802.11k Measurement Frame Proposal

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/279r0 March 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide ai simulations Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1054r0 Submission Sep Santosh Pandey (Cisco)Slide 1 FILS Reduced Neighbor Report Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE /0129r3 May 2012 Santosh Abraham, Qualcomm Inc. Short Beacon Slide 1 Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0281r0 March 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Recommendations for association Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0102r2 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 TGah Power Saving Date: Authors: Date: Jan, 2012.
Doc.:IEEE /0114r0 January 2012 Low Power Medium Access Date: Slide 1 Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/0592r0 May 2015 Eric Wong (Apple)Slide 1 More Power Save Calibration Results Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE /1503r1 November 2011 Short Beacon Slide 1 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /2446r0 Submission September 2007 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 MIB Attributes for 40 MHz Scanning in 2.4 GHz Date:
Doc.: IEEE /xxx Submission September 2003 Martin Lefkowitz, Trapeze NetworksSlide 1 Domain Signaling Martin Lefkowitz Trapeze Networks 5753 W.
Doc.: IEEE /0176r0 Submission Slide 1 March 2005 Stephen Wang, et. al. Measurement Pilot Frame Steve Emeott, Walter Johnson, Floyd Simpson, Stephen.
Doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Submission January 2012 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Scanning with FILS Date: Authors:
Amendment Proposal for TV White Spaces Operation
FILS Reduced Neighbor Report
TBTT Information Field Type (TIFT) Clarification for P802.11REVmd
AP discovery with FILS beacon
Further Consideration on Smart Scanning Usage Model
Further Consideration on Smart Scanning Usage Model
2200 Mission College Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA
Follow-Up on WUR Discovery Frame and Discovery Channel
WUR Discovery Frame and Discovery Channel
2200 Mission College Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA
Response frame in WUR Mode Setup
WUR Discovery Frame Content
Multiple BSSID and MU Date: Authors: Nov 2016 Liwen Chu
WUR frame format – Follow up
Follow-Up on WUR Discovery Frame and Discovery Channel
WUR frame format – Follow up
Follow-Up on WUR Discovery Frame and Discovery Channel
Advertising WUR Discovery Frame Related Info for Fast Scanning
Advertising WUR Discovery Frame Related Info for Fast Scanning
WUR Discovery Frame Content
BSS Scanning through Low Power Radio
Consideration on WUR frame for Fast Scanning
Consideration on WUR frame for Fast Scanning
Advertising WUR Discovery Frame Related Info for Fast Scanning
Enhancements to Mesh Discovery
Consideration on WUR frame for Fast Scanning
AP discovery with FILS beacon
WUR frame format – Follow up
Follow-Up on WUR Discovery Frame and Discovery Channel
Wireless Sidelink Protocol
AP discovery with FILS beacon
AP discovery with FILS beacon
Some Power-save changes in e Draft
WUR Discovery Frame Content
FILS Reduced Neighbor Report
Follow-Up on WUR Discovery Frame and Discovery Channel
Follow-Up on WUR Discovery Frame and Discovery Channel
Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
802.11ba Architecture Discussion
WUR frame format – Follow up
Advertising WUR Discovery Frame Related Info for Fast Scanning
Power efficient and unified s solution
Power saving mechanism consideration for ah framework
Considerations on VL WUR frames
Regulatory Information for Low Latency Scanning in 5 GHz bands
2200 Mission College Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA
Advertising WUR Discovery Frame Related Info for Fast Scanning
Considerations on VL WUR frames
Interference Signalling Enhancements
Synchronization of Quiet Periods for Incumbent User Detection
FILS Frame Content Date: Authors: February 2008
Scheduled Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
MBCA and Beacon Timing element clean up
Response frame in WUR Mode Setup
Considerations on VL WUR frames
Cooperative AP Discovery
Chapter 11 Comment Resolution for Letter Ballot 63
TGu/TGv Joint Meeting Date: Authors: May 2008 Month Year
Presentation transcript:

802.11k Measurement Frame Proposal November 2004 802.11k Measurement Frame Proposal Steve Emeott, Tim Wilson, Floyd Simpson, Stephen Wang and Walter Johnson Motorola Steve Emeott, et. al.

