What Are the FDA Requirements for Submitting an IDE?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) Overview for IRBs
1 Developed by: U-MIC To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the.
Regulation of Medical Devices Celia M. Witten, Ph.D., M.D. Director Division of General, Restorative and Neurological Devices Office of Device Evaluation.
Humanitarian Device Exemptions (HDE) 101 Elizabeth Hillebrenner, MSE Biomedical Engineer IDE and HDE Program Staff Center for Devices and Radiological.
Strengthening the Medical Device Clinical Trial Enterprise
John Naim, PhD Director Clinical Trials Research Unit
Columbia University IRB IRB 101 September 21, 2005 George Gasparis, Executive Director, CU IRB Asst. V.P. and Sr. Asst. Dean for Research Ethics.
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting November 9, 2004 Research Use of Stored Data and Tissues.
Special Topics in IND Regulation
8 Criteria for IRB Approval of Research 45 CFR (a)
Cross-Labeling: Legal and Regulatory Issues David M. Fox Hogan & Hartson LLP th Street, NW Washington, DC
+ Medical Devices Approval Process. + Objectives Define a medical device Be familiar with the classification system for medical devices Understand the.
Classification of HLA Devices FDA Introduction & Background Sheryl A. Kochman CBER/OBRR/DBA.
1 THE UNIQUE ROLES OF IRB IN MEDICAL DEVICE CLINICALL TRIAL Chiu Lin, Ph.D. CITI, May, 2009 CITI, May, 2009.
Device Research Presented by Marian Serge, R.N.. Goals Identify devices Recognize difference between significant risk (SR) and non- significant risk (NSR)
Adverse Events, Unanticipated Problems, Protocol Deviations & other Safety Information Which Form 4 to Use?
Regulatory Considerations for Investigational Assays: Planning for Success Elizabeth Mansfield, PhD OIVD/FDA “Next-Generation DNA Sequencing as a Tool.
Investigational New Drug Application (IND)
When do I need an IND ? FDA Guidance for Industry – Investigation New Drug Applications (INDs) - Determining Whether Human Research Studies Can Be Conducted.
Medical Devices IRB Determination IRB Member Continuing Education.
Planned Emergency Research Exception from Informed Consent Requirements September 2007.
Investigational Drugs in the hospital. + What is Investigational Drug? Investigational or experimental drugs are new drugs that have not yet been approved.
PATRICIA KERBY, MPA HUMAN SUBJECTIONS PROTECTION COMPLIANCE OFFICER OFFICE OF RESEARCH COMPLIANCE What are the FDA’s expectations in 2010?
Humanitarian Use Devices September 23, 2011 Theodore Stevens, MS, RAC Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Center for Biologics Evaluation and.
Investigational Devices and Humanitarian Use Devices June 2007.
General Regulatory Issues in the Development of Drugs Intended for Treatment of Chronic Illness Sharon Hertz, M.D. Medical Officer Division of Anesthetic,
Human Specimen Repositories Requirements of 21 CFR Parts 50 & 56 PRIM & R May 5, 2004 Sally A. Hojvat, Ph.D. Director of Microbiology Devices Office of.
Radiology Advisory Panel Meeting Radiology Advisory Panel Meeting Computer-Assisted Detection (CADe) Devices Joyce M. Whang Deputy Division Director Radiological.
Complaint Handling Medical Device Reporting May 19, 2016 Rita Harden, Director Customer Relations & Regulatory Reporting.
PD233: Design of Biomedical Devices and Systems (Lecture 2) Dr. Manish Arora CPDM, IISc Course Website:
November 9, 2015 February 20, 2017 Using real world evidence – industry perspective Pma indication expansion Melissa hasenbank, phd Sr. Clinical Research.
Clinical trials for medical devices: FDA and the IDE process
Rachel Neubrander, PhD Division of Cardiovascular Devices
Dartmouth Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) Data Safety Monitoring and Reporting requirements Brown Bag Series: Noon / First Tuesday of the Month.
The CRT of EFS Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going
Conditional IRB Approval
Back to Basics – Approval Criteria
Division of Cardiovascular Devices
U.S. FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health Update
Risk Determinations and Research with Children
Regulatory Considerations for Coronary Drug Coated Balloons (DCBs)
Premarket Notification 510(k) process
The HIPAA Privacy Rule: Implications for Medical Research
Andrew Farb, MD and Dorothy Abel, BSBME
FDA’s IDE Decisions and Communications
How to Put Together an IDE Application
Balancing Pre and Postmarket Requirements Different Scenarios
Balancing Regulation and Innovation: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
Reasonable Assurance of Safety and Effectiveness: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division.
The FDA Early Feasibility Study Pilot and the Innovation Pathway
Adverse Event Reporting: Trials and Tribulations
FDA Guidance on Early Feasibility Studies, Including First-in-Human
First-in-Man, First In The USA: What’s The Difference?
Criteria for Approval Is an IND Required? Devices
Deputy Director, Division of Biostatistics No Conflict of Interest
Introduction of New Technology: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
Pharmacovigilance in clinical trials
UK Legal Requirement for Notification of Serious Breaches of Good Clinical Practice or The Trial Protocol John Poland, PhD Senior Director, Regulatory.
Medical Device Regulatory Essentials: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
Early Feasibility in the USA –An Academic View
Bozeman Health Clinical Research
Erica Takai, PhD for Andrew Farb, M.D.
Device Review Decision Tree Version Date: 4/28/15 This decision tree to be used for studies involving research on a device ( approved or unapproved)
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
Streamlining IRB Procedures for Expanded Access
Linda M. Chatwin, Esq. RAC Business Manager, UL LLC
IND Review Process Seoul National University
Opening an IND: Investigator Perspective
Regulatory Perspective of the Use of EHRs in RCTs
Presentation transcript:

