Grade A Dairy Equivalence

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WTO, Trade and Environment Division
Advertisements

UOttawa.ca CETA – A New Model for Regulatory Cooperation, Transparency and Coherence? Presentation by: Professor Debra Steger University of Victoria European.
Merton V. Smith, Ph.D., J.D. Director International Programs Center for Veterinary Medicine U.S. Food and Drug Administration Governance of Veterinary.
The United States Experience Implementing the WTO SPS Agreement Hangzhou, China December 2008 Roseanne Freese Senior WTO SPS Affairs Officer United States.
INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)
FSMA: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going Supplemental Notices of Proposed Rulemaking Public Meeting November 13, 2014 Roberta F. Wagner, B.S., M.S.
Presentation 4.2 CODEX STANDARDS ON SAFETY Section IV Food Quality and Standards Service (ESNS) Food and Nutrition Division. FAO.
FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE
Proposed Rules to Help Ensure the Safety of Imported Food 1.
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.
OFFICIAL CONTROL OF FOOD LABELLING AND FOOD QUALITY CONTROL Dr. Pirjo-Liisa Penttilä Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Finland.
2st Regional Workshop: Improving Capacity for Diagnosis of Disease of Fish and Molluscs Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina, October 2013, FAO Technical.
Governmental, Legal and Regulatory Framework in Azerbaijan Republic Aysel Hasanova, Akbar Guliyev, Emin Mansurov Regional Workshop - School for Drafting.
Compliance with the WTO Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement and Steps Toward Developing Good Regulatory Practices Bryan O’Byrne Trade Compliance Center.
Technical Regulations – U.S. Procedures and Practices U.S.-Brazil Commercial Dialogue Digital Video Conference Series August 22, 2006 Mary Saunders Chief,
Conformity Assessment and Accreditation Mike Peet Chief Executive Officer South African National Accreditation System.
SPS ISSUES IN THE NAFTA REGION
N° 1 The European railway Agency: an engine for the integrated railway area EFRTC, Vilamoura on June 24 TH 2005 Olivier PIRON 24 June 2005.
Overview of the EU Food Safety Requirements
Assessment of Egypt’s Compliance with the WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) April 18th, 2004 by Sahar Tohamy, ATR World Bank Institute.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.1 Steps in the Licensing Process Geoff Vaughan University.
OVERVIEW OF THE ROLES OF VARIOUS INSTITUTIONS AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR AFLATOXIN CONTROL IN TANZANIA RAYMOND N. WIGENGE DIRECTOR OF FOOD SAFETY TFDA.
International Trade Regulations: the Law of the WTO Professor Mohammad F. A. Nsour Class 3 1.
General overview of South Africa’s commitment to global market access & maintenance based on requirements for phytosanitary measures by PATRICK TSHIKHUDO.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Bilateral Safety Agreements June 7, U.S. Perspective on Bilateral Safety Agreements: Where We’ve Been and Where.
BULGARIA STATE AGENCY FOR METROLOGY AND TECHNICAL SURVEILLANCE BULGARIA 2003.
PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP (PPP) FRAMEWORK AND GUIDELINES Syed M. Ali Zaidi, P.Eng. PM(Stanford), Ph.D. Director, Strategic Partnerships Alberta Infrastructure.
Organising of the Official Food Control in Finland Jorma Hirn Director General National Food Agency.
JOINT FAO/IAEA PROGRAMME of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture 1 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS) Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) &
Animal Drug Import Tolerances Under ADAA of 1996 FDA’s Public Health Protection, International Harmonization, and Trade-Related Goals Merton V. Smith,
Health & Consumers Directorate General EU SPS Notification Authority and Enquiry Point - working methods Brussels, 23 November 2011.
Special Meeting on Procedures for Information Exchange November 7, 2007 Geneva Session 1 Anne Meininger United States USA WTO TBT Enquiry Point.
Federal Rulemaking Primer January 29, 2016 First Published: April 24, 2013 Producer: Alexander Perry Director: Afzal Bari.
Tracy McCracken SPS Technical Advisor East Africa Region United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Kenya and East Aferica/Office of Regional.
1 The WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade Basic Concepts and Member Obligations.
Meet your Regulator Workshop with FANR licensees October 2011 Dr. John Loy Director, Radiation Safety Federal Authority for Nuclear Regulation.
Harmonised use of accreditation for assessing the competence of various Conformity Assessment Bodies Dr Andreas Steinhorst, EA ERA workshop 13 April 2016,
Final Rule for Sanitary Transportation. Background Proposed Rule: February 5, 2014 Public Comments: More than 200 Final Rule: On Display April 5, 2016.
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Systems Recognition Import System Public Meeting March 21, 2016 Caroline Smith DeWaal International Food Safety.
T Mr.Willy Musinguzi, EAC. .Overview of EAC SQMT Infrastructure How EAC standards are Harmonized and Implemented How EAC Quality Infrastructure relates.
Food Safety, Risk Analysis, and International Trade 23 May 2002.
1. Consumers, Health And Food Executive Agency European and international stakeholders Codex Alimentarius EU National implementations 2.
What is ISO? ISO is that the world’s largest developer of voluntary International Standards. International Standards provide state of the art specifications.
The Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Measures
National Food Control Systems
Governmental, Legal and Regulatory Framework in Azerbaijan Republic
Public Participation in Biofuels Voluntary
66 items – 70% of circulated products
Nega Beru, Ph. D. Director, Office of Food Safety
FSMA Implementation Jennifer Thomas
PROCESS FOR EVALUATING THE EQUIVALENCE OF FOREIGN MEAT AND POULTRY FOOD REGULATORY SYSTEMS International Policy Division Food Safety and Inspection.
IMPLEMENTATION OF MEAs IN NATIONAL LAW
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Overview of the WTO SPS Agreement and the role of
The EAC Quality Infrastructure and WTO TBT Agreement.
Establishing the Infrastructure for Radiation Safety Preparatory Actions and Initial Regulatory Activities.
Multinational collaboration in the Authorisation of VMPs: the EU approach VICH Outreach Forum Tokyo, Nov 2017 Noel Joseph European Commission.
HACCP Essential Tool for Food Safety
Technical Assistance and Capacity Building Activities in SADC
International Legal Framework
FOOD AND VETERINARY OFFICE
EU Reference Centres for Animal Welfare
WTO – SPS Agreement Rights and obligations of OIE Members
Jennifer Stradtman, Director, Technical Barriers to Trade
Role of Industry Self-regulation in Phytosanitary Compliance
Operationalizing Export Certification and Regionalization Programmes
The evaluation process
Raising the Standards in European Homeopathy
EU Food Safety Requirements: - Hygiene of Foodstuffs -
EU-Project: Trade and Private Sector Development (TPSD)
Presentation transcript:

Grade A Dairy Equivalence National Conference of Interstate Milk Shippers May 13, 2017 Ted Elkin Deputy Director for Regulatory Affairs Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Office of Foods & Veterinary Medicine U.S. Food and Drug Administration

What is Equivalence? Equivalence is a tool established in trade law (Article 4 of the SPS Agreement) for determining that two food safety systems, though different, provide the same level of public health protection. The Codex Alimentarius Commission has published guidelines (2003) on the application of equivalence in comparing food inspection and certification systems. www.fda.gov

What is Equivalence? Undertaking equivalence assessments is an obligation of the United States as a signatory to the SPS Agreement. The U.S. must conduct assessments (pre- determinational) of EU food safety systems under the Veterinary Equivalency Agreement (VEA). It is important to note that the obligation is to conduct a consultation, not to determine equivalence is achieved. Failure to meet this obligation exposes the U.S. to potential dispute resolution action, including possible trade sanctions, in the WTO.

Equivalence and U.S. Law The Uruguay Round Agreements Act of 1994 (19 U.S.C. §2578a) establishes the relationship between the SPS Agreement and U.S. law. The URAA provides Federal agencies with authority to implement the regulations necessary to comply with U.S. treaty obligations under the SPS Agreement.

Equivalence and the Pasteurized Milk Ordinance (PMO) Grade “A” milk/milk products regulated through the provisions of the PMO and include, but are not limited to, all milk and milk products with a standard of identity provided for in 21 CFR Part 131. These include: milk, acidified milk, cultured milk, concentrated milk, nonfat dry milk, evaporated milk, dry whole milk, cream, half and half, and yogurt.

Equivalence and the Pasteurized Milk Ordinance (PMO) The PMO permits the importation of Grade “A” milk/milk products only when a foreign country’s food controls system is determined to be in compliance with or equivalent to the provisions of the PMO. FDA’s Cooperative Agreement with NCIMS recognizes that FDA has the responsibility for assessing the equivalence of foreign milk safety systems. FDA will consult with the NCIMS executive board before finalizing any Grade “A” dairy equivalence determination.

Equivalence Evaluation Process Codex guidelines recommend assessing the equivalence of sanitary measures in the following areas: Infrastructure, including the legal basis for setting and enforcing food safety standards, administrative and laboratory support, and compliance mechanisms; Program design, implementation, and monitoring; including enforcement criteria, inspection protocols, and audit/review mechanisms; and Requirements for individual facilities, equipment, processes, including product sampling and analytical methods.

Equivalence Evaluation Process The steps involved in a Grade “A” dairy equivalence assessment include: Review of the foreign milk safety program against the PMO dairy matrices (i.e. comparison tables) by a technical team; On-site audits of laboratories, farms, and processors; Determine whether equivalence is sufficiently demonstrated by the foreign system; and If equivalence is determined, solicit public comment on proposed determination, draft and implement a framework agreement.

Equivalence Evaluation Process Five FDA matrices incorporating PMO requirements: Milk plants; Dairy Farms/Raw Milk Transportation and Sampling; Animal Health Laws; Laboratory Support Services; Animal Drug Testing and Residue Requirements for Dairy Animals and Milk/Milk Products

Equivalence Requests Several countries have requested equivalence determinations from FDA for Grade “A” milk/milk products: Canada New Zealand Several European Union Member States (Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands, Sweden, and the United Kingdom)

Status of Equivalence Assessments Canada: Assessment placed on hold at Canada’s request pending the implementation of the Safe Food for Canadians Act New Zealand: Technical work, including on-site audit, complete; final report being prepared for internal clearance and briefing to NCIMS executive board. Administrative procedure remains.

Status of Equivalence Assessments European Union: EU assessment in early stage. PMO assessments and on-site audits conducted for Ireland, France, and the Netherlands. Reports being developed for agency clearance and transmittal to European Commission. If FDA finds equivalence, administrative actions remain, including NCIMS consultation, public comment, and formalization of equivalence agreement. Important note: the EC has identified U.S. restrictions on the import of “fluid or poured” dairy products as a non-tariff trade barrier and has raised the issue as a trade concern in the WTO SPS Committee.

Considerations FDA appreciates the U.S. industry’s clear interest in Grade “A” dairy equivalence determinations. We have met with dairy industry representatives to discuss their interests and will take those into account. FDA’s role, consistent with U.S. obligations under the SPS Agreement, is to make an equivalence determination based on technical findings that a foreign food safety system satisfies the U.S. level of protection.

Next Steps Communications: consultation with NCIMS executive board on any equivalence determination; outreach to membership. Public Notice: Trade law requires that the FDA provide an opportunity for public comment on the equivalence determination. An Equivalence Agreement: Either an MOU or an agreement containing the understandings reached by the parties.

Questions? Thank you