Seismic analysis of Bridges Part II

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Seismic Design of Buried Structures
Advertisements

Design of Steel and Composite-Structures for Seismic Loading – Safety Requirements, Concepts and Methods – Prof. Dr.-Ing. Ekkehard Fehling, University.
Passive Vibration Control
1 LESSLOSS Sub Project 7 Techniques and Methods for Vulnerability Reduction Barcelona 18 th May 07 – Lisbon 24 th May 07 LESSLOSS Dissemination Meeting.
Seismic Performance Modeling of Reinforced Concrete Bridges
THE USE OF YIELD LINE ANALYSIS AND PANEL TESTS FOR THE DESIGN OF SHOTCRETE  by  WC JOUGHIN* and GC HOWELL** SRK Consulting, Johannesburg * Principal.
Seismic Performance Assessment and Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings SPEAR International Workshop Joint Research Centre, Ispra, 4 th -5 th April 2005.
2.2 STRUCTURAL ELEMENT BEAM
An-Najah National University
4 Pure Bending.
Performance-based Evaluation of the Seismic Response of Bridges with Foundations Designed to Uplift Marios Panagiotou Assistant Professor, University of.
Response Spectrum Analysis as per Indian IS: 1893 (Part 1)-2002
Konstantinos Agrafiotis
Seismic design for the wind turbine tower (WP1.5 background document presentation) Institute of Steel Structures Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki.
Contents : Introduction. Rapid Visual Screening.
Shake Table Testing of a Large Scale Two Span R-C Bridge Univ. of Washington *PI: Marc Eberhard Co-PI: Pedro Arduino Co-PI: Steven Kramer RA: Tyler Ranf.
Lecture 2 January 19, 2006.
2o Ciclo de Palestras em Engenharia Civil de Novembro de 2003 Universidade Nova de Lisboa-Centro de Investigaçao em Estruturas e Construção-UNIC.
Concrete Shear Wall Design
4 Pure Bending.
4 Pure Bending.
Structural Design. Introduction It is necessary to evaluate the structural reliability of a proposed design to ensure that the product will perform adequately.
10 Pure Bending.
December 3-4, 2007Earthquake Readiness Workshop Seismic Design Considerations Mike Sheehan.
GW Rodgers, C Denmead, N Leach, JG Chase & John B Mander
Elastic and inelastic relations..... mx+cx+Q(x)= -ma x Q x Q Q=kx elasticinelastic.
University of Palestine
CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE SEISMIC ANALYSIS USING ARTIFICIAL ACCELEROGRAMS
Static Pushover Analysis
Reinforced Concrete Design
Concrete 2003 Brisbane July 2003 Design Of Pre-cast Buried Structures For Internal Impact Loading.
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Weian Liu 3. Research Interest Soil Structure Interaction Seismic Analysis and Design of Bridge Structures Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics.
Module on the Assessment of the Structural Condition Bucharest October 5-7, st MEMSCON Event 07/10/10, BucharestDBA.
University of Palestine
1 NEESR Project Meeting 22/02/2008 Modeling of Bridge Piers with Shear-Flexural Interaction and Bridge System Response Prof. Jian Zhang Shi-Yu Xu Prof.
©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG 1 COMPOSITE FLOORS - II.
Semi-active Management of Structures Subjected to High Frequency Ground Excitation C.M. Ewing, R.P. Dhakal, J.G. Chase and J.B. Mander 19 th ACMSM, Christchurch,
An-Najah National University Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department Graduation Project Prepared by : 1- Areej Melhem 2- Jawad Ateyani 3-Rasha.
Presented by: Sasithorn THAMMARAK (st109957)
Practical Design of PT Buildings
University of Illinois Contribution Amr S. Elnashai Sung Jig Kim Curtis Holub Narutoshi Nakata Oh Sung Kwon Seismic Simulation and Design of Bridge Columns.
EGM 5653 Advanced Mechanics of Materials
UNIT - IV PLASTIC ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES
Kenneth O’Neill Experimental Investigation of Circular Concrete Filled Steel Tube Geometry on Seismic Performance.
INTRODUCTION Due to Industrial revolution metro cities are getting very thickly populated and availability of land goes on decreasing. Due to which multistory.
PLASTIC ANALYSIS OF BEAMS - SANDEEP DIGAVALLI. AT A GLANCE OF THIS TOPIC  BASIS OF PLASTIC THEORY  STRESS-STRAIN CURVE OF PLASTIC MATERIALS  STRESSES.
Bassam A. Izzuddin* and Bassam A. Burgan†
Reinforced Concrete Structures Under Imposed Displacements
Review of Indian Seismic Codes
11 Energy Methods.
An-Najah National University Faculty of Engineering
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Pure Bending.
NUMERICAL SEISMIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF RC BRIDGES WITH HOLLOW PIERS
CFHT Pier Building Evaluation
ANDRÉS ALONSO-RODRIGUEZ Universidad de Valparaíso, Chile
GUIDED BY, MS. D. DARLING HELEN LYDIA M.TECH., PRESENTED BY,
ASSESSEMENT AND REHABILITATION OF STRUCTURES
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
4 Pure Bending.
11 Energy Methods.
Structure I Course Code: ARCH 208 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg
Earthquake resistant buildings
Chapter 6 Bending.
PLASTIC ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES
Analysis And Design Of AS-Shorooq Residential Building
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
4 Pure Bending.
Presentation transcript:

Seismic analysis of Bridges Part II

Analysis methods Simplified non-linear analysis: Simply supported Bridges Most of the bridges are built using a simply supported deck configuration. For the evaluation of the seismic behaviour of as-built condition of the retrofitted condition that maintain the static scheme (presence of discontinuity of the deck) a simplified methodology can be adopted. It is base on the following steps: The pier can be considered a simple oscillator with a mass given by the tributary mass relative to the deck and the mass of the pier. The non linearity can be considered as concentrated at the pier base and assumed of elasto-perfectly plastic type The capacity of the pier represented by the shear displacement curve evaluated starting to the yielding and ultimate rotation on the plastic hinge at the pier base The response is evaluated by Push-over analysis using the N2 method The verification is made in term of ductile and fragile mechanisms

Analysis methods Simplified non-linear analysis: Simply supported Bridges Transversal direction: determination of the SDOF characteristics Mass of the simplified system Effective height the pier

Analysis methods Simplified non-linear analysis: Simply supported Bridges Transversal direction: determination of the capacity Length of the plastic hinge On the basis of the simplified model the capacity of the pier can be evaluated starting form the linearized Moment-Curvature relationship and evaluating the yielding and ultimate top displacements using the following formula

Analysis methods Simplified non-linear analysis: Simply supported Bridges Transversal direction: Evaluation of the performance point by N2 Principle of equal displacement Principle of equal Energy

Analysis methods Simplified non-linear analysis: Simply supported Bridges Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake-resistant design, Miranda Bertero ( 1994) – E. Spectra vol 10 n° 2 (behaviour factor)

Analysis methods Simplified non-linear analysis: Simply supported Bridges As soon as we have found the global multilinear capacity curve of the bridge, built considering all the piers in parallel, the above procedure can be easily applied considering the global mass as the sum of the single masses

Analysis methods Simplified non-linear analysis: Continuous deck bridges Mono-modal method Bi-linearization 1st mode Distribution of force Participation factor V * u*

Analysis methods Simplified non-linear analysis: Continuous deck bridges Mono-modal method Evaluation of the maximum displacement V * u* To be compared With the capacity

Example

Simply supported bridge (ordinary bridge) Geometry 2 3 4 5 Data 1 Class IV Soil B VS,30 > 500m/s Concrete fc = 25 MPa Steel fsy = 400 MPa

Simply supported bridge Definition of the seismic input Nominal life (ordinary bridge): VN= 50 years Class: IV  Cu = 2 Reference life : VR = Cu  VN = 100 years Soil B Life safety level (SLV) PR=10%  TR=949 y. Collapse prevention (SLC) PR=5%  TR=1950 y. NTC08 provide discrete TR. Therefore an interpolation of data is needed

Simply supported bridge Definition of the seismic input Life safety level (SLV) PR=10%  TR=949 y. Nominal life (ordinary bridge): VN= 50 years Class: IV  Cu = 2 Reference life : VR = Cu  VN = 100 years Soil B Collapse prevention (SLC) PR=5%  TR=1950 y. NTC08 provide discrete TR. Therefore an interpolation of data is needed

Simply supported bridge Evaluation of weight and mass (pier 5) Mass of the deck Height of the deck respect to ground Total weight of the pier cap Height of the pier cap Linear weight of the pier Height of the pier Total weight of the pier Height of foundation Axial force on the pier Total mass 10.0 m

Simply supported bridge Evaluation of Moment-rotation of the pier base Concrete: Kent-Park model Steel N=5437 kN Bi-linearization

Simply supported bridge Evaluation of the capacity of the piers (Force-displacement law) Pier 5

Simply supported bridge Evaluation of the seismic Demand (transversal direction) (T > Tc) equal displacement Fundamental period Spectral acceleration (SLV) Spectral Displacement Base-shear Base Moment

Simply supported bridge Evaluation of the seismic Capacity (Longitudinal direction) Bilinearization of the Multilinear law

Simply supported bridge Evaluation of the seismic Demand (Longitudinal direction) (non-linear response) For example for the pier 5

Simply supported bridge Verification format (Ductile mechanisms) Pier 5

Simply supported bridge Verification format (Ductile mechanisms)

Simply supported bridge Verification format (Fragile mechanisms) Axial force contribution Concrete contribution Reinforcement contribution

Simply supported bridge Verification format (Fragile mechanisms)

Simply supported bridge Verification format (Fragile mechanisms) Pier 5

Simply supported bridge SLV SLC The level of safety is encountered both for SLV and SLC In conclusion the bridge does not have an enough level of safety both with respect to ductile mechanism and to fragile one A retrofitting action has to be adopted.