Detector R&D Group Meeting MEMS Seismometer Development

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gravitational Wave Astronomy Dr. Giles Hammond Institute for Gravitational Research SUPA, University of Glasgow Universität Jena, August 2010.
Advertisements

HOW DOES MY SIGNAL GET FROM HERE TO THERE? By Forest Cummings, W5LQU And Dave Russell, W2DMR.
Project #3: Design of a MEMS Vertical Actuator Jianwei Heng Alvin Tai ME128 Spring 2005.
Time Varying Structural Behaviour of the PETS “On-Off” mechanism piston movement impact Riku Raatikainen
LIGO-G W Commissioning Data on Vibration Isolation & Suspensions Fred Raab 24 October 02.
Thermally Deformable Mirrors: a new Adaptive Optics scheme for Advanced Gravitational Wave Interferometers Marie Kasprzack Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur.
A spring with a mass of 6 kg has damping constant 33 and spring constant 234. Find the damping constant that would produce critical damping
Ksjp, 7/01 MEMS Design & Fab Overview Integrating multiple steps of a single actuator Simple beam theory Mechanical Digital to Analog Converter.
Halliday/Resnick/Walker Fundamentals of Physics 8th edition
LIGO-G D Suspensions Design for Advanced LIGO Phil Willems NSF Review, Oct , 2002 MIT.
Introduction to seismic sensors (subject 3.2) Peter Novotny PACMAN meeting, CERN, 7 October 2014.
Yuji Otake, Akito Araya and Kazuo Hidano
Simulations for Future Ground Based GW Detectors GWADW 2010 Kyoto, Japan.
ILIAS GW Meeting Mallorca - October 23-24, 2005Luca Taffarello Status of the commissioning of the AURIGA detector Luca Taffarello (INFN Sezione di Padova)
Thoughts on short term improvements for Mirror Suspension Control G.Losurdo - P.Ruggi.
Objectives Vocabulary
1 of 28 A design study of a Cryogenic High Accurate Derotator.
Environmental noise studies at VIRGO Environmental contributions to Virgo readout noise (C-runs) many sources identified through coherency analyses with.
Chapter 11 Vibrations and Waves Phy 2053 Conceptual Questions.
SUSPENSIONS Pisa S.Braccini C.Bradaschia R.Cavalieri G.Cella V.Dattilo A.Di Virgilio F.Fidecaro F.Frasconi A.Gennai G.Gennaro A.Giazotto L.Holloway F.Paoletti.
G R LIGO R&D1 Wireless optical controls of LIGO static suspensions actuators Maria Paola Clarizia University of Sannio Mentor: Riccardo De Salvo.
Advanced interferometers for astronomical observations Lee Samuel Finn Center for Gravitational Wave Physics, Penn State.
Mechanical Modeling The dynamic response is give by d’Alembert principle and is From this equation the switching time, mechanical bandwidth and and effect.
Resonance in a Closed Tube Constant Frequency, Changing Length.
LIGO Surf Project Q Of the Thermal Noise Interferometer Adam Bushmaker Mentor: Dr. Eric Black LIGO-G D.
Newton’s Second Law of Motion – Force & Acceleration
Power Up of the First VELO Module at IP8 Eddy & Olaf on behalf of the VELO group.
Chapter 6 The Modes of Oscillation of Simple and Composite Systems.
Chapter 26: Sound. The Origin of Sound  All sounds are produced by the vibrations of material objects  Pitch – our subjective impression of sound 
The control of the Virgo Superattenuator: present and future Giovanni Losurdo - INFN Firenze/Urbino on behalf of the Virgo Collaboration.
Behavior of Spectral Lines – Part II
SPIE'031 Evaluation of Micromachined Relays for Space Applications Alexander Teverovsky, QSS/Goddard Operations
Torsion Pendulum Dual Oscillator (TorPeDO) David McManus, Min Jet Yap, Robert Ward, Bram Slagmolen, Daniel Shaddock, David McClelland.
Time Varying Structural Behaviour of the PETS “On-Off” mechanism piston movement impact Riku Raatikainen
Universal Gravitation Problems Universal Gravitation Problems
Active Vibration Isolation using a Suspension Point Interferometer Youichi Aso Dept. Physics, University of Tokyo ASPEN Winter Conference on Gravitational.
ET-ILIAS_GWA joint meeting, Nov Henning Rehbein Detuned signal-recycling interferometer unstableresonance worsesensitivity enhancedsensitivity.
Paola Puppo INFN – Rome Thermal Noise Meeting – “Sapienza”-Rome - February 26 th 2008.
Introduction to Sensors and Actuators
Fulvio Ricci Cascina, November, 24th 2008
Objective Functions for Optimizing Resonant Mass Sensor Performance
FORTH - Modelling Heraklion, July 2004.
Wave Properties.
Reaching the Advanced LIGO Detector Design Sensitivity
New Ideas, Concepts, Designs
Scaling law Professor Huang.
Quantum noise reduction techniques for the Einstein telescope
Graphing Data.
Signals and Noise Signal to Noise Ratio Types of Noise
VISUAL AIDS for instruction in VACUUM TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS
Ponderomotive Squeezing Quantum Measurement Group
Integrated Microsystem
Where is this station/location?
M. Benacquista Montana State University-Billings
Example. Electrical: Resistor-Inductor-Capacitor (RLC) system.
Properties of Gases.
Noise, Ch. 16, Senturia Noise often limits performance of MEMS sensors and other devices (oscillators, filters, for.
Boyle’s Law -Assumes constant concentration of gas and temperature
Law of universal gravitation
A. Heidmann M. Pinard J.-M. Courty P.-F. Cohadon
LIGO Photon Calibrators
CHEM 3310 Chemical Kinetics Collision Theory & Transition State Theory.
Testing the variation of pressure with volume Fig 1 Testing the variation of pressure with volume Gas under pressure Pressure gauge (Pa) To foot.
Graphing Data.
Saturated: Unsaturated: Supersaturated:
Motion Simple Pendulum
Tukey Box Plots Review.
Wave Period Amplitude Crest Trough Frequency Hertz Wavelength
Seismometer Development for the 1TeV Linear Collider
Transferring LC-UV to LC-MS.
Presentation transcript:

Detector R&D 7 December 2016 borisb@nikhef.nl Detector R&D Group Meeting MEMS Seismometer Development B.A. Boom, Nikhef Amsterdam Detector R&D 7 December 2016 borisb@nikhef.nl

Backup Slide: MEMS Seismometer Spring suspension Proofmass Capacitors Thermal actuator 3mm Seismometer sensitivity grows inversely proportional to the system natural frequency squared. A low natural frequency is desirable. Seismometer response in m/g 𝐻 𝜔 = 𝑔 𝜔 2 − 𝜔 0 2 2 + 𝜔 𝜔 0 𝑄 2 , 𝜔 0 = 𝑘 𝑚 MEMS Seismometers Mass limited to few tens of milligrams Lower 𝑘 by miniaturized anti-spring technology 150µm

Importance of Quality Factor Q determines the mechanical noise floor of the sensor Q as function gap size Strong dependence on gap for viscous regime (-55% @ dx=4.5) Moderate dependence on gap for molecular gas damping regime (-25% @ dx=4.5) Strong dependence on gap for non-gaseous damping (-55% @dx=4.5) Detector R&D 7 December 2016 borisb@nikhef.nl

Normalized Q factors vs pressure Q decreases with gap size for all pressures. The minimum observed change occurs around pressure aimed at for packaging Q vs gap Q factor is maximum in center of gap Q factor depends on gap for all pressure ranges: Also for non gaseous damping, why?  open question At vacuum packaging pressures, gap dependence is minimum. Conclusion for ~10-2 mbar Reducing the gap by 50% will change the Q by ~50% This will double C0 Throwing away half the sensing fingers halves the damping  Q is almost independent on the gap size in this pressure range Detector R&D 7 December 2016 borisb@nikhef.nl

MEMS 2017 Conference Content Operations Relations My submission got accepted for an oral presentation!  Relations Content Operations Detector R&D 7 December 2016 borisb@nikhef.nl