of High-Energy, High-Density Electron and Positron Beams

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Erdem Oz* USC E-164X,E167 Collaboration Plasma Dark Current in Self-Ionized Plasma Wake Field Accelerators
Advertisements

Design and Experimental Considerations for Multi-stage Laser Driven Particle Accelerator at 1μm Driving Wavelength Y.Y. Lin( 林元堯), A.C. Chiang (蔣安忠), Y.C.
The scaling of LWFA in the ultra-relativistic blowout regime: Generation of Gev to TeV monoenergetic electron beams W.Lu, M.Tzoufras, F.S.Tsung, C. Joshi,
Historical Review on the Plasma Based Particle Accelerators Congratulation for opening “Plasma and Space Science Center” Yasushi Nishida Lunghwa University.
Bunch shape monitor for Linac-4 A.V.Feschenko Institute For Nuclear Research (INR), Moscow , Russia.
Particle-Driven Plasma Wakefield Acceleration James Holloway University College London, London, UK PhD Supervisors: Professor Matthew wing University College.
E166 Collaboration J.C. Sheppard SLAC, October, 2003 E166 Background Test Simulations: Overview-what do we need J. C. Sheppard.
Undulator-Based Positron Production in the Final Focus Test Beam (E-166) K.T. McDonald, J.C. Sheppard, Co-Spokespersons SLAC Experimental Program Advisory.
TEST BEAMS Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Ted Fieguth DoE/SLAC Program Review April & May 1, 1997.
K. Moffeit 6 Jan 2005 WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at the International Linear Collider SLAC January 6-8, 2005 Polarimetry at the ILC Design issues.
Before aperture After aperture Faraday Cup Trigger Photodiode Laser Energy Meter Phosphor Screen Solenoids Successful Initial X-Band Photoinjector Electron.
M. Woods (SLAC) Beam Diagnostics for test facilities of i)  ii) polarized e+ source January 9 –11, 2002.
March 2011Particle and Nuclear Physics,1 Experimental tools accelerators particle interactions with matter detectors.
Beijing, Feb 3 rd, 2007 LEPOL 1 Low Energy Positron Polarimetry for the ILC Sabine Riemann (DESY) On behalf of the LEPOL Collaboration.
Progress of Novel Vacuum Laser Acceleration Experiment at ATF Xiaoping Ding, Lei Shao ATF Users’ Meeting, Apr. 4-6, 2007 Collaborators: D. Cline (PI),
FACET and beam-driven e-/e+ collider concepts Chengkun Huang (UCLA/LANL) and members of FACET collaboration SciDAC COMPASS all hands meeting 2009 LA-UR.
Compton/Linac based Polarized Positrons Source V. Yakimenko BNL IWLC2010, Geneva, October 18-22, 2010.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
MEIC Staged Cooling Scheme and Simulation Studies He Zhang MEIC Collaboration Meeting, 10/06/2015.
Institute of Atomic and Molecular Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taiwan National Taiwan University, Taiwan National Central University, Taiwan National Chung.
Nonlinear Optics in Plasmas. What is relativistic self-guiding? Ponderomotive self-channeling resulting from expulsion of electrons on axis Relativistic.
A.P. Potylitsyn, S.Yu. Gogolev
Max Cornacchia, SLAC LCLS Project Overview BESAC, Feb , 2001 LCLS Project Overview What is the LCLS ? Transition from 3 rd generation light sources.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 1 PRoy LINAC06 Neutralized Drift Compression and Related Experiments* P. K. Roy 1, W. L. Waldron.
UCLA Positron Production Experiments at SABER Presented by Devon Johnson 3/15/06.
Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee MeetingLCLS February 26, 2001 J. Hastings Brookhaven National Laboratory LCLS Scientific Program X-Ray Laser Physics:
GWENAEL FUBIANI L’OASIS GROUP, LBNL 6D Space charge estimates for dense electron bunches in vacuum W.P. LEEMANS, E. ESAREY, B.A. SHADWICK, J. QIANG, G.
NON-INTERCEPTING DIAGNOSTIC FOR HIGH BRIGHTNESS ELECTRON BEAMS USING OPTICAL DIFFRACTION RADIATION INTERFERENCE (ODRI) A. Cianchi #1,2, M. Castellano 3,
An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron radiation. I.Meshkov, T. Mamedov, E. Syresin, An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron.
Non Double-Layer Regime: a new laser driven ion acceleration mechanism toward TeV 1.
Tuning Techniques And Operator Diagnostics for FACET at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Chris Melton SLAC Accelerator Operations.
Prospects for generating high brightness and low energy spread electron beams through self-injection schemes Xinlu Xu*, Fei Li, Peicheng Yu, Wei Lu, Warren.
Proposal for the End Station Test Beam (ESTB) at SLAC John Jaros ALCPG09 Albuquerque September 30, 2009.
J.Maxson, D. Cesar, P. Musumeci UCLA
Coherent THz radiation source driven by pre-bunched electron beam
1 1 Office of Science Strong Field Electrodynamics of Thin Foils S. S. Bulanov Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA We acknowledge support.
ISIS – Rutherford Appleton Cockcroft -Walton LINAC Muons Neutrons Synchrotron.
V.N. Litvinenko (SBU) C. Joshi, W. Mori (UCLA)
Primary Beam Lines for the Project at CERN
Polarization of final electrons/positrons during multiple Compton
Experiments on Fast Ion Instability at PLS
Emittance measurements for LI2FE electron beams
Proton-driven plasma wakefield acceleration in hollow plasma
Preliminary result of FCC positron source simulation Pavel MARTYSHKIN
Sara Thorin, MAX IV Laboratory
Yeong-Shin Park and Y. S. Hwang
Show that the (beam size ^2) varies quadratically with distance in a drift section with no quadrupoles.
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Have a chance to operate your own beam at CERN
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Laserwire: high resolution non-invasive beam profiling
EuPRAXIA working package report
Lecture 2 Live Feed – CERN Control Centre
Why Study Electron Clouds? Methods and Tools to Study Electron Clouds
Wakefield Accelerator
The operation of LHC accelerator complex Beam Measurement and Diagnostics Thanks to Stefano Redaelli CERN Beams Department Operations Group.
Beam-beam R&D for eRHIC Linac-Ring Option
All-Optical Injection
E-164 E-162 Collaboration: and E-164+X:
Synchrotron Ring Schematic
High resolution profile measurements
Heavy Ion Fusion Modeling Update*
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
End Station Test Beam (ESTB) at SLAC
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
LCLS bunch length monitor utilizing coherent radiation
Final Focus System: gg Interaction Region
T.Fujita, K.Umemori, K.Yoshida V.Ababiy, A.P.Potylitsin, I.E.Vnukov
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Presentation transcript:

