CEN TC226 Road Equipment and ADAS (Advanced Driver Assistance Systems) CEN TC226 Road Equipment and ADAS (Advanced Driver Assistance Systems) SVMF 09. mars 2017 Trond Cato Johansen

DRIVING AUTOMATION SYSTEMS LEVEL (JAE Standard J3016) Driverless AD NO MORE DRIVER Robot Taxi AD ADAS ENJOY FREE TIME Driver not required during defined use case Driver will respond if a request to intervene Longitudinal AND Lateral driving control possible Longitudinal OR Lateral driving control possible No Driver Assistance System Level 0 Driver Only Level 1 Assisted Level 2 Partially Automated Level 3 Conditionally Automated Level 4 Highly Automated Level 5 Fully Automated

INVOLVED STAKEHOLDERS CAR MANUFACTURERS / RESEARCH INSTITUTES / ROAD ADMINISTRATION / INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT CIE MAIN ASSESSMENT The word « Interaction » is more relevant than « adaptation » in order to qualify vehicles and infrastructure relationship The pace of performance increase for AD system is significantly higher than the infrastructure investment cycle. Problems are quite different depending on the level of driving automation system (according to JAE J3016 standard). ADAS (level 1 & level 2) Recognition of road markings (H&V) : availbility reliability Service availability depending on road assets quality Heteregoneity of vehicles sensor and system performance No request from sensor suppliers and car manufacturers about the minimum caracteristics of road markings & signs Road marking & signs specification are only defined for new features. Maintenance and reliability evaluation is under infrastructure manager evaluation. Communication V2X in urban area for driver information (e.g. « GLOSA »). AUTONOMOUS DRIVING (level 3 to 5) : Communication V2X is key for safety / comfort / availability Some use-case keeps technically « unsolved » such as road work area detection or toll gate management.

On the other hand, a lot of road equipement are already communicating (IoT), without interaction with vehicles. Data sharing about safety events, traffic conditions, road quality … could be provided out of any commercial activity (« common good »). Administration budget constraint, business model, return on investement are to be taken in consideration. MAIN RELEVANT STANDARDIZATION TOPICS Communication between Vehicle and Infrastructure State of play (feedback from current projects such as Scoop towards ITS standarization activity) Interoperability for standard messages (communication profiles) Communication infrastructure and data sharing vehicle – infrastructure Based on non profit principle OPEN ISSUE Road marking & signs recognition (in connection with assistance functions availability) Need for better understanding of the recognition mechanisms / technology anticipation / Environmental conditions

Många viktiga organisationer är involverade

Europeisk policy för H & V vägmarkering

Från mötesantäckningarna Känd problematik

Vägen vidare i CEN TC226 4 work items