PFA Study with Jupiter Contents : 1. Introduction 2. GLD-PFA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Selected topics from the recent GLD studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK 19 July, 2006 GLD lunch time meeting At VCLW06.
Advertisements

Lauri A. Wendland: Hadronic tau jet reconstruction with particle flow algorithm at CMS, cHarged08, Hadronic tau jet reconstruction with particle.
PFA-Enhanced Dual Readout Crystal Calorimetry Stephen Magill - ANL Hans Wenzel - FNAL Outline : Motivation Detector Parameters Use of a PFA in Dual Readout.
1 Study of the Tail Catcher Muon Tracker (TCMT) Scintillator Strips and Leakage with Simulated Coil Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE.
Ties Behnke, Vasiliy Morgunov 1SLAC simulation workshop, May 2003 Pflow in SNARK: the next steps Ties Behnke, SLAC and DESY; Vassilly Morgunov, DESY and.
Some early attempts at PFA Dhiman Chakraborty. LCWS05 Some early attempts at PFA Dhiman Chakraborty2 Introduction Primarily interested in exploring the.
 Performance Goals -> Motivation  Analog/Digital Comparisons  E-flow Algorithm Development  Readout R&D  Summary Optimization of the Hadron Calorimeter.
PFA Development – Definitions and Preparation 0) Generate some events w/G4 in proper format 1)Check Sampling Fractions ECAL, HCAL separately How? Photons,
Scintillator (semi)DHCAL? Vishnu Zutshi for. Introduction Can a scintillator (semi)digital calorimeter work? Cell sizes are necessarily 6-12 cm 2 Can.
David Attié Club ‘ILC Physics Case’ CEA Saclay June 23, 2013 ILD & SiD concepts and R&D.
Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation 2007/Feb/ ACFA ILC Workshop M1 ICEPP, Tokyo Hitoshi HANO collaborated with Acfa-Sim-J.
Taikan Suehara et al., Beijing, 2010/3/29 page 1 Simulation study of W + DM signature for identification of new physics Taikan Suehara (ICEPP,
1 Realistic top Quark Reconstruction for Vertex Detector Optimisation Talini Pinto Jayawardena (RAL) Kristian Harder (RAL) LCFI Collaboration Meeting 23/09/08.
Taikan Suehara, ECFA08, Warsaw, 2008/06/11 page 1 Tau-pair and SUSY analysis for ILD optimization in Jupiter/Marlin framework Taikan Suehara ICEPP, The.
Summary of Simulation and Reconstruction Shaomin CHEN (Tsinghua University)  Framework and toolkit  Application in ILC detector design Jupiter/Satellites,
Event Reconstruction in SiD02 with a Dual Readout Calorimeter Detector Geometry EM Calibration Cerenkov/Scintillator Correction Jet Reconstruction Performance.
Angular resolution study of GLD Calorimeter 2006/Dec/21 ILC-sousei Annual Meeting M1 ICEPP, Tokyo Hitoshi HANO.
1 Using Jupiter and Satellites Akiya Miyamoto KEK Jan 2006.
PFA Template Concept Performance Mip Track and Interaction Point ID Cluster Pointing Algorithm Single Particle Tests of PFA Algorithms S. Magill ANL.
Development of a Particle Flow Algorithms (PFA) at Argonne Presented by Lei Xia ANL - HEP.
Two Density-based Clustering Algorithms L. Xia (ANL) V. Zutshi (NIU)
UTA GEM DHCAL Simulation Jae Yu * UTA DoE Site Visit Nov. 13, 2003 (*On behalf of the UTA team; A. Brandt, K. De, S. Habib, V. Kaushik, J. Li, M. Sosebee,
Pandora calorimetry and leakage correction Peter Speckmayer 2010/09/011Peter Speckmayer, WG2 meeting.
Software tools and Computing Akiya Miyamoto KEK 29-September-2006 At FJPPL meeting.
Taikan Suehara, 16 th general meeting of ILC physics (Asia) wg., 2010/07/17 page 1 Model 500 GeV Taikan Suehara ICEPP, The Univ. of Tokyo.
05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge True particle flow and performance of recent particle flow algorithms.
Bangalore, India1 Performance of GLD Detector Bangalore March 9 th -13 th, 2006 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP) on behalf of the.
