Competition on the range:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable Development and Evolution of the Criteria and Indicators.
Advertisements

Perform Range Forage Inventory for Large Ungulates Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Dept. and Range Dept. Project.
Guidelines for Setting “Proper” Stocking Rate
Teacher Info:  Have students take “What is Range” Quiz prior to presentation, asking them to do their best to answer the questions  Then go through slides.
Fire and prairie Oct 12, 2010 From:
Managing Rangelands rangeland: landscape of grasses and/or scattered trees - uncultivated & provides forage for large animals - gradient in precipitation,
DALLES MOUNTAIN RANCH REHABILITATION PROJECT A cooperative partnership between Western SARE, Washington State University, Washington State Parks, and Native.
Factors that regulate populations Lecture #3 APES
Rangeland Succession. Succession  The orderly change of plant communities over time.  The gradual replacement of one plant community by another through.
Grazing for Weed Control and Wildlife Management Morgan Doran Livestock & Natural Resources Advisor University of California Cooperative Extension.
GRASSLAND ECOLOGY. WORLD GRASSLANDS NORTH AMERICAN GRASSLANDS REFLECT WEATHER PATTERNS.
WLCI Update July 23, 2010 Conserving World-class Wildlife Resources Facilitating Responsible Development.
The Effects of Coyote Removal in Texas: A Case Study in Conservation Biology Adapted from activity by Margaret Carroll Department of Biology Framingham.
 Necessary materials: PowerPoint Guide Teacher Information!
Pinyon Juniper Community. Microbiotic Crust Ecological roles for biological crusts 1. Fix carbon and nitrogen 2. Trap dust 3. Increase water retention.
Livestock & Wildlife Interaction. Interactions NegativePositive It Depends on….?
 Discuss silvicultural principles related to restoration/fuels treatments  Compare conditions from the 1900 Cheesman Lake reconstruction to current.
Population Dynamics of Wildlife and Cattle in East Africa Please read and ANNOTATE the article “The Loaming Threat of Overgrazing: Effects and Recommendations”
Responses of Large Mammals to Forest Thinning Treatments in Southwest Jemez Mountains, New Mexico James W. Cain III 1, Robert Parmenter 2, Mark A. Peyton.
Flamingos and the Scientific Method
Results from Midterm I A B C D F Mean = 23.4 Minimum score = 9 Maximum score = 37.
Homes on the Range An Introduction to California Rangelands Photo Credit: Bureau of Land Management.
Stanislaus National Forest Livestock Grazing Susan Forbes Range Management Specialist September 24, 2010 Over One Hundred Years of Grazing.
What is Rangeland?. What is rangeland? Uncultivated land dominated by native plants: grasses, grass-like plants, forbs, or shrubs. All land that is not.
On – Site Training Overview LAND USE PLANNING FOR PRIORITY SPECIES AND VEGETATION March 11, 2010.
Range Management Chapter 1 1. Range Management Terminology 2. Basic Range Management Concepts 3. Range Management Information Sources 4. Importance of.
Biomass Production Estimation
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE LAND MANAGEMENT AND CONSERVATION.
Responses of Large Mammals to Prescribed and Wildfires in Southwest Jemez Mountains, New Mexico James W. Cain III 1, Robert Parmenter 2, Mark A. Peyton.
National Forest System Grazing Objectives 1.Manage range vegetation to protect basic soil and water resources, provide for ecological diversity, improve.
What is Range?. A.A series of mountains. B.A cooking stove that has an oven and a flat top with burners. C.A place where shooting or golf driving is practiced.
Beneficial Management Practices for Saskatchewan Species at Risk: Swift Fox Endangered.
APES Day 72! Respond to the quote by Adam Smith from The Wealth of Nations, “No society can surely be flourishing and happy, of which the far greater part.
Holistic Management (HM) Planned Grazing in Laikipia Presented by LWF RANGELANDS OUTREACH TEAM 10 th October 2015.
FOUR CHAPTERS: Wildlife, Predator Management, Fisheries, and Sensitive Species Bill James Utah Div. of Wildlife Resources.
P Differentiate the terms producers, consumers decomposers. P. 93 Producer = a plant which can synthesize carbohydrates using carbon dioxide.
Bob Schooley, University of Illinois, Jornada LTER Brandon Bestelmeyer, USDA-ARS, Jornada LTER Andrea Campanella, Sierra Nevada Research Institute John.
What are Rangelands? Presentation (ppt.)
The Bighorn Sheep By: Horace Yao. Great Facts About The Bighorn Sheep They are large enough to continue to be hunted down, unlike other near extinct animals.
Sage-Grouse 101 David Dahlgren, PhD Utah State University.
Deer Harvest Planning in the Kemptville District Eastern Ontario Deer Advisory Council Kemptville District May 16 th, 2016.
UC Research Station at Anza Borrego
An Introduction to California Rangelands
Factors that regulate populations
Impacts of Lake Organisms on Terrestrial Systems
Research and Conservation on the Lower Brule Indian Reservation
In situ conservation.
Holistic Management (HM) Planned Grazing in Laikipia
The Science – or Lack Thereof – of Wild Horse & Burro Management
Ungrazed deep grassland
The Effects of Coyote Removal in Texas: A Case Study in Conservation Biology National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science website;
Human Impact on the Environment
Species at Risk.
Abiotic and biotic factors and
Grazing Management and Fire
Rangeland Principles (Rem 151)
Maintaining Biodiversity
Today’s Bell Ringer 11 April
Large-scale Ecology Interacting ecosystems
What is Rangeland Management?
Animal Nutrition on the Rangeland
Multi-Species Grazing
Rangelands and Feedlots
Grazing Ecology and Management
Werribee Open Range Zoo
Effects of Soil Nutrients and Fire
By: Philip W. Williams Bachelor of Science in Forestry Student
Sustainability and Resources
Grazing & Recovery after Fire
Multi-Species Grazing
Presentation transcript:

Dustin H. Ranglack Ph.D. Candidate dhranglack@gmail.com @dhranglack Competition on the range: Science vs. perception in a bison-cattle conflict in the western USA Dustin H. Ranglack, Susan Durham, and Johan T. du Toit Genome.gov Tringa.org Dustin H. Ranglack Ph.D. Candidate dhranglack@gmail.com @dhranglack

@dhranglack Introduction Integration of local ecological knowledge (LEK) into adaptive management But science is still needed nature.org

Wildlife-livestock conflict @dhranglack Wildlife-livestock conflict World-wide negative view towards native large herbivores Disease Competition Near eradication of many wildlife species Ryan Sensenig

@dhranglack Bison Currently ~500,000 ~20,000 in conservation herds Intensively managed; fragmented landscapes; cattle introgression Perceived competition with livestock limiting large-scale restoration

@dhranglack Predictions If bison significantly reduce forage availability for cattle: Bison visitation a significant predictor of grass biomass depletion If bison are the main wildlife competitor with cattle for grazing resources: Bison and cattle the two predominant grass consumers

Study site Henry Mountains (HM) Colorado Plateau Arid/semi-arid @dhranglack Study site Henry Mountains (HM) Colorado Plateau Arid/semi-arid Isolated Public land (BLM) Desert grassland/shrubland PJ and mixed conifer forest Subalpine grassland and aspen

HM bison Introduced in 1940s Co-mingle with cattle Free-ranging @dhranglack HM bison Introduced in 1940s Free-ranging Genetically pure Disease Free Huntable ~325 adults post-hunt Co-mingle with cattle

@dhranglack HM bison conflict Drought

Other HM grazers Lagomorphs Black-tailed jackrabbits @dhranglack Other HM grazers Lagomorphs Black-tailed jackrabbits Desert cottontail rabbits Bill Bouton Alan Vernon

@dhranglack Goals Measure rancher perceptions of wildlife-livestock conflict in the HM Determine relative impacts of bison, cattle, and lagomorphs on HM rangeland

Rancher survey Questionnaire mailed to 21 ranchers @dhranglack Rancher survey Questionnaire mailed to 21 ranchers What are the biggest issues? Main wildlife competitors? Predator control?

Rancher survey 12 responses (57.1% of ranchers; 70.9% of cattle) @dhranglack Rancher survey 12 responses (57.1% of ranchers; 70.9% of cattle) Competition for forage biggest concern Wildlife competitors (high=3, low=1) Bison: Mean: 2.18, SE: 0.25 Lagomorphs: Mean: 1.11, SE: 0.11 All felt that coyotes should be controlled

@dhranglack Exclosure sites

Experimental design At each site (n=20): @dhranglack Experimental design At each site (n=20): 1 - 8’x8’ exclosure (bison + cattle out) 1 - 8’x8’ exclosure (bison + cattle + lagomorphs out) 1 - 8’x8’ reference plot (all grazers in) Total of 40 exclosures and 20 reference plots

@dhranglack Site layout

Data collection Oct. 2011: set up Oct. 2012: clipped @dhranglack Data collection Oct. 2011: set up Oct. 2012: clipped Separated into grass, forb, shrub, cactus Dried and weighed

@dhranglack October 2011, Site #19 Partial Exclosure Full Exclosure

@dhranglack October 2012, Site # 19 Partial exclosure Full exclosure

@dhranglack Predictions Bison visitation a significant predictor of grass biomass depletion Bison and cattle the two predominant grass consumers

@dhranglack Bison 44 GPS collars deployed on HM bison

Bison RDI RDI: Relative Density Index RDIi = Si/A @dhranglack Bison RDI RDI: Relative Density Index RDIi = Si/A Si = bison locations / sq. km around site i A = bison locations/ sq. km in the area comprising the habitat in which site i occurs Log transformed for analysis

Bison RDI RDI >0: higher than expected bison use @dhranglack Bison RDI RDI >0: higher than expected bison use RDI <0: lower than expected bison use Sam Abell

@dhranglack Expected Prediction 1

@dhranglack Observed

@dhranglack Prediction 1 Bison visitation a significant predictor of grass biomass depletion

@dhranglack Predictions Bison visitation a significant predictor of grass biomass depletion Bison and cattle the two predominant grass consumers

@dhranglack One-way, RBD ANOVA Significant differences among reference, partial, and full exclosures (p < 0.05) Large herbivores = 13.9 g/m2 (p = 0.005) Lagomorphs = 7.2 g/m2 (p = 0.048) How much of the large herbivore effect is due to bison vs cattle? Using ‘animal days’ to determine the relative impacts of each.

Animal days (# of individuals) * (# of days in the area) @dhranglack Animal days (# of individuals) * (# of days in the area) Bison = 21,415 days Cattle = 81,949 days

Grass use Cattle: 11.0 g/m2 Lagomorphs: 7.2 g/m2 Bison: 2.9 g/m2 @dhranglack Grass use Cattle: 11.0 g/m2 Lagomorphs: 7.2 g/m2 Bison: 2.9 g/m2 James Marvin Phelps

@dhranglack Overall grass use

Prediction 2 Bison and cattle the two predominant grass consumers @dhranglack Prediction 2 Bison and cattle the two predominant grass consumers

Adaptive management Integrating LEK must be done carefully @dhranglack Adaptive management Integrating LEK must be done carefully While useful in many cases, it might be: based on misunderstanding not matched with current conditions biased to suit political needs Management decision based on perceptions are unlikely to lead to a satisfactory outcome Science should provide direction

Discussion Trophic cascade from predator removal? @dhranglack Discussion Trophic cascade from predator removal? $1.35 M spent annually in Utah on predator control Hope for bison restoration Impacts on cattle overstated

@dhranglack Acknowledgements dhranglack@gmail.com Chris Holcomb