Sayward Harrison, Ph.D. & Lauren Pierce, M.A., S.S.P.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bullying in Our Schools: Protecting GLBT Youth
Advertisements

Youth in Alternative Learning Settings School Context and Climate: Perceptions, Behaviors and Experiences.
Presentation to PPS Leadership August 14, 2013 LGBTQ Administrators & Allies SUPPORTING PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS’ LGBTQ STUDENTS, STAFF, AND FAMILIES.
Bullying Prevention Catherine Bradshaw, Ph.D., M.Ed. Johns Hopkins Center for the Prevention of Youth Violence (CDC) Johns Hopkins Center for Prevention.
Anti-Bullying Bill of Rights Act By: Frank P. Cavallo, Jr., Esquire Parker McCay P.A.
Promoting positive mental health among BC youth.  Administration took place in Grade 7-12 classes in 50 of the 59 BC School Districts.
Anne Gregory, Ph.D. Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey The school context and bullying.
Suicide Prevention Education. Why are we here? Suicide is the third leading cause of death in young people between the ages of 15 and 24. Every 16 minutes.
LGBTQ Youth in Schools ACSSW Conference January 27, 2015 Elaine M. Maccio, Ph.D., LCSW Louisiana State University School of Social Work.
BULLYING PREVENTION AND INTERVENTION INFORMATION An overview for school staff.
School Psychological Services in High Schools: Responding to Teachers’ Needs Presented by Kari Sears, Ed.S., NCSP, Patricia Warner, Ph.D., NCSP, Tammy.
Examining the Experiences of LGB Students Using the ACHA-NCHA Todd M. Smith December 1, 2006.
LGBTQ College Students Robin Knight Michele Feldman Brad Field COUN 7132 Contemporary College Student Georgia Southern University.
Gay Friendly or Gay Phobic: What Are You Creating? Douglas Williamson International School Bangkok.
Creating Safe Spaces for LGBT Youth Amy L. Reynolds University at Buffalo Anne Nowak Sweet Home Family Support Center Marvin L. Henchbarger Gay & Lesbian.
 Understand incidence & impact of bullying & harassment on LGBTQ youth  Identify national responses to bullying  Identify what therapeutic recreation.
LGBTQ 101: Foundational Information for Effective Practice Presented by: Sarah R. Young, MSW Presented for: ALGBTICAL Winter Workshop February 21, 2013.
© 2007 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. 1 School Health Services: Promoting and Protecting Student Health Chapter 2.
2 ND ANNUAL GSA CONFERENCE 2013 CALGARY.
CHAPTER 23 COUNSELING SEXUAL MINORITIES. Homosexuality  Homosexuality involves the affectional and/or sexual orientation to a person of the same sex.
We all have a role: Building social capital among youth in care.
Unifying science, education and service to transform lives Module 11 Clinical Issues with Youth A Provider’s Introduction to Substance Abuse for Lesbian,
Suicide Prevention Education a collaboration of the Mississippi Department of Education/Office of Healthy Schools Mississippi Department of Mental Health.
Our High School Students’ Perspectives: Results of the RCSD-Specific questions attached the 2009 Youth Risk Behavior Survey Part 2 of 2: Bullying, Harassment,
G S A Gay-Straight Alliance Onteora High School January, 2008.
LGBT BULLYING STATISTICS EMMA COUGHLIN AND REILY POND.
LGBTQ STUDENT SAFETY DATA Analysis of SFUSD Health Survey Data.
Introduction to Human Services Unit 9 seminar.  School social workers date back to the late 1800’s.  They were called: Visiting Teachers, Home Visitors,
Building School Connectedness. Building Successful Students: A Collaborative Workshop. 2/28/2013 Geoffrey Bones, Psy.D. School Psychologist Calkins Road.
Let’s Talk Sex!! Straight or Alternative…. By Kim Silverthorn Project PEACE Mental Health Capacity Building In Schools Initiative.
Educational Resources & Training
Educating Youth in Foster Care Shanna McBride and Angela Griffin, M.Ed.
LGBTQA YOUTH & HEALTH School Based Clinic. School Clinic  Services  Cost  Location  Registration.
DEFINITION  Bullying: Physical, verbal, or psychological attacks or intimidation against a person who can’t properly defend themselves. Includes two.
Lexington High School Youth Risk Behavior Survey 2015 Results.
Introduction to Human Services Unit 9 Dawn Burgess, Ed. D.