of High-Energy, High-Density Electron and Positron Beams Plasma Focusing of High-Energy, High-Density Electron and Positron Beams Hector A. Baldis ILSA / Lawrence Livermore Nat. Laboratory and Dep.Applied Sciences, UC Davis for SLAC-E150 Plasma Lens Collaboration Stanford University APS-DPP Meeting, Quebec October 23-27, 2000 This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by University of California Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, under contract No. W-7405-Eng-48.

Principle of the Plasma Lens Motivation for the plasma lens: 100 to 1000 times stronger than conventional magnets focuses beam in X and Y simultaneously focuses both electrons and positrons smaller spot size and enhanced luminosity possible simplification of Final Focusing System (FFS) In vacuum, there is no net Lorentz force on the beam In a plasma, E-field is neutralized; B-field pinches the beam.

Why a Plasma Lens ? Linear collider luminosity ~1/sx sy. ~10 km Linear collider luminosity ~1/sx sy. Plasma lens is super strong: of order 1000 Tesla / cm; about 1000 times stronger than conventional quadrupoles. For SLC/NLC, an enhancement of luminosity by a factor of approximately 5 is possible. Potential reduction of complexity and length of FFS in linear collider. Plasma lens focuses electrons as well as positrons ~5 km

Theory of plasma lens focusing was first proposed by Pisin Chen in1987 An electron beam traversing a plasma The parabolic dashed curves within the beam indicates the longitudinal density distribution. The plasma electron density relative to the beam electron density will determine the location of the return current.

Previous Experiments ANL - J.Rosenzweig,et al.,(1998) Thick plasma lens 35 cm long with n~1-7 x 1013 cm-3 21 MeV electron beamwith n ~ 2.5-4 x 1010 cm-3 Beam size reduced from s = 1.4 mm to s = 0.9 mm Tokyo university - H. Nakanishi, et al., (1990) Thin plasma lens with density n~1.4 x 1011 cm-3 18 MeV electron beam with n ~ 1.2 x 1010 cm-3 Theory for thin plasma lens is confirm UCLA - G. Hairapetian, et al., (1993) Thin plasma lens with n ~ 4 x 1012 cm-3 LBNL - W. Leemans, et al., (1996) These experiments confirmed the plasma lens concept, but operated at low electron energies and low plasma densities

Goals of the E150 Experiment Study plasma focusing for high-energy, high-density electron and positron particle beams in the regime relevant to high energy colliders Better understanding of beam-plasma interactions and benchmarking of computer codes for future plasma lens designs Develop compact, simple and economical plasma lens designs suitable for high-energy collider applications

E150 Collaboration P. Chen, W. Craddock, F.J. Dekker, C. Field, R. Iverson, F. King, J. Ng, P. Raymond,D. Walz Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University H.A. Baldis, P. Bolton Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory D. Cline, Y. Fukui, V. Kumar University of California, Los Angeles C. Crawford, R. Noble Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory K. Nakajima KEK-National Laboratory for High Energy Physics A. Ogata Hiroshima University A. W. Weidemann University of Tennessee

Parameters of the E150 Experiment Final Focus Test Beam Facility (FFTB) beam parameters (e- and e+) bunch charge: 1,5 x 1010 (electrons or positrons) per pulse beam size: 5-8 mm in X, 3-5 mm in Y bunch length: 700 mm beam energy: 30 GeV normal emittance: 3-5 x 10-5 m rad in X 0.3-0.6 x 10-5 m rad in Y Gas Jet gas: N2 or H2, neutral density ~3 x 1018 /cm3 nozzle size: 3 mm gas pressure: 250-1000 lb per square inch Plasma Production beam-induced ionization: ~7% efficiency laser-induced ionization: ~45% efficiency laser pulse: l=1.06mm, E~1J, T~2-3 ns plasma characterization: optical interferometry

Two ways to produce an Ionized medium Beam Induced Ionization Two ways to produce an Ionized medium Self induced ionization front part of the beam ionize the gas remanding part focuses Pre-formed plasma laser pulse ionize the gas full beam focuses

Schematic Layout of the Experiment

Differential Pumping System

Experimental Setup Entry port for laser and plasma diagnostics IR Laser and Optics Wire scanner and gas jet Entry port for laser and plasma diagnostics Experimental Setup

Wires will break after plasma Carbon Wire Scanner (Robert Kirby/SLAC) Scanning wires were placed at 0o, 45o, and 90o Gold foils provide additional diagnostic (bremstrahlung) Wires will break after plasma focussing of beams

Plasma Lens Measurements Setup Beam size measurements Scan e- or e+ beam transversely, after plasma gas target Interleave measurements with and without plasma Detect bremstrahlung signal off carbon fibers (4-7 mm diameter) (as a function of beam position) Synchrotron Radiation (SR) monitor Detects photon flux from plasma lens induced SR Provides an “on-line” measurement of plasma focusing gradient Segmented monitor, 35 m down beam from the plasma lens Beam associated background removed statistically Plasma focusing dynamics Cherenkov target provides a measure of divergence Measure time-resolved (~ ps resolution) beam profile down stream

Beam Induced Plasma Focusing 30 GeV Electron Beam Beam diameter at fixed Z Beam size along Z

Focusing of positron beams Plasma Focusing of Positron Beams Focusing of positron beams (30 GeV positrons, 1.5 x 1010 e+ per pulse)

Summary Plasma lens focusing of 30 GeV positrons beam observed for the first time Plasma focusing of both 30 GeV electrons and positrons: spot size reduction better than 40% plasma lens induced SR observed plasma focusing gradient reaches 5 MTesla / m