Luminosity monitor and LHC operation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam commissioning strategy Global machine checkout Essential 450 GeV commissioning System/beam commissioning Machine protection commissioning.
Advertisements

Impact of LHCf on BRAN and beam monitoring Y.Itow, H.Menjo (Nagoya University) The 1 st TAN integration workshop Mar10, 2006.
Luminosity measurments roadmap for luminosity determinations relative luminosity monitors luminosity from machine parameters luminosity from physics processes.
The ATS MD part III (Achromatic Telescopic Squeezing scheme) Participants: Any (active) volunteers Goal: 1)MD1 (S. Fartoukh & R. Assmann  10h): “Pre-squeeze’’
* IP5 IP1 IP2 IP8 vertical crossing angle at IP8 R. Bruce, W. Herr, B. Holzer Acknowledgement: S. Fartoukh, M. Giovannozzi, S. Redaelli, J. Wenninger.
Beam Commissioning Workshop, 19th January Luminosity Optimization S. White, H. Burkhardt.
1 Luminosity monitor and LHC operation H. Burkhardt AB/ABP, TAN integration workshop, 10/3/2006 Thanks for discussions and input from Enrico Bravin, Ralph.
● 08:30 Loaded by mistake squeeze function to 2 m  Dumped beams ● 10:30-13:00 Test of new algorithm for long. Emittance blow-up to minimize oscillations.
07-JUL-2003LEADE / JW1 Satellite bunches in the LHC Satellite “definition” Satellite luminosity Satellite detection & tolerances J. Wenninger AB/OP.
Stefano Redaelli Beam Department - Operations Group Operational Aspects of the Phase II Crab Cavity System LHC-CC09 3 rd LHC Crab Cavity Workshop European.
ION COMMISSIONING REVISITED 1 Thanks to: John Jowett, Walter Venturini. Matteo Solfaroli.
R. Assmann - LHCCWG Two Beam Operation R.W. Aßmann LHCCWG Acknowledgements to W. Herr, V. Previtali, A. Butterworth, P. Baudrenghien, J. Uythoven,
P. 1K. Eggert – Early TOTEM Running with the  * =90m Optics Karsten Eggert on behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration Politecnico di Bari and Sezione INFN Bari,
1 Experience at CERN with luminosity monitoring and calibration, ISR, SPS proton antiproton collider, LEP, and comments for LHC… Werner Herr and Rüdiger.
Luminosity measurement at LHC (The machine point of view) Enrico Bravin AB/BDI Large part of the material presented here has been produced by the LBNL.
CONTENT: Beam characteristics and MP concerns BI configuration Operational settings Collimators Planning Shift breakdown Thanks to: P.Baudrenghien, G.Bellodi,
Cryo back at 17:30 Beam back at 19:00 IR2 aperture until ~03:00 Since then no beam from the SPS:  Connector problem on MKD  Connector eroded, needs to.
Overview of Wire Compensation for the LHC Jean-Pierre Koutchouk CARE-HHH Meeting on beam-beam effects and beam-beam compensation CERN 08/28/2008.
Progress with Beam Report to LMC, Machine Coordination W10: Mike Lamont – Ralph Assmann Thanks to other machine coordinators, EIC’s, operators,
H. Matis, S. Hedges, M. Placidi, A. Ratti, W. Turner [+several students] (LBNL) R. Miyamoto (now at ESSS) H. Matis - LARP CM18 - May 8, Fluka Modeling.
BRAN at IR2 and IR8: status, commissioning and operation Enrico Bravin AB-BI Joint LHC Machine-Experiments Workshop on Very Forward Detectors 25 January.
HiRadMat Primary Beam Overview C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi On behalf of the HiRadMat Primary beam line working group HiRadMat Project Review
First collisions in LHC
Fabio Follin Delphine Jacquet For the LHC operation team
Operating IP8 at high luminosity in the HL-LHC era
M.Fitterer, A.Patapenka, A.Valishev (FNAL)
Impact of running with LHCf and early Totem 90 m optics
LHC Commissioning with Beam
Task 2. 5: Beam-beam studies D. Banfi, J. Barranco, T. Pieloni, A
MPI-ATL Calor Meeting 7-Sep-2009 H. Oberlack MPI für Physik, Munich
First data from TOTEM experiment at LHC
LHC schedule.
D0 and its integrability
fundamental equations of LHC performance
Field quality update and recent tracking results
Emmanuel Tsesmelis TS/LEA 26 January 2007
Saturday 21st April 00:33 Interlock during ramp on BLM HV
LHC Emittance Measurements and Preservation
Machine plans - Alignment workshop
Week 46 Week 46: Machine coordinators: Roger Bailey – Gianluigi Arduini Main aims of the week: Stable beams with ions Scheduled stop for ion source refill.
Fill 1410 revisited Peak luminosity 1.4e32 Beam current 2.68/2.65 e13
Limits on damping times
J. Uythoven, W. Venturini Delsolaro, CERN, Geneva
Week 35 – Technical Stop and Restart
Summary of Week 26 Main aims: G. Arduini, B. Holzer, M. Lamont
Luminosity measurement at LHC (The machine point of view)
Tuesday 28th September Fill 1375 ongoing 09:00 Move in Roman Pots
Study of e+ e- background due to beamstrahlung for different ILC parameter sets Stephan Gronenborn.
Yesterday morning Held 1647 for a while – SPS kicker problem
Overall commissioning strategy for protons (estd. 2005)
LHC Beam Operations Past, Present and Future
Luminometer Integration at IR2
Summary Thursday h21: Stable beams fill #1303.
Machine Tolerances in Cleaning Insertions
HL-LHC operations with LHCb at high luminosity
Machine plans - CMS startup workshop
MD#2 News & Plan Tue – Wed (19. – 20.6.)
Collimators: Operations - Baseline Assumptions
The Measurement of Forward Particle Production in LHC
From commissioning to full performance…
Monday :15 fill 3523 dumped by BPMs IP6
Summary Tuesday h23: Machine closed. Precycle started.
Thursday 22nd March 00:20 – 02:40 on longer squeeze function, orbit and chroma correction at 4 TeV 2:40 – 5:30 second cycle with long squeeze 5:46 – 7:00.
Another Immortal Fill….
Beam commissioning plans, 2007 and 2008
LHC beam orbit and collision position determination & control – performance and issues, prospects for Run 3 Orbit in collision - Luminosity WS - J. Wenninger.
Feedbacks & Stabilization Getting them going
Large emittance scenario for the Phase II Upgrade of the LHC
Monday 152 bunch operation summary
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Presentation transcript:

Luminosity monitor and LHC operation H. Burkhardt AB/ABP, TAN integration workshop, 10/3/2006 Luminosity monitor and LHC operation Thanks for discussions and input from Enrico Bravin, Ralph Assmann, Jörg Wenninger, Werner Herr, Roger Bailey and others. Apologies for any omissions (prepared on rather short notice)

Outline Importance of luminosity monitoring in operation and commissioning Operational use in (early) operation

Introduction Luminosity and background signals are the main figures of merit in operation. Fast, robust, relative luminosity is important to help to bring beams into collision, for tuning and optimisation LHC luminometer spec. : beam lumi every sec, bunch-by-bunch lumi every 10 sec, backgrounds every sec. Absolute lumi and vertex position every minute from experiments. (see LHC-B-ES-0007 , Table 5) Some redundancy, particularly in commissioning is essential to understand what we measure and to distinguish signal, background, geometry etc. Needs good communication and signal exchange with experiments

LEP status page

Luminosity and beam parameters For head-on collisions of round beams and N particles / bunch nb bunches (nb = 1 for bunch Lumi) Reduction factor due to the crossing angle qc is the full crossing angle of ~ 300 mrad only really significant (~ 20%) at 7 TeV squeezed sz is the rms bunch length 7.55 cm at 7 TeV

Luminosity and collision rates per bunch crossing According to lum. spec : dynamic range 1026 - 4x1034 cm-2 s-1 What about 450 GeV - pilot beams ? ( pile-up ) Simple estimate, using spp = 100 mbarn Checks with first collisions at injection energy and optics (450 GeV, b*=18 m) at very moderate intensity (2x1010 , L = 2.5 1026 cm-2 s-1) should be ~ easy and are within the specified dynamic range. Generally : rates in machine luminometer high, statistics no problem.

Coincidences, Pile - up. Nominal conditions : many collisions at each crossing, and only few, ~ O ( 10-3 ) beam-gas interactions / crossing. Left / right coincidences will be of little use in this case. For commissioning, early running ( + special conditions high-b ) : Pile-up ok up to some L = 1029 cm-2 s-1 / bunch Beam-gas background instead maybe much higher than nominal in commissioning and early operation. Coincidences (or some other robust reliable method) needed to allow for reliable, background subtracted luminosity determination.

Staged commissioning plan for protons Stage I II III IV Hardware commissioning Machine checkout Beam commissioning 43 bunch operation ? 75ns ops 25ns ops I Install Phase II and MKB 25ns ops II No beam Beam Beam Pilot physics run First collisions 43 bunches, no crossing angle, no squeeze, moderate intensities Push performance (156 bunches, partial squeeze in 1 and 5, push intensity) Performance limit 1032 cm-2 s-1 (limited by event pileup) 75ns operation Establish multi-bunch operation, moderate intensities Relaxed machine parameters (squeeze and crossing angle) Push squeeze and crossing angle Performance limit 1033 cm-2 s-1 (limited by event pileup and *) 25ns operation I Nominal crossing angle Push squeeze Increase intensity to 50% nominal Performance limit 2 1033 cm-2 s-1 (limited by *) 25ns operation II Push towards nominal performance Need to revisit 75ns operation Strategy needed for ion runs Strategy needed for TOTEM runs

Operational use in (early) operation Bring beams into collision Centre collisions in x and y Luminosity / tuning Monitoring of Lumi / Background

Bringing beams into collision Initial beam finding and overlap optimization BPM’s at IP: BPM resolution Dy(IP) in sigma b* 200 mm 283 mm 18 s 0.5 m 200 mm 283 mm 3 s 18.0 m 50 mm 70 mm 4.4 s 0.5 m 50 mm 70 mm 0.7 s 18 m (S. Fartoukh) From R.A. LCC 11/6/2003 Roughly: 0. 3 mm resolution anticipated from BPMs. Beam sizes ~ 0.4 mm at 450 GeV, 0.1 mm at 7 TeV at b* = 18m BPM resolution should be sufficient to get beams sufficiently close to already see some beam-beam effects (collisions, modified tune signal. )

Centre collisions Separation scans in two dimensions ( for LEP only needed in y ) This can be done manually with a set of steering knobs and when safe and reliable enough using a semi - automatic procedure.

Continued tuning Continuous lumi / background monitoring needed for optimisation (orbit, tune, waist, …) Monitor and optimise the bunch-by-bunch specific luminosity (divided by I x I ) In the LHC, the two beams may drift apart and require further separation scans.

Interference with LHCf To my knowledge so far : Running with LHCf instead of the converter in front of the machine luminometer may significantly interfere with the luminosity / vertex / background measurements. To be clarified ! Concern : sensitivity on beam angles and positions at IP ! Angular acceptance rather small : 80 mm / 143 m = 0.56 mrad

My preliminary conclusions Continuous, robust luminosity and background monitoring will be essential for operations. We have to be able to clearly distinguish between luminosity, background, and acceptance effects. Some redundancy and robust background subtraction (including coincidences) will be required, particularly at commissioning.