What Are the FDA Requirements for Submitting an IDE? Andrew Farb, MD and Dorothy Abel, BSBME Interventional Cardiology Devices Branch Division of Cardiovascular Devices Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) The Essentials of Clinical Research CRT 2013 Washington, DC February 25, 2013 Will not talk about IND’s 1

I/we have no real or apparent conflicts of interest to report. Andrew Farb, MD I/we have no real or apparent conflicts of interest to report.

The Investigational Device Exemptions (IDE) Regulations and Clinical Studies Practice of medicine and off-label use The IDE regulations Applicability to clinical studies Exempted investigations Significant risk studies IDE basics IDE decision-making Case studies for sponsor-investigators: Is an IDE required? 3

Practice of Medicine Section 1006 of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act specifically states that: Nothing in this Act shall be construed to limit or interfere with the authority of a health care practitioner to prescribe or administer any legally marketed device to a patient for any condition or disease within a legitimate health care practitioner-patient relationship. 4

Off-Label Use Considerations Definitive data from appropriately designed and conducted clinical studies are needed to guide informed treatment decisions. The FDA approves a device for marketing for a specific use or uses. Off-label is a term applied to the use of an approved device under the practice of medicine, outside of the instructions for use. Off-label use of an approved device is not necessarily inappropriate or unstudied , but is typically supported by less information than with on-label use. 5

The Investigational Device Exemptions (IDE) Regulations The purpose of the IDE regulations is to encourage development of useful devices while providing protection of public health and safety. Clinical studies (i.e., any standardized, systematic collection of safety and/or effectiveness data) performed in the US are subject to the IDE regulations Regardless of whether the data would be used to support a marketing application. 6

Applicability of the IDE Regulations Some clinical studies are exempted from the IDE regulations, for example: The study of approved devices that are being used on-label The testing of a modification to a device or of a combination of two or more legally marketed devices if the testing does not put subjects at risk and is not for the purpose of determining safety or effectiveness A clinical study of a significant risk device, subject to the IDE regulations, requires prior FDA approval through the submission of an IDE application to FDA, and IRB approval, before initiating study subject enrollment. 7

Significant Risk Determination Significant risk devices are those that present the potential for serious risk to the health, safety, or welfare of a subject. A significant risk device may be: an implant; a life supporting or life sustaining device; or a device of substantial importance in diagnosing curing, mitigating, or treating disease, or in otherwise preventing impairment of human health. 8

IDE Basics An IDE approval is issued by the FDA to allow the use of significant risk investigational devices in human subjects. An approved IDE provides protection to human subjects (e.g., informed consent), study monitoring, and allows shipping of devices. An approved IDE exempts sponsors from certain provisions of the FD&C Act. Clinical study data collected under an IDE can be used to support a marketing application [PMA or 510(k)]. IDE submissions have a 30-day FDA review period. 9

Definitions Sponsor: A person or other entity that initiates, but does not actually conduct the investigation. Investigator: An individual who actually conducts a clinical investigation, i.e., under whose immediate direction the investigational device is administered, dispensed, or used. Sponsor-Investigator: Individual who both initiates and actually conducts, alone or with others, a clinical investigation, i.e., under whose immediate direction the investigational device is administered, dispensed, or used. 10

IDE Application The information to be included in an IDE application is listed in the regulations. The IDE sponsor needs to provide: sufficient information to justify the proposed study based on reports of prior investigations of the device; an appropriate investigational plan; adequate patient protection measures; and other required elements that address records and reports, study monitoring, and manufacturing information. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/HowtoMarketYourDevice/InvestigationalDeviceExemptionIDE/ucm046164.htm 11

IDE Decision-Making IDE approval: No outstanding issues that must be addressed to support the initiation of the clinical study IDE approval with conditions: FDA has identified issues, but these issues do not raise concerns that preclude study initiation Issues must be addressed within 45 days from the date of FDA’s decision letter IDE Disapproval Outstanding issues that may lead to approval with conditions include: Issues related to data analysis methods and handling if the corrections will occur prior to the gathering of important study data; Issues related to late stage follow-up procedures and assessments, if the corrections are made prior to beginning any late-stage procedures or assessments; Minor divergences from what FDA considers appropriate study endpoints, design assumptions, or key definitions; Issues related to the informed consent document that must be corrected before enrolling subjects but can be reviewed by FDA after study initiation; Requests for additional information or data involving non-clinical testing issues that do not need to be resolved prior to study initiation; Other minor clarifications, corrections, or modifications that do not need to be resolved prior to review completion

