The Belle II Experiment at SuperKEKB

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Belle Silicon Vertex Detector T. Tsuboyama (KEK) 6 Dec Workshop New Hadrons with Various Flavors 6-7 Dec Nagoya Univ.
Advertisements

Barrel PID upgrade K. Inami (Nagoya-u) and PID group - R&D status - TOP counter - iTOP - Focusing DIRC - To do, cost estimation.
Super B factory plan at KEK Masa Yamauchi KEK Super B Factory Workshop April 20-22, 2005 Honolulu Why, how, what, who, when and how much?
1 Measurement of f D + via D +   + Sheldon Stone, Syracuse University  D o D o, D o  K -  + K-K- K+K+ ++  K-K- K+K+ “I charm you, by my once-commended.
Search for LFV  decays involving     ’ at Belle Y. Enari, Belle collaboration Nagoya University.
June-10 th, 2005 WIN05 Super B factories Shoji Uno ( KEK) Super B factories Shoji Uno ( KEK) June-10 th, 2005 WIN05 Delphi, Greece Contents 1. Physics.
Description of BTeV detector Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing The BTeV Collaboration DPF 2000 Aug , 2000 Columbus, Ohio.
Belle Upgrade Plan - An Overview - M.Yamauchi KEK January 2004 Super B Factory Workshop University of Hawaii, Honolulu.
Super B KEK - Super KEKB -
SuperKEKB to search for new sources of flavor mixing and CP violation - Introduction - Introduction - Motivation for L= Motivation for L=
B. Golob, Belle II 1/23Epiphany Conference, Cracow, Jan 2012 Boštjan Golob University of Ljubljana/Jožef Stefan Institute & Belle/Belle II Collaboration.
Status and Physics Prospects of the SuperKEKB Project Y. Horii Tohoku Univ. (Japan) 1 5th March 2011, La Thuile 2011.
SuperKEKB to search for new sources of flavor mixing and CP violation - Introduction - Introduction - Motivation for L= Motivation for L=
The BELLE II project and other … B.A.Shwartz Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics of SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
The Belle Experiment at KEK Christoph Schwanda Institute of High Energy Physics (HEPHY) Austrian Academy of Sciences Symposium Wissenschaftliche Kooperation.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
Welcome to the 1 st Open Meeting of the Super KEKB Collaboration. (T. Browder, University of Hawaii) [All talks and discussions about the detector, physics.
SuperKEKB B factory April 12, 2006 Nobu Katayama (KEK)
TOP counter overview and issues K. Inami (Nagoya university) 2008/7/3-4 2 nd open meeting for proto-collaboration - Overview - Design - Performance - Prototype.
Development of TOP counter for Super B factory K. Inami (Nagoya university) 2007/10/ th International Workshop on Ring Imaging Cherenkov Counters.
PID for super Belle (design consideration) K. Inami (Nagoya-u) - Barrel (TOP counter) - Possible configuration - Geometry - Endcap (Aerogel RICH) - Photo.
July 24, 2010 Yutaka USHIRODA (KEK) for the Belle II Collaboration Status and Prospects of SuperKEKB and Belle II.
Tsukuba-hall webcam 1 Beam Pipe and Vertex Detector extraction: on Nov. 10, 2010 Belle Detector Roll-out: Dec. 9, 2010 End-caps, CDC, B-ACC, TOF extraction:
The Belle II DEPFET Pixel Detector
1 Koji Hara (KEK) For the Belle Collaboration Time Dependent CP Violation in B 0 →  +  - Decays [hep-ex/ ]
1 Recent results from Belle and Status of SuperKEKB/Belle II Chengping Shen Univ. of Hawaii, Belle collaboration.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
1 Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Fergus Wilson, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2) 3.Collider Experiments.
Aerogel RICH & TOP counter for super KEKB Y.Mazuka Nagoya University June 14-16, 2006 The 3 rd SuperB workshop at SLAC.
Upgrade of the MEG liquid xenon calorimeter with VUV-light sensitive large area SiPMs Kei Ieki for the MEG-II collaboration 1 II.
Pavel Pakhlov ITEP, Moscow For the Belle/Belle-2 Collaborations Belle-2 experiment at SuperKEKB New Physics P h y s i c i s t Unlike the cat we can build.
FARICH status E.A.Kravchenko Budker INP, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Belle II Science and Overall Project Tom Browder University of Hawaii.
H.-G. Moser, Jennifer Consortium Meeting, Rome, June 10-12, B factories - results and motivation for upgrade SuperKEB - how to reach 40x more luminosity.
Belle II status and plans
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
Tsukuba shrine (near KEK) I’m Hiroyuki Nakayama from KEK.
Belle II at SuperKEKB Kurtis Nishimura University of Hawaii
The Software Library of the Belle II Experiment
Epiphany Conference, Cracow, January 2012
Epiphany Conference, Cracow, January 2012
Proximity focusing RICH with TOF capabilities for the Belle upgrade
Status of BESIII and upgrade of BESIII
 Silicon Vertex Detector Upgrade for the Belle II Experiment
Prospect of hadron spectroscopy in higher intensity e+e- collider
Particle Identification (PID) at HIEPA Experiment
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
Tagir Aushev For the Belle Collaboration (EPFL, Lausanne ITEP, Moscow)
Report on WP2 Activities
Budker INP, Novosibirsk
New Physics Prospects in Mixing and CP Violation at Belle II
  at Super tau-charm
ALICE upgrade plans Paolo Giubellino LHCC Upgrades
Belle II - Introduction
Focusing Aerogel RICH for PID and Momentum Measurement
The Compact Muon Solenoid Detector
Flavour Physics Belle II experiment at SuperKEKB Tsukuba, Japan
Search for CP Violating Decays of theU(4S)
Super-KEKB Collaboration
Francesco Forti SuperB Workshop LNF, March, 2006
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 6th May 2009 Fergus Wilson, RAL.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 28th April 2008 Fergus Wilson. RAL.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL
Hadron Fragmentation New Results from Belle
SuperKEKB Proto-collaboration
Charmed Baryon Spectroscopy at BABAR
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
UK HEP Forum „The Spice of Flavour“ Abingdon November 2018
Presentation transcript:

The Belle II Experiment at SuperKEKB Changzheng Yuan (苑长征) (for the Belle II Collaboration) IHEP, Beijing Hefei, May 25, 2012 1

Belle / KEKB / KEK e- Belle e+ Tokyo (45 mins by Tsukuba Exps) KEKB: e- (HER): 8.0 GeV e+ (LER): 3.5 GeV crossing angle: 22 mrad ECM=M(U(4S)) also at 1S, 2S, 5S LER HER e- Belle 2010 Ldt = 1020 fb-1 e+ 1999 (1.02 ab-1) Peak lumi record at KEKB: L=2.1 x 1034/cm2/s with crab cavities

Physics at a SuperB Factory There is a good chance to see new phenomena: CPV in from the new physics (non KM). Lepton flavor violations in t decays. They will help to diagnose (if found) or constrain (if not found) new physics models. Btn, Dtn can probe the charged Higgs in large tanb region. Physics motivation is independent of LHC. If LHC finds NP, precision flavour physics is compulsory. If LHC finds no NP, high statistics B/t decays would be a unique way to search for the >TeV scale physics [very probably if Mhiggs~125 GeV]. There are many more topics: CPV in charm, new hadrons, … Recent update of the physics reach with 50 ab-1 (75 ab-1): Physics at Super B Factory (Belle II authors + guests) hep-ex > arXiv:1002.5012 SuperB Progress Reports: Physics (SuperB authors + guests) hep-ex > arXiv:1008.1541

Search for New Physics B+ +  Sensitivity to new physics with charged Higgs B+ +  In the SM CKM fit Searches for lepton flavour violation in tau decays In the SM the lepton flavour violation decays are extremely small: Br(l)  1054 Br( 3 leptons)  1014

Hadron spectroscopy at B factories - examples b family – new states PRL 108, 122001 PRL 108, 032001 X(3872) Z+(4430) c family – XYZ states Review in EPJC71, 1534 p+p-  Light hadrons spectroscopy via ISR: g-2, … PRL 103, 231801 PRD 70, 072004

Physics sensitivity at Belle II

Physics sensitivity at Belle II

Strategies to increase luminosity Smaller by* Increase beam currents Increase xy “Nano-Beam” scheme Collision with very small spot-size beams Invented by Pantaleo Raimondi for SuperB 8

SuperKEKB collider SuperKEKB Target: L = 8x1035/cm2/s e+ 4GeV 3.6 A Colliding bunches Damping ring Low emittance gun Positron source New beam pipe & bellows Belle II New IR TiN-coated beam pipe with antechambers Redesign the lattices of HER & LER to squeeze the emittance Add / modify RF systems for higher beam current New positron target / capture section New superconducting /permanent final focusing quads near the IP Low emittance electrons to inject Low emittance positrons to inject Replace short dipoles with longer ones (LER) 9

Machine design parameters KEKB SuperKEKB units LER HER Beam energy Eb 3.5 8 4 7 GeV Half crossing angle φ 11 41.5 mrad Horizontal emittance εx 18 24 3.2 4.3-4.6 nm Emittance ratio Κ 0.88 0.66 0.27 0.25 % Beta functions at IP βx*/βy* 1200/5.9 32/0.27 25/0.31 mm Beam currents Ib 1.64 1.19 3.60 2.60 A beam-beam parameter ξy 0.129 0.090 0.0886 0.0830 Luminosity L 2.1 x 1034 8 x 1035 cm-2s-1 Small beam size & high current to increase luminosity Large crossing angle Change beam energies to solve the problem of LER short lifetime

Luminosity vs. time ∫L dt=50 ab-1 (2022) ∫L dt=10 ab-1 (2018) ∫L dt L current B factories design L=8·1035 s-1cm-2 L [/cm2s]

Requirements on the detector Critical issues at L= 8 x 1035/cm2/sec Higher background ( 10-20) radiation damage and occupancy fake hits and pile-up noise in the EM Calorimeter Higher event rate ( 10) higher rate trigger, DAQ and computing Special features required low momentum  identification Hermeticity,  “reconstruction” Result: significant upgrade

Belle II detector upgrade RPC m & KL counter: scintillator + Si-PM for end-caps 7.4 m CsI(Tl) EM calorimeter: waveform sampling electronics, pure CsI for end-caps 3.3 m 1.5 m 4 layers DSSD → 2 layers PXD (DEPFET) + 4 layers DSSD 7.1 m Time-of-Flight, Aerogel Cherenkov Counter → Time-of-Propagation counter (barrel), prox. focusing Aerogel RICH (forward) Central Drift Chamber: smaller cell size, long lever arm

Vertex detector PXD+SVD Belle II SVD Belle z impact parameter r [cm] DSSD’s pixels sBelle Design Group, KEK Report 2008-7 z [cm] z [cm] DCDB R/O chip DEPFET matrix z impact parameter resolution DEPFET mockup Belle Switcher control chip 20 mm 10 mm prototype DEPFET sensor pb*sin5/2(q) [GeV/c] Belle II Si Vertex Det.

DEPFET pixels for Belle II radius pixel thickness Layer 1 r = 14mm 50x50mm2 75mm(0.18%X0) Layer 2 r = 22mm 50x75mm2 75mm total of 8 M pixels Mechanical mockup 像素探测器 Power consumption in sensitive area: 0.1W/cm² => air-cooling sufficient 15

DSSDs Belle II Belle Beam Pipe r = 10 mm 15 mm DEPFET Layer 1 r = 14 mm Layer 2 r = 22 mm DSSD Layer 3 r = 38 mm 20 mm Layer 4 r = 80 mm 43.5 mm Layer 5 r = 115 mm 70 mm Layer 6 r = 140 mm 88 mm s[mm] pbsin(q)3/2 [GeV/c] Belle II Belle Less Coulomb Scattering & Pixel detector closer to the beam pipe improve the vertex resolution significantly.

Central Drift Chamber longer lever arm Improved momentum resolution and dE/dx Belle Belle II Belle Belle II inner most sense wire r=88mm r=168mm outer most sense wire r=863mm r=1111.4mm Number of layers 50 56 Total sense wires 8400 14336 Gas He:C2H6 sense wire W(Φ30μm) field wire Al(Φ120μm) normal cell 10~20 mm 18 mm 10 mm 6~8 mm small cell 17

PID Time Of Propagation counter (barrel) y x prototype quartz bar Hamamatsu 16ch MCP-PMT partial Cerenkov ring reconstruction from x, y and t of propagation Proximity focusing Aerogel RICH (endcap) Aerogel Aerogel radiator Hamamatsu HAPD Cherenkov photon 200mm n~1.05 Hamamatsu HAPD

TOP (Barrel PID) Beam test was done Quartz radiator MCP-PMT Beam spot 875mm 915mm quartz 3rd 2nd 1st Quartz radiator 2.6mL x 45cmW x 2cmT Excellent surface accuracy MCP-PMT Hamamatsu 16ch MCP-PMT Good TTS (<35ps) & enough lifetime Multialkali photo-cathode  SBA Beam test was done # of photons consistent T OK 1st 2nd 3rd [1count/25ps] Time resolution beam data Simulations # of photons

Aerogel RICH (endcap PID) Test Beam setup Aerogel Hamamatsu HAPD Q.E. ~33% (recent good ones) Clear Cherenkov image observed Cherenkov angle distribution RICH with a novel “focusing” radiator --- a two-layer radiator Employ multiple layers with different refractive indices Cherenkov images from individual layers overlap on the photon detector. 6.6 σ p/K at 4GeV/c !

Expected PID improvement K efficiency 1.5 GeV 2.5 GeV 3.5 GeV 1.5 GeV 2.5 GeV 3.5 GeV p fake rate Belle PID iTOP only (no dE/dx) 21

ECL (Electromagnetic Calorimeter) Upgrade electronics to do waveform sampling & fitting Upgrade endcap crystal (baseline option: pure CsI + photomultipliers); upgrade will have to be staged. t ECL signal amplitude time sampling trigger off-time bkg. One module of new electronics tested in Belle 2x improved s at 20x bkg. pure CsI crystals faster performance and better rad. hardness than Tl doped CsI 22

Emiss measurements B  tn, hnn, ... Example of B  hnn measurement: fully (partially) reconstruct Btag; reconstruct h from Bsig→hnn or t(→ hn)n; no additional energy in EM calorim.; signal at EECL~0; Btag full reconstruction: NeuroBayes; TOP detector; ECL, increased background; Example of B  hnn measurement: Missing E (n) Btag Bsig Bsig → tn candidate event signal region hadr. tag B(B0 →K*0) < 3.4 ·10-4 @ 90% C.L. Belle, PRL99, 221802 (2007), 490 fb-1 B(B+  K(*)+nn) can be measured to ±30% with 50 ab-1 -- exp. signal (20xBr) exp. bkg. (scaled to sideband)

KLM: KL& Muon detector LAYOUT One layer: 75 strips (4 cm width)/sector 5 segments 1 segment = 15strips Two orthogonal layer = superlayer F&B endcap KLM: Total area ~1400 m2 16800 strips the longest strip 2.8 m; the shortest 0.6 m WLS fiber in each strip Hamamatsu MPPC at one fiber end mirrored far fiber end RPC g Scintillator (Endcap) also inner 1,2, or 3 layers of Barrel (TBD) Endcap muon detection is already limited by bkgs. Endcap RPCs will not work at full luminosity and higher bkgs. Inner barrel is marginal. MPPC: Hamamatsu 1.3×1.3 mm 667 pixels (used in T2K Near Detector) 24

Belle II Collaboration USTC is here! ~ 400 members from 65 institutes in 19 countries  Distributed collaboration  distributed computing

Belle II Computing Model: Grid-based Distributed Computing Common framework for DAQ and offline based on root I/O Raw Data Storage and Processing Belle II detector MC Production (optional) MC Production and Ntuple Production Ntuple Analysis

Luminosity vs. time ∫L dt=50 ab-1 (2022) ∫L dt=10 ab-1 (2018) ∫L dt L current B factories design L=8·1035 s-1cm-2 L [/cm2s]

Summary Belle II at SuperKEKB will enable a new generation of precision studies in flavor physics. Belle II and LHC experiments will be nicely complimentary. Significant opportunities both during data collection and with final dataset (50+ ab-1). for more information, see: http://belle2.kek.jp/physics.html Belle II Technical Design Report - arXiv:1011.0352 Thank you!