Park Ridge Counseling and Guidance Program. The mission of the counseling at Park Ridge Elementary School is to provide services and support to ensure,
SOGI-inclusive Education Implementation
Nation’s First Collaborative School of Public Health
California’s LGBTQ Supportive Laws and Policies
Stephanie Begun, MSW, PhD Student Shanna K. Kattari, M.Ed, PhD Student
Barry County MiPHY Results
LGBTQ+ Students and Education
Homophobia and Transphobia
LGBTQ+ Mental Health and Suicide
Strategies for Suicide Prevention Amongst LGBTQ High School Students
Creating a Safe School: Celebrating All
Lindsay C. Webster, Ph.D., LPC, LSC, NCC
La Trobe University & the University of New England
LGBTQ+ Community and Harassment
ISCA/ICAN Webinar Series: Creating Safe Schools for LGBTQ+ Youth
LGBTQ Support in Schools
Jeff Bianco MEd Curriculum and Instruction Co-chair GLSEN Connecticut
Overview of Risk and Resilience factors in LGBTQ2S Populations
LGBTQ Student Safety Data
YRBS results Mental Health Violence and Safety Sexual Behavior Youth Disproportionately at Risk (YDR) Overall Health and Wellbeing.
Discrimination Against Transgender Youth in Schools
POLICY & Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender & Intersex students
Stefanie Hassing, AU Graduate Student
LGBT Students, Harassment, and The Law
SAFE & DRUG FREE SCHOOLS REPORT Presented by: Brandy Gardner Safe & Drug Free Schools Coordinator Dr. Peggy J. Rogers, Assistant Superintendent.
Survey Results West Hartford High School Risk Behavior Survey – 2017
Adolescent Mental Health: Identifying Needs & Building Resiliency
Analysis of SFUSD Health Survey Data
LGBTQ Student Safety Data
Analysis of SFUSD Health Survey Data
Emerging Risks for Adolescent Health
Suicide Prevention Education
Presentation transcript:

Sayward Harrison, Ph.D. & Lauren Pierce, M.A., S.S.P. Needs Assessment for School Support Staff Serving LGBTQ Youth Sayward Harrison, Ph.D. & Lauren Pierce, M.A., S.S.P. ABSTRACT RISK FACTORS FOR LGBTQ YOUTH RESULTS AND SUMMARY A needs assessment was developed to examine the knowledge, training, and experience of student service providers in serving Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and/or Questioning (LGBTQ) youth. Participants consisted of 157 school counselors, school psychologists, and school social workers employed by a large, urban school district in the Southeast. While providers recognized the need for greater awareness and training in working with LGBTQ youth, they also identified a number of perceived barriers and lacked knowledge of resources and supports for this population. . LGBTQ youth face increased risk for a variety of negative outcomes, and are at higher risk than their heterosexual counterparts for experiencing harassment and discrimination, as well as negative social-emotional and academic outcomes4, 5, 6. In a national survey of over 7,000 LGBTQ students, 85% reported being verbally harassed while at school, 40% reported being physically harassed, and 19% reported being physically assaulted within the past year as a result of their sexual orientation1 Of these students, 62% did not report the incident to a teacher or administrator because they believed no action would take place or the situation would worsen. Of the students who did report, over one-third indicated that the schools took no action in response to the harassment. Bullying and harassment can cause students to feel unsafe at school, and ultimately may lead to higher rates of absenteeism. In fact, in a national school climate survey, nearly one-third of LGBTQ students reported that in the past month they had skipped at least one day of school because of safety concerns1. Frequently harassed LGBTQ youth reported grade point averages that are almost a half a grade lower than those who did not experience frequent harassment. Increased victimization is also linked with higher levels of mental health problems, including depression and anxiety, and lower levels of self-esteem. Awareness of Risk Factors The vast majority of student service providers recognized that LGBTQ youth are at increased risk for a number of negative outcomes including suicide attempts, harassment, physical assault, and mental health disorders. Fewer providers were aware that LGBTQ youth face also increased risk of acquiring STDs including HIV, experiencing homelessness, using alcohol and marijuana, experiencing declining school performance over time, being truant, and dropping out of school. Barriers to Service Provision Service providers endorsed several barriers to providing services to LGBTQ youth: Knowledge of Policies 25% of student service providers were not sure if LGBTQ youth are protected by the district’s bullying policy 44% of providers reported that they do not know if their school’s bullying program specifically addresses LGBTQ students 76% of providers indicated there is a need for greater awareness of LGBTQ issues in the district 28% of providers reported that they were unaware of any organizations in the county which specifically provide services to LGBTQ youth 27% were not sure if their own schools had organizations for LGBTQ youth Primary versus Secondary Differences Secondary school service providers (i.e., serve middle and high schools) reported that they feel significantly (p < .05) more competent in providing services to LGBTQ youth than providers who work solely with primary students and reported significantly more experience in serving these students, including intervening in harassment, providing counseling for mental health issues, conducting suicide interventions, identifying themselves as an ally, and providing LGBTQ resources to students and parents. When compared to heterosexual youth, do you believe LGBTQ youth are more or less likely to… SCHOOLS’ ROLE IN SERVING LGBTQ YOUTH ACQUIRE AN STD (INCLUDING HIV)? ATTEMPT SUICIDE? DROP OUT OF SCHOOL? The presence of supportive school staff is linked with a number of positive outcomes for LGBTQ students, including fewer missed days of school, fewer reports of feeling unsafe, increased academic achievement, higher educational aspirations, and a greater sense of overall “school belonging”1. Schools with anti-bullying policies that include protections based on sexual orientation or gender identity/expression have students who report hearing fewer homophobic remarks, experiencing lower levels of victimization, and viewing staff as more likely to intervene with harassment1. Many educational systems currently lack the appropriate resources and supports to create a safe school environment for LGBTQ youth, and there is often inconsistent educator participation in creating supportive school environments2.  Without proper staff development, teacher interpretation and enforcement of school policies designed to create safe climates for LGBTQ youth may be confounded by personal experiences or perceptions2.  PROCEDURE A 68-item multiple choice needs assessment was created in order to assess the knowledge and experience of providers in working with LGBTQ youth. Participants were surveyed regarding their: 1) Awareness of the LGBTQ population, 2) Knowledge of risk factors for LGBTQ students, 3) Personal perceptions towards LGBTQ issues, 4) Experience serving LGBTQ students, 5) Perceived barriers to serving LGBTQ youth, 6) Willingness to participate in a related professional development program, 7) Awareness of LGBTQ supports within the school and community, and 8) Knowledge of district policies, including anti-bullying policies. Researchers received permission to survey full- and part-time school counselors, school psychologists, and school social workers from a large, urban school district in the Southeastern U.S. regarding their knowledge and experience in working with LGBTQ youth. Participation was voluntary and confidential. Researchers attended staff meetings for these service providers to introduce and administer the needs assessment. After completing the survey, participants received a debriefing letter which included resources related to LGBTQ youth. PURPOSE OF THE PRESENT STUDY Youth who identify as LGBTQ face increased risk for a variety of negative outcomes and are at higher risk than their heterosexual counterparts for experiencing harassment and discrimination, as well as negative social-emotional and academic outcomes.4,5,6 However, the presence of supportive school staff is linked with a number of positive outcomes for LGBTQ youth, including fewer missed days of school, fewer reports of feeling unsafe, increased academic achievement, higher educational aspirations, and a greater sense of overall “school belonging”.7 (Kosciw, Greytak, Diaz, & Bartkiewicz, 2009). An initial step in educating staff members and ultimately improving outcomes for LGBTQ students is to determine the knowledge base and needs of student service providers who may often work directly with this population. The present study involved the creation of a needs assessment designed to identify the knowledge , training, and experience of student support staff in working with LGBTQ youth. Ultimately the results of this study will facilitate the creation of professional development programs for the district’s counselors, psychologists, nurses, and social workers, in order to assist them in better supporting LGBTQ youth. The findings from this study will also foster the creation of support systems and programs within the district that aim to establish a positive and safe school climate for LGBTQ youth. DEMOGRAPHICS 157 total participants: 67 school counselors (43%) 46 school psychologists (29%) 44 school social workers (28%) Gender: Female – 89% Male – 11% Schools Served: Ethnicity: Caucasian – 58% African-American – 39% Multi-racial – 2% Asian – 1% Educational Degrees: Bachelor’s (6%) Master’s (62%) Specialist (28% Doctoral (5%) REFERENCES Identify as LGBTQ: No – 95.9% Yes – 4.5% Prefer not to Answer – 0.6% LGBTQ Friend or Relative: Yes – 64% No – 36%   1 Kosciw, Greytak, Diaz, & Bartkiewicz, 2009; 2 Anagnostopoulos et al., 2009; 3 Payne & Smith, 2011; 4 Bontempo & D’Augelli, 2002; 5 D’Augelli, 2006; 6 Ryan & Futterman, 1998; 7 Kosciw, Greytak, Diaz, & Bartkiewicz, 2009