Mobile Stations and Signal Quality Measurements November 2004 Mobile Stations and Signal Quality Measurements Mobile stations will employ several functions that require measurements of AP signal quality as input Discovery of 802.11 service areas Identification and ranking BSS transition (handover) candidates Initial transmit rate selection Flexible techniques for measuring signal quality are required to accommodate an increasing range of applications Mobile stations roaming into an 802.11 coverage area must be able to rapidly scan, preferably passively, the available channels prior to association Handheld stations camped on an 802.11 system must be able to take measurements while still offering long standby times Complexity of mechanisms used to take measurements must be suitable for wide range of wireless networks Steve Emeott, et. al.

Measurement Functions November 2004 Measurement Functions Both the base standard and 802.11k provide tools the station may use to take measurements Beacon frames generated by the access point Probe response and request functions Neighbor report currently provides optional fields providing timing information that may be used to predict beacon transmission times Several use cases will be provided to illustrate why these capabilities are suboptimal from the perspective of a handheld device Steve Emeott, et. al.

Use Case 1: Serving Channel Acquisition November 2004 Use Case 1: Serving Channel Acquisition Neighbor reports are generally unavailable to stations in areas where there is no 802.11 coverage Because of radar avoidance regulations, the station must passive scan (in the 5 GHz band) until it finds a channel with an active AP.  The channel acquisition time is a function of the beacon interval, unless something new is done.  AP2 A voice station associated with a foreign network scans for 802.11a coverage Challenge: The station (possibly with a call in progress) has to find an access point that is located on one of the 19 channels in the 5 GHz band.  AP1 Steve Emeott, et. al.

Use Case 2: Neighbor AP Scanning November 2004 Use Case 2: Neighbor AP Scanning After a station is associated, the neighbor reports provided may not include the optional TBTT offset fields Without the TBTT offset information, the station must passively scan in the 5 GHz band until TBTT information is collected   This scanning time is a function of the beacon interval, unless something new is done. AP2 A voice station roams into 802.11a coverage   Challenge: The station (possibly with a call in progress) has to scan for neighbors in the 5 GHz band.  AP1 Steve Emeott, et. al.

Use Case 3: Handover Trigger November 2004 Use Case 3: Handover Trigger When measurements are missed, a STA operating at 5 GHz is unable to issue a probe request (radar avoidance regulations).  Measurement accuracy is compromised if too much time elapses between measurements Ill advised handover decisions may result if a STA is unable to update its signal quality estimate in a timely fashion (resulting in call dragging or handover flurries) AP2 A voice station with a call in progress roams within an 802.11a wireless network   Challenge: Due to the beacon interval, beacon frames may provide sparse measurement opportunities. AP1 Steve Emeott, et. al.

Proposal: Measurement Frame November 2004 Proposal: Measurement Frame Definition: A measurement frame is a new management frame (for example, using frame type 6) that contains only the fields needed by a station to take a link margin measurement plus those required by a station to formulate a valid probe request frame Necessary Fields include: Timestamp (8 octets) Measurement Frame Interval (2 octets) Capability info (2 octets) DS Parameter set (3 octets) Country info (3 octets) Max regulatory power (1 octet) AP Max Power (1 octet) AP Power Used (1 octet) AP Noise Floor (1 octet) Total Frame Body Length = 22 Octets Steve Emeott, et. al.

New Link Margin Calculation November 2004 New Link Margin Calculation Setup Assume the STA knows STA_Noise_Floor and STA_Max_Power New measurement frame provides AP_Noise_Floor and AP_Max_Power, AP_Power_Used Step 1: Calculate RCPIc, RCPIc = RCPI + (AP_Max_Power - AP_Power_Used) Defined as the RCPI that would have been received had the message been sent at AP_Max_Power Step 2: Calculate Link Margin Downlink LM = RCPIc – STA_Noise_Floor Uplink LM = RCPIc - (AP_Max_Power - STA_Max_Power) - AP_Noise_Floor. Steve Emeott, et. al.

November 2004 New AP Max Power Field Why do we need AP Max Power when we have Max Regulatory Power? A particular AP may not choose to transmit at the regulatory max (it might be "dialed back"), but the SU wants to probe at the regulatory max, because probing is used to survey all APs; The AP max power has to be referenced to the same point as the AP Power Used and AP Noise Floor, which may not be the same point as the regulatory max Steve Emeott, et. al.

November 2004 New AP Power Used Field Why do we need AP Power Used when 11h defines TPC report, which contains Transmit Power field? Because TPC report is variable-length and some fields not used (which unnecessarily lengthens the frame); Because the value of the Transmit Power field is defined as EIRP, when what is needed is a value referenced to the same point as AP Max Power and AP Noise Floor Steve Emeott, et. al.

New Max Regulatory Power Field November 2004 New Max Regulatory Power Field Why do we need "max regulatory power" when 11d defines "Max Transmit Power" in Country and 11h defines "Power Constraint" IE? Because the Country IE describes the whole band, which wastes space since we only need to know about the one channel; Because the Power Constraint is defined as a variable IE, which is a waste of bytes; Because the Power Constraint is defined as a delta off the Country max tx power, and why give a number and a delta when a single number will do. Steve Emeott, et. al.

New AP Noise Floor Field November 2004 New AP Noise Floor Field AP Noise Floor is not provided in any standard IE Steve Emeott, et. al.

Measurement Frame Generation November 2004 Measurement Frame Generation A measurement frame generation function shall transmit the Measurement frame when the value of the TSF Timer (in us) modulo the Measurement Frame interval equals 0. The Measurement frame shall be addressed to the broadcast destination address. The Measurement frame shall not be buffered for power save reasons. Steve Emeott, et. al.

Beacon versus Measurement Frame November 2004 Beacon versus Measurement Frame Attribute Beacon Frames Measurement Frames Frame Length Around 137 bytes plus MAC and PHY headers w/ null SSID, zero length TIM and no optional fields 22 bytes plus MAC and PHY headers Interval Typically around 100ms, possible that shortening interval could negatively impact legacy equip. Shorter than beacon interval to provide additional measurement opportunities Link Margin Frame does not include fields necessary to accurately estimate link margin Frame type includes fields required to calculate link margin in uplink/downlink Interworking w/ Legacy Format of frame may not be shorted without risking problems with legacy equipment New mgmt frame sub-type that may be defined to have any length Steve Emeott, et. al.

Reducing Power Consumption November 2004 Reducing Power Consumption Several factors influence power consumed while taking measurements The accuracy with which the measurement start time can be estimated The length of the frame being measured The number of steps involved in taking measurements on multiple channels Consideration 1: Once a station knows the measurement frame interval, it may calculate the expected arrival time of future measurement frames Since measurement frame are generated when the value of the TSF Timer (in us) modulo the Measurement Frame interval equals 0 Consideration 2: Measurement frames contains only the fields needed by a station to estimate link margin and to formulate a valid probe request frame Standby mode: the station has longer battery life because it need not stay awake to receive beacons when taking the measurement Voice call: the station may return to its serving channel and resume transmitting voice frames in a shorter period of time   Consideration 3: Since measurement frame intervals are shorter than beacon intervals, it is possible for a station to complete multiple measurements without cycling between sleep and awake modes each time.  Steve Emeott, et. al.

November 2004 Pros and Cons Pros Substantially reduces need to use active scan, without reducing measurement opportunities or increasing current drain Provides measurement opportunity taking significantly less time to receive than a beacon frame Includes fields not found in beacon and probe response that are required to accurately estimate link margin Provides frame that station roaming into 802.11 coverage can take measurement on using passive scan Offers station a standard way to rapidly collect measurements using passive scan Cons Consumes capacity in addition to bandwidth used for beacon frames, but saves capacity otherwise consumed by active probing. When deploying a virtual AP, it is not advisable to transmit a different set of measurement frames for each BSSID Steve Emeott, et. al.

November 2004 Straw Poll 1 Should 802.11k include a means to reduce the amount of time and effort required by a station to detect the presence of active AP, measure signal quality and estimate link margin. Yes/No/Abstain Steve Emeott, et. al.

November 2004 Straw Poll 2 Should 802.11k include a means to permit AP to provide stations with measurement opportunities in addition to those afforded by beacon frames and probe responses since the length of the beacon interval may be too large to provide adequate measurement opportunities? Yes/No/Abstain Steve Emeott, et. al.