Activities in the framework of GSICS CNES Agency Report

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radiometric Calibration PROBA-V QWG #2. PRESENTATION OUTLINE »Introduction »Stability of PROBA-V »ICP updates since QWG#1 »Outlook »Moon calibration GSICS.
Advertisements

Japan Meteorological Agency, June 2016 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS JMA’s Cal/Val activities Presented to CGMS-44 Working Group.
Japan Meteorological Agency, June 2016 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Non-Meteorological Application for Himawari-8 Presented.
Agency xxx, version xx, Date xx 2016 [update in the slide master] Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Introduction to GSICS Presented.
Report from USGS 17th GSICS Executive Panel, Biot, 2-3 June 2016 Thomas Stone U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, Arizona USA GSICS-EP-17, Biot, 2-3 June.
1 Bertrand Fougnie Patrice Henry, Sophie Lachérade, Philippe Gamet Processing team CNES-DCT/ME Synergic Calibration Crossing Multiple Methods GSICS Annual.
GSICS Coordination Center Report Fangfang Yu, Fuzhong Weng, Fred Wu and George Ohring NOAA/Center for Satellite Applications and Research 8 April, 2013.
PLEIADES Lunar Observations Sophie Lachérade, Bertrand Fougnie
Paper under review for JGR-Atmospheres …
SADE Export Web Site Claire Tinel, Denis Blumstein, Patrice Henry - CNES Pascale Lafitte - CNES GSICS WG Meeting – Feb 2010 – Claire Tinel / CNES.
NOAA VIIRS Team GIRO Implementation Updates
METimage Calibration Pepe Phillips GSICS Data & Research Working
Contents GSICS activities Visible channel calibration
VIS/NIR reference instrument requirements
Crossing Multiple Methods
2017 Annual Meeting Preparation and Proposal of CLARREO-like Workshop by GSICS/IVOS Scott NSMC/CMA March 20-24, 2017.
Lunar Calibration Workshop Activities
Second Joint GSICS-IVOS Lunar Calibration Workshop
Toward a wider use of the Moon for In-flight Characterization
Activities in the framework of GSICS CNES GPRC Report
Sébastien Wagner, Tim Hewison In collaboration with D. Doelling (NASA)
SEVIRI Solar Channel Calibration system
CNES Agency Report for GSICS
JMA’s GSICS and SCOPE-CM activities Presented to CGMS-43 Working Group II session, agenda item 3 (from MTSAT-2) Japan Meteorological Agency.
Activities in the framework of GSICS CNES GPRC Report
Calibration and Performance MODIS Characterization Support Team (MCST)
Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales - Toulouse - France
Update on Advancing Development of the ROLO Lunar Calibration System
Future Developments of the Lunar Calibration System
CALIBRATION over the Moon An introduction to « POLO »
Combination Approaches
Vicarious Calibration of Sentinel-3 Toward the Blending of Methods
JMA Agency Report 2017 Arata Okuyama, Masaya Takahashi and Hidehiko Murata Meteorological Satellite Center, Japan Meteorological Agency.
Status of MODIS and VIIRS Reflective Solar Calibration
GRWG VIS/NIR sub-group briefing report
VIS/NIR sub-group discussion
Combining Multiple References
Annual GSICS Calibration Report for {Agency}
Sensitivity ANALYSIS Sébastien Wagner (EUMETSAT) In collaboration with
Proposal of SI-traceable IR and VIS Hyperspetral reference Workshop by GSICS/IVOS Scott NSMC/CMA.
Combination Approaches
GSICS LEO-LEO IR Sentinel-3/SLSTR-IASI Products
Update on GSICS Product Development
JMA Agency Report 2018 Masaya Takahashi, Yusuke Yogo and Hidehiko Murata Meteorological Satellite Center, Japan Meteorological Agency.
Inter-calibration of the SEVIRI solar bands against MODIS Aqua, using Deep Convective Clouds as transfer targets Sébastien Wagner, Tim Hewison In collaboration.
Scoring Reference Instruments
Recent activities of OCR-VC
Dorothee Coppens.
GSICS IR Reference Uncertainty & Traceability Report
IR hyperspectral comparisons
Status of the EUMETSAT GSICS DCC product
Current Status of ROLO and Future Development
Early calibration results of FY-4A/GIIRS during in-orbit testing
Radiometric inter-comparison of IASI
GRWG UV Sub-Group Briefing Report & Introducing Special Session on Strategy for Inter-calibration of SWIR Spectrometers Rose Munro.
Progress toward DCC Demo product
Status after 3 months of L1 Cal/Val
GSICS IR Reference Uncertainty & Traceability Report Tim Hewison
T. Hewison, S. Wagner, A. Burini, O. Perez Navarro, M. Burla, F
S3B OLCI Lunar Observations
Recent Activities of Ocean Surface Topography Virtual Constellation (OST-VC) Remko Scharroo (EUMETSAT)
G16 vs. G17 IR Inter-comparison: Some Experiences and Lessons from validation toward GEO-GEO Inter-calibration Fangfang Yu, Xiangqian Wu, Hyelim Yoo and.
T. Hewison, S. Wagner, A. Burini, O. Perez Navarro, M. Burla, F
GRWG VIS/NIR sub-group briefing report
VIS/NIR sub-group discussion
GSICS IR Reference Uncertainty & Traceability Report
Lunar Calibration Workshop Activities
Toward a synergy between on-orbit lunar observations
Lunar Calibration Workshop Status of the preparation
The PROBA-V Mission Sindy Sterckx, Wouter Dierckx, Tanja Van Achteren, Stefan Adriaensen and the PROBA-V team GSICS Users' Workshop, 2013.
Presentation transcript:

Activities in the framework of GSICS CNES Agency Report GSICS Annual Meeting 20-24th March 2017, Madison, Wisconsin Activities in the framework of GSICS CNES Agency Report Denis Jouglet & Bertrand Fougnie for CNES Calibration Center (CNES-DSO/SI/MO + support from CNES-DNO/OT/PE)

Summary CNES Instrument updates CNES Activity summary and actions S3, S2, IASI A&B&C, IASI-NG, 3MI, Microcarb CNES Activity summary and actions The Sentinel framework Continuation of Sentinel-2 : routine S2A + commissioning S2B Commissioning of Sentinel-3A optical sensors (OLCI & SLSTR) The IASI family Status for IASI-A & B, Preparation of IASI-C IASI inter-comparison The V2 of the calibration system SADE/MUSCLE News from the Lunar activity Status on actions Support to GRWG activities Agency’s personnel supporting GSICS CNES’s interest on GSICS topics

CNES’s Instrument of Interest - Update CNES instruments or instruments with CNES involvement Sentinel Missions S3A/OLCI & SLSTR : routine for S3A (end of ramp-up phase) S3B/OLCI & SLSTR : launch scheduled end of Nov’17 (satellite tests starting) S2A/MSI : operational routine – monitoring of the calibrations and performances S2B/MSI : launched 7th March’17 – the commissioning is just starting EPS IASI-A : Operational since 2007 (10y in orbit), consistent with IASI-B < 0.01K, reprocessing on L1data on-going, EOL technology tests in 2019-2021, decom. 2021. IASI-B : Operational since 2013, nominal performance (prime) IASI-C : launch in Oct’18. MetOp-C PLM thermal vacuum tests on-going EPS-SG : EUMETSAT Polar System Second Generation – launch in 2021 3MI : CNES/EUMETSAT collaboration on level-1 and cal/val activities IASI-NG : under development (twice better spectral resolution and radiometric noise) Other sounders Microcarb : CO2, spectrometer in NIR/SWIR, mission recently decided

CNES’s Activities in the framework of GSICS

Sentinel-2 Sentinel 2 : MSI Sentinel-2 ESA mission - Operational needs of the European Copernicus Program Land surface S2A : Launched in June 2015 S2B : Launched the 7th March 2017 MSI imager : 13 bands from 440 to 2200nm, 10/20/60m, 290km CNES responsible for the image quality activities during commissioning and support the routine phase : Include Geometry and Radiometry MSI Sentinel-2

Sentinel-2 Sentinel 2A Trending over desert Multi-method Radiometric calibration – some samples… MODIS wrt S2/MSI S2/MSI wrt MERIS Trending over desert Multi-method

Sentinel-3 Sentinel 3 Sentinel-3A OLCI SLSTR ESA mission - Operational needs of the European Copernicus Program Oceanography and land monitoring S3A : launched in February 2016 S3B : to be launched in November 2017 Altimetry + 2 optical sensors OLCI and SLST (follow-on MERIS and AATSR) OLCI = 21 bands from 410 to 1020nm, 300m, 1270km SLSTR = 11 bands from 550 to 12 000nm, 500m/1km, 1400km On-board diffusers + Black body (nominal) + Vicarious calibration methods Sentinel-3A OLCI SLSTR

Sentinel-3 The nominal calibration is currently derived by ESA using on-board devices OLCI : two diffusers + Spectral calibration (pink panel + fraunhofer) SLSTR : VISAL (diffuser) + black bodies CNES will validate radiometry during commissioning All managed through SADE/Muscle Rayleigh scattering (absolute) : OLCI and SLSTR Sunglint (interband) : OLCI and SLSTR Deep Convective Clouds (interband, monitoring) : OLCI PICS - desert an snowy sites (monitoring, cross-calibration) : Bridge to MERIS and AATSR (ENVISAT) Bridge to MODIS reference Bridge between Sentinel missions with MSI Sentinel-3 = A new major experience for methods and combination

Sentinel-3 - Commissioning Main results : Validation of the ageing observed by diffuser in the early weeks (OLCI) Validation of the long-term stability Excellent spectral consistency (OLCI) Small residual bias in VISNIR for OLCI & SLSTR Very large bias in SWIR for SLSTR 1 2 Best estimate S3A OLCI OLCI+SLSTR 3 OLCI OLCI 9

Direct IASI-A / B inter-comparison: 2016 update Statistics on “quasi-SNOs” (50min delay) Focus on homogeneous and stable scenes, night, as many “A before B” as “A after B” 2016 Results: Biases between 0 and ~0.1K Highest bias for short wvn  Very good cross calibration  Same behaviour as the previous years, no degradation 2015

IASI / CrIS & AIRS inter-comparison: 2016 update Statistics on SNOs (regional averaging, pseudo-channels) Results: Biases between 0 and 0.15K Highest bias for short wvn  Same behaviour as the previous years, non degradation IASI-A - CrIS 2016 (1 year) IASI-A - AIRS 2016 (1 year) IASI-B - CrIS 2016 (1 year) IASI-B - AIRS 2016 (1 year)

IASI FM2 on MetOp-A IASI End of Life technology possible tests (TBC): 5 tests on the instrument (redundancies, software patches, etc) Local improvement of spatial sampling and possibly spatial resolution: reduction of swath and increase of spatial sampling Limb measurements: exploit a Pitch Over manoeuvre of the spacecraft to acquire measurements in the Limb direction. IASI-A & B inter-calibration : acquire SNO (but limited to ~10 SNO for the moment over the poles. Change of altitude keeping the same local hour is not possible). Lunar acquisition: acquire the moon in most possible moon phases for calibration purposes

V2 of the CNES Calibration System Many calibration methods & data in SADE/MUSCLE PICS : 20 desert sites + 4 snowy sites Oceanic sites : Rayleigh scattering and sunglint DCC : clouds Celestial : moon and stars SADE/Muscle development started in ~2000 Progressive developed through successive upgrades Limitation of the current – SADE Database Very large number of data Architecture to be revised for new application : celestial targets, polarization Need to improve the Muscle calibration toolbox Some environments become obsolete Opportunity to upgrade some tools (including redesign) Decision to develop a new system in 2016-2017 Specification written in 2016-2017 Development in 2017-2018 : KO in October’16, on-going

CNES Activity on Lunar Calibration On-going activity to propose a corrected model Correction of the residual sensitivity to moon phase : 9th order polynomial mean correction Spectral and Absolute correction – stars irradiance transferred to moon using PHR-1A Model derived using Pleiades measurements – Under consolidation and validation Significant reduction of the dispersion, and residual bias down to 2-3% Current validity for Pleiades bands – to be tested for a wider spectral range then potentially move toward an operational form

CNES Activity on Lunar Calibration R&T study on the use of the moon for IASI intercalibration will start this year : bibliography : Moon in the TIR domain + Inventory of Moon IR properties + example of acquisitions by space infrared sensors. Analysis of Moon acquisitions by IASI-A & B during CALVAL (partial data over 6 small spectral regions) to test its potential for inter-calibration. Depending on results, routine acquisitions would be considered for both IASI A&B 2 phases (~80% &~20%) of the Moon accessible in a cold space view of IASI (directed towards zenith) Same Moon phase seen by both IASI in the same hour  Moon radiometry should be very similar between IASI-A & B Possibility to make long term monitoring of radiometric calibration Requires to handle the non uniformity of the Moon and its size / position in the FOV. Low amount of data => more noise Moon seen by IIS (IASI integrated imager)

Actions & Recommendations GRWG.2016.4h.1 - Lunar surface target selections & auto-mapping “investigate the possibility for CNES to provide NOAA with Pleiades Moon data in order to support the characterization of uniform target sites Resp. : approval for a distribution of Pleiades data under license agreement. Request to be addressed to CNES. GRWG.2016.3p.3 - Hyperspectral IR comparisons - including TANSO-FTS/2 “EUM + CNES to work on the inter-comparison between CrIS and TANSO-FTS” IASI/GOSAT-2 : for the moment, no real needs for CNES GRWG.2014.13 – IASI inter-comparison uncertainty budget as part of the GSICS Reference Traceability and uncertainty report  on-going, currently on stand-by, but will be ready for end ‘17. Presented next year Recommendation (GRWG-16) 4g - Way forward on lunar inter-calibration “CNES and EUM to resolve any differences in formulation of presented lunar inter-calibration approaches.”  CNES was not able to work on this specific topics.

