rationalization: Members discredit and explain away warning contrary to group thinking. 3. Illusion of Morality: Members believe their decisions are morally correct, ignoring the ethical consequences of their decisions. 4. Excessive Stereotyping: The group constructs negative stereotypes of rivals outside the group.

(8 symptoms of groupthink, continued) 5. Pressure for Conformity: Members pressure any in the group who express arguments against the group's stereotypes, illusions, or commitments, viewing such opposition as disloyalty. 6. Self-Censorship: Members withhold their dissenting views and counter-arguments. 7. Illusion of Unanimity: Members perceive falsely that everyone agrees with the group's decision; silence is seen as consent. 8. Mindguards: Some members appoint themselves to the role of protecting the group from adverse information that might threaten group complacency.

10 ways to Avoid GroupThink

1. The group should be made aware of the causes and consequences of group think. 2. The leader should be neutral when assigning a decision-making task to a group, initially withholding all preferences and expectations. This practice will be especially effective if the leaders consistently encourages an atmosphere of open inquiry. 3. The leader should give high priority to airing objections and doubts, and be accepting of criticism.

4. Groups should always consider unpopular alternatives, assigning the role of devil's advocate to several strong members of the group. 5. Sometimes it is useful to divide the group into two separate deliberative bodies as feasibilities are evaluated. 6. Spend a sizable amount of time surveying all warning signals from rival group and organizations.

7. After reaching a preliminary consensus on a decision, all residual doubts should be expressed and the matter reconsidered. 8. Outside experts should be included in vital decision making. 9. Tentative decisions should be discussed with trusted colleagues not in the decision-making group. 10. The organization should routinely follow the administrative practice of establishing several independent decision-making groups to work on the same critical issue or policy.