1 QuickSim - brief introduction - Akiya Miyamoto KEK 22 June 2005 GLD meeting See also.
13 July 2005 ACFA8 Gamma Finding procedure for Realistic PFA T.Fujikawa(Tohoku Univ.), M-C. Chang(Tohoku Univ.), K.Fujii(KEK), A.Miyamoto(KEK), S.Yamashita(ICEPP),
2/4/20079th ACFA ILC Detector Simulation Works 9 th ACFA IHEP Feb. 4 th -7 th, 2007 Tamaki Yoshioka ICEPP, Univ. of Tokyo on behalf.
1 D.Chakraborty – VLCW'06 – 2006/07/21 PFA reconstruction with directed tree clustering Dhiman Chakraborty for the NICADD/NIU software group Vancouver.
Particle Flow Review Particle Flow for the ILC (Jet) Energy Resolution Goal PFA Confusion Contribution Detector Optimization with PFAs Future Developments.
Ties Behnke: Event Reconstruction 1Arlington LC workshop, Jan 9-11, 2003 Event Reconstruction Event Reconstruction in the BRAHMS simulation framework:
1 Software tools in Asia Akiya Miyamoto KEK 18-March-2005 Simulation and Reconstruction Session LCWS2005 Representing acfa-sim-j activity M.C.Chang 1,K.Fujii.
1 Hadronic calorimeter simulation S.Itoh, T.Takeshita ( Shinshu Univ.) GLC calorimeter group Contents - Comparison between Scintillator and Gas - Digital.
1 1 - To test the performance 2 - To optimise the detector 3 – To use the relevant variable Software and jet energy measurement On the importance to understand.
Individual Particle Reconstruction The PFA Approach to Detector Development for the ILC Steve Magill (ANL) Norman Graf, Ron Cassell (SLAC)
7/13/2005The 8th ACFA Daegu, Korea 1 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP), M-C.Chang(Tohoku), K.Fujii (KEK), T.Fujikawa (Tohoku), A.Miyamoto (KEK), S.Yamashita.
1 Software tools for GLD Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK 25 May, 2005 at IHEP Based on acfa-sim-j activity.
12/20/2006ILC-Sousei Annual KEK1 Particle Flow Algorithm for Full Simulation Study ILC-Sousei Annual KEK Dec. 20 th -22 nd, 2006 Tamaki.
Status of SiD/Iowa PFA by Usha Mallik The University of Iowa for Ron Cassell, Mat Charles, TJ Kim, Christoph Pahl 1 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas,
Study of Calorimeter performance using the LC full simulator The 8th ACFA Workshop Yoshihiro Yamaguchi (Tsukuba U.) M. -C. Chang (RCNS, Tohoku U.) K. Fujii.
Taikan Suehara, 15 th general meeting of ILC physics (Asia) wg., 2010/05/15 page 1 Model 500 GeV Taikan Suehara ICEPP, The Univ. of Tokyo.
DESY1 Particle Flow Calorimetry At ILC Experiment DESY May 29 th -June 4 rd, 2007 Tamaki Yoshioka ICEPP, Univ. of Tokyo Contents.
1 GLD DOD Akiya Miyamoto KEK 2 nd GLD DOD meeting All figures shown here are preliminary.
Study of the MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu University) for the GLD Calorimeter Group Kobe Introduction Performance.
1 Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation 2007/Feb/5 ACFA ILC Workshop M1 ICEPP, Tokyo Hitoshi HANO On behalf of the Acfa-Sim-J.
On behalf of the Acfa-Sim-J Group
Discrimination of new physics models with ILC
Benchmark analysis of tau-pairs
Electroweak physics at CEPC
CEPC 数字强子量能器读出电子学预研进展
Predrag Krstonosic - ILC Valencia
CALICE scintillator HCAL
The reconstruction method for GLD PFA
Individual Particle Reconstruction
Linear Collider Simulation Tools
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
The KL reconstruction for the Belle experiment at KEK B-factory
Using Single Photons for WIMP Searches at the ILC
Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE Collaboration
Argonne National Laboratory
Detector Optimization using Particle Flow Algorithm
ZHH: Linear collider Benchmark
Steve Magill Steve Kuhlmann ANL/SLAC Motivation
ZHH Analysis preliminary results on different detector models
LC Calorimeter Testbeam Requirements
Sheraton Waikiki Hotel
What does it change for ECAL design ?
Presentation transcript:

