The Second Patient Report of the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
This presentation provides some guidance on how to interpret the tables and graphs provided in your Clinical Indicator Trend Report. Most indicators have.
Advertisements

Improving the quality of medical and surgical care NCEPOD Dr Marisa Mason.
Time based targets five years on: The WA perspective and other lessons.  Dr Mark Monaghan.
Integrating audit with QI research Carol J. Peden MD, FRCA, FICM, MPH. NELA QI Lead, EPOCH QI Lead Macintosh Professor Royal College of Anaesthetists,
2012 Project Steering Group Chaired by Professor Derek Bell An evaluation of consultant input into acute medical admissions management Hospital service.
The Health Roundtable Emergency general surgery model of care Presenter: Mr Douglas Stupart Innovation Poster Session HRT1215 – Innovation Awards Sydney.
Acute Quality Standards Dan Beckett Acute Physician CMO Advisor for Acute & General Medicine.
1989 Microsoft released ‘Office’ suite Berlin Wall comes down George Bush snr. becomes President USSR pulls out of Afghanistan First NCEPOD Report.
The Use of Funnel Plots & Multi- Year Cumulative Data to Track Hospital Performance Herbert MA, Hamman BH, Roper KL, Ring WS, Edgerton JR, Texas Quality.
The “CEPOD” Theatre. CENOD Confidential Enquiry into NON Operative Death.
Monthly Market Watch for Maricopa County An overview of what is happening in the Maricopa County real estate market (using January 2011 statistics) Provided.
Quality & Safety Markers Local process and outcome results presented Falls, Hand hygiene, Peri-operative harm CLAB is not presented as already substantial.
Carol J. Peden BSC, MB ChB, MD, FRCA, FFICM, MPH Royal United Hospital, Bath.
“ Knowing the Risk:” implications for Critical Care Dr Jane Eddleston.
Reflections on NCEPOD: Knowing the Risk Norman S Williams President December 2011.
The National Emergency Laparotomy Audit Dave Murray National Clinical Lead
The First Patient Report of the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit
Date of download: 6/26/2016 From: Variations in Mortality and Length of Stay in Intensive Care Units Ann Intern Med. 1993;118(10): doi: /
Implementing Clinical Governance COMPASS Consultant Outcome Indicators Programme.
The Royal College of Emergency Medicine Assessing for Cognitive Impairment in Older People Clinical Audit National findings The Royal College of.
The Royal College of Emergency Medicine Mental Health in the ED Clinical Audit National findings The Royal College of Emergency Medicine Clinical.
Developing a structured narrative with an improvement message Jose Lourtie NELA Project Manager Royal College of Anaesthetists.
2016 Primary Assessment Update 27th September 2016
Process Control Charts
LATEST RESEARCH JUNE 2015 Formed in 2009 the Aston Research Centre for
SEPSIS COLLABORATIVE Clinical Measures Scorecard Classification
R36: UTILISING FRAILTY EARLY WARNING SCORE (FEWS) IN THE ACUTE HOSPITAL SETTING TO IDENTIFY FRAIL AND VULNERABLE PATIENTS Lotte Dinesen1,2,Alan J Poots1,
R16: DOES THE CUMULATIVE FRAILTY EARLY WARNING SCORE (FEWS) AND NEWS IMPROVE PREDICTOR POWER FOR VARIOUS PATIENT OUTCOMES IN THE ELDERLY ACUTE CARE POPULATION?
Healing our Health System Models of Care
2013 Wisconsin Health Trends: Progress Report
David Culliford, Lynn Josephs, Matthew Johnson, Mike Thomas
Approaching NELA data.
ACE – a new model for children’s urgent care
J.Livie1, E.Goodall1, M.Wilson2,C.Payne2 Department of Surgery2
Understanding Standards Event Higher Statistics Award
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
HIV Prevention Data Amanda Dennison, MPH Ohio Department of Health
FRACTURED NECK OF FEMUR
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Discovery In Action Investigating variation in BADS Same Day Surgery rates in a Health Board.
Clinical audit 2017/18 National Results
PROPPR Transfusion of Plasma, Platelets, and Red Blood Cells in a 1:1:1 vs a 1:1:2 Ratio and Mortality in Patients With Severe Trauma. 
Pre Hospital Recognition
Clinical audit 2017/18 National Results
Management of diabetic patients undergoing elective surgery
Principal recommendations
To Admit…or not to Admit…that is the question!
How Structured Mortality Reviews Can Improve Quality of Care
National COPD Audit Programme
Principal recommendations
Dr S Rochow. Clinical Lead, Triage Unit. Woodend Hospital
FRACTURED NECK OF FEMUR
Assessing for Cognitive Impairment
How do the use and price of healthcare in the U. S
Local Alcohol Profiles for England phe. org
Discovery In Action Investigating variation in BADS Same Day Surgery rates in a Health Board.
National Emergency Laparotomy Audit
Summary of Slide Content
Useful QI principles for NELA
Lecture 4 Study design and bias in screening and diagnostic tests
Be ready to feedback your main points to the room in 15 mins.
Monthly Performance Report
Module 5 Part 3 Understanding System Stability: Types and Causes of Process Variation Adapted from: The Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI), the.
Discovery in Action: Case Study
Discovery In Action Investigating variation in BADS Same Day Surgery rates in a Health Board.
Emergency Laparotomy Cymru
PowerPoint 16:9 Screen Ratio Template *
Patient Forum Pack May 2019 This report refers to May 2019 (M2) data unless otherwise stated All data is based on LONDON Clinical Commissioning Groups.
Principal recommendations
Presentation transcript:

The Second Patient Report of the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit www.nela.org.uk info@nela.org.uk

NELA Aims To improve the quality of care provided to patients undergoing emergency laparotomy through provision of high quality data Facilitate local quality improvement Provide comparative data at hospital level to allow identification of high performing sites Only reporting at hospital level emergency laparotomy care is a “team game” clinician level reporting is not appropriate

Year 2 (Dec 2014-Nov 2015) 23000+ patients (70%) from 186 hospitals Some things have improved Personal practice Some have yet to improve Organisational change Still considerable variation 70% case ascertainment for year 2 Target for year 3 is 80% 3

Improvements seen in: Case ascertainment 70% from 65% CT scanning & reporting 72% from 68% Preop risk assessment 64% from 56% Consultant surgeon and anaesthetist presence in theatre 70% from 65% High risk patients Consultant anaesthetists present 82% Consultant surgeon present 89% still differences between “in” & “out of hours”.

Risk Assessment 56% vs 64% Assessment, appreciation and communication of risk leads to better standards of care Improvements seen in risk assessment. The red arrows on these time series graphs mark the time where the 1st results became available, and began to be disseminated to clinicians. Many of these graphs show a reassuring upturn from this point. Well done!!

P-POSSUM calibration A note about P-POSSUM. It is generally recognised that P-POSSUM overpredicts. This graph shows the degree of correlation between observed outcomes vs Possum predicted outcome. Up to ~15% predicted risk, POSSUM is reasonably accurate. From a clinical perspective, P-POSSUM is therefore still useful for identifying patients who fall in a lower, high or highest risk category, in order to make decisions about the need for resources such as critical care. However we would urge caution in reliance on P-POSSUM when used to guide clinical decision making at high levels of predicted mortality as it overestimates risk of death by a factor of approximately two.

Risk of death and observed ONS 30-day & 90-day mortality Median calculated preoperative P-POSSUM risk of death, and observed ONS 30-day and 90-day mortality by documented preoperative risk category (Year 2 data) The “not documented” group have mortality profile similar to the “high risk” group

Consultant presence & critical care admission according to risk Intraoperative presence of both a consultant surgeon and consultant anaesthetist, and direct postoperative admission to critical care by documented preoperative risk category (Year 2 data) The “not documented” group have a lower level of consultant input compared to the “high risk” group.

Consultant presence (>5% risk) Upturn since results disseminated from year 1

Critical care admission 83% vs 85% Interesting dip in Critical Care admissions over winter for the 5-10% group, whereas the higher risk group is more constant

Yet to improve Antibiotic administration: 20% did not get pre-op Delays to theatre: 70% of most urgent patients Critical care for highest risk patients remained ~85% Elderly care input only 10%

Proportion of hospitals meeting standards Whilst the number of hospitals rated “green” (ie meeting standards) remains relatively low for some measures, there has been improvement since year 1 as shown on the next graphs

Number of standards being met Number of hospitals rated Green This shows the number of hospitals meeting 1,2,3 etc standards of care (rated “green”). Y-axis shows number of hospitals. X-axis shows the number of standards met at each hospital. Eg ~42 hospitals met 4 standards. Less than 15 hospitals met 6 standards. Blue is year 1, red year 2 Number of standards met

Number of standards being met Number of hospitals rated Green The curve has shifted right in year 2, ie more hospitals meet more standards, although there is still considerable way to go. Many hospitals are actually rated “yellow” meaning they may be close to meeting standards in many areas of care. Number of standards met

Outcomes

ONS 30-day and 90-day mortality by age group (Year 1 and Year 2 data) Mortality is age related. Almost half the patient are >70 years old. Given the age-related mortality, there is an argument that the elderly should be admitted to Critical Care regardless of POSSUM risk, especially as POSSUM categorises anyone over 70 as having the same risk.

Funnel plot of risk-adjusted ONS 30-day mortality (Year 1 and Year 2 data) No actual outliers with risk adjusted mortality >3SD above mean. However there are a few who are “alerts” with mortality between 2 & 3 SDs. From year 3, NELA will be naming outliers and those hospitals above 2SDs for 2 out of 3 years on a rolling basis.

Trend in the overall ONS 30-day & 90-day mortality Trend in the overall ONS 30-day and 90-day mortality percentage rate (split medians denoting the change from Year 1 to Year 2) Reassuring drop around time year 1 results disseminated. We are hopeful that this trend will continue

Length of Stay: £200 million + Improvements in length of stay equate to ~£200 million savings per year. This is a significant finding, as it means that hospitals should see financial advantages in improving patient care, and can help win the argument that it is worthwhile investing in improved resources. Mean LOS 18.1 days  16.3 days £22 (€30) million savings

Other outcomes Length of stay Return to theatre Also variation in other outcomes between hospitals Length of stay Return to theatre Unplanned CCU admission

Hospital level figures Suggest inserting Hospital Performance Indicator graphs here as necessary

National Emergency Laparotomy Audit? Quality Improvement Project Share Best Practice http://nela.org.uk/Pathway-Examples#pt NELA QI dashboard generates real-time charts that show change over time The key to improvement is not about waiting to see if things have improved in the next report. Continuous quality improvement is needed at a local level.

Summary Thank you for: Risk Assessment drives resources 43000+ patients since the audit started improvement seen at personal level Risk Assessment drives resources Need organisational change Not “National Audit”, but local Quality Improvement