Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University (STOU)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Second Information Technology in Education Study (SITES) A Project of the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA)
Advertisements

L2 program design Content, structure, evaluation.
F o r m f u n c t i o n followingfollowing m o v i n g online, i m p r o v i n g onsite Rebekah Nix Cynthia Ledbetter may 23-25, 2007 | austin, tx.
What do you know about Effective Teaching Behaviors?
Faculty Evaluation Systems: Student Evaluations of Faculty What are we measuring? “The evaluation of teachers is a mark of a good college.” Ernest Boyer,
Academic Media Videoconference Services Assessing your Students, your Course, and the Videoconference System Donald Dover Videoconference Operations Manager.
Robert delMas (Univ. of Minnesota, USA) Ann Ooms (Kingston College, UK) Joan Garfield (Univ. of Minnesota, USA) Beth Chance (Cal Poly State Univ., USA)
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Studying in America: American System of Education Studying in America: American System of Education Presented by Richard Kaburente INFORMATION RESOURCE.
Orientation to the Social Studies 11 Integrated Resource Package (IRP) 2005.
Direct vs Indirect Assessment of Student Learning: An Introduction Dr. Sheila Handy, Chair Business Management and Co-Chair University Assessment Committee.
Department of Physical Sciences School of Science and Technology B.S. in Chemistry Education CIP CODE: PROGRAM CODE: Program Quality Improvement.
Implication of Gender and Perception of Self- Competence on Educational Aspiration among Graduates in Taiwan Wan-Chen Hsu and Chia- Hsun Chiang Presenter.
NCATE Standard 6 Governance and Resources: Debunking the Myths AACTE/NCATE Workshop Arlington, VA April 2008 Linda Bradley James Madison University
The Structure and Role of QA Bodies at the University and faculty/department levels UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE Serbia.
University of Arkansas Faculty Senate Task Force on Grades Preliminary Report April 19, 2005.
Maximizing Learning Using Online Assessment 2011 SLATE Conference October 14, /12/ P. Boyles, Assistant Professor, Chicago State University,
ONLINE LEARNING A GROWING TREND IN EDUCATION. Instructional Delivery Methods  Traditional : Classroom environment only  Hybrid : Classroom and online.
Measuring of student subject competencies by SAM: regional experience Elena Kardanova National Research University Higher School of Economics.
An Introduction to Measurement and Evaluation Emily H. Wughalter, Ed.D. Summer 2010 Department of Kinesiology.
Evidence of Student Learning Fall Faculty Seminar Office of Institutional Research and Assessment August 15, 2012.
Teacher Behaviors The teacher should allow the students to figure out the main idea of a lesson on their own. (SD, D, A, SA) –SD=4, D=3, A=2, SA=1 The.
Online Course Evaluations Is there a perfect time? Presenters: Cassandra Jones, Ph.D., Director of Assessment Michael Anuszkiewicz, Research Associate.
Influential Factors on Consumers’ Behavioral Intention to Buy A Luxury Car: Thailand Case By Netpreeya Choomchaiyo.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System Jessica Garner
BY: SHAIFALI RACHNA PURI. ACADEMIC RECORD (Marks in qualifying degrees) ACADEMIC RECORD (Marks in Higher Degrees ) ACADEMIC RECORD (Marks in entrance.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
Psychological predictors in context: Travel intentions among university staff and students Rob Wall Institute of Energy and Sustainable Development De.
Teaching Practice at the University of the South Pacific Presentation by Kusum Prakash of The University of the South Pacific School of Education Arts.
Assessment and Evaluation of CAREER Educational Components Center for Teaching Advancement and Assessment Research.
4/16/07 Assessment of the Core – Humanities with Writing Charlyne L. Walker Director of Educational Research and Evaluation, Arts and Sciences.
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
WELCOME Exchange students of 2017 – 2018!
Teachers’ evaluation by the Petroleum – Gas University of Ploiești
An Introduction to Measurement and Evaluation
NCATE Unit Standards 1 and 2
ACT Student Opinion Survey Results
The Application Process Understanding the IERs (Institutional Eligibility Requirements ) 2106 TRACS Annual Conference.
Heidi Manning, Susan Larson and Bethany Leraas
Direct vs Indirect Assessment of Student Learning: An Introduction
Developing items and assembling a test based on curriculum standards
Scaling up EBPs and HLPs
Ginger Holden, Learning Communities Coordinator
Emergency contraception (EC) Definition & Use
UWL Teaching and Learning Conference
Dawn LaBarbera PhD, PA-C
Evaluation of An Urban Natural Science Initiative
Elayne Colón and Tom Dana
Introduction to Program Learning Assessment
Exploring the Role of Cultural and Policy Context in Distributed Leadership Practices in the US and Denmark The Comprehensive Assessment of Leadership.
GRADUATE PROGRAM COORDINATOR GRADUATE CURRICULUM SERIES
Shudong Wang NWEA Liru Zhang Delaware Department of Education
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
Strengthening Key Performance Indicators and Quality Assurance in Research in Ugandan Universities: A Case Study of Islamic University in Uganda. DR. MATOVU.
WELCOME Exchange students of 2018 – 2019!
Improving the First Year: Campus Discussion March 30, 2009
Jennifer Bryer PhD, RN, CNE Virginia Peterson-Graziose DNP, RN, CNE
Sit by institution or program size Self-define small, medium, or large
An Unfinished Canvas Arts Education in California
Tuning South East Asia - TASE
Investigation of Inverted and Active Pedagogies in STEM Disciplines: A Preliminary Report Reza O. Abbasian Texas Lutheran University, Department of.
Evaluation of Teaching Process and Students Experience
SARA BRANCH, HO HUYNH, JULIE LAZZARA, LYRA STEIN
“We Go Together”: Discipline-Based Linked Course Learning Community Leads to Positive Developments for Students Dawn McKinney and Karen Peterson University.
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction
LibQual+ Survey Results 2002
WELCOME Exchange students 2019 – 2020!
Examining the role of assessments in achievement gaps
CLASSROOM ENVIRONMENT AND THE STRATIFICATION OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT’S MATHEMATICS ABILITY PERCEPTIONS Nelda a. nacion 5th international scholars’
Presentation transcript:

Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University (STOU) Sungworn Ngudgratoke

Where is STOU? STOU is located in the Nonthaburi Province which is next to Bangkok in the north 47 Km from Suwannabhumi Airport and about 30 min. by car 10 minutes from Don Muang Airport www.stou.ac.th STOU

Major Functions STOU has Responsibilities mandated by the Commission of Higher Education, Ministry of Education Teaching Research Providing services to social Maintaining Thai culture, art University and Faculty effectiveness are evaluated by these functions

Enrollment in 2011 (2nd semester)

19 MOU with universities in Asia, Europe, Australia, New Zealand, and USA

10 Regional Centers Classroom Teaching for graduate students Library Admission and Registration

Instruction Delivery system Undergraduate (No more than 3 courses per semester) Printed materials Television programs CD, DVD Classroom instructions (optional) E-learning (some courses) Graduate (No more than 2 courses per semester) CD/DVD Classroom instruction (Required) : 2-3 meeting E-learning

Assessment system Grading is judged by final exam. But additional assignment completions may be required by some courses. Final exam employs multiple-choice item tests, but some schools such as Law school uses both MC tests and essay tests. Some students take final exam through an e-assessment system. Graduate courses use a variety of assessment methods including course projects, presentation, and final examination. Final exam uses essay t Students take the exam on Saturday and Sunday More than 100 test centers throughout the country. Some high schools are selected to be our test centers and high school teachers are test proctors.

Future International Conference at STOU 57th World Assembly of the International Council on Education for Teaching (ICET) will be held at STOU on July 16-19, 2013

A comparative study on research productivity between KNOU and STOU

Research Institute of KNOU and STOU Institute of Distance Education (IDE) of KNOU Policy research & General research Institute of Research and Development (IRD) of KNOU Research in distance education & General research There are 13 researchers and 19 staff There are six divisions: secretary, research development and dissemination, research coordination, distance education research, institutional research, and special research service

Number of research at IRD Year source 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 total STOU revenue 5 8 15 14 12 64 STOU Distance Education grant 4 6 10 25 22 37 110 Thai Government grant 9 2 11 55 STOU society service grant 72 Total 26 38 28 40 57 52 60 301

Introduction Research productivity is one of major outcomes of higher education organizations. It is an indicator of university quality and reflects quality of faculty. One of the important and significant issues related to research productivity is to identify factors that cause faculty conduct research and make publication.

Introduction Several theories are developed to explain human behaviors (e.g. conducting research). This study employs the theory of planed behavior (TPB) (Ajzen, 1991) to predict research productivity of KNOU and STOU faculty.

Objectives To examine policy and contextual factors that have potentials to strengthen research productivity of STOU and KNOU. To develop a model of research productivity of STOU and KNOU faculty using the theory of planned behavior.

Conceptual Model Attitude Norms Intention productivity Perceived behavior control Intention productivity

Instrument and Sample The survey is conducted by using a 7-point rating scale IDE research report and research summary Today, 40 and 3 surveys are completed by STOU and KNOU faculty, respectively.

Measurement Attitude (6 items, reliability=0.94) “the degree of a faculty ’s favorable or unfavorable evaluation or appraisal of behavior in question Subjective norms (4 items, reliability=0.91) the perceived social pressure to conduct research and publications. Perceived behavioral control (7 items, reliability=0.86 faculty’ perception of ease or difficulty in conducting research and in making publications Intention (4 items, reliability=0.90) faculty’ intention to do research and make publications Research productivity (6 items, reliability=0.68) measured by a total number of research and publication.

Data analysis Content analysis Structural equation modeling

Descriptive statistics  Variables N Mean Std. Deviation ATTITUDE STOU 43 4.78 1.43 KNOU 3 4.44 0.38 SNORM 3.95 4.33 PBC 4.18 1.13 4.05 0.81 INTENTION 4.27 1.15 3.52 0.78 Resproduct 49.26 9.69 60.57 9.85

Results 2=1.08, df=2, p=0.58, RMSEA=0.00, GFI=.991, AGFI=.929