IDE Decision-Making IDE Disapproval is appropriate when: Probable risks to the subjects are not outweighed by the anticipated benefits to the subjects and the importance of the knowledge to be gained Safety concerns related to the device/procedure Often that nonclinical testing does not provide adequate safety information Unacceptable risks to subjects in the proposed study Inadequate potential for benefit OR The study does not pose a reasonable scientific question and/or is not designed to collect data related to that scientific question

FDASIA Section 601 Amends Section 520(g)(4)(C) of the FD&C Act FDA shall not disapprove an IDE because: the investigation may not support a substantial equivalence or de novo classification determination or approval of a device; the investigation may not meet a requirement, including a data requirement, relating to the approval or clearance of a device; or an additional or different investigation may be necessary to support clearance or approval of the device.

IDE Decision-Making in Plain Language An FDA evaluation that concludes that the study is not adequate to support a subsequent marketing application cannot be used as the basis for IDE disapproval as long as: the probable risks of the study are not outweighed by the anticipated benefits and the importance of the knowledge to be gained; and the study is scientifically sound CDRH is developing new procedures to facilitate agreement between FDA and industry sponsors on a study design that both parties consider reasonable to support a marketing application.

When is an IDE Required? Example 1 The investigator-initiated research involves the use of an approved covered stent for treating intimal hyperplasia at the venous anastomosis of two different manufacturers’ cleared A-V access grafts to determine whether the results are affected by the graft type. All three devices are FDA approved/cleared and are being used in accordance with their labeling. But the specific brand of graft with which the covered stent can be used with is not specified in the product labeling. The investigator intends to publish the results in a peer-review journal. 16

Determining the Need for an IDE Submission Questions to Address Determining the Need for an IDE Submission YES NO Does the research constitute a clinical study?   If YES, proceed to next question. If NO, then an FDA approved IDE is not required.    Does the study involve: a) an off-label use of a medical device that has been approved/cleared by the FDA; or b) an Investigational Device?   17

An IDE is Not Needed The research constitutes a clinical study because the investigator plans to systematically collect safety and effectiveness data. The devices are being used in accordance with their labels, so no IDE submission is required. NOTE: The prior clinical studies of each of the devices to be used in the new study did require IDEs, as they involved the use of significant risk investigational devices. 18

When is an IDE Required? Example 2 The investigator intends to compare the performance of two approved coronary drug-eluting stents in the treatment of stenotic saphenous vein bypass grafts. The stents are FDA-approved for the treatment of native coronary artery lesions. The investigator intends to publish the results in a peer-review journal, and the manufacturer of one of the DES may use the data to support a change in their product’s labeling. 19

Determining the Need for an IDE Submission Questions to Address Determining the Need for an IDE Submission YES NO Does the research constitute a clinical study?   If YES, proceed to next question. If NO, then an FDA approved IDE is not required.    Does the study involve: a) an off-label use of a medical device that has been approved/cleared by the FDA; or b) an Investigational Device? 20

Determining the Need for an IDE Submission Questions to Address Determining the Need for an IDE Submission YES NO Is the Investigational Device a Significant Risk (SR) Device (per 21 CFR 812.3(m) and 812.20(a)(1)? (a) Is the investigational device intended as an implant and presents a potential for serious risk to the health, safety, or welfare of a subject? (b) Is the investigational device purported or represented to be for a use in supporting or sustaining human life and presents a potential for serious risk to the health, safety, or welfare of a subject? (c) Is the investigational device for a use of substantial importance in diagnosing, curing, mitigating, or treating disease, or otherwise preventing impairment of human health and presents a potential for serious risk to the health, safety, or welfare of a subject? (d) Does the investigational device otherwise present a potential for serious risk to the health, safety, or welfare of a subject?  If YES to any of questions (a) - (d), the study utilizes a Significant Risk Device and therefore requires IDE approval prior to study initiation.      N/A 21

An IDE is Needed The research constitutes a clinical study because the investigator plans to systematically collect safety and effectiveness data. Although the devices are commonly used off-label for the treatment of stenotic SVGs, the proposed prospective clinical study of these significant risk devices requires IDE and IRB approval prior to initiation. 22

Parting Thoughts IDE approval is needed for some clinical research studies, depending on: the device’s approval status; the intended clinical use; and whether the device is a significant risk or nonsignificant risk device. If there is any doubt with respect to the answers to the questions in deciding whether an IDE is needed, contact FDA. Early contact with the appropriate Division of Cardiovascular Devices branch chief is highly recommended to discuss the entire IDE process Early contact can help sponsors determine what’s needed to meet IDE administrative requirements and avoid wasted steps. 23