CNES’s Personnel Supporting GSICS CNES involved in GSICS Research Working Group Personnel : Denis Jouglet : Infrared domain and cross-calibration Bertrand Fougnie : reflective domain and calibration The CNES Calibration team is involved in various projects (CNES or collaborative projects) providing results and feedbacks to be shared with GRWG. Members could be in the expertise team (~10 persons) the operation team, routine or not (~5 persons) CNES resources for GSICS GRWG activities are (very) limited. The activity is mainly : Sharing of results, analysis, feedbacks Participation to discussions (specific tasks, WG) during Annual Meeting, Webmeeting and WS Some analysis could be conducted on very specific tasks

CNES’s interest on the GSICS tasks On the GSICS Agenda items, CNES is especially interested by : Generally, improvement in all the calibration methods (methodology, performance, error budget) Improvement on the capability to extract radiometric characterizations from lunar acquisitions : temporal, interband, absolute, cross calibration (but also MTF, straylight…) Defining a common reference for the solar irradiance Defining the best radiometric references (to be used at least for cross-calibration) Identifying relevant hyperspectral data to be used to improve the performance of various methods Feedbacks on IASI cross-comparisons with other sensors Document error budgets and traceability of our references Improve the collection of Users needs and Users feedbacks on GSICS products

That’s all Folks !

1 - IASI FM2 on MetOp-A status Launch in 2006 10th birthday in October 2016 Instrument in good health, very stable Switch from Nominal to Redundant side in April 2015 (electronic part) has solved alarm reports on the measurement of the mobile cube corner speed. Compensation device stopped on both IASI in flight in October 2015. Reprocessing of IASI-A data (2007-2015) on going at EUMETSAT, to make a consistent dataset since launch. Driven by the L1 format and algorithms changes in 2010 (“Day 2”) All algorithms and characterization improvements made since launch have been taken into account for L1 reprocessing, leading to a better spectra quality (mostly on spectral quality) L2 reprocessing will follow

1 - IASI FM2 on MetOp-A status Strategy for the MetOp-A lifetime extension: to maintain MetOp-A service at least until MetOp-C is operational and IASI data are validated. BUT the LTAN of MetOp-A and phase with MetOp-B have started to drift already (~30 min/2 years each) => intercalibration biases with IASI-A will be impacted Start IASI End of Life Experiments after MetOp-C commissioning in 2019 until 2021 MetOp-A passivation in ~2021 maximum. IASI End of Life technology tests: under instruction by EUMETSAT 17 experiments were proposed 8 were rejected 9 are still under instruction

2 - IASI PFM-R on MetOp-B status The new correction implementation on board has an impact on climate statistics by breaking the radiometric stability in the time series. Intercalibration with IASI will change. The IASI data reprocessing with the new correction is impossible, because: the correction is done in the on-board processing of interferograms all the interferograms are not transmitted on ground (due to bandwidth constrains) only the real part of the level 0 spectrum is transmitted on ground, the on-board Fourier transform of the interferogram is thus an irreversible processing It has been discussed with ISSWG (IASI science working group) and with a larger scientific community during the 4th IASI conference (April 2016). Some concerns have been expressed, with the L1c radiances themselves, to maintain time series consistency for Climate. The users who need the data in NRT, including NWP, need them as good as possible and hence favor the implementation of the correction. For NWP, the consistency between IASI sounders is very important. It was commented that 0.1K is very unlikely to significantly impact the L2 products. The discussions with some climatologist led to a consensus : change only IASI-B correction tables to let IASI-A as a stable reference. The situation for IASI-A will be reconsidered after the launch of MetOp-C.

3 - IASI FM3-R on MetOp-C status FM3 instrument retrofit : change of the 2 mechanisms (scan and cube corner) due to magnet delamination. Instrument optical vacuum in January 2016 at TAS was successful => FM3-R FM3-R has been delivered to EUMETSAT and integrated on the Metop PLM module in October 2016. MetOp-C PLM thermal vacuum tests are on-going at ESTEC (March-April 2017) The launch of MetOp-C is planned in October 2018 from Kourou MetOp-C will be positioned half orbit apart MetOp-B (has Metop-A was).