Janice Light and Thomas Jakobs Penn State University & InvoTek, Inc.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
State of Indiana Business One Stop (BOS) Program Roadmap Updated June 6, 2013 RFI ATTACHMENT D.
Advertisements

MODULE 8: PROJECT TRACKING AND EVALUATION
Begin with Knowledge Translation; Have the End – Technology Transfer – in Mind Begin with Knowledge Translation; Have the End – Technology Transfer – in.
Assistive Technology Competencies for Educational Personnel.
NRCOI March 5th Conference Call
How to Translate Knowledge in Three States: Discovery, Invention, Innovation Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University.
Funding is provided by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research under the US Department of Education, Grant # H133E University.
Research Program Overview National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Robert J. Jaeger, Ph.D. Interagency and International Affairs Interagency.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Interaction Design CMU. Today’s objectives Continue Design approaches (UCD, ACD)  User-Centered Design  Activity-Centered Design.
The NEKIA Knowledge Utilization Initiative Board of Directors Meeting Monday April 11, 2005 Montreal.
Professionalizing Mobility Management: Developing Standards and Competencies Julie Dupree, Easter Seals Association of Travel Instruction Conference August.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
Technology Transfer Innovation Program (T 2 IP). What Is the Program Mission Why Is It Important Who Is It Designed to Assist How Will It Encourage TT.
Sara Lovell, CPCS Education Coordinator Providence Alaska Medical Center.
Stages of Development (SoD) National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR) Copyright National Institute on.
Bridging the Evidence Gap: Level Of Knowledge Use Survey - LOKUS as a Validated Instrument Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology.
Knowledge Translation Conference KT Solutions for Overcoming Barriers to Research Use Hosted by SEDL’s Center on Knowledge Translation for Disability and.
Knowledge Translation Conference KT Solutions for Overcoming Barriers to Research Use Hosted by SEDL’s Center on Knowledge Translation for Disability and.
Is One Minute Madness?? Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University at Buffalo.
 “I have to teach the same information skills each year because students do not learn them.”  “I don’t have time to give tests so I do not assess student.
AccrualNet: A New NCI Tool for Supporting Accrual to Clinical Trials Linda Parreco, RN, MS NCI, Office of Communication and Education September 29, 2010.
ANGEL - Cooperation Model of the Accessible Environment for the Integration of the Disabled into the Labour Market.
325K: COMBINED PRIORITY FOR PERSONNEL PREPARATION Webinar on the Annual Performance Report for Continuation Funding Office of Special Education Programs.
325D: PREPARATION OF LEADERSHIP PERSONNEL Webinar on Project Objective and Performance Measures for the Annual Performance Report for Continuation Funding.
RERC on AAC Janice Light & David McNaughton, Penn State University Thomas Jakobs, InvoTek, Inc. David Beukelman & Susan Fager, Madonna Rehabilitation Hospital.
Stages of Research and Development
Update from the Faster Payments Task Force
New Zealand Child and Youth Profile
New Zealand Disability Strategy
CIS 376 Bruce R. Maxim UM-Dearborn
Understanding Students with Communication Disorders
Stephen Bauer NIDILRR Program Officer
Thomas Mitchell, MA, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
Transforming The Way We Think and Work
A’Dreanna Truesdell Ta’Tanese Epps ABSTRACT:
Knowledge Translation Outcome Measurement
Four Models to Guide AT Projects Intending Innovative Technology Development Outcomes Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer.
“CareerGuide for Schools”
What Are Some Work Incentives for Persons with Mental Health Conditions? 30 second training for families.
The Social Model for A/T Technology Transfer – AAATE 2010 “From Problem Identification to Social Validation: An Operational Model” Joseph P. Lane,
Bridging the Deliverable Gap: Improving Government’s approach to innovation intending social benefit. Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation.
Expanding Product Accessibility with Primary Market Research Techniques Jennifer L Flagg Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer, University.
Four Models to Guide AT Projects Intending Innovative Technology Development Outcomes Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer.
Tools for Technical, Business & Consumer Analysis in AT Product Development: Expanding the Need to Knowledge Model Joseph P. Lane, Center on KT4TT.
Knowledge Translation Outcome Measurement
Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer (KT4TT)
Christine Holyfield & Kathryn Drager
Partnering With Providers to achieve employment for persons with mental health conditions 30 second training for families.
Is One Minute Madness?? Joseph P. Lane
RESNA 2018 Annual Conference
Knowledge Translation Across RERC Activities
Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer
The development of this training was supported by: The National Institute of Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR), Administration.
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Knowledge Utility results from Rigor in Methods & Relevance in Content
Transferability in Practice?
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer
Continuity Guidance Circular Webinar
Welcome Recording Slide Deck Chat Box Mute
Blueprint Outlines practical, consumer-focused, state and local strategies for improving eating and physical activity that will lead to healthier lives.
Grantee Guide to Project Performance Measurement
Partnering with Providers To achieve
Thomas Mitchell, MA, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
RESEARCH FUNDING Organisational communication Science Communication
Seminar on the Evaluation of AUT STEM Programme
NOAA OneStop and the Cloud
Alignment Across the Ages
Presentation transcript:

Janice Light and Thomas Jakobs Penn State University & InvoTek, Inc. Applying the Stages of Development: Experiences, challenges, and strategies from the RERC on AAC Janice Light and Thomas Jakobs Penn State University & InvoTek, Inc.

Goals To share our experience at each stage of development Describe challenges Discuss strategies to overcome some of the challenges To share the story of one R & D project Development of AAC displays that support transition from graphic symbols to literacy (T2L) for individuals with complex communication needs (CCN)

Background Building long-term relationships Janice and Tom were acquainted with each other for several years before collaborating Initial collaboration grew out of clinical need Janice’s research & clinical experience suggested that AAC technologies would be more effective if displays could be created “just in time” during interactions with children with CCN Tom said “what if we build an app that does the following…”? Janice said “It would be better if …” A Phase 1 SBIR proposal was born! Phase 1 writing started in 2007, Phase 2 completed in 2016.

Stages of Development Stages of Development start with the product idea. This is stage one, whose activities transform the Product IDEA into the Proof of Concept. Between Proof of Concept and Proof of Product comes Stage two. Second stage activities transform the Proof of Concept into a Proof of Product. After Proof of Product comes the stage three activities transform a Proof of Product into the Adopted Product. The final stage is Proof of Adoption

R & D strategy In order to maximize benefit for individuals with CCN, our R & D projects focus on the clinical need Enhance the effectiveness of AAC technologies Potential to be incorporated into a wide range of AAC tools Potential to increase the number of people who benefit Our tech transfer strategy Foster an environment of trust and integrity Involve potential commercialization partners as early as possible, even in idea stage

Tech transfer strategy Development path Utilizes a stage gate process (Center on KT4TT) Encourages participation of key stakeholders RERC on AAC responsibilities Identify unmet needs & priorities; define scope of projects Conduct R & D to develop engineering solutions Proof of concept Test these prototypes & evaluate them clinically in the field Proof of product Commercialization through development partners Incorporate the solutions into their products/apps Spearhead commercialization/production activities Proof of adoption

Stages of Development - 1 Stages of Development start with the product idea. This is stage one, whose activities transform the Product IDEA into the Proof of Concept. Between Proof of Concept and Proof of Product comes Stage two. Second stage activities transform the Proof of Concept into a Proof of Product. After Proof of Product comes the stage three activities transform a Proof of Product into the Adopted Product. The final stage is Proof of Adoption. This chart is focusing on the Stage One activities that transform the Product IDEA into a Proof of Concept.

Stage 1 Need and target audience Need & target audience defined Prior research Prior RERC grant SBIR Phase 1 & Phase 2 grants Clinical experience Stakeholder input Individuals who use AAC, families, clinicians, AT manufacturers /app developers, etc. State of science conference with key stakeholders

AAC technologies to support transition from graphic symbols to literacy (T2L) Unmet need More than 90% of individuals with CCN enter adulthood without literacy skills As a result, they are severely restricted in education, employment, healthcare & community living Current AAC technologies do not support the transition from picture symbols to literacy Goal To develop AAC apps to support transition to literacy

Target market Team Target market Team Children & adults with CCN who are nonliterate Team Technical team (InvoTek, Saltillo) Clinical team (PSU) Consumer team (PSU) Commercialization partners (Tobii Dynavox, Saltillo)

Stage 1 Product idea Potential technology solution/scope of project defined through… Comprehensive review of research Define theory & research underlying user interface design Present text dynamically upon selection of graphic symbol Text presentation paired with speech output Input from AAC manufacturers/app developers Identify partners and roles Competing technology search Tech transfer plan developed Assistance of KT4TT

T2L Technology solution Outputs 2 prototype AAC apps to improve literacy skills for individuals with CCN Grid-based app VSD-based app Research-based user interface design specs for AAC apps to support transition from picture symbols to literacy

Stage 1 Assessments T2L Proof of Concept Establish feasibility Technical development & functional testing Clinical testing Expert clinicians User testing Pilot testing with individuals with CCN Assess usability, utility, consumer satisfaction, use

Challenges From product idea to proof of concept Collaborating at a distance Technical and clinical teams Ensuring comprehensive stakeholder input Involving commercialization partners Building relationships Maximizing resources Leveraging other funding sources Achieving designs that are clinically sound & research-based

Stages of Development - 2 Stages of Development start with the product idea. This is stage one, whose activities transform the Product IDEA into the Proof of Concept. Between Proof of Concept and Proof of Product comes Stage two. Second stage activities transform the Proof of Concept into a Proof of Product. After Proof of Product comes the stage three activities transform a Proof of Product into the Adopted Product. The final stage is Proof of Adoption. This chart is focusing on the Stage Two activities that transform the Proof of Concept into a Proof of Product

Stage 2 Proof of concept to proof of product Clinical evaluation with stakeholders in real world Individuals with CCN, families AAC clinicians, rehab /educational personnel, etc. Iterative technical development Fine-tuning design based on clinical results Ongoing collaboration with AT manufacturers

Stage 2 Assessments Proof of Product Establish that the product is effective Series of single case experimental research designs targeting Children with autism, Down syndrome/ IDD, CP Adults with autism, Down syndrome /IDD, CP Research hypothesis Individuals with CCN will increase their literacy skills as a result of using the T2L app VSD app or grid app

Stage 2 – Assessment data 6 studies in progress

Stage 2 Assessment data

Challenges Proof of concept to proof of product Dealing with changes in mainstream technology E.g., Google speech recognition Implementing high quality clinical trials Recruiting & retaining individuals with complex needs & families Conducting studies in real world contexts Involving AT manufacturers/app developers Developing relationships Communicating product specs clearly Google speech recognition problem: Previous versions of Android allowed for retrieval of a “low quality” recording in addition to the text when accessing the speech recognition api. The latest version of Android removed the ability to retrieve the recording. Two work arounds are possible: (1) record twice or (2) use the new Google Cloud speech api (alpha version) which requires internet access.

Stages of Development - 3 Stages of Development start with the product idea. This is stage one, whose activities transform the Product IDEA into the Proof of Concept. Between Proof of Concept and Proof of Product comes Stage two. Second stage activities transform the Proof of Concept into a Proof of Product. After Proof of Product comes the stage three activities transform a Proof of Product into the Adopted Product. The final stage is Proof of Adoption. This chart is focusing on the Stage Three activities that transform the Proof of Product into an Adopted Product

Stage 3 Proof of product to adopted product Commercialization efforts Tech IP remains with developer InvoTek for VSD prototype Licensed to Tobii Dynavox Released as SnapScene 2016 Saltillo for grid prototype Publish research / user interface design specs Promote widespread adoption & greater benefit

Stage 3 Assessments Proof product is beneficial Assessment of awareness of stakeholders, use by individuals with CCN, retention, impact, etc.

Challenges Proof of product to adopted product Ensuring product is realized fully Communicating product specs clearly to AT manufacturers Providing resources as supports for clinicians & families Disseminating implementation guidelines & research results rapidly in user friendly formats e.g., trainings, MOOC Assessing adoption Accessing data on use, retention, etc. Time lag for uptake

Lessons learned Gather comprehensive input from stakeholders Involve potential commercialization partners early and often Exclusivity may not be best commercialization approach Communicate openly, clearly, and specifically Demonstrate benefit/impact with compelling clinical data Focus on the mission Very few disability-related products generate substantial revenue through licensing Instead, market your success when applying for contracts and/or grants.

RERC-AAC.ORG The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR grant number #90RE5017) to the Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center on Augmentative and Alternative Communication (RERC on AAC). NIDILRR is a Center within the Administration for Community Living (ACL), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The contents of this presentation do not necessarily represent the policy of NIDILRR, ACL, HHS, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government.