PFA Study with Jupiter Contents : 1. Introduction 2. GLD-PFA 3. Z->qqbar Study 4. Zh Study 5. Summary FJPPL Meeting @ KEK September 29th, 2006 Tamaki Yoshioka ICEPP, Univ. of Tokyo 9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK

Introduction → Jet energy resolution is the key in the ILC physics. Most of the important physics processes to be studied in the ILC experiment have multi-jets in the final state. → Jet energy resolution is the key in the ILC physics. The best energy resolution is obtained by reconstructing momenta of individual particles avoiding double counting among Trackers and Calorimeters. - Charged particles (~60%) measured by Tracker. - Photons (~30%) by electromagnetic CAL (ECAL). - Neutral hadrons (~10%) by ECAL + hadron CAL (HCAL). → Particle Flow Algorithm (PFA) In this talk, general scheme and performance of the GLD-PFA, using the GEANT4-based full simulator (Jupiter), will be presented. 9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK

Geometry in Jupiter Solenoid TPC Hadron Calorimeter (HCAL) VTX, IT Muon Detector Electromagnetic Calorimeter (ECAL) Dodecagonal Shape As of August 06 9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK

Calorimeter Geometry in Jupiter Readout Line =10cm 349.4cm BarrelHD 229.8cm BarrelEM 210cm 270cm EndcapHD Barrel.InnerRadius=210cm EndcapEM Endcap.InnerRadius=40cm IP Barrel.HalfZ=280cm 419.4cm 280cm 299.8cm 9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK

Calorimeter Structure Active Layer Absorber Current cell size : 2x2cm Can be changed. ECAL W/Scinti./Gap 3/2/1 (mm) x 33 layers HCAL Fe/Scinti./Gap 20/5/1 (mm) x 46 layers 9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK

GLD-PFA 9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK

Particle Flow Algorithm for GLD Flow of GLD-PFA Photon Finding Charged Hadron Finding Neutral Hadron Finding Satellite Hits Finding *Satellite hits = calorimeter hit cell which does not belong to a cluster core Note : Monte-Carlo truth information is used for muon and neutrino. 9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK

Photon Likelihood (Input) - Five variables are selected to form the photon likelihood function. trkdis velocity meanlay Edep/nhits chi2 Photon Other 9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK

Photon Likelihood (Output) linear Cut position is set to be 0.7. Other Photon log Photon Other 9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK

Charged Hadron Finding Basic Concept : Extrapolate the charged track and calculate a distance between a calorimeter hit cell and the extrapolated track. Connect the cell that in a certain tube radius (clustering). Extrapolated Track Calculate the distance for any track/calorimeter cell combination. HCAL Tube Radius Hit Cells Tube radius for ECAL and HCAL can be changed separately. distance ECAL Calorimeter input position Charged Track 9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK

Neutral Hadron Likelihood (Input) - Four variables are selected to form the NHD likelihood function. velocity Edensity Edep/nhits meanlayer Neutral Hadron Satellite Hits 9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK

Neutral Hadron Likelihood (Output) linear Satellite Hits Neutral Hadron Cut position is set to be 0.73. log Neutral Hadron Satellite Hits 9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK

Z -> qqbar 9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK

Z-pole Event Display End View Side View - 2cm x 2cm tile (GLD backup solution) is used in this study. 9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK

Event Display e+ e- Z → qqbar @ 91.2GeV Next: 電子、陽電子衝突 Yellow : Photon Red, Green : Charged Hadron Black, Blue : Neutral Hadron Z → qqbar @ 91.2GeV 9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK Next: 電子、陽電子衝突

Event Display Gamma Finding Yellow : Photon Red, Green : Charged Hadron Black, Blue : Neutral Hadron Gamma Finding 9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK

Event Display Charged Hadron Finding Yellow : Photon Red, Green : Charged Hadron Black, Blue : Neutral Hadron Charged Hadron Finding 9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK

Event Display Satellite Hits Finding Yellow : Photon Red, Green : Charged Hadron Black, Blue : Neutral Hadron Satellite Hits Finding 9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK

Event Display Remaining : Neutral Hadron Yellow : Photon Red, Green : Charged Hadron Black, Blue : Neutral Hadron Remaining : Neutral Hadron 9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK

Performance - Energy-weighted Efficiency and Purity Definition Efficiency : xxx  (total xx E in collected hits)/(true xxx total E in CAL) Purity : Pxxx  (total xxx E in a cluster)/(total E in a cluster) xxx = Photon, CHD, NHD, Satellite both  and P values are energy-weighted 9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK

Jet Energy Resolution - Z → uds @ 91.2GeV, new calorimeter geometry, 2cm x 2cm tile In barrel region, ILC goal of 30% has been achieved. Performance in 0.7<|cosθ|<0.8 is too bad. → Already fixed. All angle 9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK

Energy Dependence - Energy dependence of jet energy resolution. Bad performance for higher energy. Not so bad performance for < 100 GeV Jet. 9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK

Linearity - Good linearity. Jet energy can be corrected. 9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK

Zh → nn h First look at the Zh events with Jupiter and realistic PFA. 9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK

Typical Event Display Two jets from Higgs can be seen. 9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK

Zh → nn h @ 350GeV - Fast MC • w/o correction • w/ correction Higgs Mass Visible Energy - Jet energy is corrected by an empirical formula obtained by Z → qqbar studies. - Selection Criteria 90 < Evis < 200 GeV pt >20 GeV/c Missing Mass 9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK

Kinematical Fit - 6 Measured Variables Jet1 : Ej1, qj1, jj1 Jet2 : Ej2, qj2, jj2 (Note : Ej1 > Ej2) - 3 Unmeasured Variables Z0 : Ez, qz, jz 4 Constraints pj1cosjj1sinqj1 + pj2cosjj2sinqj2 + pZcosjZsinqZ = 0 pj1sinjj1sinqj1 + pj2sinjj2sinqj2 + pZsinjZsinqZ = 0 pj1cosqj1 + pj2cosqj2 + pZcosqZ = 0 Ej1 + Ej2 + Ez – Ecm = 0 (Note: jet mass is fixed : pfit = √{Efit2 – (Emeas2 – pmeas2)} ) → 1C-fit can be performed. 9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK

Fitted Results Very Preliminary Prob > 0.02 Higgs mass resolution is significantly improved. … But, Peak at prob=1 indicates the fitting didn’t work well. 9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK

Stretch Functions Too Narrow Strange = Overestimated The stretch function should form a normal Gaussian if the X and s are proper. Too Narrow = Overestimated Strange Need to understand. 9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK

Summary • Realistic PFA has been developed using the GEANT-4 based full simulator of the GLD detector. • Jet energy resolution is studied by using Z->qq events. ILC goal of 30% has been achieved for Z-pole events. • ZH study based on current PFA performance is now ongoing. 9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK