The status of membrane bioreactor technology Simon Judd Trends in Biotechnology Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 109-116 (February 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.11.005 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions
Figure 1 Schematic of conventional sewage treatment and unit operations displaced by MBR technology. Trends in Biotechnology 2008 26, 109-116DOI: (10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.11.005) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions
Figure 2 MBR process configurations: (a) sidestream and (b) immersed. Trends in Biotechnology 2008 26, 109-116DOI: (10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.11.005) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions
Figure 3 System configurations, denitrifying MBR: (a) nitrate extraction (eMBR), (b) membrane diffusion of hydrogen (dMBR) and (c) biomass rejection (rMBR). Trends in Biotechnology 2008 26, 109-116DOI: (10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.11.005) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions
Figure 4 MBR membrane configurations: (a) multi-tube (MT), (b) hollow fibre (HF) and (c) flat sheet (FS). Adapted, with permission, from [1]. Trends in Biotechnology 2008 26, 109-116DOI: (10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.11.005) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions
Figure 5 Inter-relationships between iMBR parameters and fouling. Adapted, with permission, from [1]. Trends in Biotechnology 2008 26, 109-116DOI: (10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.11.005) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions