Yet another approach to the ToF-based PID at PANDA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Html version of the presentation For virtual participants in TOFWEB/ALI-Off/venusians.html.
Advertisements

1 MICE Beamline: Plans for initial commissioning. Kevin Tilley, 16 th November. - 75days until commissioning Target, detectors, particle production Upstream.
HARP Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) K2K Neutrino CH Meeting Neuchâtel, June 21-22, 2004.
PHYSTAT2007, CERN Geneva, June 2007 ALICE Statistical Wish-List I. Belikov, on behalf of the ALICE collaboration.
14 Sept 2004 D.Dedovich Tau041 Measurement of Tau hadronic branching ratios in DELPHI experiment at LEP Dima Dedovich (Dubna) DELPHI Collaboration E.Phys.J.
1 PID Detectors & Emittance Resolution Chris Rogers Rutherford Appleton Laboratory MICE CM17.
Sci Fi Simulation Status Malcolm Ellis MICE Meeting Osaka, 2 nd August 2004.
Algorithms and Methods for Particle Identification with ALICE TOF Detector at Very High Particle Multiplicity TOF simulation group B.Zagreev ACAT2002,
1Malcolm Ellis - Software Meeting - 31st May 2006 Data Challenge Requirements  First list of requirements, based on Yagmur’s document: u
TOF (and Global) PID F. Pierella for the TOF-Offline Group INFN & Bologna University PPR Meeting, January 2003.
PPR meeting - January 23, 2003 Andrea Dainese 1 TPC tracking parameterization: a useful tool for simulation studies with large statistics Motivation Implementation.
A Reconstruction Algorithm for a RICH detector for CLAS12 Ahmed El Alaoui RICH Workchop, Jefferson Lab, newport News, VA November th 2011.
GlueX Particle Identification Ryan Mitchell Indiana University Detector Review, October 2004.
Results from Step I of MICE D Adey 2013 International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super-beams and Beta- beams Working Group 3 – Accelerator Topics.
GlueX Software Status April 28, 2006 David Lawrence, JLab.
PANDA collaboration meeting2.-4. June 2004 simulation statusOverview New Framework  why  status  schedule Simulation subdetector  Forward spectrometer.
Material budget, energy losses and multiple scattering.
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon, FCP Nashville B s Mixing at CDF Frontiers in Contemporary Physics Nashville, May Gavril Giurgiu – for CDF.
PANDA Anton A. Izotov, Gatchina A.A.Izotov, Gatchina, PANDA Forward TOF Walls. Side TOF walls in dipole Magnet SiPM/PMT187.
TOF, Status of the Code F. Pierella, Bologna University and INFN TOF Offline Group ALICE Offline Week, June 2002.
Status of GlueX Particle Identification Ryan Mitchell September 10, 2004.
TOP counter overview and issues K. Inami (Nagoya university) 2008/7/3-4 2 nd open meeting for proto-collaboration - Overview - Design - Performance - Prototype.
Track extrapolation to TOF with Kalman filter F. Pierella for the TOF-Offline Group INFN & Bologna University PPR Meeting, January 2003.
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
Results from HARP-CDP or The irresistible Power of Truth Friedrich Dydak / CERN 24 June, 2008.
PANDA GSI 13. December 2006 PID TAG Georg Schepers PANDA Technical Assessment Group PID Status Report G. Schepers for the PID TAG GSI PID TAG.
Frank L. H. WolfsDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester Status of the TOF February 22, 2001 Straight-line tracking What have we learned?
Particle Identification at BESIII Kanglin He April 23, 2007, Amsterdam.
PID simulations Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE collaboration meeting RAL.
A search for strange tribaryonic states in the reaction Heejoong Yim Seoul National University For KEK-PS E549 collaboration.
I.BelikovCHEP 2004, Interlaken, 30 Sep Bayesian Approach for Combined Particle Identification in ALICE Experiment at LHC. I.Belikov, P.Hristov, M.Ivanov,
Status of the Monte-Carlo work Alexander Kiselev EIC Tracking Meeting.
00 Cooler CSB Direct or Extra Photons in d+d  0 Andrew Bacher for the CSB Cooler Collaboration ECT Trento, June 2005.
KalFitAlg: recent developments and tests WANG Dayong Jan.18,2006.
Recent results from Kalman track fitting WANG Dayong Oct.26,2005.
Status of Analysis Software Kanglin He For Analysis Software Group.
G. Cowan Lectures on Statistical Data Analysis Lecture 5 page 1 Statistical Data Analysis: Lecture 5 1Probability, Bayes’ theorem 2Random variables and.
FRANCESCO NOFERINI (INFN CNAF – INFN BOLOGNA) 08/12/2009 ALICE TOF - general meeting - F. Noferini - GRID and resonances GRID and  analysis in pp 1.
P.F.Ermolov SVD-2 status and experimental program VHMP 16 April 2005 SVD-2 status and experimental program 1.SVD history 2.SVD-2 setup 3.Experiment characteristics.
Particle identification by energy loss measurement in the NA61 (SHINE) experiment Magdalena Posiadala University of Warsaw.
Paolo Massarotti Kaon meeting March 2007  ±  X    X  Time measurement use neutral vertex only in order to obtain a completely independent.
Hadron production in C+C at 2 A GeV measured by the HADES spectrometer Nov02 gen3 analysis and results for spline tracks (shown in Dubna) changes - removing.
Jet Production in Au+Au Collisions at STAR Alexander Schmah for the STAR Collaboration Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Hard Probes 2015 in Montreal/Canada.
Extrapolation Techniques  Four different techniques have been used to extrapolate near detector data to the far detector to predict the neutrino energy.
QM2002 (July / / Nantes / France)Susumu SATO (JSPS) for the PHENIX collaboration page 1 Susumu SATO Japan Society for the Promotion of Science,
MONTE CARLO TRANSPORT SIMULATION Panda Computing Week 2012, Torino.
Study of influence of particle identification and resonances excitation on correlation functions mesured by ALICE setup. 1. Influence of particle identification.
14/06/2010 Stefano Spataro Status of LHE Tracking and Particle Identification Status of LHE Tracking and Particle Identification Stefano Spataro III Panda.
Time-zero evaluation using TOF, T0 and vertex detectors
Susanna Costanza - Pavia Group PANDA C.M., Stockholm – June 14, 2010
(LHE) tracking and PID packages
Status of the forward tracker design
for Particle Identification
M. Kuhn, P. Hopchev, M. Ferro-Luzzi
A PID based approach for antineutrino selection
Measurement of track length and time-of-flight hypothesis
Event “zero-time” determination with TOF detector
Global PID MICE CM43 29/10/15 Celeste Pidcott University of Warwick
ITEP /4/2010 – II Panda Russia Meeting – Maria Pia Bussa
Status of the TOF Detector
Hellenic Open University
The time-of-flight reconstruction & calibration
Reddy Pratap Gandrajula (University of Iowa) on behalf of CMS
Study of dE/dx Performance in TPC at CEPC
for the PHENIX collaboration
Product moment correlation
Geant4 in HARP V.Ivanchenko For the HARP Collaboration
NKS2 Meeting with Bydzovsky NKS2 Experiment / Analysis Status
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
The Q+ Pentaquark Search at HERMES Wolfgang Lorenzon Collaboration
Presentation transcript:

Yet another approach to the ToF-based PID at PANDA A.Kiselev, Yu.Naryshkin PANDA Collaboration Meeting Stockholm, 14.06.2010

Layout of the talk Motivation of this work Suggested formalism Monte-Carlo results Discussion

ToF detectors at PANDA Forward Wall Barrel ToF (?) Side Wall Continuous beam , no “start” counters  tstart unknown!

Algorithms considered so far Three main procedures: Reconstruction from one identified particle Minimization mass residuals under start time variations Mass hypothesis  find time offset  The following 3 slides: Stefano Spataro, Sep’2008

Start time reconstruction: the 1-st way identify one particle in the event (assume its mass) calculate its time-of-flight (from momentum and path length) calculate START time of the reaction recalculate tof of the other particles in the event

Start time reconstruction: the 2nd way New algorithm was implemented (Alexander Schmah) variation of start time tstart calculate mass from tstart, momentum, tof, path length find the closest realistic mass construct residual for all the particles Find tstart that minimizes the Q functional

Start time reconstruction: the 3rd way use PID informations from other detectors or mass hypothesis per each particle calculate the time-of-flight calculate the mean offset or not stand-alone Improvements for the global PID …Work in progress

The “4-th way”: goals Quantify PID decision as much as possible Provide statistically significant formulation Have a better interface to tracking package Be flexible in terms of input: do not require ANY external PID info per default be able to use such information, if available Allow flexible output: be able either to provide its own PID decision … … or, alternatively, give input for the “global” PID

The “4-th way”: logic consider all N tracks in a given event at once, that’s clear assume each track can be pion/kaon/proton evaluate all 3N {m1,…,mN} mass configurations separately, one by one obtain their c2 weights (and tS offsets) reject (reweight) some, using external PID input compare various mass configurations obtain the significance estimate select the “most probable” one(s)

Formalism (simplified version) how to evaluate a given {m1,…,mN} mass configuration? Y (tS0) is distributed as c2 with N-1 degrees of freedom for “correct” mass configurations Tends to have higher c2 values for the “wrong” ones

Standalone PID evaluation calculate “weight” for each {m1,…,mN} configuration: define “probability” of j-th track to be say a pion as use Monte-Carlo to check selection efficiency & proton contamination (in this report: PYTHIA @10GeV/c, forward spectrometer tracks only)

Proton-pion separation Pions, <p>=2.15 GeV/c Protons, <p>=3.25 GeV/c NB: fluxes are not accounted here!

Proton-pion separation, cont’d  Consider modest (100ps) ToF resolution Pions Protons

Kaon separation <p>=2.7 GeV/c NB: again, fluxes are not accounted here!

Formalism (advanced version) Extra requirements to the tracking package: append {tS} to the “standard” Kalman filter {x,y,sx,sy,1/p} parameter set do track fitting for pion/kaon/proton hypotheses separately provide {p,l,tS}i parameter set with cov.matrix on per-track (and per-mass-hypothesis) basis This allows to extend the suggested formalism in a way, that ToF-based PID 1) is not biased by unknown tS offsets during the 1-st tracking pass, 2) gives the most complete and statistically meaningful set of information to the “global” PANDA PID code

Formalism (advanced, in detail) Kalman filter c2 Track->event matching ToF measurement extended parameter set  requires further studies!

Summary The (relatively) new formalism to handle PANDA ToF-based PID problem is suggested It allows to implement a statistically solid interface between tracking code, ToF measurements and the “global” PID